United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Cops Break Into Innocent Man’s Yard, Kill His Dog, Steal His Body, Then Urinate On His Fence
Source:
Free Thought Project
URL Source: https://thefreethoughtproject.com/w ... dy-then-urinate-on-his-plants/
Published: Jun 24, 2018
Author: Jay Syrmopoulos
Post Date: 2018-06-24 10:15:23 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 12394
Comments: 116
Dos Palos, CA – Dos Palos resident George Aguaristi filed a $1 million dollar suit in Merced County after authorities came onto his property without a warrant last month and the killed his 5-year-old pitbull, Samson. The entire ordeal was captured on surveillance cameras installed on the property. Authorities have yet to explain why they came onto the 61-year-old Dos Palos resident’s property despite signs being posted on the front gate noting “No Trespassing” and “Beware of Dog.” A report in Merced Sun-Star explained: He said he woke up May 30 with a neighbor knocking on his window who said officers had been in his fenced-in yard. The 61-year-old noted he has “Beware of Dog” and “No Trespassing” signs on the front gate. Aguaristi said he went outside to feed Samson and Delilah, another pit bull, but couldn’t find the male. After finding a business card wedge in the screen door, he called the number, which was for an investigator for the Merced County District Attorney’s Office. Efforts to reach the lead investigator by phone were unsuccessful on Thursday. It was an investigator who told the homeowner that an officer had killed his dog, Aguaristi said. He’d slept through it all. “I was just in shock. My mind just went,” Aguaristi said. “Eventually, I said, ‘Is there something you needed to ask me?’ And, (the officer) says, ‘No, that’s about it.’ “ After being informed that his dog had been killed, Aguaristi reviewed footage from the surveillance cameras on his property. The footage revealed that around 8:30 a.m. a male and female officer entered the property through the front gate where the signs were posted. The female officer can be seen walking towards the porch of the residence, at which point Samson comes down the stairs and takes a stance between the front door of the home and the officer. At this point the officer appears to use pepper spray — which only serves to agitate Samson — who begins to move toward the officer. The officer can then be seen pulling a firearm and shooting/killing the dog. While likely not aware they were being recorded, the two officers can then be seen taking Samson’s dead body and an investigator can be seen washing Samson’s blood off of the driveway with a garden hose. “They killed my dog and they stole it,” Aguaristi said. The fact that these officers took the dog and attempted to wash away the blood is indicative of an attempt at covering up the truth of the incident in that these officers came onto private property, which warned to “Beware of Dog” and “No Trespassing,” and proceeded to then kill an animal that was doing what it was supposed to be doing – and where it was supposed to be! Sadly, this is not an exception to the rule, as TFTP has reported time and time again on cases of police officers shooting dogs maliciously and without regard. In fact, just the other day we reported on the case of an officer shooting at a dog in a small room resulting in a 9-year-old child being shot in the face. Samson is now buried on the property, and a neighbor’s children, who played with the dog often, have made a cross for his headstone, Aguaristi said. Aguaristi said that he doesn’t hate law enforcement, but just wants “justice for Samson.” “He was a good boy,” he said. “He didn’t deserve that.” To add insult to injury, after killing his dog, whom Aguaristi referred to as his “best friend” and “son,” the officer can be seen urinating on Aguaristi’s fence.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-76) not displayed.
.
.
.
#77. To: sneakypete (#70)
(Edited)
Stop with the bravado bullshit and learn to understand the current state of the law regarding when police can legally come on your property or enter your home without a warrant. While the Fourth Amendment provides all people the right to be secure on their property, laws have been written and courts have carved out a few legal and lawful exceptions to the freedom and against the warrant requirement. The first thing you should understand is that government agents are permitted to approach your front door and routinely conduct what is called a “knock and talk” investigation. This means they simply have the right to approach the front door of your home, knock on the door of your home and speak to you or whomever answers the door. Law enforcement can even enter your home without a warrant based upon a few exceptions to the requirement for a warrant. One widely used exception to the warrant requirement is the “plain view doctrine” which means that if the police have probable cause to believe they have observed something in plain view inside your home that is contraband, then they have the absolute legal right to enter without a warrant and seize that item or those items. Another widely used exception to the warrant requirement is a search based upon probable cause when they believe the search will uncover criminal activity or contraband. There are a number of common observations by police that can lead to probable cause and entry into your home without a warrant. One is the odor of marijuana. If police smell the odor of marijuana coming from a room, that gives them probable cause to enter and search without a warrant. Then there is the exception to the warrant requirement known as “exigent circumstances”. This is really a secondary exception to probable cause in that if law enforcement has a reasonable belief that evidence may be lost or destroyed in the time it takes to get a warrant, then they can legally search for or seize the evidence without a warrant. While this typically applies if the officer already has probable cause, it however is an exception worthy of its own category. These laws on police entering your property or home without a warrant are always being tested and continually evolving. Exceptions other than those I have listed here might apply to the no warrant requirement as well. Therefore if you ever have a question on Warrantless Searches, then you should not hesitate to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney with in depth knowledge of Constitutional law and emerging issues.
Awww...does somebody need a hug? Looks as if you really missed your boyfriend.
That you consider yourself either enlightened or intelligent is hilarious.
Jealously in an emotional reaction to believing scenarios in your mind that are not true. Simply changing what you believe will change your imagination and projection which can eliminate these destructive emotional reactions. Even when you feel there is justification for absurd jealous reaction, jealousy definitely is not a beneficial way to deal with the situation and is a total worthless cause.
However, SCOTUS also decreed there definitely is an “implied license” which allows the police to walk up to your front door and knock irrespective of any No Trespass – Private Property type signs, fence or other obstructions and all stupid-ass comments you may bluster up in your aggressive and indignant way with no effect. The court ruled that it is within the implied license for the police to come talk to the homeowner and no Fourth Amendment violation occurs. SCOTUS ruled that homeowners implicitly consent to people coming to knock on the door and talk to them. If you fail to recognize that under our Constitution the Supreme Court of the United States is the final arbiter of the law and is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution….then that is your personal problem. Law enforcement can legitimately approach your residence without a warrant in order to conduct a warrantless knock-and-talk encounter. This not an intrusion subject to constitutional protections. BTW – The TFTP article you posted is yet another of many biased trash pieces.
Shoot first, make up Fake News later. Do the words "cheap shit" now define you. You might notice that *I* am a Trump supporter,you freaking dummy! But seeing as how your hatred of Trump knows no boundaries,how about name the clown you voted for instead of Trump? Or are you ashamed to mention his or her name,or maybe have a restraining order against you that keeps you from mentioning them?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Nice little tap dance you are doing to try to provide cover for the two cops that invaded that mans property for no known reason,and then killed his dog before leaving.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
HorseHillary! The cops ONLY have that "implied license" if they have reason to believe a crime has been committed or is being committed on the property,or if there is cause to believe someone there is in distress. Which those two obviously did not have because they just killed the dog and left. As for the No Trespassing signs,the SC had their heads up their asses on that one,and I fully expect them to be forced to reverse it on appeal. Cops have NO universal/under any conditions to enter a property that is posted with No Trespassing signs. If there is no emergency and they need to contact you,they can send you a letter,call you on the phone,or wait until you leave the house and yard,and approach you on the street.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Get over yourself already you self-aggrandizing clown. Your penchant for worshiping all things government is not what any sane person would call "enlightened".
Nice little tap dance you are doing to try to provide cover for the two cops that invaded that mans property for no known reason,and then killed his dog before leaving. I am no common tap dancer. If there is a necessary analogy comparison to dancing to be made, then I am a sophisticated ballroom dancer along the style of Fred Astaire. However I need no dance analogy to continue pointing out to you that while the reason for the officers visit the Dos Palos resident George Aguaristi home will be revealed, that point is irrelevant since the officers had the lawful right to approach the door for a “knock-and-talk” visit. Also, there are many court cases to show the officers violated no law when they shot the PITBULL they felt was threatening them. Ergo, there was definitely NO property invasion and shooting the PITBULL was a decision the threatened officer made lawfully. While you may continue to disagree with the SCOTUS decision, you still need to learn and understand the current state of the law is that police can legally come onto your property and go to your door without a warrant.
They never even knocked on the door you idiotic ass! They killed his dog then ran away like the cowards that they are.
Yeah sure - It's called the "I feared for my life defense" boot-licker, the one that cops always use after killing non-threatening dogs or unarmed humans. The magic words that exonerate any cop from facing repercussions for his criminal actions. The dog posed no threat until the cops provoked it with pepper spray. See, that's how these sadists operate - provoke the dog - then claim that they feared for their lives.
HorseHillary! The cops ONLY have that "implied license" if they have reason to believe a crime has been committed or is being committed on the property,or if there is cause to believe someone there is in distress. Which those two obviously did not have …
Nicely performed op all in all. The officer can then be seen pulling a firearm and shooting/killing the dog [and preserving their own persons from bodily harm]. Hmmm... There's a presumption that pepper spray was used on the "agitated" the pitbull (as though they aren't naturally "agitated" in any case.) It appears "Samson" the Antifa-Dog was the aggressor here, threatening the LEOs. He was possibly guarding a drug operation or human traffickers. 'Free Thought Project' is a PsyOp. They are obsessed with Ghetto/Antifa criminal fortresses and their denizens -- including pitbulls -- BUT ignoring the Democrats assaults on conservatives and their daily incitement of a CIVIL WAR. Nice priorities.
Police officers’ time is too valuable an asset to waste. Your spurious remark is therefore illegitimate and made by you without having nay true genuine qualities. It is a continuation of the thought process your warped irrational mins indulges in.
if he was wanted in connection with criminal activity, why the hell wouldn't they knock at the door. Why didn't they just get a SWAT team and break it down? You bootlickers drool at the thought of SWAT raids. They had no reason to be there in the first place.
Yeah sure - It's called the "I feared for my life defense" boot-licker, the one that cops always use after killing non-threatening dogs or unarmed humans. It is easy to understand that you continue the willful and selective blindness….a true hallmark of all libertarian. It’s the only way the short memory span of you libertarians can continue to hold onto your ridiculously failed and ludicrous ideology in the face of true reality. Mere conjecture and pure speculation is not good….NOT GOOD. I do see more of you expounding pure libertarian bullshit, and you continue to expose that you are just another petulant cop-hating anarchist divorced from reality with a case of arrested development. You are utterly clueless about the real world because you can’t perceive anything outside your only little self-absorbed bubble of hate.
While you may continue to disagree with the SCOTUS decision, you still need to learn and understand the current state of the law is that police can legally come onto your property and go to your door without a warrant. ---- gatlin These laws on police entering your property or home without a warrant are always being tested and continually evolving. Exceptions other than those I have listed here might apply to the no warrant requirement as well. Therefore if you ever have a question on Warrantless Searches, then you should not hesitate to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney with in depth knowledge of Constitutional law and emerging issues.----- Gatlin Indeed, laws on police entering your property or home without a warrant are always being tested and continually evolving, and with another solid conservative on the scotus, appointed by Trump, we can expect to see these warrantless infringements overturned.. Gatlin will weep..
HA!! Did Herr Gilligan really write this?? He's sounding an awful lot like...the official business end of such pointed questions and issues, isn't he?
I believe in equal justice under law…a societal ideal that has influenced the American legal system.
They had no reason to be there in the first place. Likely because the perp and LE had a history whereby the perp disrespected and dared LE. Daring LE to push the envelope is a bad bet -- even IF you're in the right. The Short Answer? Neither these kinds of outlaw perps or LE play by "The Rules". (Didn't you ever watch the excellent Tee-Bee Show, 'The Shield'?)
There is a distinctly huge difference between expectation and hope. Expectation is seen as demanding an event to exactly happen as one wants it to happen….regardless how the event is actually happening. An expectation is something that is normally inflexible and rigid….completely unable to give or change. An expectation can easily influence behavior and attitude and affect how you see the world….then how you respond to it. On the other hand, hope is much different. While an expectation is the assumption that some event is actually going to happen….hope is the wish for something to happen. Hope is not rigidly implanted as is expectation because hope is completely flexible and alive to respond to events. Hope embraces reality and gives reason to change over time. Expectation is always so intensely rigid and it is responds to negatively and even become angry…then make an attempt to control to try to force the expectation. However, when something does not live up to our hope, it is easy to keep hoping because hope is ever flexible. One can easily adjust a hope based on a learned experience. There is no such thing as a false hope while expectations can easily be unrealized. Ergo, maybe you should be filled with hope and not expectation. Just saying …
I watch the video. The dog did attack the "Officer"(look more like detectives not uniformed officers). Looks as if the second officer almost was attacked by the other dog from the backside but the discharge scared the dog away. I can not tell if that was front of back door. If it was front then you must allow people access to your house for communications. I found this property on google and its a hodge podge house in the middle of no where. There was no getting out of the yard without officers getting bitup, dog dying or both.
name the clown you voted for instead of Trump? Big whoopie doo! Go hug your Trumpy Bear. If the police blew you and your pets to smithereens for no particular reason, Trump would praise them. I voted for Darrell Castle, and he's not a clown. Neither Trump nor Hillary are worthy of a vote.
Darell Castle - ***Snicker*** From: THE LIBERTARIAN REPUBLIC. Top 10 Reasons Not to Vote for Constitution Party Candidate Darrell Castle. Darrell Castle is Not a Serious or Legitimate Choice for President - by Josh Guckert Some libertarians, upset with the nomination of Gary Johnson, as well as the choices of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, have begun pondering the possibility of voting for Constitution Party candidate Darrell Castle. He is scheduled to be on enough ballots (when including write-in eligible states) to theoretically win the election. However, deeper inspection into his record indicates a very frightening candidacy. While he is good on many issues which libertarians hold dear, on others, he and his party are as bad or worse than the Republicans and Democrats. These are the top ten reasons not to vote for the Constitution Party and Darrell Castle. Click here to read the 10 reason not to vote for Constitution Party Candidate Darrell Castle.
Do you think Donald Trump is too lenient on immigration? Perhaps in that case, Castle might be the answer. Yes, a President Darrell Castle would have deported millions of Donald's Dream Students already, and be raiding Gatlin's gated community for more, right now!
The dictionary states the word “perhaps” is “used when one does not wish to be too definite or assertive in the expression of an opinion.” Your use of the word firmly speaks to the fact that you lack trust in the man to do anything about immigration. Pathetic and sad....very SAD.
There’s only a few normal posters here. When one stops posting... of course they’re missed. lol
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Rather subjective term. Am sure not everyone would agree who all belongs in that group, LOL !!!
Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt "If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers) AMERICA! Designed by geniuses. Now run by idiots.
Because they ran away like scared little girls after killing the dog. Ah, but YES they do. I thoroughly covered the specific conditions in my Post #77. You get wood at thinking of licking jack boots,and this interferes with your ability to reason.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
There is literally no excuse you won't make to kiss cop ass,is there?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
No,it's called a "police state" because DA are VERY reluctant to charge the cops they work with to build their conviction rates with a crime. Furthermore,judges are reluctant to deal with a cop conviction,so they find reasons to dismiss the charges. It IS a fixed system that protects itself.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
He doesn't even rise to that level.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
There is no limit to your stubborn ignorance, is there?
It is merely a derogatory conjecture by you to support your agenda.
I find no satisfaction is doing that so I will leave you with the knowledge that a SCOTUS ruling permitted the officers to have lawful access to the front door of that residence and case law justified the shooting of the PITBULL that can be seen in the video threatening the officers. There was definitely no trespass and it was absolutely a good shoot on the PITBULL kill. If you are pissed off about all of that….then learn to LIVE WITH IT….for there is nothing else you can do.
You have no evidence to show that is true. You mean other than them running away?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Yes,there is. I can and will continue to live my life according to MY standards and beliefs.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
And there are people that are shocked that trust & respect for law enforcement is at an all time low ! Story's like this, those of shooting unarmed people, and the recent revelations of the corruption of FBI & DOJ, plus corruption of " elites " fuels that lack of respect & shrinking trust. I am surprised at the number that find that lack of trust & respect shocking !!
Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt "If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers) AMERICA! Designed by geniuses. Now run by idiots.
If (law enforcement) wants to come on my property and be able to leave under (their) own power,bring a search warrant.
#78. To: GrandIsland, Gatslime (#66)
Don’t ignore me Gatlin... say hello.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.
#79. To: Gatlin (#68)
...enlightened and intelligent posters...
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.
#80. To: Deckard (#78)
Overcoming your intense jealousy is similar to changing any emotional reaction or behavior. You can begin to do so with awareness. Awareness allows you to see that the projected stories in your mind are fabricated. When you have established this clarity then you no longer react to the scenarios that your mind conjures up.
#81. To: Deckard (#79)
While you have consistently demonstrated that you are not, it is evident by my postings that I am a profoundly enlightened and intelligent person to such a high degree whereby I am able to thoroughly comprehend that in the Florida v. Jardines (2013) decision, SCOTUS held that the front porch of your residence is indeed a Fourth Amendment protected area.
#82. To: hondo68 (#72)
(Edited)
Fire Island, Gatlin, Noyo Chimp
#83. To: Gatlin (#77)
Stop with the bravado bullshit and learn to understand the current state of the law regarding when police can legally come on your property or enter your home without a warrant.
#84. To: Gatlin (#81)
The court ruled that it is within the implied license for the police to come talk to the homeowner and no Fourth Amendment violation occurs.
#85. To: Gatlin (#81)
I am a profoundly enlightened and intelligent person...
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.
#86. To: sneakypete (#83)
Stop with the bravado bullshit and learn to understand the current state of the law regarding when police can legally come on your property or enter your home without a warrant.
#87. To: Gatlin (#86)
the officers had the lawful right to approach the door for a “knock-and-talk” visit.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.
#88. To: Gatlin (#86)
Also, there are many court cases to show the officers violated no law when they shot the PITBULL they felt was threatening them.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.
#89. To: sneakypete (#84)
The court ruled that it is within the implied license for the police to come talk to the homeowner and no Fourth Amendment violation occurs.
How do you know the police officers did not have “have reason to believe a crime has been committed or is being committed on the property or if there is cause to believe someone there is in distress?” You don’t and therefore your comment specific to his incident is immaterial and not relevant. Your comment is truly PURE “HorseHillary.” As for the No Trespassing signs,the SC had their heads up their asses on that one,and I fully expect them to be forced to reverse it on appeal.
You are of course entitled to your personal opinion and your belief that the ruling may may be reversed. But until the time that may occur…. the decision eemains the Law of the Land and there is absolutely nothing you can do about that. Cops have NO universal/under any conditions to enter a property that is posted with No Trespassing signs.
Ah, but YES they do. I thoroughly covered the specific conditions in my Post #77.
#90. To: GrandIsland, Tooconservative (#0)
(Edited)
...The officer appears to use pepper spray — which only serves to agitate Samson — who begins to move toward the officer.
#91. To: Deckard (#87)
They never even knocked on the door …
If shooting the dog at the front door did not cause George Aguaristi to come to the front door and open it, then what makes you think that knocking on the door would not have been a waste of time? They killed his dog then ran away like the cowards that they are.
They killed the dog but you have no evidence that the officers “ran away like cowards.”
#92. To: Gatlin (#91)
If shooting the dog at the front door did not cause George Aguaristi to come to the front door and open it, then what makes you think that knocking on the door would not have been a waste of time?
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.
#93. To: Deckard (#88)
Also, there are many court cases to show the officers violated no law when they shot the PITBULL they felt was threatening them.
No its called American Jurisprudence where a jury of peers decide each case on its facts. The dog posed no threat until the cops provoked it with pepper spray.
You do NOT know that the PITBULL posed no threat or that it was provoked by the pepper spray. See, that's how these sadists operate - provoke the dog - then claim that they feared for their lives.
No I don’t see any of that.
#94. To: Gatlin, Y'ALL, --- on the wrong side of a constitutional fence once again... (#86)
#95. To: tpaine, Gilligan (#94)
Therefore if you ever have a question on Warrantless Searches, then you should not hesitate to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney with in depth knowledge of Constitutional law and emerging issues.----- Gatlin
#96. To: Deckard (#92)
if he was wanted in connection with criminal activity …
There is absolutely no reason at this point to believe that he was “wanted in connection with criminal activity.” There is no way of knowing it was not a “civil matter” and that the officers only wanted to “knock-and-talk” to him about….is there? … why the hell wouldn't they knock at the door.
Uh….the PITUBLL blocked their path to the door. Why didn't they just get a SWAT team and break it down?
They obviously felt this was not an exceptional situations that required intense firepower or specialized tactics. You bootlickers drool at the thought of SWAT raids.
Nah … They had no reason to be there in the first place.
PROVE that !!!
#97. To: Deckard, sneakypete, GrandIsland (#92)
Why didn't they just get a SWAT team and break it [the door] down?
#98. To: tpaine (#94)
Indeed, laws on police entering your property or home without a warrant are always being tested and continually evolving, and with another solid conservative on the scotus, appointed by Trump, we can expect to see these warrantless infringements overturned..
Expect….EXPECT?
#99. To: all (#0)
#100. To: sneakypete, FOP (#82)
*I* am a Trump supporter
#101. To: hondo68, sneakypete (#100)
I voted for Darrell Castle, and he's not a clown.
#102. To: Gatlin, Amnesty Don, DACA, Reconquista Republicans, Taters gated sanctuary, *Border Invasion* (#101)
Click here to read the 10 reason not to vote for Constitution Party Candidate Darrell Castle.
1. Immigration 
#103. To: hondo68 (#102)
Perhaps in that case, Castle might be the answer.
I don’t deal with anything pertaining to a “perhaps” since the word is only “used to express uncertainty or a vague possibility.”
#104. To: Deckard (#78)
Looks as if you really missed
#105. To: GrandIsland (#104)
" There’s only a few normal posters here. "
#106. To: Gatlin (#89)
How do you know the police officers did not have “have reason to believe a crime has been committed or is being committed on the property or if there is cause to believe someone there is in distress?”
#107. To: Gatlin (#91)
If shooting the dog at the front door did not cause George Aguaristi to come to the front door and open it, then what makes you think that knocking on the door would not have been a waste of time?
#108. To: Gatlin (#93)
No its called American Jurisprudence where a jury of peers decide each case on its facts.
#109. To: hondo68 (#100)
I voted for Darrell Castle, and he's not a clown.
#110. To: sneakypete (#107)
#111. To: sneakypete (#106)
Because they ran away like scared little girls after killing the dog.
You have no evidence to show that is true.
#112. To: sneakypete (#106)
You get wood at thinking of licking jack boots,and this interferes with your ability to reason.
Nah, I get great satisfaction for showing that you are a cop-hating biased idiot.
#113. To: sneakypete (#112)
It is obvious this discussion has run its course and all we are doing now is resorting to exchanging personal insults.
#114. To: Gatlin (#111)
Because they ran away like scared little girls after killing the dog.
#115. To: Gatlin (#113)
If you are pissed off about all of that….then learn to LIVE WITH IT….for there is nothing else you can do.
#116. To: sneakypete (#108)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]