Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income
Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?
"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"
"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"
"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"
Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)
Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’
‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber
Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'
Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.
No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !
"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "
"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"
"The Teleprompter Campaign"
Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh
"Pagans in Paris"
"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".
"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t
Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter
Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service
Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement
Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally
Trump Assassination Attempt
We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.
Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop
Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation
2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises
Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details
Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit
AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.
If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.
"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"
How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion
Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men
Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.
South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel
Today I turned 50!
San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee
Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas
Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!
Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park
Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'
Will it ever end?
Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?
Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version
There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists
The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.
Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders
The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena
How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
New World Order See other New World Order Articles Title: The Case for Libertarian Monarchism
Source:
71Republic.com
URL Source: https://71republic.com/2018/06/23/libertarian-monarchism-part-one/
Published: Jun 23, 2018
Author: Daniel Szewc
Post Date: 2018-07-01 08:39:42 by Gatlin
Keywords: None Views: 5186
Comments: 31
The Case for Libertarian Monarchism, Part One Contrary to popular opinion, monarchism, rather than a form of democracy, is the best way to protect liberty. To many, the sheer idea of any government form that isnt reduced to nothingness is incompatible with liberty. Yet, to see the full picture, we must look at it from all angles possible. In the case of government systems, the placement of power is the most important. In democracy, the power of the state is absolute, yet the state is a public entity, run by majority rule. This is precisely presented by the fact that Adolf Hitler came to power democratically. Democracy is the road to socialism, as the founder of communism, Karl Marx, once said. What many forget, is that the second power in the Bundestag during the 1930s was the Communist Party. Thus, totalitarianism in Germany was simply not possible to avoid. In fact, any system that uses democratic measures of picking leaders is bound to fall into an étatiste (Fr. for statist, a term corrupted by modern English speaking anarchists) spiral, over a longer period of time. Whenever democratization occurs, in the long run, so does the expansion of the state apparatus. In Europe, on the other hand, monarchism often has lasted over a thousand years. A democratic-like system in the USA is failing already, before its 300 year mark. This failing state has not faced threats from its usually peaceful neighbors in 200 years. We can see the fall of the system in the USA, by viewing its support for socialists like Bernie Sanders within its youth, as well as populists and career politicians for its older generation. Why does this happen? The answer is simple. Whenever elections of any sort occur, conflicts of interest begin to appear. Then, the losing side lobbies to give voting rights to those who support their ideas. The more voters, the more conflicts, and so the snowball effect goes. In the end, people with no meritocratic basis get the right to vote, and strong, monarchism eventually may take over from within or from outside. Some consider the Republican model as the best idea to preserve liberty, yet in all its forms, it assumes an elective body, and/or a constitution, which is insentient as the sovereign. In this case, since ownership of the state cannot be considered a part of the Constitutions role, it is viewed as a passive manager of the morals (
of policies passed by sentient beings, able to manipulate words and context). All of the above disproves two main forms of government- ones in which the sovereign is a person chosen by the majority, and one in which the sovereign can be edited and interpreted by the irrational mob that holds sovereignty. Clearly, monarchism, to be detailed more in part two, is a more secure system to protect liberty. | The Case for Libertarian Monarchism, Part Two: Monarchy and Success A monarchy, unlike a democracy, will act in the best interest of a country. Democracy is a failed concept. It is based on the Marxist doctrine of intellectual equality of all people, which is defied by the evolutionary principles of specialization and natural selection. Individuals vary in intelligence and in basic knowledge. In fact, in a recent poll, only 26% of Americans could name the branches of their government. These, mind you, are the people who decide, in a democracy, who the most qualified to manage government affairs. Democracy also implies a collectivist mindset, as well as collective responsibility, which diminishes personal liberty. It is an obvious concept that for personal liberty to be practiced, personal responsibility must be applied too. But, the only way for government to have personal responsibility is via its privatization. In other words, it must become an absolute monarchy. Monarchism is the most efficient system possible. Unlike democratic governments, a monarchy claims its power because it holds the state as private property. Often, this is implied to be God-given. Thus, it establishes property as a God-given right. Moreover, it is impossible for an absolute monarch to support socialism or communism, as both oppose hierarchy, and a monarchy is of course a hierarchy. The biggest enemy of communism, which it would favor a monarch to support, is a free, unregulated market. Furthermore, monarchs will tend to support a free market to gain competitiveness on a global scale. Prince Hans Adam II of Liechtenstein does exactly this. As a result, his economy thrives. A monarch looks for the best, most prosperous system, because ideological lines are not his or her goal. Rather, a monarchs goal is to bring prosperity to the owned country. In this case, using what past monarchs didnt have, (Austrian school of economics studies and axioms) he or she would determine that a free market is the best option for the economy. For, what a monarch wants, is not to be personally rich, but rich compared to neighboring states. Of course, nothing makes your neighbors poorer than giving the firms that pay taxes to them a better deal. In turn, the neighbors, seeking the same goal, would lower taxes further. This constant prisoners dilemma between the monarchs of the world would shrink governments to a fraction of their current sizes. Ultimately, the only key remaining aspects would be diplomacy, a justice system, the military and a police force. Even with these, monarchs would be seeking cost reductions. Even if the free market proves itself inferior, the systems which are most effective will still prevail. For any economic stance, a monarchy will allow for a country to truly prosper. |
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
|