[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Establishments war on Donald Trump Title: Here's How Much The Federal Government Paid Alleged Trump Campaign 'Spy' In 2016 More details have begun to emerge about the Cambridge professor who allegedly acted as an FBI informant on the Trump campaign, including how much money the federal government paid him in 2016, when he was allegedly attempting to draw out information from campaign advisers about "collusion" with Russia. According to public records, Stefan Halper, a 73-year-old American-born professor at Cambridge University with ties to both American and British intelligence stretching back decades, received $282,000 and $129,000 in 2016 and 2017, respectively, from the Department of Defenses Office of Net Assessment, the internal think tank that reports directly to the secretary of defense (then Ash Carter). As the New York Post notes, it is unclear how much of the money if any from the Office of Net Assessment was directed to Halper for his alleged role as an informant on the Trump campaign. Halper was identified by multiple outlets after reports published Friday by the Washington Post and New York Times provided enough details about the Trump campaign "spy" for other outlets to connect the dots. Both reports described an American-born British academic who met with Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, two Trump campaign advisers who have since been ensnared in the federal Russia probe. In response to the allegations, President Trump announced Sunday that he is calling on the Department of Justice to investigate "whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purpose" and to find out who in the Obama administration may have played a role in the alleged operation. "I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!" he tweeted Sunday. On Sunday, the DOJ responded to Trump's demand by saying they were going to "expand" their ongoing FISA application review to include "whether there was any impropriety or political motivation in how the FBI conducted its counterintelligence investigation of persons suspected of involvement with the Russian agents who interfered in the 2016 presidential election." "The Department has asked the Inspector General to expand the ongoing review of the FISA application process to include determining whether there was any impropriety or political motivation in how the FBI conducted its counterintelligence investigation of persons suspected of involvement with the Russian agents who interfered in the 2016 presidential election," DOJ spokesperson Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement Sunday. "As always, the IG will consult with the appropriate U.S. Attorney if there is any evidence of potential criminal conduct." Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein also responded to Trump's call for an investigation, saying in a statement, "If anyone did infiltrate or surveil participants in a presidential campaign for inappropriate purposes, we need to know about it and take appropriate action." Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#2. To: Tooconservative (#0)
Biased and misleading headline..... objective journalism 101 Headline: Here's How The Much Department of Defenses Office of Net Assessment Paid national security asset In 2016. You see, Russia is not our friend. Russia has been actively working to weaken our government for years, perhaps decades. To benefit themselves. They finally found the easiest entry into hacking our elections....an idiot white nationalist candidate who's only interest is himself.... So the Russians did everything they could to make sure dumb-ass donnie was elected..... Our defense department was aware of this and wanted to find out who, if anyone was actually selling out.... Based on dip-shit donnie's response.....I think we know the answer....
Your Party Pod Person didn't win. Deal with it.
There are no replies to Comment # 8. End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||||
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|