International News
See other International News Articles
Title: At the royal wedding, why was the heretic allowed to give the homily?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 21, 2018
Author: Barry Midyet
Post Date: 2018-05-21 12:24:50 by interpreter
Keywords: royal wedding
Views: 1464
Comments: 12
Why was the biggest heretic in the history of heretics allowed to preach the homily at the royal wedding? Yes, I'm talking about the black guy but it has nothing to do with his color. He is the presiding bishop of the US branch of the Anglican Church that the Archbishop of Canterbury has repeatedly threatened to excommunicate if he does not repent and quit ordaining openly sinning queers as priests, and quit allowing them to perform same-sex marriages. And I am one of many in my Church who are trying our best to get him removed from his position as head honcho. He has driven almost half of our members out of the Church, and I'm fixin to be one of them if he doesn't change his heretical teachings. Now this is just speculation, but judging by the fact that the bride (Meghan) was the only one in the whole place who was smiling, I strongly suspect that she had something to do with it. Does anyone know how the heretic even got invited, much less was given permission to spout his lies from the pulpit? And nothing he said was from the Bible. Instead of quoting the Bible he quoted Martin Luther King. Now let me make it clear. I have nothing against MLK, and nothin aainst queers who want to get married by a justice of the Peace, or maybe in someone else's Church, but not in my Church. Barry Midyet
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: interpreter (#0)
It's already over. Your side lost.
"Let's go to the Winchester, have a nice cold pint, and wait for this all to blow over."
Yep. That was true of the slavers - and my side won. That was true of the segregationists - and my side won. It was true of the anti-Catholic bigots of the turn of the last century who tried to shut out Catholic immigration and shut down Catholic schooling - and my side won. It was true of those who wanted to stop interracial marriage - and my side won. It was true of those who opposed universal public schooling - and my side won. It was true of those who opposed women voting - and my side won. It was true of those who wanted to keep the draft going - and my side won. It was true of those who imposed Prohibition - and my side won. It was true of those who opposed progressive taxation - and my side won. It was true of those who outlawed private gay sex - and my side won. It is true of those who do not consider gay couples to be "married" - and my side lost. It is true of those who believe life begins at conception - and my side is still losing, and appears destined to lose, so this will forever be a major evil blemish on my civilization.
She may even think she had something to do with it,but the Royal Family is more of a international multi-Billion Dollar corporation than it is a family,and a LOT of the Commonwealth nations and other nations they do business with is populated by black people. Having someone who is almost white but identifies as black in the Royal Family is a VERY good PR move on their part. And make no mistake about it,the bride only offered suggestions or gave approval where it wasn't needed. It was the Queen Mother and her Councillors who made the final decisions. Or at least those were MY initial thoughts,along with "Whoever decided to hire that pack of hyenas to destroy that classic R&B song by Ben E King,needed to be dragged outside and severely beaten before being hanged and shot. How anyone could even pretend that out of time caterwauling was anything less than criminal is beyond me. I am guessing the musical director must have lost a bet,or was being blackmailed. And "No,I did NOT watch the wedding". I saw and heard that crime against music on the tv news feeds.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
You're in Henry VIII's bullshit "church"?
Well, yeah. Momos seem to be nice, straight-living people, but they do believe some odd junk.
Dont know why everyone seems to think Henry VIII founded our Church. Long longbefore he made the final break with Rome, the Anglican Church, for most of its 2000 year history, was independent from Rome, and made its own rules, and divorce laws, etcetera. In fact, our Church was founded in 47 AD, long before the Roman Church came into existence (despite the Popes' ridiculous claims that they were the first Church. The Antioch and Alexandrian Churches are also way older than Rome's Church. The only time we were subject to Rome was when the Pope sent someone to conquer England, which did not happen until 1000 AD when he sent the Mormon Kings. Later on, the Pope helped install Bloody Mary, who slaughtered the hundreds of bishops and priests who refused to submit to Rome. And we still say the Eucharist/ liturgy exactly as St. Peter taught the Church(es) to say it, unlike Rome. For example, we still say "the ever- blessed virgin Mary" when talking about the mother of Jesus, whereas Rome has changed it to "the blessed ever-virgin Mary" which is of course a lie because the Bible says otherwise, and it leads to Mary-worship. In other words, unlike Rome, we have always worshiped Jesus, and not Mary except when we were forced to at the point of a sword. Ireland is only part of the British Isles that has traditionally been loyal to the Pope. And of course, that has been the cause of many wars over the centuries (unfortunately).
Great cartoon, and it fits many other sects besides the Mormons.
Well, of course the Queen had the final sayso about pretty much everything, and had to have also given the OK to invite the heretic. But my point is, the archbishop of Canterbury definitely did not OK it. If he has not excommunicated the heretic already, he has definitely started the process. Those two do not like each other at all, and neither does any other Anglican bishop, and especially the African ones who are main ones behind the establishment of the AMIA Churches in the US (the Anglican Mission in America). The AMIA churches are steadily gaining members, whereas the Episcopal churches are steadily loosing members. The only reason I am still in the Episcopal Church is because there are no AMIA churches close by. (Yet, but I'm working to change that, the Lord willing).
Sorry i clicked on the wrong button. The previous post is actually meant for sneakypete
Dont think so. Millions of Anglicans, including myself, are working hard to get rid of him. The handwriting is already on the wall as the saying goes.
#2. To: interpreter (#0)
"royal wedding"
#3. To: Tooconservative (#1)
It's already over. Your side lost.
#4. To: interpreter (#0)
(Edited)
Now this is just speculation, but judging by the fact that the bride (Meghan) was the only one in the whole place who was smiling, I strongly suspect that she had something to do with it.
#5. To: interpreter (#0)
And I am one of many in my Church who are trying our best to get him removed from his position as head honcho.
Could be worse, I suppose. Could be Mooslum or Scientologist. Either of those would be REALLY moronic.
#6. To: Hank Rearden (#5)
Either of those would be REALLY moronic.
Chapter 3: The Angel Moroni and the Gold Plates (1823–1827).
https://www.lds.org/media-library/video/2010-06-04-chapter-3-the- angel-moroni-and-the-gold-plates-1823-1827?lang=eng
#7. To: VxH (#6)
(Edited)
"Watch this, Rocky, while I pull a religion out of my hat!"
#8. To: Hank Rearden (#5)
(Edited)
You're in Henry VIII's bullshit "church"? Could be worse, I suppose. Could be Mooslum or Scientologist. Either of those would be REALLY moronic.
#9. To: Hank Rearden (#7)
#10. To: Hank Rearden (#5)
#11. To: All (#10)
#12. To: Tooconservative (#1)
It's already over. Your side lost.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]