[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Leave the US, Trump tells liberal congresswomen of color

In Iran, some take off their hijabs as hard-liners push back

Wilbury Twist

Trump Consiglieres Giuliani and Bolton Paid Big Bucks by MEK Terrorist Group

The Untold Story of Christian Zionism’s Rise to Power in the United States

The Death of Privacy: Government Fearmongers to Read Your Mail

Real Hedge-Fund Managers Have Some Thoughts on What Epstein Was Actually Doing

Nellis AFB security forces anti-terrorism squad commander relieved of duty following 1 October massacre. But why?

Was Jeffrey Epstein a “State Department cut out”?

Trump's Congressional Reform Act

Book: Paul Ryan Slammed Trump for Calling Stormy Daniels ‘Horse Face’

Most Veterans Say Iraq, Afghanistan Wars Weren't Worth It

US Fast-Food Drive-Thrus Will Soon Use License Plate And Facial Recognition Technology

The Death of Privacy

Florida Sheriff Deputy Arrested After Planting Drugs on Innocent People

This Cop Is Getting $2,500 a Month Because Killing an Unarmed Man in a Hotel Hallway Gave Him PTSD

British navy to Iran: Back the hell off

Court Upholds Conviction Of Cop Who Threatened, Beat, Tased, And Arrested A Man For Complaining About Being Beaten By Him Earlier

Megan Rapinoe Drops the F-Bomb to End the Speech: ‘New York City, You’re the Motherf—-ing Best’

Flashback: Billionaire Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Sent Bill Clinton $3.5 Million From Secret Swiss Bank Account

The President’s Son Was ATTACKED While With Friends In Chicago — Secret Service SWARM!

Why Baseballs Are Flying in 2019

Bouton, ex-Yankee and 'Ball Four' author, dies

Anderson Cooper Giddily Tells Megan Rapinoe He Wants to ‘Hang out’ with Her

Americans Shocked to Find Their Rights Literally Vanish at U.S. Airports

Bombshell: Alex Acosta Reportedly Claimed Jeffrey Epstein "Belonged To Intelligence"

HILLARY RELEGATED TO THE DUSTBIN OF HISTORY

Greg Abbott Is About to Make Austin Regret Its Desire to Become Like California In Its Homeless Problem

Trump defends Home Depot co-founder after shoppers threaten boycott

The Heart of Darkness: The Sexual Predators Within America’s Power Elite

Jeffrey Epstein's Wikipedia Page Stealth-Edited To Remove Ties To Democrats

How socialism violates all Ten Commandments

Citizens Now Charged with a Crime for Repairing Their Own Car in Their Own Driveway

Daily marijuana use increasing among young adults

Despite Legalization, Adolescent Marijuana Use Hits 15-Year Low

An Iowa Man Wins His Free Speech Suit After Being Charged for a Facebook Rant Against a Cop

Government Bullies Want to Seize This Man's Home Because of Overgrown Grass

WATCH: Surveillance Video Shows Group Of About 60 Teens Vandalizing, Looting Walgreens On South Street

Why the Earth is actually 100% flat

A Glass of Wine

Michelle Obama Gets Personal: ‘Yes, I Support ... Great Sex at Every Age’

Gen Z Adults Encourage Each Other To Sign Up For Facial Recognition At Music Festivals

Pelosi says Trump is trying to ‘Make America White Again’ with census question

Camera-Shy Antifa Hits Washington D.C.

Frog-Marching Trump Toward War on Iran

Chicago Cops Taser Man Four Times in Front of his Kids for Recording them

How to Create a Gun-Free America in 5 Easy Steps

Kentucky man is told giving used glasses to the homeless is against the law

Bill Clinton Denies Knowing Anything About His Pedophile Friend Jeffery Epstein But Flight Logs Show Otherwise

Someone with a website claims The Creation Account in Genesis Describes A Flat Earth and Teaches True Science


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Poison Watch
See other Poison Watch Articles

Title: Hey, Tooconservative And Other Libertarians, Maybe Republicans Just Aren’t That Into Your Libertarianism [Appropriately Modified Title]
Source: Reason
URL Source: https://reason.com/blog/2018/06/13/ ... tarians-maybe-republicans-just
Published: Jun 13, 2018
Author: Matt Welch
Post Date: 2018-06-28 22:50:40 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 1273
Comments: 29

June 12 was not a good day for free-market constitutionalism in the modern GOP.

Libertarian-leaning Republican congressman Mark Sanford got primaried in South Carolina last night by immigration hawk and late-breaking Donald Trump endorsee Katie Harrington, whose main line of attack on Sanford was that he was disloyal to Trump. But that was just one event in a day unusually swollen with reminders that the modern GOP at the national level is not welcoming to libertarian ideas.

Take two issues that we've been banging on about at Reason for years: tariffs, and Congress's paralytic fear of doing even its minimal constitutional duty. In a remarkable speech yesterday, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who is retiring at the end of his term this year, combined the two issues in a damning indictment of his colleagues' cowardice. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Corker charged, blocks all amendments—including one Corker introduced last week requiring congressional approval for "national security" tariffs—because "Well gosh, we might poke the bear" (meaning the president). Watch:

Not to be overly tautological, but it's difficult for even the most libertarian-leaning legislators to get meaningful stuff done if they are prevented from legislating.

Then there was the defeat last night of liberty-movement Republican Nick Freitas in the Virginia GOP primary for U.S. Senate at the hands of Confederate monument enthusiast and recent Paul Nehlen fan Corey Stewart, who is fond of saying stuff like "I was Trump before Trump was Trump" and tweeting jibber-jabber like this:

All of the above was enough for Daniel McCarthy to write the latest version of "How Donald Trump eclipsed the 'libertarian moment.'" McCarthy's grim conclusion: "The revolution begun by Trump in 2016 is continuing at the state and congressional levels. And the Ron Paul revolution begun by Senator Paul's father now seems marginal, if not utterly defeated—a remarkable reversal of fortune from just four years ago."

Politicians respond to incentives, and right now the imperative Republican incentive is to kiss Donald Trump's ring. Less than 15 months ago, Trump was warning that "The Freedom Caucus will hurt the entire Republican agenda if they don't get on the team, & fast. We must fight them, & Dems, in 2018!" Last night, as one Freedom Caucus incumbent lost to a Trump-backed challenger and a Rand Paul–backed Senate candidate lost to a #MAGA nationalist, Freedom Caucus stalwarts Reps. Mark Meadows (R–N.C.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) went on Laura Ingraham's Fox News program not to sulk but to talk about possibly impeaching Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for his role in overseeing the Mueller investigation. They have gotten on the team.

Libertarian policy goals will still sometimes be met under Trump, some of them intentionally, some not. He will continue deregulating and appointing some good judges, may yet contribute to genuine peace on the Korean peninsula, and has proven surprisingly malleable on marijuana enforcement and prison reform. But as an organizing body, particularly anywhere near the levers of federal power, the GOP is an increasingly unreliable ally to libertarians.

Daniel McCarthy, in his essay, provides some interesting food for thought about the unsatisfying-to-many penchant among libertarians for calling balls and strikes in a more emotional age of with-us-or-against-us polarization:

The other great issue at the libertarians' disposal, smaller government, simply never mattered in the ways they thought it did. Anti-government sentiment was most powerful with Republican voters as an expression of anti-elitism and resistance to a government run by a liberal Democrat like Barack Obama. Emphasizing cutting government on principle, as libertarians did, would never be as effective as emphasizing fighting the liberals, with or without shrinking the state. Trump was not the most anti-government candidate, but he was the most anti-left. The libertarian position, by contrast with Trump, seemed like just a more thoroughgoing version of what every other supposedly conservative Republican believed about cutting government....

Urgency matters in politics, and Trump is a master of creating a sense of urgency in both his supporters and his opponents—as Michael Anton's "Flight 93" essay and the left's continual cries of "authoritarianism!" have shown. Ron Paul did create a sense of urgency in his campaigns, largely by capitalizing on powerful issues that had been ignored by the establishment in both parties, such as disastrous wars with bipartisan support and the mysteries of the Federal Reserve. The elder Paul said a further financial meltdown was imminent. But Trump outflanked the libertarian line in this respect as well. And today the most urgent question in American politics, the one that quickens pulses the most, is simply whether you are for or against Trump. Mark Sanford has said he's not really anti-Trump, but that he simply applies to Trump the standards that derive from his libertarian-ish principles. If those standards lead to a good grade for Trump, Sanford is happy to apply it. If not, then not. But his kind of abstraction and fixity, whatever its merits in other respects, cannot convey a sense of urgency. The libertarian way proves over time to be oblivious to circumstances and psychological conditions, which are in fact the essence of real politics....

Those who look to the likely rout of Republicans like Corey Stewart in November as the shock that will turn the Republican Party against Trump are profoundly misunderstanding what the GOP has been going through for a decade, which is a search—whether through libertarians or nationalists or whomever else might arise—for the perfect anti-establishment vessel.

Or as Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) put it to me last year, "How could these people let us down? How could they go from being libertarian ideologues to voting for Donald Trump? And then I realized what it was: They weren't voting for the libertarian in the race, they were voting for the craziest son of a bitch in the race when they voted for me and Rand and Ron earlier. So Trump just won, you know, that category, but dumped the ideological baggage."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#1. To: Gatlin (#0) (Edited)

Libertarians continue to get more out of a Trump presidency than a Xlinton one.

It's not much more complicated than that.

As for the decline of libertarianism in the GOP (along with the decline of the internationalists, the conservatives and the free traders), that is a temporary matter. When Trump eclipses as a lame duck or leaves the presidency, these issues will return to GOP politics with the same force they had before.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-28   23:04:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Tooconservative, Gatlin, aka ACLU-SHILL (#1)

Hilarious...

Gatlin -- who at one time openly fronted for AND extolled the "virtues" of the subversive ACLU -- is calling YOU and Libertarians out?? RICH.

The ACLU is Communism thinly veiling its FASCISM. It is about enforcing *unreasonable* rules and restrictions which restrain and obliterate common sense and true freedom.

Libertarianism *at it's extreme* is the polar opposite. In NEITHER case did the Founders intend either for this Republic.

And for what it's worth, yes, Constitutional Libertarianism is EXACTLY what Trump and Reagan are and were. NOT to mention the Founders.

Real Libertarianism IS "conservatism" at its sweet spot.

Gatlin has always been an extreme Statist, a rigid Authoritarian.

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-29   14:21:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Liberator (#18)

Gatlin has always been an extreme Statist,

According to Major Burns: Let’s Abandon The Term ‘Statist’

Deckard  posted on  2018-06-29   14:27:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Deckard (#20) (Edited)

According to Major Burns: Let’s Abandon The Term ‘Statist’
Bzzzt....WRONG.

Yet another worthless non-sequitur, and a completely baseless assertion which continues to exhibit some of that misogyny that you libertarians are notorious for.

The recommendation came from one of your fellow libertarians, Nathan Kreider, when he posted it on beinglibertarian.com.

You libertarians have so much trouble articulating your warped thoughts that I would never want to further restrict your limited communication skills by additionally handicapping your inability to speak fluently and coherently.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-06-29   16:02:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 27.

#28. To: Gatlin (#27)

Yet another worthless non-sequitur, and a completely baseless assertion...

yet - you did post the article.

Deckard  posted on  2018-06-29 17:41:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com