[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Actor James Woods bashes Twitter after getting locked out

Handling an AGW (Armed Government Worker)

MICHAEL MOORE’S ANTI-TRUMP FILM BOMBS AT THE BOX OFFICE. THE NUMBERS ARE HORRIFIC

IDEN GAVE A LENGTHY ENDORSEMENT OF KAVANAUGH ACCUSER UNTIL ONE QUESTION CAUSED HIM TO WALK AWAY

Kavanaugh will use 1982 calendar to deny sex assault claims

Christine Blasey Ford’s Classmate (Quickly) Changes Her Tune

Criminal Charges for North Carolina Woman Who Sheltered Pets During Hurricane Florence

enate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years

Russian MoD Presents IL-20 Investigation Results - Israel "Crossed The Line Of Civilized Relations"

We need to talk frankly about our rapid population growth in Africa if we want to beat poverty

Beto O’Rourke: “I Did Not Try To Leave The Scene Of The Accident”

LMFAO 🤣WHEN TRUMPS SPEAKS WE ALL LISTEN ... THIS JIVE A$$ TALKING TURKEY SHADY FOOL IS NOW A HAS BEEN FROM HOPE - CHANGE --- TO NOPE - DERANGED!

BREAKING: Christine Blasey Ford's Female Witness Doesn't Remember Anything

Ron Paul Tells Truth On Syria - Immediately Smeared

Ron Paul Tells Truth On Syria - Immediately Smeared

Ron Paul Tells Truth On Syria - Immediately Smeared

Medea Benjamin Shows America What Real Resistance Looks Like (consistently non-interventionist)

Former Trump Aide Jason Miller Accused of Secretly Administering Abortion Pill

Alex Jones “I’m Ready to Die” - Exclusive Interview After Being Banned

The White House is considering an antitrust investigation into 'online platform bias' at Google and Facebook — read the leaked document here

PayPal Cuts Off Alex Jones’s Infowars

Rosenstein suggested he secretly record Trump and discussed 25th amendment

Chelsea Clinton’s Abortion Claim Sounds Like Something Hitler Might’ve Said

Why Are We in Media Hell?

Trump's "Opposition" Supports All His Evil Agendas While Attacking Fake Nonsense

What Democrats Have Become; Brett Kavanaugh is a casualty of an anything-goes political resistance.

BREAKING: FORMER SCALIA LAW CLERK Drops Pictures and Evidence That Blows Christine Ford’s Case Wide Open

President Trump to North Carolina resident: 'At least you got a nice boat out of the deal'

Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War

Former Admitted Groper Cory Booker Says, ‘It Would Be Irresponsible Not To’ Consider 2020 Presidential Run

Laugh of the Day

Three Cheers for Price Gouging During Hurricane Florence

FEMA: Trump administration will send ‘presidential alerts’ to cellphones across America

Young Christine Blasey Ford remembered as popular figure in Dewey Beach bar scene in 1980's

Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford's team lays out terms it wants for potential Senate interview, sources say

Are Social Media Companies Banning Because Of What Happens In "Real World"? (Face to Face, not online)

COURT DOCUMENTS: Sherrod Brown’s Ex-Wife Accused Him of Assaulting Her

Trump advised Spain to build wall across Sahara to stop migrants

Republicans may 'compel' testimony from Fusion GPS researcher Nellie Ohr, ex-FBI official James Baker

Pope Francis says the devil is causing people to question the Catholic Church

'Family Values' Senator(R) Sentenced to 15 Years for Child Sex Trafficking and Child Porn

Beto O’Rourke to Black American: Illegal Immigrant Labor Needed for Cotton Gin

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Classmate Backs Off Claim She Heard About Alleged Assault

Grassley Ltr to Feinstein Re UNREDACTED Ltr of Christine Blasey Ford (19 Sep 2018)

Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Warner Write Letter to Rosenstein, Wray Demanding They Withstand Pressure to Violate DOJ and FBI Norms

Huh. Democrats really don’t want those Carter Page FISA docs released

BOMBSHELL: Comey’s FBI said to have kept TWO sets of records regarding ‘Spygate’ operation

FBI, Justice Dept plan to redact Russia documents despite Trump order for full declassification: report

Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan Encourages Deep State to Defy President Trump’s Declassification Order

The SOBs got to Norm Macdonald


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Poles Blasting EU for Gay Flag
Source: Church Militant
URL Source: https://www.churchmilitant.com/news ... poles-blasting-eu-for-gay-flag
Published: May 19, 2018
Author: Alexander Slavsky
Post Date: 2018-05-19 10:25:11 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 1587
Comments: 151

Claims that display normalizes homosexuality

BRUSSELS (ChurchMilitant.com) - Brussels is getting backlash from Poland for flying a gay flag outside of the European Parliament.

On Thursday, a rainbow flag was hoisted up in front of the building for the first time in its history, marking "International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia."

Despite outcry from Polish conservatives, the European Union said, "Regrettably, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) persons in Europe are still subject to serious discrimination and maltreatment on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity."

Ryszard Legutko, co-chairman of the European Conservatives and Reformists group, said in a letter to the European Parliament that Thursday's initiative displayed "just one lobby group."

He questioned why the Parliament would not promote other unofficial "international days" like those celebrating museums, beer or students.

Since 1990, May 17 has been remembered as the anniversary of the removal of homosexuality from the International Classification of Diseases of the World Health Organization.

But Legutko blasted the display of a rainbow flag, saying it endorses a "moral revolution" that privileges same-sex couples. There are "practically no ... attacks" on those with same-sex attraction, Legutko emphasized.

There are 'practically no ... attacks' on those with same-sex attraction.

This didn't stop the European Commission and European External Action Service, also in Brussels, from illuminating its headquarters with the colors of the gay flag.

Frans Timmermans, vice president of the European Commission, said, "It's time we put an end to the widespread discrimination against LGBTI people together."

However, Legutko instead recommended hoisting a flag with a fish — a symbol of Christianity — to symbolize the millions of Christians suffering persecution worldwide.


Poster Comment:

Many of us are sick and tired of politicians kissing the asses of queers! Resurrect the law that outlaws homosexual acts and proselytizing today's thoroughly confused youth. The belong hidden under a rock.

Widespread LGBTQI discrimination? Where? When? By whom? If it happens there must have been major stories in the press. But nothing.

Instead what I see are Christians being slaughtered and persecuted by the thousands over the last 20 years and not a word from the atheistic marxists in Brussels, London, Berlin, Paris.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: IbJensen (#0)

It looks like a total non-event with 200 people attending, probably over half of them paid government workers at the EU Ministry of Sodomy.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-05-19   11:26:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: IbJensen (#0)

Looking again, I was too generous in my crowd estimate. It wasn't 200 people, it wasn't even 100. And some of them talked like American tourists.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-05-19   12:27:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: IbJensen (#0)

Resurrect the law that outlaws homosexual acts

Nah. Government has no business in people's private consensual sex lives. None.

I can see delegitimizing gay marriage, but for that to happen the Christian majority would need to actually vote the part. And they don't. And won't.

We should stop mollycoddling emotional sensitivities, but we should not go back to outlawing private sexual behavior.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-19   12:47:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

Yeah who cares if those Catholics molest little kids. It is private and consensual right?

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-05-19   13:12:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)

Nonsensical non-sequitur

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-19   14:13:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Vicomte13 (#5)

So you were wrong. There should be laws against perverted sex acts. Or are you sticking with your original concept in contradiction of scripture?

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-05-19   15:06:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: IbJensen (#0)

Since 1990, May 17 has been remembered as the anniversary of the removal of homosexuality from the International Classification of Diseases of the World Health Organization.

But Legutko blasted the display of a rainbow flag, saying it endorses a "moral revolution" that privileges same-sex couples.

Celebrating a day that will long live in psychological and psychiatric infamy and deterioration.

rlk  posted on  2018-05-19   15:23:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

We should not go back to outlawing private sexual behavior.

Bullshit! These sick freaks attempt to recruit youngsters to follow their path to their sickening methods of achieving sexual gratification....but then you know this!

Further, there is no 'Christian majority' anymore as those of us left abhor the placing of these sex freaks atop a pedestal to be more revered than heterosexuals.

And even further, all serial killers have been proven to be homosexual. They're afflicted with a serious mental disease. And lastly, any ingesting of fecal matter is proof that these shit-heels are not worthly of acceptance in a polite society.

Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.

IbJensen  posted on  2018-05-19   18:34:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#6)

I said private consensual sex lives. The age of consent is included within my comment. I’m not a bit wrong.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-19   18:54:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: IbJensen (#8)

So you maintain the age of consent. Doesn’t mean you outlaw adult activity.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-19   18:56:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Vicomte13 (#9)

You react with the same luke warmness that the Pope does when faggots are discovered in the Vatican in positions of influence. Your indifference to evil is your pc weakness.

Why are catholics so tolerant of faggots?

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-05-19   19:16:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Vicomte13 (#10)

So you maintain the age of consent. Doesn’t mean you outlaw adult activity.

By 'adult activity' do you mean where one male shoves his pe-pee up another's poo-poo? And furthermore, the faggots shove their mouths up that poo-poo hole and in doing so ingests fecal matter.

Their methods of 'love making' are injurious to their health. Why, God forbid, they might even die of a serious disease.

Better get a checkup.

Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.

IbJensen  posted on  2018-05-19   21:44:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: IbJensen (#0)

There is one thing to consider, they cannot reproduce by normal means, this makes them a dying breed

paraclete  posted on  2018-05-19   21:58:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: IbJensen (#12)

Yeah, all of the gross aspects of homosexual sodomy are what I mean by adult activity. It's legal between consenting adults, and ought to be legal. They're welcome to it.

I don't need to get a checkup with regards to those things. Do you?

Private sex between consenting adults is their business, and the law does not belong there.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-20   0:24:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: paraclete (#13)

There is one thing to consider, they cannot reproduce by normal means, this makes them a dying breed

Sarcasm?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   2:41:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: sneakypete (#15)

No, fact

paraclete  posted on  2018-05-20   3:10:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: paraclete (#16)

No, fact

In that case you are a fool. Homosexuals father or give birth to children every day,and have done so since the dawn of time.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   9:24:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: IbJensen (#0)

Now homos are getting their own flag?

They sure do like to dress up,don't they?

Who is their ambassador to the UN,Elton John,or Boy Jorge Bush?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   9:45:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: sneakypete, paraclete (#17)

Homosexuals father or give birth to children every day,and have done so since the dawn of time.

You would agree that they do it a lower rate, based on common sense?

Over the course of several generations such genes would be wiped out of the pool.

Ergo - homosexuality is acquired.

A Pole  posted on  2018-05-20   9:50:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: IbJensen (#0)

Resurrect the law that outlaws homosexual acts and proselytizing today's thoroughly confused youth.

Any other anti-personal freedom laws you want passed,comrade?

And if you seriously think "today's thoroughly confused youth" that are heterosexuals can actually be talked into becoming homosexuals,you are a bi-sexual that is already a member of that group.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   9:50:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Tooconservative (#1)

It looks like a total non-event with 200 people attending, probably over half of them paid government workers at the EU Ministry of Sodomy

Naw,I'm guessing 150 of them were reporters,2 or 3 were people who were lost and looking for directions,several were cops,and the rest were people employed by some pro-homo think tank.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   9:52:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#17)

In that case you are a fool. Homosexuals father or give birth to children every day,and have done so since the dawn of time.

Not so much any more unless they're rich and hire a surrogate mother.

The bigger thing now is two gay guys raising an adopted Chinese baby girl somewhere in the suburbs.

Hardly any gay guys bother to get married and pretend to be straight any more.

With gays absenting themselves from the gene pool more than they ever have, you have to wonder if we'll see a result from this. If gaiety tends to run in families (for whatever reason), there should be a lot fewer gays in 20-30 years as a result.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-05-20   9:56:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: A Pole (#19)

You would agree that they do it a lower rate, based on common sense?

Of course. First of all,there are FAR fewer true homosexuals than there are bi-sexuals and heterosexuals.

I am speaking of bi-sexual and heterosexual people as people who have those desires,regardless of if they are sexually active or not.

Over the course of several generations such genes would be wiped out of the pool.

Ain't no such thing in the known universe. We are ALL born with both female and male genes. Somehow or another the "correct balance" of genes, for what of a more scientific description, to create a completely heterosexual baby,gets out of whack,and a baby will be born with a genetic inclination to be sexually attracted to people of the same gender,or people of both genders.

These people have no more control over who they are sexually attracted to than you do,so why do you think it is permissible for government to punish them for what amounts to a genetic birth defect?

BTW,don't even THINK that you can deny that all of us are both with both male and female genetic codes until you can come up with an explanation of why males are born with nipples.

BTW-2,NONE of this means that you personally have to like any of it. It just means that government doesn't have the right to dictate private behavior to people just because we don't like or approve of what they might be doing in private.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   10:13:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: sneakypete (#23)

These people have no more control over who they are sexually attracted to than you do,so why do you think it is permissible for government to punish them for what amounts to a genetic birth defect?

I don't. Same way with adulterers (as they feel sexually attracted to other people's wives) , I do not want government to punish them.

A Pole  posted on  2018-05-20   10:22:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: A K A Stone (#4)

Yeah who cares if those Catholics molest little kids. It is private and consensual right?

You would have a point if you could show us where it is only illegal for homosexuals to molest children,and just peachy-keen for pedophiles to molest children of the opposite sex.

You can't,so you don't have an argument.

Pedophilia is about the sexual attraction to CHILDREN.not just homosexual attraction to children of the same gender as the offender.

I am far from being an authority on this issue,but it seems like I read years ago that MOST pedophiles have a gender preference,but will abduct and rape children of either gender because their sexual "kink" is for children,not children of a specific gender.

This kind of conduct just cannot be allowed. They either need to be permanently sealed away from contact with any and all children,or chemically castrated as well as given drugs to decrease their sexual desire by checking in at a clinic every day and given the drug under medical supervision. If they are not willing to sign up for that,they just need to be locked away,

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   10:23:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: A K A Stone (#6)

There should be laws against perverted sex acts.

Who gets to determine what is perverted,you?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   10:24:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: IbJensen (#8)

And even further, all serial killers have been proven to be homosexual.

Where did you pick up on that little factoid? Hear if from your cult leader during Sunday services at the compound?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   10:31:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: A K A Stone (#11)

Why are catholics so tolerant of faggots?

Because Catholic Priests are their "mainline to Gawd",and Catholic Priests are not allowed to marry or date women. Kinda sets the tone for a certain type of male to want to become a Priest,doesn't it?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   10:34:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: IbJensen (#12)

By 'adult activity' do you mean where one male shoves his pe-pee up another's poo-poo?

How old are you,9?

Does your mom know you are posting here?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   10:35:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Tooconservative (#22)

Not so much any more unless they're rich and hire a surrogate mother.

Only if you live in a yuppie community like Hollywood,NYC,Bridgeport,etc,etc,etc.

The majority of children born to homosexuals are born to married male and female parents,and are usually the result of at least one partner being bi-sexual,in the closet due to guilt feelings,and trying to "pass" as what we all laughingly call "normal".

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   11:06:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: A Pole (#24)

I don't. Same way with adulterers (as they feel sexually attracted to other people's wives) , I do not want government to punish them.

My apologies for misunderstanding you.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   11:07:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: sneakypete (#30)

The majority of children born to homosexuals are born to married male and female parents,and are usually the result of at least one partner being bi-sexual,in the closet due to guilt feelings,and trying to "pass" as what we all laughingly call "normal".

There is another possible reason as well. A few that I know personally, sorely miss having a normal family life. They feel alone, and are sad when they see other people children and grandchildren. They told me this more than one time.

And curiously, they are quite conservative and dislike all those "LGBT" activists.

A Pole  posted on  2018-05-20   11:16:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: sneakypete (#30)

The majority of children born to homosexuals are born to married male and female parents,and are usually the result of at least one partner being bi-sexual,in the closet due to guilt feelings,and trying to "pass" as what we all laughingly call "normal".

You're living in the past.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-05-20   11:18:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: IbJensen (#0)

Resurrect the law that outlaws homosexual acts and proselytizing today's thoroughly confused youth.

I'm all for it. There's nothing discriminatory or unconstitutional about regulating behavior. If we don't like it, why should we have to put up with it?

If liberals can ban prayer in schools -- a constitutional right protected by the first amendment -- we can certainly ban homosexual behavior.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-05-20   11:25:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: A Pole (#24)

These people have no more control over who they are sexually attracted to than you do,so why do you think it is permissible for government to punish them for what amounts to a genetic birth defect?

I don't.

You should. What about those born with "what amounts to a genetic birth defect" an attraction to young children? Animals? Dead bodies? They get a pass also because they were "born that way"?

There's a thing called "self- control". I don't care what you're attracted to. If society is against it, control yourself. We do not have to accept perversion.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-05-20   11:38:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: A K A Stone (#11)

You react with the same luke warmness that the Pope does when faggots are discovered in the Vatican in positions of influence. Your indifference to evil is your pc weakness.

Why are catholics so tolerant of faggots?

Because I believe in human liberty, and when it comes to victimless crimes, I believe that such things should be decriminalized so they are not crimes at all.

I do not want to pay police, prosecutors and prison guards, and empower them to intervene in people's bedrooms. I think people who are obsessed about the subject are themselves closeted perverts in some sense or others, sort of like cross-dressing Nancy-boy J. Edgar Hoover who loved to spy on people to get their sexual secrets, then blackmail them using it.

Because of that long-standing tradition of law enforcement and government to use evidence of criminalized private sex to control people, I want the power removed from government to do that. Monica Lewinsky and Stormy Daniels and that guy who Obama used to blow are not of concern to me, and I want to make sure the law stays with me, so that people who ARE concerned about these things are left without power to do anything about it.

I am not indifferent to evil: I think that extorting political concessions from people using the threat of revealing their sex lives is much, MUCH more evil than the actual sex acts.

You don't agree, obviously. The parameters of the law have been worked out in the public square, and the people agree with me a lot more than they agree with you, so you lose.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-20   15:49:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: misterwhite (#35)

If society is against it, control yourself. We do not have to accept perversion.

If. Truth is, society is more against police intrusion in the bedroom than it is against perversion, and we - the majority -are right about that. So we've stripped away the power of you, the minority, to enforce laws on private sexual behavior. You still hate it, but you've lost the law. We took it from you, and we're not giving it back.

You have to accept that perversion is legal, because it is, and we're not going to let you make it illegal again.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-20   15:51:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: misterwhite (#34)

I'm all for it. There's nothing discriminatory or unconstitutional about regulating behavior. If we don't like it, why should we have to put up with it?

You are a true democrat (little d): what "we", don't like, we don't put up with.

That's how we got to tolerating gays, legalizing marijuana, even ending the Vietnam War and racial segregation. We, the majority, finally got tired of putting up with things we didn't like, and we changed the law to suit us. It's why we have a progressive tax code instead of a flat tax or a national sales tax. It's why alcohol prohibition was thrown out.

It's why abortion was kept legal once the Supreme Court changed the law.

It's why the obscenity laws were swept away in all but name, and why sports betting will be sweeping across the USA soon.

It's why the 55 MPH speed limit didn't hold.

It's not hard to look at a couple of more things that we're beginning to like less and less: police brutality and school shootings.

On all of the various issues, the only one I can see that the people have gotten wrong has been abortion. So, I'm all for going the route you suggest: If WE don't like it, we outlaw it. WE is the people, the electorate.

We don't CARE about gay sex, and we don't LIKE laws that go into the bedroom. So now the former is legal, and the latter have been swept aside.

YOU don't like what the people like on a lot of vectors, which is why it's a mistake for you to take such a democratic line. Democracy works for me and the way I want to see things, it REALLY doesn't work for you. You're an authoritarian at heart. The people don't like what you like.

So yes, there's nothing discriminatory or unconstitutional about regulating behavior. if we don't like it, we should we have to put up with it? Let's put these things to a vote. Wait - we already have, in state after state. My side won.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-05-20   16:16:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Vicomte13 (#37)

So we've stripped away the power of you, the minority, to enforce laws on private sexual behavior.

I'm against the public, not private, behavior of gays.

I don't want my children exposed to perversion and a lifestyle choice associated with the spread of a deadly disease and other STDs, rampant drug use, sex orgies, sex with strangers, different sex partners every week, and a high rate of depression and suicide.

Even those gays who "fall in love" and "get married" feel no obligation to remain sexually monogamous.

So go ahead and engage in your private behavior. I won't stop you.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-05-20   16:46:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: A Pole (#32)

There is another possible reason as well. A few that I know personally, sorely miss having a normal family life. They feel alone, and are sad when they see other people children and grandchildren. They told me this more than one time.

And curiously, they are quite conservative and dislike all those "LGBT" activists.

I've had the same experiences with a few I have known.

The sad and simple truth is that most people just want to live normal lives and be happy.

Sounds easy to do,doesn't it?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-05-20   17:43:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 151) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com