[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court
Source: YouTube
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUxA_fh_cMA
Published: Jul 9, 2018
Author: staff
Post Date: 2018-07-09 21:25:39 by buckeroo
Keywords: None
Views: 9661
Comments: 160

Kool Pick! Should go through the Senate seamlessly.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-1) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#2. To: buckeroo (#0)

I think Trump punted a bit with this pick.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2018-07-09   21:39:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: hondo68 (#1)

Well, at least Trump did not pick Gatlin!

buckeroo  posted on  2018-07-09   21:40:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: buckeroo (#3)

Well, at least Trump did not pick Gatlin!

Less gay wedding cakes with Kavi.

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-09   21:57:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: buckeroo (#0)

Yay! Another Catholic!

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-09   22:09:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: hondo68 (#1)

Jesuit swamp critter.

Those Jesuits are ideologues.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2018-07-09   22:20:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Vicomte13 (#5)

Yay! Another Catholic!

Does this mean that the Catholic Pope residing in the Vatican will have heavy influence on US Supreme Court Justice decisions?

buckeroo  posted on  2018-07-09   22:24:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: buckeroo, Vicomte13, Melania, Donald, Francis the hippie Pope (#7)

Does this mean that the Catholic Pope residing in the Vatican will have heavy influence on US Supreme Court Justice decisions?

The Catholic A-Team

SCOTUS, White House, IMF

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-09   22:53:24 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: hondo68 (#8)

Where is "Gatlin" in all his infinite wisdom?

buckeroo  posted on  2018-07-09   22:56:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: buckeroo (#7)

Does this mean that the Catholic Pope residing in the Vatican will have heavy influence on US Supreme Court Justice decisions?

Well, I certainly hope so!

So now we've got Chief Justice Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Sam Alito, Gorsuch (who was a Catholic, but now attends an Episcopal church) and, soon, Kavanaugh. Plus Sotomayor. That's 5 1/2 Catholics. Kagan, Breyer and Ginsburg are Jews.

It would be best if Sotomayor would listen more to the Pope.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-09   23:00:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: hondo68 (#8)

Melania is Catholic.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-09   23:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Vicomte13 (#11)

Melania is Catholic.

That's like 2 1/2 Catholics out of three. Trump will go whichever way the wind blows.

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-09   23:12:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Vicomte13 (#10) (Edited)

Well, I certainly hope so!

You obviously monitor the individual members of the USSC. Where is there any serious and formative [discussion] of religious belief systems that the USSC has?

buckeroo  posted on  2018-07-09   23:12:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: buckeroo (#0)

“Kavanaugh, who has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit since 2006, dissented from a 2011 decision in which a three-judge panel upheld the District of Columbia's ban on so-called assault weapons and its requirement that all guns be registered. Kavanaugh disagreed with the majority's use of "intermediate scrutiny," saying an analysis "based on text, history, and tradition" is more consistent with the Supreme Court's Second Amendment precedents.

The D.C. "assault weapon" ban covers a list of specific models as well as guns that meet certain criteria. A semi-automatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine is illegal, for instance, if it has any of six prohibited features, including an adjustable stock, a pistol grip, or a flash suppressor. "The list appears to be haphazard," Kavanaugh noted. "It bans certain semi-automatic rifles but not others —with no particular explanation or rationale for why some made the list and some did not." In any case, he concluded, the law is inconsistent with the landmark 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller.”

If he ruthlessly defends the 2nd amendment, for 25 more years, I’ll be pleased

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2018-07-09   23:39:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: no gnu taxes (#2)

Absolutely. The guy was hired by Elena Kagan and runs around with Bush and Rove,

https://www.npr.org/2018/07/09/626164904/who-is-brett-kavanaugh-president- trumps-pick-for-the-supreme-court

luke21  posted on  2018-07-10   0:21:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: luke21 (#15) (Edited)

I'm here... :)

Gatlin  posted on  2018-07-10   4:37:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Gatlin (#16)

I'm here... :)

Fake News!

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-10   9:34:52 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: hondo68 (#17)

I always "Put On A Happy Face."

Gatlin  posted on  2018-07-10   10:04:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: no gnu taxes (#2) (Edited)

I think Trump punted a bit with this pick.

He's saving Amy to replace the bridge troll next year.
Leftists are going to explode once they realize he'll have all the picks on his short list on the Court by 2024.

SCOTUS is the only reason Trump got my vote, but I'm thoroughly impressed with other aspects of his administration so far. He's got my vote in 2020.

Hank Rearden  posted on  2018-07-10   10:34:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Hank Rearden, luke21 (#19)

He's got my vote in 2020.

Karl Rove approved, good to go.

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-10   10:55:30 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: hondo68 (#1)

Jesuit swamp critter.

He's a Jesuit? Seriously?

Being associated with the Bush Crime Family was bad enough,but THAT,if true,should be the kiss of death for the SC.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   11:01:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Vicomte13 (#5)

Yay! Another Catholic!

You say that just like it's something anyone sane would be proud to shout.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   11:03:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Fred Mertz (#6)

Jesuit swamp critter.

Those Jesuits are ideologues.

They are like PR hacks that warm up the "audiences" for the fundie Catholics that dream of once again ruling the western world and setting fire to anyone that disagrees with them.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   11:04:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Vicomte13 (#10)

Does this mean that the Catholic Pope residing in the Vatican will have heavy influence on US Supreme Court Justice decisions?

Well, I certainly hope so!

Since you have just proven yourself to be completely insane,nothing you post in the future has any value.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   11:06:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: GrandIsland (#14)

The D.C. "assault weapon" ban covers a list of specific models as well as guns that meet certain criteria. A semi-automatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine is illegal, for instance, if it has any of six prohibited features, including an adjustable stock, a pistol grip, or a flash suppressor. "The list appears to be haphazard," Kavanaugh noted. "It bans certain semi-automatic rifles but not others —with no particular explanation or rationale for why some made the list and some did not." In any case, he concluded, the law is inconsistent with the landmark 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller.”

If he ruthlessly defends the 2nd amendment, for 25 more years, I’ll be pleased

That doesn't "Read" like a 2nd Amendment defense to me. To ME,it reads like a bitch they didn't dot their "i's" and cross their "t's".

He was NOT complaining about their desire to limit American Constitutional Freedoms,he was bitching because it was a poorly-done job.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   11:09:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: sneakypete, GrandIsland (#25)

That doesn't "Read" like a 2nd Amendment defense to me. To ME,it reads like a bitch they didn't dot their "i's" and cross their "t's".

He was NOT complaining about their desire to limit American Constitutional Freedoms,he was bitching because it was a poorly-done job.

Kavanaugh DISSENT at 2-3, Heller II, 670 F.3d 1244 (DC Cir 10-7036, 2011)

In my judgment, both D.C.’s ban on semi-automatic rifles and its gun registration requirement are unconstitutional under Heller.

In Heller, the Supreme Court held that handguns – the vast majority of which today are semi-automatic – are constitutionally protected because they have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens. There is no meaningful or persuasive constitutional distinction between semi-automatic handguns and semi-automatic rifles. Semi-automatic rifles, like semi-automatic handguns, have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens for self-defense in the home, hunting, and other lawful uses. Moreover, semi-automatic handguns are used in connection with violent crimes far more than semi-automatic rifles are. It follows from Heller’s protection of semi-automatic handguns that semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally protected and that D.C.’s ban on them is unconstitutional. (By contrast, fully automatic weapons, also known as machine guns, have traditionally been banned and may continue to be banned after Heller.)

D.C.’s registration requirement, which is significantly more stringent than any other federal or state gun law in the United States, is likewise unconstitutional. Heller and later McDonald said that regulations on the sale, possession, or use of guns are permissible if they are within the class of traditional, “longstanding” gun regulations in the United States. Registration of all lawfully possessed guns – as distinct from licensing of gun owners or mandatory record-keeping by gun sellers – has not traditionally been required in the United States and even today remains highly unusual. Under Heller’s history- and tradition-based test, D.C.’s registration requirement is therefore unconstitutional.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-10   11:40:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: sneakypete (#24)

Since you have just proven yourself to be completely insane,nothing you post in the future has any value.

Not a fan of Catholicism, I see.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-10   12:28:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: sneakypete (#23)

They are like PR hacks that warm up the "audiences" for the fundie Catholics that dream of once again ruling the western world and setting fire to anyone that disagrees with them.

Nah. That's not what we Catholics are about.

What we're about is family, babies and social welfare/poverty relief.

We oppose the death penalty because of the corruption and unreliability of the human judicial process.

We oppose war other than necessary defensive war.

We're social conservatives and fiscal liberals.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-10   12:31:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: sneakypete, Jesuit Trump family, Catholic yutes (#21) (Edited)

— Kavanaugh has tutored at Washington Jesuit Academy, where he sits on the board of directors, and at J.O. Wilson Elementary School, according to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals website. He went to high school at Georgetown Prep — which Justice Neil Gorsuch also attended — and is a graduate of Yale College and Yale Law School.

www.politico.com/newslett...plenty-of-material-274850


He's a Jesuit? Seriously?

Is the Pope Catholic?


Trump chose a judge reared in Washington’s finest Jesuit institutions, including Georgetown Preparatory School. Kavanaugh, who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, is active in several Catholic organizations in the area. Trump pointed out that he coaches his daughter’s Catholic Youth Organization basketball team.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/07/08/catholics-on-the-court-the-historic-struggle-between-canon-and-constitutional-law/?utm_term=.08490fd4fdc3

Both of Trump's SCOTUS justices Gorsuch & Kavanaugh, attended the same Jesuit high school.
If one SCOTUS Jesuit is good, then two is better right?

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-10   12:49:18 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: nolu chan (#26)

Kavanaugh DISSENT at 2-3, Heller II, 670 F.3d 1244 (DC Cir 10-7036, 2011)

In my judgment, both D.C.’s ban on semi-automatic rifles and its gun registration requirement are unconstitutional under Heller.

Thank you. That one sentence changes the entire intent of the rest of what he wrote.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   13:37:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Vicomte13 (#27) (Edited)

Since you have just proven yourself to be completely insane,nothing you post in the future has any value.

Not a fan of Catholicism, I see.

Or Islam,or any other slave cult.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   13:37:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: hondo68 (#29)

Both of Trump's SCOTUS justices Gorsuch & Kavanaugh, attended the same Jesuit high school. If one SCOTUS Jesuit is good, then two is better right?

It doesn't matter if they are Jesuits,or Thomas Jefferson and George Washington brought back to life,if Trump recommended them,you would hate them and find fault.

You are one of those sad people who just ain't happy unless you are mad.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-10   13:40:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: no gnu taxes (#2)

I think Trump punted a bit with this pick.

I agree.

But he's cornered the Dems by doing so. IF they reject him (as I expect), the NEXT picks will only be further RIGHT.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:45:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: buckeroo, Gatlin (#3)

Well, at least Trump did not pick Gatlin!

BUMMER!!

(He and Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg would have been quite the spectacle, what with wearing each others robe etc)

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:47:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: hondo68 (#8)

Do you remotely understand the concept of politics and photo-ops??

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:48:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Vicomte13 (#10)

(Does this mean that the Catholic Pope residing in the Vatican will have heavy influence on US Supreme Court Justice decisions?)

Well, I certainly hope so!

You can NOT be serious.

This Pope is a pro-homo, Commie anti-Christ/fascist.

And besides -- waaay too many RCCs wrecking SCOTUS.

We need PROTS who reflected the FOUNDERS very USCON! And where are THEY??

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: hondo68 (#12)

Trump will go whichever way the wind blows.

Chyeah -- cuz Trump is a "Follower", right?

Move waaaay to the back of the class room.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:51:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: sneakypete, GrandIsland (#25)

If he ruthlessly defends the 2nd amendment, for 25 more years, I’ll be pleased

That doesn't "Read" like a 2nd Amendment defense to me. To ME,it reads like a bitch they didn't dot their "i's" and cross their "t's".

He was NOT complaining about their desire to limit American Constitutional Freedoms,he was bitching because it was a poorly-done job.

Nicely interpreted, Pete.

I think this guy may be squishy on 2A issues. Not to mention OTHERS.

Don't like this pick.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:54:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: sneakypete, Cult of Personality, Trumpkins, love the Jesuits (#32) (Edited)

You are one of those sad people who just ain't happy unless you are mad.

That means that you're mad because someone criticized Dear Leader Donald, and it's fine with you if he somehow packs SCOTUS full of Jesuits.

Got it, Jesuits are good when Trump nominates them, but bad if someone else does. Makes sense if you're a cult of personality person.

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-10   13:56:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: sneakypete, nolu chan, GrandIsland (#30)

(In my judgment, both D.C.’s ban on semi-automatic rifles and its gun registration requirement are unconstitutional under Heller.)

Thank you. That one sentence changes the entire intent of the rest of what he wrote.

I hope Nolu is right.

I'm not sure if Kavanaugh is fully un-ambiguous on the issue. I'm not a big fan of "Abstaining" on votes.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:57:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: sneakypete, hondo68 (#32) (Edited)

It doesn't matter if they are Jesuits,or Thomas Jefferson and George Washington brought back to life,if Trump recommended them,you would hate them and find fault.

Yup.

Hondo has been sporting his pink p***y hats and "I'M WITH ---> HER!" button loud and proud.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-10   13:59:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Liberator, no gnu taxes (#33)

IF they reject him (as I expect), the NEXT picks will only be further RIGHT.

Rejecting Kavanaugh risks the next nominee facing a Dem majority in the Senate, or a slimmer GOP majority. If that happens, Trump could nominate conservatives until he leaves office and not get anyone approved.

There are currently 51 GOP, 47 Dem, 2 Ind (caucus with Dem).

At least 3 Dem senators are runnning for reelection in states that Trump won by 20 to 40 points. The liklihood is that Kavanaugh gets narrow Senate approval.

If post-election the GOP retains 50 or more Senate seats (likely), then the next nominee for an opening could well be Barrett, Hardiman, Kethledge, or Thapar.

It is very possible Trump gets to name a successor for Ginsburg or Sotomayor, and possibly Thomas at 70+ could resign to ensure a young, conservative replacement.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-10   14:06:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (43 - 160) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com