Title: Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror* Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJQjpG-lGY4 Published:Jul 18, 2018 Author:NA Post Date:2018-07-18 14:06:01 by VxH Keywords:None Views:9390 Comments:60
=============
Poster Comment:
The ride of Rainbow snowflakes in their Log Cabin Trojan RINO are coming to an end.
NIXON: You know what happened to the Romans? The last six Roman emperors were fags. Neither in a public way. You know what happened to the popes? They were layin' the nuns; that's been goin' on for years, centuries. But the Catholic Church went to hell three or four centuries ago. It was homosexual, and it had to be cleaned out. That's what's happened to Britain. It happened earlier to France.
Let's look at the strong societies. The Russians. Goddamn, they root 'em out. They don't let 'em around at all. I don't know what they do with them. Look at this country. You think the Russians allow dope? Homosexuality, dope, immorality, are the enemies of strong societies. That's why the Communists and left-wingers are clinging to one another. They're trying to destroy us. I know Moynihan will disagree with this, [Attorney General John] Mitchell will, and Garment will. But, goddamn, we have to stand up to this.
EHRLICHMAN: It's fatal liberality.
NIXON: Huh?
EHRLICHMAN: It's fatal liberality. And with its use on television, it has such leverage.
Maybe the Log Cabin RINOs can move to Canada where snowflakes don't melt as fast?
Something happened between then and now to those Russians Nixon was so impressed with. They still "root 'em out", so evidently their harshness versus our laxness didn't save them.
No, because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, REPROBATELY MINDED, idiots... like you!
You clearly like to layer on the insults, but your answer to the question doesn't hold together all that well.
The question is: Why do you care how people procure their orgasms?
And your answer is that the reason you care is moral relativism, and the reason that you care about moral relativism is that it produces psychotic, delusional reprobately minded idiots.
So, putting it together, you apparently care about how people procure their orgasms because the way they procure their orgasms produces psychosis and idiocy.
At one point you cited Romans, so you're evidently basing moral absolutism - the opposite of moral relativism - on the Christian God.
The Christian God, in Scripture, clearly rejects all heterosexual sex outside of wedlock, and all masturbation that involves fantasies of anyone other than one's spouse, as immoral and wicked.
So, you think that masturbation and sex before marriage produces psychosis and idiocy. That's the ineluctable logic of what you have said.
How shall we stop all this masturbation, then? By law and punishment?
Or are you going to cut and run from the religious moorings to which you have lashed yourself - which call masturbation sexual immorality - and become a moral relativist yourself?
Antibiotic resistance is the ability of bacteria to resist the effects of the drugs used to treat them. This means the bacteria are no longer killed by a drug that used to kill them before. The bacteria are then free to keep multiplying. Gonorrhea has developed resistance to nearly all of the antibiotics used for its treatment. We are currently down to one last recommended and effective class of antibiotics, cephalosporins, to treat this common infection. This is an urgent public health threat because gonorrhea control in the United States largely relies on our ability to successfully treat the infection.
Gonorrhea is skilled at outsmarting the antibiotics that are used to kill it. For this reason, we must continuously monitor for antibiotic resistance and encourage the research and development of new drugs for gonorrhea treatment.
Nobody disputes that STD's are a bad thing to catch. But pointing at something bad is not a policy.
What is it specifically that you are proposing we should do, legally, about sexual immorality, criminalize all of that which is prohibited by the Christian God?
You simply know, along with the rest of us, that there are incurable STDs.
I'll tell you then what the law should be: pretty much what it is: consenting adults can do whatever they want sexually without legal repercussions. As adults, they need to be aware of the potential health implications of STDs, and protect themselves accordingly, but hetero- and homo- and auto-sexual activity between consenting adults is not illegal in our free nation.
That's the right standard, and it should not be changed.