United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Film Footage Captures Completely Insane Climate Engineering Operations Over Las Vegas, Nevada
Source:
FromThe Trenches/YouTube
URL Source: http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... egas-nevada/224706#more-224706
Published: Apr 27, 2018
Author: April Lee
Post Date: 2018-04-27 10:37:47 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2938
Comments: 39
http://GeoengineeringWatch.org "Nature’s former balance is no more, the hand of man has forever altered what once was." ~ Dane Wigington Poster Comment: 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
Settle down; it's just clouds mixed with vapor trails. Scientifically-ignorant, gullible, stupid people will be the end of civilization.
There is no scientific data that supports global warming. None. All of the temperature data collected is then "adjusted" for various made-up factors ... which results in (surprise!) an increase in temperature. Second, who's to say that the Earth isn't returning to the temperature it should be? Third, doesn't solar activity have any effect? Remember back in the 70's when we were supposedly entering an ice age? And whatever happened to "acid rain" which was going to destroy the planet? Lastly, “water vapor accounts for about 97 percent of the total (natural plus man-emitted) greenhouse warming of the planet." The current concentration of carbon dioxide is about 0.04%. In pre-industrial times it was 0.03%.
Should I believe you.....some character pounding on a keyboard and professing advanced knowledge on a right-wing argument clinic?? Or actual scientists (lots of them) producing empirical evidence....??? https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ I think I'll believe NASA.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments- account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/ I believe the raw temperature data collected by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office. I don't believe the adjustments they make to that raw data.
Are you a scientist? I'm not either...... I'll still take their word for it.
Nope. And I wasn't back in the 70's when "scientists" told me a global ice age was approaching, that acid rain would destroy the planet, the ozone hole will give us all cancer, killer bees were coming to America to wipe us out, AIDS will kill everyone, there will be mass starvation due to overpopulation, bacon causes cancer, and GMO food is dangerous. You take their word on all that, too?
No, I'm placing my trust in the hundreds of scientists and organizations that are backing this finding. This issue has nothing to do with the junk science you've mentioned.
They are all working with the same corrupted data. Which is why Trump recently demanded they produce their raw data ... before it was "adjusted". "A proposed policy would bar the E.P.A. from considering research that doesn't release its raw data for review". You're in favor of that, right? No more "secret science"? No more, "trust me"?
Just because DD45 is tweeting doesn't make the "corrupted data" argument any more valid. A proposed policy Lots of agendas are proposed as policy.....
#18. To: Jameson (#16)
We'll see how quickly that raw data is turned over. If ever. This whole "the Earth is getting hotter and man is the cause" bullshit is about to come to a crashing end.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Hank Rearden (#2)
(Edited)
Scientifically-ignorant, gullible, stupid people will be the end of civilization.
#5. To: misterwhite (#3)
There is no scientific data that supports global warming. None.
#6. To: Jameson (#5)
(Edited)
"I think I'll believe NASA."
#7. To: misterwhite (#6)
I don't believe the adjustments they make to that raw data.
#8. To: Jameson (#7)
Are you a scientist?
#9. To: misterwhite (#8)
You take their word on all that, too?
#14. To: Jameson (#9)
(Edited)
No, I'm placing my trust in the hundreds of scientists and organizations that are backing this finding.
-- New York Times
#16. To: misterwhite (#14)
They are all working with the same corrupted data. Which is why Trump recently demanded they produce their raw data
Replies to Comment # 16. Just because DD45 is tweeting doesn't make the "corrupted data" argument any more valid.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]