[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: If We Want Your Money, We’ll Take Your Money… We live in a Deliverance nation. If the government wants your money, theyll take your money simple as that. Rustem Kazazi, 64, was recently relieved of his life savings $58,100 by the US Customs and Border Protection service. The money was found in his possession and that was enough to take it from him, without so much as a traffic violation alleged. Kazazi was traveling by air to his native Albania and stupidly, but not illegally brought the cash with him to the airport, intending to use it to buy a retirement home on the Adriatic coast. He packed the money in neat bundles, put it in his carry-on luggage. During his screening by the Heimat Sicherheitsdeinst Homeland Security, rendered in the appropriate German the money was found and that was all it took to take it. No charges were filed against Kazazi and hes never been convicted of anything. But his moneys gone. Under the asset forfeiture laws recently defended by the chief law enforcer of the country, Attorney General Jeff Sessions it is not only acceptable but meritorious to simply take peoples life savings without any legal process whatsoever beyond the mere grabbing of the money by law enforcers, that is. Possession of cash any amount, there is no defined amount below which it is deemed not-illicit and beyond which it is deemed illicit provides all the warrant necessary to simply take the money. Could be $58,100 or $5,800 or $580 or $58. It doesnt matter. You have money. They want your money. Now get up against that tree. Kazazi is attempting to recover his funds via a lawsuit, with help from the Institute for Justice. But the vile fact is this is not some backwoods aberration. It is the policy of the government generally; it is defended by the highest law enforcement authority in the country and by the president himself. That horrible little man Sessions has gloated openly about the delights of taking money from people without having to deal with the inconvenience of charging and then convicting them of a criminal act first. He and other defenders of asset forfeiture regard the mere possession of cash as ipso facto proof that those possessing it are drug dealers. He is not only unconcerned about due process about establishing via proof, in court, that a person committed a crime he is contemptuous of it. And by dint of that, Sessions has established himself as no better than the crazed hillbilly in the 1972 movie. If we want your money, well take your money. Worse, actually. Because it is not some isolated horror, deep in the backwoods. The hillbilly in the movie didnt have a badge to go with his gun and Ned Beattys character could have defended himself, physically. Legally. It is illegal to defend oneself against the likes of the Heimat Sicherheitsdeinst, the U.S. Customs service and, of course, Attorney General Sessions. We must simply bend over the log and accept whats coming. If theres an upside, it is that Kazazis case is receiving national coverage. Peoples eyes may begin to open. Reading about Kazazis ordeal, learning that his ordeal is common, that it is legal; that a similar thing could just as easily happen to any of them perhaps after getting pulled over for some minor traffic offense on their way to the bank with the days receipts from their business, or with an envelope of cash with which theyd intended to buy a used car theyd found listed in the classified. It may rouse them from their torpor, get them to thinking about something other than fuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhtttttttball for a change. About the horrific fact that the government now asserts the authority to seize money at will, in any amount, just the same as any street thug. It may occur to them that the government has become thuggery codified. Made official, legal. Which will serve the very good purpose of delegitimizing the government, causing it to be held rightly in contempt by the people. If ever there were justification for resistance, this is it. Are we to accept being robbed literally just because the robbers wear government-issued outfits? If the government can simply take our money at will, what else can it do? What have we been reduced to? It is embarrassing. In the movie, Ned Beattys character the one who gets raped by the crazed hillbilly is as despicable as the hillbilly because he cooperates in his own defilement. He drops them panties and then as ordered squeals like a pig. I wonder how long Americans will continue to squeal. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
OK... so after running afoul of regulations intended to inhibit international money laundering, Kazai will probably get his money back through the justice system... I got no problem with that... But I only arrived at that conclusion after reading about the situation in a more mainstream article.... without all the anti-goobermint libertarian gobbledegook. That crap almost had me dismissing him as just another money laundering tax dodger,,,, So at least now a judge or jury might give him a fair shake...
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|