The Left's War On Christians
See other The Left's War On Christians Articles
Title: Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror*
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJQjpG-lGY4
Published: Jul 18, 2018
Author: NA
Post Date: 2018-07-18 14:06:01 by VxH
Keywords: None
Views: 9391
Comments: 60
Poster Comment: The ride of Rainbow snowflakes in their Log Cabin Trojan RINO are coming to an end. Putin know's science, too.
============= 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
#1. To: All (#0)
(Edited)
NIXON: You know what happened to the Romans? The last six Roman emperors were fags. Neither in a public way. You know what happened to the popes? They were layin' the nuns; that's been goin' on for years, centuries. But the Catholic Church went to hell three or four centuries ago. It was homosexual, and it had to be cleaned out. That's what's happened to Britain. It happened earlier to France. Let's look at the strong societies. The Russians. Goddamn, they root 'em out. They don't let 'em around at all. I don't know what they do with them. Look at this country. You think the Russians allow dope? Homosexuality, dope, immorality, are the enemies of strong societies. That's why the Communists and left-wingers are clinging to one another. They're trying to destroy us. I know Moynihan will disagree with this, [Attorney General John] Mitchell will, and Garment will. But, goddamn, we have to stand up to this. EHRLICHMAN: It's fatal liberality. NIXON: Huh? EHRLICHMAN: It's fatal liberality. And with its use on television, it has such leverage. Maybe the Log Cabin RINOs can move to Canada where snowflakes don't melt as fast?
Nixon sure had strong opinions, huh? Something happened between then and now to those Russians Nixon was so impressed with. They still "root 'em out", so evidently their harshness versus our laxness didn't save them.
Unlike the Bolshe-Sodomites who legalized the abomination of nature, again, in 1963.
Do you really care how people procure their orgasms?
Are you really one of Herbie Marcuse's Usefully demoralized Idiots?
No. I don't know who Herbie Marcuse is. From the b&w photo he looks like an obscure person who lived long ago and who has no bearing on my life. I'm not at all demoralized about anything. I'm not at all useful to any cause I oppose, and I'm particularly useful to the ones I support. And I'm not an idiot. So pretty much no on all accounts. You answered my question with questions, which I answered completely. I therefore return to my original question and ask it again: Do you REALLY care how people procure their orgasms?
You're a psychotic, delusional, Idiot. Meanwhile, Putin... in Reality Land: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish," Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.
None of those things is true. Why do you care about how other people procure their orgasms?
Because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, idiots... like you! Just like in Romans chapter 1.
So, to put what you said in plain language, you care about how people procure their orgasms because you're a moral absolutist.
No, because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, REPROBATELY MINDED, idiots... like you!
You clearly like to layer on the insults, but your answer to the question doesn't hold together all that well. The question is: Why do you care how people procure their orgasms? And your answer is that the reason you care is moral relativism, and the reason that you care about moral relativism is that it produces psychotic, delusional reprobately minded idiots. So, putting it together, you apparently care about how people procure their orgasms because the way they procure their orgasms produces psychosis and idiocy. At one point you cited Romans, so you're evidently basing moral absolutism - the opposite of moral relativism - on the Christian God. The Christian God, in Scripture, clearly rejects all heterosexual sex outside of wedlock, and all masturbation that involves fantasies of anyone other than one's spouse, as immoral and wicked. So, you think that masturbation and sex before marriage produces psychosis and idiocy. That's the ineluctable logic of what you have said. How shall we stop all this masturbation, then? By law and punishment? Or are you going to cut and run from the religious moorings to which you have lashed yourself - which call masturbation sexual immorality - and become a moral relativist yourself?
Are you one of those geniuses who wait until the Check Engine light comes on to check/change the oil - or do you RTFM?
No. I was a Navy pilot and a ship's officer. I take very good care of mechanical equipment. What is that you are specifically proposing we should do, legally, about sexual immorality? Criminalize all of that which is prohibited by the Christian God?
Antibiotic resistance is the ability of bacteria to resist the effects of the drugs used to treat them. This means the bacteria are no longer killed by a drug that used to kill them before. The bacteria are then free to keep multiplying. Gonorrhea has developed resistance to nearly all of the antibiotics used for its treatment. We are currently down to one last recommended and effective class of antibiotics, cephalosporins, to treat this common infection. This is an urgent public health threat because gonorrhea control in the United States largely relies on our ability to successfully treat the infection. Gonorrhea is skilled at outsmarting the antibiotics that are used to kill it. For this reason, we must continuously monitor for antibiotic resistance and encourage the research and development of new drugs for gonorrhea treatment. https://www.cdc.gov/s td/gonorrhea/arg/basic.htm ===============================
Nobody disputes that STD's are a bad thing to catch. But pointing at something bad is not a policy. What is it specifically that you are proposing we should do, legally, about sexual immorality, criminalize all of that which is prohibited by the Christian God?
That would be the RTFM part. People who don't RTFM: ESAD/FOAD! Bonappetit!
People who don't RTFM: ESAD/FOAD! Bonappetit! You don't have any proposal as far as law. You simply know, along with the rest of us, that there are incurable STDs. I'll tell you then what the law should be: pretty much what it is: consenting adults can do whatever they want sexually without legal repercussions. As adults, they need to be aware of the potential health implications of STDs, and protect themselves accordingly, but hetero- and homo- and auto-sexual activity between consenting adults is not illegal in our free nation. That's the right standard, and it should not be changed.
Says the Universal, Reprobately Minded, Idiot. Natural Law doesn't give a shyte about what some shyster lawyer like you, the Supreme Court, or any other man-made created thing manages to pull out of its collective arse. Would "Highly drug-resistant gonorrhea" be a problem if people had followed the moral health code articulated in scripture? NO. It wouldn't.
#22. To: VxH (#20)
Well, I certainly have no problem with Natural Law running its course. Them's the breaks. It doesn't seem to be fast enough or complete enough in its coverage for you, so you've got to dream up additional things, human penalties, the death penalty. You're not content to let Nature do her bit, you've got to be sure that you catch and punish that larger number of people who do what you don't like and who come through unharmed. Nature didn't harm them, dammit, so now YOU'RE determined to do it. This is why American law and governance is a whole lot more like me and a whole lot less like you. No amount of raging distemper on your part can change that. In fact, when I'm placed alongside of you and we both talk, people realize that you're mean and crazy, and that while I clearly have religious ideas that are far from the mainstream, my general approach to people is reasonable, tolerant, peaceable and charitable. Given the choice between me and my kind, and you and yours, the bulk of the people will choose me and mind, because they don't want to be oppressed and bullied, and you and yours are ready to put people to death for not following your cranky little belief system. But hey, you do you, I'll do me, and you'll get more and more bitter as the years pass and things drift further and further away from you. I'll be just fine.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: VxH (#1)
#3. To: Vicomte13 (#2)
They still "root 'em out",
#4. To: VxH (#3)
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
#6. To: VxH (#5)
Are you really one of Herbie Marcuse's Usefully demoralized Idiots?
#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)
(Edited)
And I'm not an idiot.
"I thought about something just now: 
#8. To: VxH (#7)
You're a psychotic, delusional, Idiot
#9. To: Vicomte13 (#8)
(Edited)
#10. To: VxH (#9)
Because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, idiots... like you!
#11. To: Vicomte13 (#10)
#12. To: VxH (#11)
(Edited)
No, because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, REPROBATELY MINDED, idiots... like you!
#13. To: Vicomte13 (#12)
#14. To: VxH (#13)
(Edited)
Are you one of those geniuses who wait until the Check Engine light comes on to check/change the oil - or do you RTFM?
#15. To: Vicomte13 (#14)
(Edited)
Antibiotic- Resistant Gonorrhea Basic Information
Antibiotic-Resistant Gonorrhea: An Overview
{ golf clap } for the Universal Reprobate.
#16. To: VxH (#15)
#17. To: Vicomte13 (#16)
Nobody disputes that STD's are a bad thing to catch
#18. To: VxH (#17)
That would be the RTFM part.
#20. To: Vicomte13 (#18)
That's the right standard, and it should not be changed.
Replies to Comment # 20.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]