The Left's War On Christians
See other The Left's War On Christians Articles
Title: Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror*
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJQjpG-lGY4
Published: Jul 18, 2018
Author: NA
Post Date: 2018-07-18 14:06:01 by VxH
Keywords: None
Views: 10370
Comments: 60
Poster Comment: The ride of Rainbow snowflakes in their Log Cabin Trojan RINO are coming to an end. Putin know's science, too.
============= 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#1. To: All (#0)
(Edited)
NIXON: You know what happened to the Romans? The last six Roman emperors were fags. Neither in a public way. You know what happened to the popes? They were layin' the nuns; that's been goin' on for years, centuries. But the Catholic Church went to hell three or four centuries ago. It was homosexual, and it had to be cleaned out. That's what's happened to Britain. It happened earlier to France. Let's look at the strong societies. The Russians. Goddamn, they root 'em out. They don't let 'em around at all. I don't know what they do with them. Look at this country. You think the Russians allow dope? Homosexuality, dope, immorality, are the enemies of strong societies. That's why the Communists and left-wingers are clinging to one another. They're trying to destroy us. I know Moynihan will disagree with this, [Attorney General John] Mitchell will, and Garment will. But, goddamn, we have to stand up to this. EHRLICHMAN: It's fatal liberality. NIXON: Huh? EHRLICHMAN: It's fatal liberality. And with its use on television, it has such leverage. Maybe the Log Cabin RINOs can move to Canada where snowflakes don't melt as fast?
Nixon sure had strong opinions, huh? Something happened between then and now to those Russians Nixon was so impressed with. They still "root 'em out", so evidently their harshness versus our laxness didn't save them.
Unlike the Bolshe-Sodomites who legalized the abomination of nature, again, in 1963.
Do you really care how people procure their orgasms?
Are you really one of Herbie Marcuse's Usefully demoralized Idiots?
No. I don't know who Herbie Marcuse is. From the b&w photo he looks like an obscure person who lived long ago and who has no bearing on my life. I'm not at all demoralized about anything. I'm not at all useful to any cause I oppose, and I'm particularly useful to the ones I support. And I'm not an idiot. So pretty much no on all accounts. You answered my question with questions, which I answered completely. I therefore return to my original question and ask it again: Do you REALLY care how people procure their orgasms?
You're a psychotic, delusional, Idiot. Meanwhile, Putin... in Reality Land: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish," Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.
None of those things is true. Why do you care about how other people procure their orgasms?
Because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, idiots... like you! Just like in Romans chapter 1.
So, to put what you said in plain language, you care about how people procure their orgasms because you're a moral absolutist.
No, because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, REPROBATELY MINDED, idiots... like you!
#12. To: VxH (#11)
(Edited)
You clearly like to layer on the insults, but your answer to the question doesn't hold together all that well. The question is: Why do you care how people procure their orgasms? And your answer is that the reason you care is moral relativism, and the reason that you care about moral relativism is that it produces psychotic, delusional reprobately minded idiots. So, putting it together, you apparently care about how people procure their orgasms because the way they procure their orgasms produces psychosis and idiocy. At one point you cited Romans, so you're evidently basing moral absolutism - the opposite of moral relativism - on the Christian God. The Christian God, in Scripture, clearly rejects all heterosexual sex outside of wedlock, and all masturbation that involves fantasies of anyone other than one's spouse, as immoral and wicked. So, you think that masturbation and sex before marriage produces psychosis and idiocy. That's the ineluctable logic of what you have said. How shall we stop all this masturbation, then? By law and punishment? Or are you going to cut and run from the religious moorings to which you have lashed yourself - which call masturbation sexual immorality - and become a moral relativist yourself?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: VxH (#1)
#3. To: Vicomte13 (#2)
They still "root 'em out",
#4. To: VxH (#3)
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
#6. To: VxH (#5)
Are you really one of Herbie Marcuse's Usefully demoralized Idiots?
#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)
(Edited)
And I'm not an idiot.
"I thought about something just now: 
#8. To: VxH (#7)
You're a psychotic, delusional, Idiot
#9. To: Vicomte13 (#8)
(Edited)
#10. To: VxH (#9)
Because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, idiots... like you!
#11. To: Vicomte13 (#10)
Replies to Comment # 11. No, because moral relativism produces psychotic, delusional, REPROBATELY MINDED, idiots... like you!
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]