LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: 15 Evil Or Incompetent Women Who Prove That Females Are Horrible Leaders
Source:
Return of Kings
URL Source: http://www.returnofkings.com/154877 ... t-females-are-horrible-leaders
Published: Mar 1, 2018
Author: John Carver
Post Date: 2018-04-11 14:54:51 by Liberator
Keywords: War, AgainstCommonSense, AndMenAndWhitey
Views: 5484
Comments: 50
A common argument amongst feminists (in addition to their emasculated white knight and soy boy allies) is that women are better suited for leadership positions in the modern world. It doesn’t matter whether it’s being President, Prime Minister, Chancellor, or CEO, because men are just “too violent” or “too corrupt” or “too sexist”, and will inevitably ruin things for everyone like they have for many millennia. Yup. Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, and Dwight Eisenhower really ran the country into the ground alright. However, they are dead wrong. Female leaders throughout the course of history have proven themselves capable of dishing out just as much wanton violence as their male counterparts, and a string of female leaders in modern times have equally proven themselves to be corruption-riddled grade-F garbage. This article will showcase fifteen prominent examples, and make a valid argument that men should continue to be the best choices to run a country or corporation. Rejected – China’s only Empress in it’s vast history would have been a shoo-in to be a “Diversity Disney Princess” if not for her horrible deeds Proof that the world’s least criminally inclined gender and racial combination (East Asian Females) are not immune to being absolutely corrupted by power, it’s no wonder that one of China’s very few female rulers in over 3,000 years of history is not a modern feminist icon. The 7th century autocrat is widely believed to have strangled her infant daughter to death in order to frame a key rival for the throne, ordered numerous people to commit suicide, and handed out treason charges like they were candy, among numerous naughty exploits. Recognizing a problem before things got out of hand, the middle kingdom hasn’t made many attempts with female rule ever since. Much like East Asia has wisely opted out of western style “diversity” in the early 21st century, after seeing it’s negative results elsewhere. She is currently languishing at the Seoul Detention Center Clearly, China’s smaller next door neighbor (if you exclude North Korea) didn’t get the memo of what’s at stake when you put a woman in charge. The first female president of South Korea (2013), and the first popularly elected female head of state in East Asia in general, Geun-hye was impeached in late 2016 on charges related to influence peddling by her top aide. And it doesn’t stop there. On 17 April 2017, she was formally charged with abuse of power, bribery, coercion, and leaking government secrets. It sounds like Seoul Detention Center is exactly where she needs to be. Oh, and here’s a 2016 video of hundreds of thousands of Seoul residents taking to the streets in protest against her dismal leadership. If the Argentinian people had some high hope that Ms. Kirchner, the wife of former president Nestor Kirchner, was going to put an end to the countries notorious reputation for corruption and cronyism when she took office in 2007, they were left just as disappointed as ever. In fact, it arguably got even worse. Four years into her presidency (2011), Wikileaks cables revealed that diplomats from the United States and several other Western countries had expressed deep concern about the current levels of corruption in Argentina. “Under President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner,” reported the Heritage Foundation in 2013, “respect for markets and the rule of law has deteriorated and corruption has boomed.” Post-presidential indictments for corruption, money laundering, and even a federal judge calling for her arrest for treason, only amplify just how mediocre she was in hindsight. Brazil elects mate-slurping former Communist revolutionary into office. Proceeds to run the Brazilian economy into the ground and gets impeached. Taking the helm of the world’s 5th most populous nation in 2011, Dilma became not only the first female president in Brazilian history, but also the first democratically-elected female president in the world to be impeached and removed in 2016. (Park Geun-hye of South Korea would closely follow suit in 2017). Initially somewhat popular with Brazilians (both on a personal level and with her government), things soured quickly in 2015 after revelations of corruption were endemic in her left-wing / SJW administration, sparking the world famous 2015–16 protests in Brazil. The rapidly expanding economic crisis in the country played a huge role as well. In July of 2015, her approval rating reached a new pathetic low of 9%, while her disapproval rating reached a whopping 64%. With the Brazilian people clearly getting tired of their Marxist matriarch running the show (into the ground), Dilma was suspended from office in May 2016 and impeached later that August. Prost! To the death of western civilization! Much like Dilma Rousseff, ‘Mother Merkel‘ was indoctrinated with much Marxist-Leninist garbage in her youth, despite being born in the prosperous free-market Republic of West Germany rather than the “everyone is poor but at least we’re equal” Communist East. The key difference is while Dilma presided over Brazil to temporary economic doldrums, Merkel may go down in history as the woman who caused more long-term damage to Germany than (literally) Hitler could ever imagine. She has been supportive of a seemingly endless influx of “refugees” and other welfare-loving migrants to her country. Most of whom tend to have minimal job skills, zero compatibility with western values, and a vastly elevated propensity towards crime (especially rape). Bombing Dresden and other cities to ashes didn’t permanently destroy Germany in World War II, but the sheer demographic replacement of the nation due to her policies certainly will in the long run. We gon’ get you Putin! We gon’ getcha! This is one nasty woman. Hillary Clinton, also affectionately known as “Hitlery” or “Hilldog” by her 100+ million domestic detractors, has been a giant metaphorical gnat on the U.S. political landscape for decades. No matter how many times you swat at her, she just…… won’t…… go away. Sinister, conniving, fraudulent, feminist, and known to treat her staffers like dog shit, we can thank the lucky stars this ticking time bomb did not become president. Also a bloodthirsty Russophobe, nobody in the oval office would have ever brought us closer to nuclear war with Russia than her. Durrrrp! Can I make my country more mediocre too please? Better qualified to be gnawing on thick carrots rather than running a small country, New Zealand’s woefully inadequate selection to be their latest Prime Minister has gone on record as saying “capitalism is a blatant failure” amongst other feminist and SJW rubbish coming out of her Mr. Ed mouth. (Would she prefer that New Zealand, consistently rated among the world’s top 20 most prosperous countries, become more like Venezuela as an alternative?) Jacinda is also a firm believer of the “gender wage gap,” a boneheaded social position which should disqualify anybody from public office, due to their lack of ability to comprehend logic, reason, and the insurmountable evidence to the contrary. Most insultingly, the 37-year-old Ms. Ardern got herself pregnant for the first time very early into her role. A nation’s leader needs to be concentrating on the welfare of their country first, second, and third for the duration of their tenure. Not taking lengthy maternity leave and juggling raising a child in its most vulnerable first years. She liked to burn people ‘Bloody Mary‘ is a well known monicker (and red colored cocktail) derived from this 16th century English tyrant. And when you consider her legacy, it’s not too difficult to understand why. As part of her aggressive attempts to reverse the English Reformation which was put in place by her father (Henry VIII), more than 280 religious dissenters were burned at the stake via her beck and call. Now that’s not very feminine behavior! She wuz queen (and she was shiet) Black women don’t get off the hook for horrible violence or screeching ineptitude in a position of power either. In fact, this lady was notoriously bad for both of those things. Ruling Madagascar from 1828 to 1861, Ranavalona I was hardly a sweet mother figure for the large island nation off the coast of eastern Africa. Her reign was beset by regular warfare, disease, forced labor (black-on-black slavery!), and cruel measures of justice which resulted in a high percentage of the population being prematurely killed. Just how out of whack was “Ranavalona the Cruel”? Well in 1845 for example, the queen wanted to go on a buffalo hunt. Naturally, she brought along her entire court and (black-on-black) slave community for the ride. About 50,000 people would march for four months on this wild and unprofitable expedition, with one-fifth of the party dropping dead from exhaustion, while others were killed for trivial infractions. The wife of “President” (Dictator) Nicolae Ceausescu in the former Socialist Republic of Romania, Elena became the second most powerful figure in the country thanks almost entirely to her husbands influence within the Communist party. In retrospect, she is now known as a professional nothingburger. Her extreme vanity and desire for (meaningless) honors led to her being appointed as “Mother of the Nation” and Deputy Prime Minister of Romania, along with an ever expanding cult of personality. She was even promoted as a scientist, and was bafflingly awarded a PhD in chemistry despite having minimal formal education. After the Revolution of 1989 and her execution along with her husband, several scientists came forth and claimed that Elena had forced them to write papers in her name. Today, nearly all universities and academic institutions worldwide refuse to acknowledge her alleged academic merit in any shape or form. Deified by the feminist/cultural Marxist western media for being an ultra-rare self-made billionaire with a vagina, Elizabeth Holmes’ blood testing empire famously went crashing down from “4.5 billion to nothing” in the span of a year (2015-2016) due to propagating fraud. Following these revelations, Fortune named Holmes one of the “World’s Most Disappointing Leaders”. The Wall Street Journal investigative reporter John Carreyrou, who was responsible for uncovering and exposing the allegations, stated that “the company was, in effect, a sham.” A Hungarian noblewoman who lived between 1560-1614, Elizabeth Bathory has the devilish distinction of being the most prolific female serial killer in all history, and quite possibly the most prolific serial killer in history. Bathory and four collaborators were accused of torturing and killing hundreds of young women between 1585 and 1609 (purported to be over 650!), and these crimes were verified by the testimony of over 300 witnesses and terrified and mutilated survivors. Now how’s that for a “Me Too” hashtag campaign? Her powerful birthright status was no doubt vital in helping her avoid arrest and retribution for many years, and it was only after rumors of her heinous atrocities spread throughout the kingdom that King Matthias II ordered a full investigation. This finally led to her apprehension, proof of guilt, and solitary confinement until death. “Intelligence Project Director” is the fancy title that ‘Fat Heidi’ holds at this cancerous Montgomery, Alabama based shanking organization. Clearly angry that she got heavily beat with the ugly stick at a young age (and accordingly was probably never very popular with men), she now wants to redefine men’s improvement websites such as Return of Kings as “hate groups“. Why? Because they teach their readers how to make more money, avoid divorce rape, get in shape, and sleep with women who look at least 4 or 5 points higher on the 10 scale than her. She’s a liar, a fraud, and acidic to the eyes and ears. Those women aren’t even worth naming. They are nobodies. It’s easy (preposterous, but easy) to place a woman in a virtue signalling role as defense minister when your country is guaranteed protection by the United States dominated, and British and French supplemented, NATO defense shield. This stands in stark contrast to the clearly far more qualified and serious minded defense ministers of Russia, Iran, and China. They are tasked with defending their nations FROM the United States. Any member of the armed forces of Albania, the Netherlands, Germany, Norway, or Italy should be absolutely insulted that these women are their bosses. Absolutely insulted. Last but not least. The current head honcho of the United Kingdom doesn’t bathe in the blood of young girls (or at least not that we know of), but her gross incompetence as a leader was put on display when she was a key figure in having ROK publisher Daryush Valizadeh (Roosh V) banned from entering her country for “unacceptable behavior” in the form of non-violent thought crimes. Any leader who lets emotions and hearsay falsehoods dictate their policies in lieu of concrete evidence, logic, and reason, is thoroughly unfit for office. Mr. Valizadeh presents the ridiculousness of his predicament in the following video. Beyond a few Tudor-era mega killers, a rambunctious African queen, and a Chinese empress who was arguably never supposed to be there in the first place, did you notice how contemporary a lot of these women are? That is because this wild experiment with female leadership is mostly a very contemporary concept, and it is clearly not working out how people would have hoped. A few isolated examples of successful female leaders from the past do exist (Britain’s Queen Victoria, Spain’s Isabella I, and Russia’s Catherine II come to mind), but they are both few and far between, and were bred and trained for those positions via royal birth. In modern times, popularly elected female leaders have proven themselves to be a disaster, time and time again. They are weak, ineffectual, prone to corruption, or dangerously SJWey. For the good of our nations, it’s time for women to “lean back” from filling up offices and government cabinets, and start filling up baby cribs again. Poster Comment: Great subject. DO females actually make for "horrible leaders"? This question obviously won't be answered at any mainstream media outlet. (And did you see the "Defense Ministers" of several EU countries??) The Proof of the charge is IRREFUTABLE. Just look at these "leaders"; And the list isn't nearly complete. At the local and state level of the US, women are razing this nation. Frankly can't this list be expanded to include thousands of fascist-Leftist women who are "leading" the world and the USA straight into the ground via pubic schools, as gummint officials and drones, as wicked corporate witches, as legislators and as AA military and LE saboteurs? WHO or WHAT is behind this insane trend? Women-in-Charge generally lead to dangerous, bloody confusion and inevitable ruination of EVERY good thing Western man has ever built -- whether governance or the essentials for survival and of modern creature comforts. Women are NOT by nature "Leaders" of men. What do all these women in "leadership" (as well as militant feminists) have in most in common? They are MARXIST. FASCIST. Can't handle power. They abuse power. They are cruel, lack compassion, and seem to regale in the suffering of others -- especially men. They are pro-homosexual and pro-Islam. They support emasculating boys and men. They are anti-Christian and anti-God (because God-the-Father is THE symbol of all paternalistic society.) Whether you are a Believer or Unbeliever in God, "Killing God-the-Father" helps usher in the Age of Gaia and Mother Earth. At its foundation, "Feminist Leadership" is about rebellion and over-turning nature. God's own rules and laws were intended for Man to be "Head of Household". So-called "Feminism" is anti-instinctive, fascist and allied with everything subversive. It is about murdering their respective nations, murdering the unborn and with it civilization itself. It goal seems to be one of cratering all humanity's innate logic and common sense.
1. Wu Zetian – Empress of China
2. Park Geun-hye – President of South Korea
3. Cristina Kirchner – President of Argentina
4. Dilma Rousseff – President of Brazil
5. Angela Merkel – Chancellor of Germany
6. Hillary Clinton – Two Times Failed U.S. Presidential Candidate And Ongoing Cuckquean
7. Jacinda Ardern – Prime Minister of New Zealand
8. Mary I – Queen of England
9. Ranavalona I – Queen of Madagascar
10. Elena Ceausescu – “Mother Of The Nation”
11. Elizabeth Holmes – Founder/CEO of Theranos
12. Elizabeth Bathory – Hungarian Countess
13. Heidi Beirich – Chief Ogress at the SPLC
Fee Fi Fo Fum! What can I do today to shank the goyim!14. The Defense Ministers of Albania, Netherlands, Germany, Norway, and Italy
15. Theresa May – Prime Minister of The U.K.
We must ban this “Roosh” character from entering Britain! He might ask for women’s phone numbers on the street and later have consensual sex with them!Conclusion
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Liberator (#0)
I think Hilldog is the name used by people who love to hate her but will still vote for her. I'm one of the few I know who call her Hitlery, at least here at LF and in real life. I had no idea it was supposed to be some widespread Thing. Maybe in some other region of the country.
Never heard the term before. Maybe its a take on Bubba's "horn-dog"? Can't understand those who hate her but still vote for her. I'm one of the few I know who call her Hitlery, at least here at LF and in real life. I had no idea it was supposed to be some widespread Thing. Maybe in some other region of the country. As well as I. The moniker is such an apt fit. I've been referring to "Hitlery" so much that if I try to type "Hillary" that "t" nearly always finds itself after the "i" no matter what.
I have long called her " Shitlerly " Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt "If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
The Proof of the charge is IRREFUTABLE. I'll refute it. Female leaders who were equal to, or better than, the best male leaders of their era: (1) Queen Elizabeth I (good queen Bess). Brought peace, prosperity and stability to England after years of turmoil. Outfitted the English fleet that defeated the "Invincible" Armada of Spain. Prevailed over the English cultural golden age. (2) Margaret Thatcher. Reversed four decades of British decline. (3) Catherine the Great. Made Russia the greatest power of her age. (4) Queen Victoria. Ruled the British Empire at its zenith. (5) Boudicca. Destroyed Roman legions. Burnt London. (6) Isabella of Spain. Finished the job of driving the Muslims from Spain. Funded Columbus to discover America. (7) Maria-Theresa of Austria. Holy Roman Empress. Reformed central Europe. Defeated France, Russia and Prussia to preserve the Hapsburg empire. (8) Queen Elizabeth II - a lodestar of dignity and stability in our ridiculous era.
La reina, Isabel I de Castilla (1451-1504) the creator of the first global superpower, the Vanquisher of Muslims in Spain. Katherine the Great Indira Gandhi Golda Meir Queen Victoria Empress Irene, the restorer of Christian Faith:
I wouldn't put Indira Ghandi up there, just as I wouldn't put Eva Peron. Yes, they were powerful leaders and they did some good, but they were really, really corrupt. The others stand.
Indira Gandhi was the greatest and beloved leader of the greatest republic in the world, and in the history. Defeated Pakistan. Was hated by the American elites and media.
Katherine the Great was also an animal lover. She really,REALLY,LOVED horses! In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
She LOVED horses! Saddam Hussein loved putting people in the shredder and throwing premature babies out of the incubators. Germans during WWI loved impaling babies on the bayonets. Jews make matzos with blood of babies. Yeah, it all must be truth if you say so.
She really,REALLY,LOVED horses! That's the legend. I doubt it. In any case, she was a great ruler of her country.
#13 heidi The cross burning wiTch WhiTe males chrisTians Love If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Well,she was a great ruler for Russia,but she was German. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Reagan was Irish, so?
No,Reagan was born in America. You could at least TRY to keep up,comreade! In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
No, but Obama is Kenyan.
As soon as I saw the title of this thread, I knew Clinton would be a favorite. Congratulations!
I think "Hildog" came from South Park.
I thought she was a bit overrated. Not terrible, just not great.
This article is both informative and entertaining. :-)
Thatcher was great. So is Queen Elizabeth II.
True. Even Victoria was probably a better-than-average monarch when you judge her by the expansion of the Brit economy and empire.
Saddam's secret police did put people through wood shredders. The throwing babies out of incubators was a complete fabrication. It was peddled to the American public without ever mentioning that the young woman who supposedly witnessed this horror was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. She played her part well as slipping an extra casus belli into the rationale for America ejecting Saddam from Kuwait.
England has always done better under the reign of her female Queens.
Despite a few religiously feisty ones, I'd concede your point.
Her female Queens have been better than the male ones.
Again, hard to disagree.
Elton John exception. And Freddie Mercury. They were among England's best Queens.
The Proof of the charge is IRREFUTABLE (NO). I'll refute it. Ah, but what DID you prove? Al you did was present isolated past historical cases of competent queens or leaders. Yes, they existed (PAST TENSE). Even so, for good reason (nature), past female "Leaders" of societies, tribes and nation were relatively rare. You've provided ONE contemporary case of excellent female leadership on Maggie Thatcher. PERIOD. Why no others? And why no refutation of those contemporary women who are demonstrably DETROYING Western Civ?? Try defending female "Leadership" within the last 40 years or so, and then you've made an actual case. There is NO question to the answer, "DO WOMEN MAKE GOOD LEADERS?". It is a resounding, "ARE ARE KIDDING ME??" The above samples given by the author just scrape the surface. Female leadership is TOXIC to the natural paternalistic order of mankind. And WHO is the authority for such "order"? GOD HIMSELF. And btw -- just because YOU crave a return to 19th century monarchy and return to Holy Roman Empire doesn't mean the rest of us do. OR Americans specifically.
Glad you saw the truth in it (and entertainment value :-) The critique of #7. Jacinda Ardern – Prime Minister of New Zealand -- was brutally funny. And so was the singling out of those so-called "Defense" Ministers of the continent of Estrogenia (who we were reminded ALL rely on the umbrella of defense from the USA in any case)...then comparing them to the REAL Defense Ministers, aka MEN.
Nice try. Like Vic, you've desperately posted the few past competent leaders -- European queens, going back 500 years. Then Meir and Gandhi (*yawn*). THAT is ALL you've got. And LIKE Vic, you completely dismiss the last 40 years of recent history as toxic "Feminism" has completely and utterly taken a sledgehammer to Western Civ and the USA -- and with it, to Common Sense and Logic. Enjoy the noose around your shrunken testicles and the female-driven, Sharia-Loving noose around Western Civ as women continue to get elected and appointed to positions of power.
You are bullshitting again. BTW, Empress Irene goes back 12 centuries plus. Meir and Gandhi would not let you clean their shoes.
You wouldn't know "bullshit" if you were mummified in a shit-sarcophagus with a blow-hole for "ventilation". Who then is the one who has completely dismissed the last 40 years of recent history as toxic "Feminism"? YOU. Who is the one who pretends that female "leadership" has NOT taken Europe AND the USA to the brink because of their complete and utter nonsensical politics? YOU. AGAIN. You've been apprised in a brief sampling of contemporary western "leaders" as having obviously taken a sledgehammer to Western Civ and the USA -- and with it, to Common Sense and Logic -- and yet YOU and Vic are still in denial of the truth of the matter. BTW, Empress Irene goes back 12 centuries plus. And...THAT example is supposed to mitigate the near total destruction of Western Civ by female "leadership"?? You can't be serious. Meir and Gandhi would not let you clean their shoes. OUCH!! Golda Meir governed LIKE A MAN. Pragmatically without a lick of gender politics. That is what made her an effective leader. Same case as with Thatcher. Same as with Indira Gandhi. They were un-corrupted by Identity Politics. CAN YOU SAY THE SAME OF TODAY'S WOMEN in positions of authority? The one unifying trait of ALL three international female leaders (the ONLY three in the "modern era") of so-called female "leaders" were their penchant for governing for the benefit of ALL their respective citizenry, without concern for tribalism like "gender","sexual orientation", race or any other PC criteria. And they were all a bit authoritarian, but not overly so. Much like an good male leader.
English people loved her: One of the MANY street reactions to the most brilliant idea of Maggy - POLL TAX !!! As a result she was forced out in infamy. "The riot in central London did much to contribute to the downfall of Margaret Thatcher, who resigned as Prime Minister on 28 November the same year. The national opposition to the poll tax (especially vehement in the North of England and Scotland) was the major factor; an opinion poll had found 78% opposed to it. John Major, who succeeded Thatcher, announced that the tax would be abolished."
The Holy Roman Empire was a shambling German/Austrian affair. That is no model of monarchy from my perspective. The Dutch or Scandinavian monarchies would be my idea of effective monarchies, and Elizabeth II has been quite a leader. As far as female leaders of the past 40 years, I presented Margaret Thatcher and Queen Elizabeth II. I can only think of one MALE leader worth spit either: Ronald Reagan. Ok, I can think of one more: John Paul II. Besides them, there haven't been great leaders of either sex.
Do you really BELIEVE this nonsense?
No, you're right. I wouldn't pigeon hole you into that kind of thinking on that subject.
And so was Britain's OTHER great leader: CHURCHILL. We know why you'd hate Thatcher: SHE WAS ANTI-SOCIALIST. John Major, who succeeded Thatcher, announced that the tax would be abolished. So he bought the votes of short-sighted socialist Brits who have proven to be so utterly myopic that they've now succumbed to a Muzzie London Mayor, Third World Invasion, and national Sharia Law. Yeah, BRILLIANT Sheep! John Major was a NWO Toolbag and ineffectual nerfball "leader" (which is to say NOT a "leader".)
Wait...you mean though it was STILL controlled by Rome?? The Dutch or Scandinavian monarchies would be my idea of effective monarchies, and Elizabeth II has been quite a leader. Elizabeth 2 -- One monarchical leaders out of how many over several centuries?? The Netherlands, Norway and Sweden are just too tiny to consider "successful". That said, perhaps you're suggesting that Monarchies MAY work in much smaller nations/kingdoms -- and you may be right. Monarchies -- "leadership" by birth -- just doesn't make any sense for a Free People or representative gummint of a Republic. As far as female leaders of the past 40 years, I presented Margaret Thatcher and Queen Elizabeth II. I can only think of one MALE leader worth spit either: Ronald Reagan. Ok, I can think of one more: John Paul II. Besides them, there haven't been great leaders of either sex. We pretty much agree on that; Except for Pope Paul. His legacy was tarnished when his kissed the Koran.
In reading both yours and A Pole's initial posts, perhaps you overlooked the author's admission of a couple of specific examples of past excellent female leadership (which both you and Pole mentioned, thus are not "refuted": The author -- Roosh V (whose amusing youtube vid explains how and why Teresa May's Britain banned him from visiting their quaint Mooslem Caliphate) also notes with specificity: Note: "MODERN WORLD". Isn't Roosh correct in his characterization that women in the vast number of cases make for disastrous "leaders"?? I don't believe either one of you has definitely answered the question.
I don't believe either one of you has definitely answered the question. No, he's wrong. I have not myself seen women in leadership to be notably better, or worse, than men.
Comments (41 - 50) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestHillary Clinton, also affectionately known as “Hitlery” or “Hilldog” by her 100+ million domestic detractors...
#2. To: Tooconservative (#1)
I think Hilldog is the name used by people who love to hate her but will still vote for her.
#3. To: Tooconservative (#1)
" I think Hilldog is the name used by people who love to hate her "
#4. To: Liberator (#0)
DO females actually make for "horrible leaders"?
#5. To: Liberator, Vicomte13, Tooconservative, sneakypete (#0)
#6. To: A Pole (#5)
#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)
#8. To: A Pole (#5)
(Edited)
Katherine the Great
#9. To: sneakypete (#8)
(Edited)
Katherine the Great was also an animal lover.
#10. To: sneakypete (#8)
Katherine the Great was also an animal lover.
#11. To: Liberator (#0)
(Edited)
boris
#12. To: Vicomte13 (#10)
That's the legend. I doubt it. In any case, she was a great ruler of her country.
#13. To: sneakypete (#12)
Well,she was a great ruler for Russia,but she was German.
#14. To: A Pole (#13)
Reagan was Irish, so?
#15. To: A Pole (#13)
#16. To: Liberator (#0)
6. Hillary Clinton – Two Times Failed U.S. Presidential Candidate And Ongoing Cuckquean
#17. To: Liberator (#2)
Never heard the term before. Maybe its a take on Bubba's "horn-dog"? Can't understand those who hate her but still vote for her.
#18. To: A Pole (#5)
Golda Meir
#19. To: Liberator (#0)
#20. To: Tooconservative (#18)
#21. To: Vicomte13 (#20)
#22. To: A Pole (#9)
Saddam Hussein loved putting people in the shredder and throwing premature babies out of the incubators.
#23. To: Tooconservative (#21)
#24. To: Vicomte13 (#23)
#25. To: Tooconservative (#24)
Despite a few religiously feisty ones, I'd concede your point.
#26. To: Vicomte13 (#25)
#27. To: Tooconservative (#26)
Again, hard to disagree.
#28. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
DO females actually make for "horrible leaders"?
#29. To: redleghunter (#19)
This article is both informative and entertaining. :-)
#30. To: A Pole, Vicomte13 (#9)
(Edited)
#31. To: Liberator (#30)
(Edited)
Like Vic, you've desperately posted the few past competent leaders -- European queens, going back 500 years. Then Meir and Gandhi (*yawn*). THAT is ALL you've got.
#32. To: A Pole, Vicomte13 (#31)
You are bullshitting again.
#33. To: Liberator (#32)
(Edited)
Same case as with Thatcher.
#34. To: Liberator (#28)
return to Holy Roman Empire
#35. To: Liberator (#30)
And LIKE Vic, you completely dismiss the last 40 years of recent history as toxic "Feminism" has completely and utterly taken a sledgehammer to Western Civ and the USA -- and with it, to Common Sense and Logic.
#36. To: Vicomte13 (#35)
Do you really BELIEVE this nonsense?
#37. To: A Pole (#33)
She [Thatcher] was forced out in infamy.
#38. To: Vicomte13 (#34)
(Edited)
The Holy Roman Empire was a shambling German/Austrian affair. That is no model of monarchy from my perspective.
#39. To: Vicomte13, A Pole (#4)
"A few isolated examples of successful female leaders from the past do exist (Britain’s Queen Victoria, Spain’s Isabella I, and Russia’s Catherine II come to mind), but they are both few and far between, and were bred and trained for those positions via royal birth."
"A common argument amongst feminists (in addition to their emasculated white knight and soy boy allies) is that women are better suited for leadership positions in the MODERN WORLD. It doesn’t matter whether it’s being President, Prime Minister, Chancellor, or CEO..."
#40. To: Liberator (#39)
Isn't Roosh correct in his characterization that women in the vast number of cases make for disastrous "leaders"??
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]