[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Rant on Fox and Friends ( This is rather cringe inducing)

HILLARY’S MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME

Harry Reid Claims Republicans Have ‘Decimated’ Federal Government

Chicago Is Trying to Pay Down Its Debt by Impounding Innocent People’s Cars

Iran's Khamenei urges Muslim nations to unite against U.S.: state TV

Did North Korea kill off its own nuclear testing capability?

Migrant 'caravan' at U.S.-Mexico border prepares for mass crossing

The 9/11 Commission Didn’t Believe the Government … So Why Should We?

Shocker! American Steel Prices Spiked in April. Hmm, I wonder why....

Staff replace traditional analogue clocks with digital ones in exam halls… because pupils can’t tell the time

Citing ‘Conclusive Evidence’ of Explosives, Families of Victims File Petition to Re-Open 9/11 Investigation

Are Cop-Assisted Promposals Charming or Alarming?

Is Russia Sponsoring Terrorism?

7 Forces Driving America Toward Civil War

FDA Approves Use Of Marijuana Derived CBD Drug For Epilepsy On Eve Of 4-20

Cops Accost Pro-2nd Amendment Parkland Survivor Over Gun Range Photos

Is the U.S. Government Evil? You Tell Me

Cops Knock Man Off Bicycle, Then Make Up Charges and Arrest Him to Justify It

Calexit gets go-ahead to start collecting signatures

Uranus Smells Like Rotten Eggs

Suicide of the West HOW THE REBIRTH OF TRIBALISM, POPULISM, NATIONALISM, AND IDENTITY POLITICS IS DESTROYING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY By JONAH GOLDBERG s

Total Control: New Measures Toward Global Totalitarianism

Civic Anarchism and Statism: I Believe in the State

'A Man Without Courage': Dershowitz Slams Comey for Leaking Trump Memos

Comey, the memos and the question of what’s classified

The 10 Highest BACs Ever Recorded (You are supposed to be dead at 0.4)

Woman fined $500 for saving free Delta Air Lines apple

Under attack, the FBI becomes a partisan battleground

Dad, Why Do I Have To Go To School?

Michigan town’s feud over military gear gets ugly

Democrats are getting desperate as Mueller stalls

Entire County Refuses to Obey New Gun Control Law, Declares Itself Gun Owner Sanctuary

Body Cam Shows Cops Never Got Out of Car to Look for Trapped Boy as He Died Right By Them

Penn State's 98-Year-Old Outing Club Is No Longer Allowed to Go Outside

14 Years Ago, Pat Tillman Was Killed and Gov’t Covered Up the Truth to His Death to Sell War

Strange Sounds in the Sky 2018

Strange Sounbds in the Sky 2018

Why I Won't Read James Comey's Book

The Sequel on The Conservative Cave on 22 Apr 2018

Hundreds of Muslims from Bangladesh breaching US border at Laredo, Texas

Revealed: Robert Mueller's FBI Repeatedly Abused Prosecutorial Discretion

A Pelosi joke

Mitt Romney fails to secure Utah GOP nomination, will face primary

Giuliani Looks To Swiftly End Mueller's Investigation

Man makes pipe-guns from scrap, sells them to gun “buyback” program for $300

Rocket Man no more: North Korea suspending nuclear and ICBM testing

Meanwhile in Sweden: Shootings And Grenade Attacks Are So Common, the Media Doesn’t Bother to Report Them Anymore (VIDEO)

Interview With Boy In ‘Chemical Attack’ Video: ‘We Didn’t See Any Chemical Attack Symptoms’

The Comey Memos Read Like The Diary Entries Of A Young Teenager

The Democratic (Democrat-Communist) Party filed a lawsuit alleging a conspiracy by Russian officials, the Trump campaign and Wikileaks to damage the Clinton campaign


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Paul Ryan is third casualty of GOP dysfunction in 20 years. Is major change afoot?
Source: USA TODAY
URL Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin ... blican-party-column/508569002/
Published: Apr 12, 2018
Author: Linda Killian, Opinion contributor
Post Date: 2018-04-12 11:56:42 by Jameson
Keywords: Paul Ryan, midterms, sinking ship
Views: 124
Comments: 26

Paul Ryan is the third GOP speaker casualty in 20 years. The historic level of departures and dysfunction suggests we may be on the cusp of major political change.

For the first 200 years of this nation’s history, only three House speakers resigned from office, all because they were accepting other political appointments. But in just the past 20 years, an equal number of House speakers, all of them Republicans, have decided to depart under very different circumstances.

Rep. Paul Ryan is voluntarily surrendering a job considered so important it is second only to the vice president in the line of succession to the presidency. That reflects some terrible truths about the state of American politics: House Republicans have become completely unmanageable, making it almost impossible for the GOP to govern. And Congress is more polarized and dysfunctional than it has been since the years before the Civil War.

Much of the coverage about Ryan’s decision focuses on the likelihood that Democrats will win a majority of seats and gain control of the House in November. Ryan is certainly the highest profile Republican not to seek re- election. But he joins a list of 30 others who are leaving at the end of this session or who have already done so, plus 13 Republicans who are leaving the House to run for the Senate or a governorship.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Even the ultra-conservative House Speaker has had enough of the shitnado that is the "it's all about me!" administration....

How many more to come??

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Jameson (#0) (Edited)

Ultra-conservative? Ryan-O is still stealing our money to pay off the Planned Murderhood babykillers.

Wow, you really are as dumb as a democRat.

Hank Rearden  posted on  2018-04-12   11:59:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Hank Rearden (#1) (Edited)

Ultra-conservative? Ryan-O is still stealing our money

Truly a lame effort at diversion.

Anyway.....

I've seen the over/under for republican's "choosing to not seek reelection" set at 50.......

I'd take the OVER

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-12   12:10:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jameson, Hank Rearden (#2)

I'd take the OVER

Don't you mean bend- OVER?? (ok, that was lame...)

But after all, THAT is liberal-Left politics at its very foundation, isn't it?

Even the ultra-conservative House Speaker has had enough of the shitnado that is the "it's all about me!" administration....

HUH?? You really haven't clue, do you? Paul Ryan, "ultra-conservative"?? Bwaahaaa!!

The truth is, Paul Ryan is ducking out likely because he's about to be exposed for his back-stabbing treachery and collusion with Democrats.

I don't even want to imagine life through your bizarro-world lens. You obviously don't have any sane clue of reality by the way you process the Trump Admin accomplishments.

Where do you formulate such characterizations? "Shitnado" and "'it's all about me!' administration" -- how did you get there? Seriously. Can you tell us which political site you frequent? Or which Tee-Bee shows and hosts you bond with politically? It's as though you visit another planet and return to LF to share what appears to us as pre-packaged, pre-fed Goebbelian Alpo.

Despite all the non-stop smears, lies and sabotage endured by Trump from 95% of the MSM and half his own Party (R), lead by "ultra-conservatives"(?!?) Paul Ryan and McConnell (who actively collude with Democrats), the man and his staffs are doing MORE for MORE Americans across ALL demographics lines than any American President since Reagan. NOTE: Trump, a billionaire didn't need to be President. He did so to help restore America as a great nation in every way.

Conversely, 0bama HATED the USA. He is a Communist and racist. He governed like a tin-horn third world petty dictator, undermining the American Middle Class standard of living while making himself and his hubby Multi-Millionaires. Does that bother you? Do you even question his motives or policies?

Oh...and by defining the Presidency as a "shitnado"...and "'it's all about me!" administration', you obviously live by the mantra or cutsy word -- all hallmarks of liberals with superiority complexes which are as delusional as their claim for supposed "tolerance". "Hypocrisy", thy name is Liberal-Democrat.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-12   15:31:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Liberator (#3)

I'd take the OVER

The tally stands at 44 - based on the article....

I say we'll hit 60 by memorial day.....

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-12   15:45:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Liberator (#3)

Where do you formulate such characterizations? "Shitnado" and "'it's all about me!' administration" -- how did you get there? Seriously.

Pretty funny huh?

I write most of my own material, which explains the occasional spelling error.

Can you tell us which political site you frequent?

I don't frequent any particular sites. I have the Google news page which provides a pretty diverse number of sources. I only block a few with annoying pay walls...

If I find something particularly interesting I'll look for the source.

which Tee-Bee shows and hosts you bond with politically?

I don't watch the national news or any of the "all opinion all the time" talking head shows. I will surf my local news options in the AM for traffic and weather though.

It's as though you visit another planet and return to LF to share what appears to us as pre-packaged, pre-fed Goebbelian Alpo.

Nothing "pre-packaged" - unlike many of the posters who type (poorly) the "almost remembered correctly" paraphrased talking points from one of the shills on the radio...

I formulate my own opinions, which are subject to change at any time.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-12   16:07:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jameson (#0)

Paul Ryan is third casualty of GOP dysfunction in 20 years.

No Ryan is the reason for the dysfunction. Big government Regressives are the issue with America and why we have such a screwed out world.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-12   19:19:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Justified (#6)

No Ryan is the reason for the dysfunction.

Oh, I see...

So.... he'll be headed back to Wisconsin in January - and out of federal government!, are you thinking the "screwed out world" will be better then?

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-12   19:23:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jameson (#7)

So.... he'll be headed back to Wisconsin in January - and out of federal government!, are you thinking the "screwed out world" will be better then?

The government will be and his family will be. Now hopefully we can get a butt kicker into the leadership role of the house that will fight for America(which is really a more conservative/Libertarian view) not some big government lackey.

Ryan maybe a nice guy but nice is not what we need to destroy the Democrat party and move the country back right of center.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-12   19:35:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Justified (#8)

Now hopefully we can get a butt kicker into the leadership role

Hmm... so You think the republican'ts will keep the majority in the House?

and what if the Democrats take over???

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-12   19:40:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jameson (#9)

Hmm... so You think the republican'ts will keep the majority in the House?

If the voters are paying attention the GOP will gain seats if the voters are not then Trump will have to stand up to the everyone in government for the betterment of the good people.

You may not like his style and too bad because that's the kinda person we need to bitch slap the Regressives harming America! If he fails then America is gone and I will put out my pirates flag and say fuck you America!

Justified  posted on  2018-04-12   19:46:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Jameson (#5)

Thanks for answering those questions.

I don't frequent any particular sites. I have the Google news page which provides a pretty diverse number of sources...I formulate my own opinions, which are subject to change at any time.

From those G00gles sources, you must have absorbed quite a bit of propaganda and disinfo to come to your horrendously erroneous conclusions of "truth".

To witness that degree of auto cyber-lobotomy taking place without patient knowledge just from G00gle "news" is...sad.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-13   12:07:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Liberator (#11)

you must have absorbed quite a bit of propaganda and disinfo

Doubtful.

As I said, I check the sources of the facts I find interesting, and I check the credentials of those who write opinion pieces.

Perhaps you should pull up the Google News page and check out the sources for yourself, - they do a pretty good job of including most of the major news sources....CNN, NY TImes, WAPO, Washington Times, ABC, CBS, NBC, BBC, USA Today.... or don't, I couldn't care less.

I'll trust the sources cited by most of these before I'll fall for the clickbait propaganda of "sources" like fromthetrenchesreport, gellerreport, zerohedge, bearingarms, or foxnews.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-13   12:52:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Jameson (#12) (Edited)

All your sources have been involved in fake news Except perhaps the BBC and Washington Times.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-04-13   13:13:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#13) (Edited)

All your sources have been involved in fake news Except perhaps the BBC and Washington Times.

Please offer some proof.

I was pointing out that Google News links to many diverse "news" sources - not all are worthy of my trust....like foxnews

and, as I said, I check the sources cited of articles I find interesting.

Rule #1 - if the white R Kelly tweets it - it's bullshit!

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-13   13:24:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Jameson (#12) (Edited)

("you must have absorbed quite a bit of propaganda and disinfo")

Doubtful.

Whereby you believe the notion is "doubtful," you should be given credit for at least conceding the possibility that the info you've accepted from your G00gle-related sources may not be THE truth.

As I said, I check the sources of the facts I find interesting, and I check the credentials of those who write opinion pieces.

But again -- you run into one fox checking the "creds" of another fox who is inspecting the hen house.

Liberal-Left sources are NOT especially known for their impartiality of reporting nor of "facts". They are mostly agenda-driven. Surely even you realize that.

Perhaps you should pull up the Google News page and check out the sources for yourself, - they do a pretty good job of including most of the major news sources....CNN, NY TImes, WAPO, Washington Times, ABC, CBS, NBC, BBC, USA Today.... or don't, I couldn't care less.

"Good job" as defined by WHOM? By what criteria? If it's about disseminating "news" from a Dem-Left paradigm, then I'd agree with you. (EDIT: Washington Times reports as a legit, unbiased News source).

I have indeed checked out G00gle news splashes. The theme is consistently anti-Trump, anti-conservative; Same as the Yahoo "news" splash as well as AOL's when signing out of their email.

I'll trust the sources cited by most of these before I'll fall for the clickbait propaganda of "sources" like fromthetrenchesreport, gellerreport, zerohedge, bearingarms, or foxnews.

The only two sources I recognize are, "Zero Hedge" and Fox News".

Zero Hedge is trusted because they will report factually as well as report what those you mentioned WILL NOT. Actual "news" isn't necessarily political. But your sources even politicize the weather.

FNC is actually NOT a "conservative" news source. You're making the same mistake that most Progressives make in that you confuse OPINION personalities and opinion shows with "NEWS".

The problem with the "news" sources you respect and swear by editorialize "news" instead of reporting JUST the facts. The editorializing and politicizing of "News" with a decidedly liberal-left slant is a fairly recent practice of news dissemination. This is why at least half of all Americans scoff at and distrust CNN, NY TImes, WAPO, ABC, CBS, NBC, BBC, USA Today etal.

EVERY SINGLE ONE of those "news" sources are notoriously liberal-left ideologues. Many of them are and were infested with with Progs, tied directly to both the Clintons AND 0bamas. The Left has managed to finagle a monopoly on "news" reporting, often (if not always) reporting on issues word-for-word, VERBATIM.

President 0bama had met with Facebook honcho Mark Zuckerberg on several occasions to presumably discuss political strategies, harvesting conservative "enemies," and ways to monitor, censor and or expose conservative private conversations. In other words, social media giant Facebook was colluding with a US President to spy on US citizens and political "enemies". This was also the case in several liberal-left media outlets during the 0bama presidency.

Do you also find nothing alarmingly wrong with this?

It appears you find nothing dishonorable or unethical about politicizing "News Reporting" for agenda's sake. Given that the apparent case, you'd also find nothing fundamentally wrong with Barry 0bama or Hillary Klinton running major news outlets either.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-13   13:30:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: A K A Stone, Jameson (#13)

All your sources have been involved in fake news Except perhaps the BBC and Washington Times.

You're correct in that noting the Washington TIMES has NOT been a disseminater of Fake News.

BBC as well as all Jameson's other "News" sources have indeed reported Fake News HEAVILY.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-13   13:32:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Liberator (#15)

I have indeed checked out G00gle news splashes. The theme is consistently anti-Trump, anti-conservative;

Maybe from your perspective,

Google is linking to a story in Variety about Will Ferrell being in a car crash, and NFL.com is reporting Dez Bryant being released from the Cowboys.

Do you see any anti-right wing bias there?

EVERY SINGLE ONE of those "news" sources

False

to presumably discuss political strategies, harvesting conservative "enemies," and ways to monitor, censor and or expose conservative private conversations.

"presumably"

Who is presuming? - you? - Where did you get you information for this claim? - Please cite your source.

"you'd also find nothing fundamentally wrong with Barry 0bama or Hillary Klinton running major news outlets either."

Another windmill at which to tilt.....

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-13   13:47:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Liberator (#16)

BBC as well as all Jameson's other "News" sources have indeed reported Fake News HEAVILY.

Please provide some proof of your claim.

And more importantly, please disprove as "fake news" any article to which I have cited.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-13   13:50:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Jameson (#17)

Google is linking to a story in Variety about Will Ferrell being in a car crash, and NFL.com is reporting Dez Bryant being released from the Cowboys.

Do you see any anti-right wing bias there?

Yes, even G00gle will link to purely "news" articles; Not EVERY article is propaganda or political PsyOp Bait.

Who is presuming? - you? - Where did you get you information for this claim? - Please cite your source.

What is the "source" of 2+2 = 4? HINT: Do-the-math.

Another windmill at which to tilt.....

Gotta love the Progs' mindset: Sgt Schultz personified.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-13   13:57:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Jameson (#18) (Edited)

Please provide some proof of your claim.

1 + 1 =2.

One day you'll understand the simple concept of addition, deduction, logic, and critical thinking. INDEPENDENT of "G00gle".

Why do you off-handedly dismiss eyewitness accounts as well? Do you require a central "authority" to tell you what "truth" is??

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-13   14:00:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Liberator (#19)

Not EVERY article is propaganda or political PsyOp Bait.

my point exactly.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-13   15:00:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Liberator (#20)

Why do you off-handedly dismiss eyewitness accounts as well?

Because it is wise to question the source.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-13   15:02:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Liberator (#15)

But your sources even politicize the weather.

Not to mention eating ice cream. You would think they would have something better to do but I guess when you live in Mommy's basement and only own "tidy whitey" underwear you have plenty of time to be offended about silly bullschitt.

Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!

CZ82  posted on  2018-04-14   12:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Jameson (#22)

Because it is wise to question the source.

"Wise" in your opinion is defined conditionally ONLY in cases that conservatives report the truth. Gotcha.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-16   19:11:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: CZ82 (#23)

You would think they would have something better to do but I guess when you live in Mommy's basement and only own "tidy whitey" underwear you have plenty of time to be offended about silly bullschitt.

True dat.

You've just described the typical male under 40 who votes Dem. They've been taught to whine like the little sackless jackazzes they are....

Dem women are simply...Human Nightmares.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-16   19:14:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Liberator (#24)

"Wise" in your opinion is defined conditionally ONLY in cases that conservatives report the truth.

False.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-16   19:15:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com