[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Are Childhood Vaccines Safe? DTP Vaccine Was Not - and Was Given for Decades!

Can you name >5 unvaxxed Amish who died from COVID? Why not? They are "supposed to be" dying in droves!

On Becoming Lutheran: A Conversation with Pr Chad Bresson (Pastor, The Table, Los Fresnos)

Lighting a Candle to Rainbow Zeus

Luther: If you must allegory, allegory this way

HUGE DEMOCRATIC MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME DISCOVERED IN INDIANA

The Drip, Governmental Lies and US Armed Forces Recruitment

It's Happening: Fisk Gives Slight Downgrade to US Credit

No Truce With the Heartland

Is This Why Pediatricians Push Vaccines?

The Cross Prepares a Way (John 14 reflections)

A WHO pandemic treaty would be a threat to our freedom

The debt ceiling melodrama is a Uniparty diversion from reality

Governor DeSantis Ban the Bioweapons or You May Become Complicit

Why Exactly Does the Government Dump Toxic Fluoride Into ¾ of the US Water Supply?

F-16s to Ukraine

DeSantis’ ‘big government’ extends to record state budget

Operation Stiff Upper Lip… British Minister Rushes to Kiev Following Artyomovsk Debacle

Hidden Christians’ Illicit Sacred Vase Brought to Light in Japan

CONNECTICUT SNEAKS PEDOPHILIA PROTECTIONS INTO LAW

Erik Sperling on the US Attempt to Keep the War in Yemen Going

Where Is That Darn Recession?

Fluoride Lawsuit Against EPA: Alleged Corruption, Shocking Under Oath Federal Statements

The Mind Virus of the Affluent Woke Left

An Interview with Satan on the Eve of His Retirement

Trump and his staffers conducted a 'dress rehearsal' to move sensitive documents even after the DOJ asked for them to be returned

DeSantis says he’ll consider pardoning Jan. 6 defendants, including Trump

Ex-Trump Advisor Bannon's Trial Over Border Wall Scheme Set for May 2024

Brickbat: Dirty Hands

Review: Animal Control Pokes Fun at Real-World Policing Problems

Texas Sues Biden Over Immigration ‘Parole’ Scam

Fisking a Turnip, Part 5: What If THEY Heard The Gospel. Bonus level: Woe’s False Standards.

Dave Smith & Konstantin Kisin on Ukraine

Hungary’s Orban Says Ukraine War Can Only End With Deal Between Russia and US

Boris Johnson Sent to Texas to Lobby Republicans to Keep Arming Ukraine

Neo-Nazi Militia Used US Armored Vehicles in Attack on Russia’s Belgorod Region

US aircraft carrier arrives in Norway to take part in drills with armed forces

The FTC should answer its Call of Duty to Gamers

Syracuse-based Christian adoption agency New Hope Family Services has entered into a favorable settlement agreement with the state of New York and may continue offering adoption services to children and families.

New York Settles Case with Christian Adoption Agency

Biden's economy leaving millions of families struggling to make ends meet

Report: China hacked critical networks to spy on U.S. military

IRS whistleblower accuses DOJ of protecting Hunter Biden

How the “Economics of War” Turns Goods Into “Bads”

Prigozhin Says 20,000 Wagner Fighters Were Killed in Bakhmut Battle

83 United Methodist Churches in Iowa Exit Denomination

Matt Taibbi shares details about being investigated by IRS

Major journal retracts study warning about transgenderism after activist threats

‘A day of sadness’: 193 Georgia churches vote to leave United Methodist Church

Church of Scotland loses over half its membership since 2000; age of average worshiper is 62: report


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

--
See other -- Articles

Title: Feds to audit CA high-speed rail project as funding flounders
Source: HotAir
URL Source: https://hotair.com/archives/2018/04 ... ail-project-funding-flounders/
Published: Apr 14, 2018
Author: Ed Morrissey
Post Date: 2018-04-15 01:08:26 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 2760
Comments: 11

Gee, I wonder what federal auditors will find — besides a phantom train set and a lot of wasted money? With a new study out showing that California doesn’t have the funding to complete even the first phase of their high-speed rail project, the Inspector General for the Department of Transportation will open the books to see how federal monies have been spent:
California’s high-speed rail project is facing an audit from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s as costs continue to climb.

The inspector general’s audit, announced Thursday, will examine the Federal Railroad Administration’s oversight of nearly $3.5 billion in federal grant money awarded to the project.

That’s bad news for a project that has already had plenty of bad news over the last several years. The IG will apparently focus mainly on how the FRA has performed in reporting on California’s progress rather than the performance of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. At issue will be whether the FRA has enforced project performance requirements, but that will still point out the lack of progress California has made despite all of the cash it received:
The federal money awarded to California comes with specific conditions that Kelly has promised to meet. They include completing a 119-mile (192-kilometer) segment of track now under construction in the Central Valley and finishing environmental reviews for the full line by 2022.

The audit will specifically evaluate how the Federal Railroad Administration determines whether California has complied with federal guidelines.

“Currently under construction” is a generous way for the Associated Press to describe the status of the project. In its original project plan — the plan that qualified California to get the $3.5 billion in federal funding — CHSRA projected that the first phase would be operational within eight to eleven years. It’s been ten years since then, and now the state projects that the rail line between somewhere-around-Fresno to somewhere-around-Bakersfield won’t be ready for several more years. During that same time, the estimated project cost rose from $33.4 billion to $77 billion, an increase of 129%, and there’s still no clear way to connect the first phase to San Francisco or Los Angeles.

In fact, as Dan Walters pointed out at the Mercury News earlier this week, no one’s sure how California can raise the money to connect the Central Valley run to the two population centers it’s supposed to connect:
After a decade-plus of cogitation, they said, the state still doesn’t have a complete scenario for raising the tens of billions of dollars it would take to extend the San Joaquin section into the San Francisco Bay Area via San Jose and southward to Los Angeles. …

Louis Thompson, one of the nation’s top rail system experts who chairs the project’s official “peer review” committee, sees “little prospect” that fares from the first extension could finance the second. He told legislators that the project, a favorite of Gov. Jerry Brown, is “at a critical point when difficult decisions need to be made,” and cited the need for a “credible long-term plan to finance the system.” …

Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor’s staff said there are multiple “issues” such as potentially higher costs than the current $77.3 billion estimate (twice what voters were told in 2008 when they passed a $9.95 billion bond issue), “significant uncertainties” about the bond issue proposal and finally, the lack of a “complete funding plan.”

The review concluded, “It is crucial for the high-speed rail project to have a complete and viable funding plan (and) at this time, no such funding plan exists.[“]

In other words, no one knows where the money will come from. The news that the IG has become curious over the FRA’s lack of enforcement indicates it won’t be coming from Washington, especially in a Congress controlled by Republicans. And even if the money was there, no one has a plan to cut through the mountains on either end to get to San Francisco or Los Angeles, a decade after launching this project.

Walters favors the completion of the Fresno-Bakersfield track, which the existing funding might cover, but it’s tough to see why. The demand for the 119-mile corridor won’t ever be high enough to nearly cover the cost of the construction and operation, even if it adds Amtrak service as Walters suggests. The two areas have serviceable highways to cover the 97-minute drive on 99, and Greyhound service that takes 130 minutes. California will have spent well over $10 billion to connect two counties (Fresno, Kern) by fixed rail with a combined 2016 population of 1,864,703 people, or 4.7% of the state’s estimated 39.5 million people. It would have been a heck of a lot cheaper to simply build a replacement highway along 99 instead, and would have been much more proportional to the demand for transport between Fresno and Kern.

It’s time to stop throwing good money after bad. One has to suspect that the IG report will come to the same conclusion, at least as far as the FRA and federal cash is concerned. Congress should have cut off this project years ago anyway. If California’s legislature wants to go broke betting on 19th-century fixed-track solutions to the 21st century’s transportation issues, they can do that all on their own.


Poster Comment:

Shocked! Shocked, I say. Aw, hell, who am I fooling? I predicted a sour end to this boondoggle from Day One, as did so many others.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: (#0)

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-04-15   1:25:12 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tooconservative (#0) (Edited)

but that will still point out the lack of progress California has made despite all of the cash it received:

Will anyone be arrested for fraud and theft of services? Or do they get to keep the hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars they stole?

misterwhite  posted on  2018-04-15   10:51:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tooconservative (#0)

... a phantom train set and a lot of wasted money?

California will be able to show the costs have not necessarily included project realization as the planning for the project consumed the costs. The bureaucrats planned an albatross.

buckeroo  posted on  2018-04-15   12:45:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#2)

Will anyone be arrested for fraud and theft of services?

Hahahahahahah, stop it, yer killin' me.     : )

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-04-15   13:57:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: buckeroo (#3)

California will be able to show the costs have not necessarily included project realization as the planning for the project consumed the costs. The bureaucrats planned an albatross.

I think they'll continue to throw money in that hole because Brown simply refuses to give up on it.

He had in mind a legacy project, like the great California irrigation/dams/canals projects of 50-100 years ago.

And it has all fallen apart. But good luck trying to get them to admit it.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-04-15   13:59:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tooconservative (#5)

I think they'll continue to throw money in that hole because Brown simply refuses to give up on it.

I predict a similar boondoggle result for the $20 billion New Jersey Gateway Tunnel project -- which we know will be $40 billion by the time it's completed.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-04-15   14:12:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#6)

And that Boston project that went so far over cost.

Too bad the NJ/NY project seemed to get funded under the horrible spending bill. Trump justified it by citing dire need for military spending but I think he knows it is wrong to let the Dems blackmail him into such a bad budget by holding the military hostage. Which was their plan all along. They knew sequestration would inevitably lead to this pork-filled scenario some years down the road.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-04-15   14:48:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Tooconservative (#7)

under the horrible spending bill

A lot of bad things happened (and didn't happen) under that spending bill. As proof, all you had to do was look at the smiles of Pelosi and Schumer.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-04-15   17:22:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Tooconservative (#7)

And that Boston project that went so far over cost.

The Big Dig. Expected to take 7 years and cost $2.8 billion. Ended up taking 15 years and costing $22 billion (with interest).

misterwhite  posted on  2018-04-15   17:36:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: misterwhite (#9)

Yep, your memory is better than mine. As I recall, that was one thing Romney did was to force through the final part and make it all end.

Some of these projects seem to want to drive costs through the roof and drag it out as long as possible for the benefit of contractors and labor. Finishing such projects kills the golden goose as far as they are concerned.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-04-16   9:06:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Tooconservative (#10)

Yep, your memory is better than mine.

Nah. My Google is better than yours.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-04-17   12:50:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com