[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles

Title: Oregon’s Liberal Dem Governor Kate Brown Accepted Large Soros Donation Three Days Before She Refused to Send National Guard to Protect US Border
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 6, 2018
Author: Joe Hoft
Post Date: 2018-04-07 23:58:18 by 3-Dee
Keywords: None
Views: 2011
Comments: 20

Oregon’s Liberal Dem Governor Kate Brown Accepted Large Soros Donation Three Days Before She Refused to Send National Guard to Protect US Border

Guest post by Joe Hoft

Liberal Democrat Governor Kate Brown accepted a large donation from George Soros only days before announcing that she will not send Oregon’s National Guard to the Southern border to help protect the country from illegal aliens.

The Oregon RNC reported on Monday April 2nd, 2018, that the Oregon governor received a large donation from former Nazi collaborator and creepy billionaire George Soros –

Willamette Week is reporting(link is external) that Governor Kate Brown has accepted “an unprecedented” campaign check from George Soros, a billionaire left-wing hedge-fund manager and campaign donor who resides in New York. This is Soros’ “first direct involvement” in Oregon.

“Kate Brown has consistently ignored problems facing everyday Oregonians and has instead used the office of Governor to make herself a national left-wing celebrity. Now, Brown is cashing in and taking big campaign donations from notorious leftist puppet master, billionaire George Soros,” stated Oregon Republican Chairman Bill Currier. Article Continues Below Branding Boot Camp: The Final Result

“We need a Governor who tackles crime, faltering state agencies, and the PERS pension crisis, and a leader who will rescue our bottom performing K-12 schools and stop the out-of-control spending and endless tax increases,” added Currier. “Kate Brown is more interested in wooing George Soros and the out-of-state, leftist, super-rich donor class than truly confronting the serious problems at home. Now we know who she really works for.”

Three days later CNN reported –

Oregon’s governor says that if President Donald Trump asks to dispatch members of her state’s National Guard to the US southern border, she’ll “say no.”

The liberal governor tweeted –

If @realDonaldTrump asks me to deploy Oregon Guard troops to the Mexico border, I’ll say no. As Commander of Oregon’s Guard, I’m deeply troubled by Trump’s plan to militarize our border.

— Governor Kate Brown (@OregonGovBrown) April 4, 2018

Creepy and sinister Soros may have gifted Governor Brown to encourage her to encourage Oregon to keep his voting machines in place too. Oregon is one of 16 states that use Soros related voting machines. Is any corrupt Democrat not associated with creepy Soros?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: 3-Dee (#0)

Oregon’s Liberal Dem Governor Kate Brown Accepted Large Soros Donation Three Days Before She Refused to Send National Guard to Protect US Border

It sounds like a good prosecutor could make a case that Kate accepted a bribe to influence commision of a subversive act. Who does she think she is, Hillary Clinton?

rlk  posted on  2018-04-08   1:29:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: 3-Dee (#0)

This is Soros’ “first direct involvement” in Oregon.

Soros is becoming the shadow president of this nation, piece by piece.

rlk  posted on  2018-04-08   2:27:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: rlk (#1)

This is something that definitely should be looked into. No doubt a fan of HRC.

3-Dee  posted on  2018-04-08   4:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: rlk (#2)

He has been involved in influencing some of the gubenatorial races. Big money and some of his candidates have won. The same thing is going on in Italy.

3-Dee  posted on  2018-04-08   4:47:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: 3-Dee (#0)

Gov. Kate Brown’s appeal crosses state line to attract national donors

Here is a link to the Eugene Register story:

registerguard.com/rg/news.../gov.-kate-browns-appeal- crosses-state-line-to-attract-national-donors.csp

Money = Free speech, right?

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   8:20:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jameson (#5)

Money = Free speech, right?

Is there no end to your moral relativism?

So you're on record as to $upporting bribing US gummint official$ to $ell out the US Constitution, Liberty AND Justice?

You have an extremely warped sense of ethics. Were you raised by wolves?

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-09   11:57:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Liberator (#6)

So you're on record as to $upporting bribing US gummint official$ to $ell out the US Constitution, Liberty AND Justice?

You're inferring what I did not imply........

On the contrary, I am in favor of challenging the SCOTUS decisions that give credibility to the practice of bribery in the name of political speech.

We could start by supporting a challenge to the Citizens United ruling....

We could support putting and end to the "legislation-for-pay" advocated by the PACs funded by the likes of: Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, Foster Friess, Paul Singer, Robert Mercer, and George Soros.

You'd agree with me on this, right?

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   12:21:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jameson (#7)

You're inferring what I did not imply........

UNLESS you consider adding 2+2 = 4 "implying".

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-09   12:30:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Liberator (#8)

I am in favor of challenging the SCOTUS decisions that give credibility to the practice of bribery in the name of political speech.

We could start by supporting a challenge to the Citizens United ruling....

We could support putting and end to the "legislation-for-pay" advocated by the PACs funded by the likes of: Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, Foster Friess, Paul Singer, Robert Mercer, and George Soros.

You'd agree with me on this, right?

Well?

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   12:32:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jameson (#7)

On the contrary, I am in favor of challenging the SCOTUS decisions that give credibility to the practice of bribery in the name of political speech.

The problem is you fail to understand the definition of "Constitutional" and subscribeto an alternative universe definition of "Free Speech"; I'm not being facetious. Your side truly dismisses reality and truth nearly all the time. Probably because you dwell in an echo chamber of consensus where logic and common sense are discarded.

We could start by supporting a challenge to the Citizens United ruling....

Chyeah -- THAT'S a good place to start. IF you're that anxious to dig up the skeleton of Stalin. And want to start CW2.

We could support putting and end to the "legislation-for-pay" advocated by the PACs funded by the likes of: Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, Foster Friess, Paul Singer, Robert Mercer, and George Soros.

I'm glad you tossed in George Soros. Finally we agree on SOMETHING.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-09   12:40:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Liberator (#10)

So you're on record as to $upporting bribing US gummint official$ to $ell out the US Constitution, Liberty AND Justice?

If you fail to understand that this is exactly what is being done to you by the billionaire-funded political action committees, you are indeed part of the problem.

If you think there is any difference in Soros sending $35,000 to Wolfe in Oregon, or the Koch brothers bankrolling ryan....you're simply choosing to be ignorant.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   12:49:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jameson (#11)

If you fail to understand that this is exactly what is being done to you by the billionaire-funded political action committees, you are indeed part of the problem.

*I* understand totally; But what YOU fail to note or concede is that 95% of these same billionaire-funded political action committees are a Leftist-Liberal-Dem alliance.

This Leftist billionaire PAC funds the MSM message, a "Resistance" meme festooned by Leftist opinion and narratives upon The Pods. THE Target: Censorship. AND embedded indoctrination of hatred and violence toward conservative-pro-National and masculine Christian-Men.

By continuing to support this status quo, you are not only THE problem, you may not even realize it.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-09   13:09:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Jameson (#11) (Edited)

If you think there is any difference in Soros sending $35,000 to Wolfe in Oregon, or the Koch brothers bankrolling ryan....you're simply choosing to be ignorant.

I don't believe there's a warrant for others' arrest in any countries as there is for SOROS...IS THERE?

Look -- Soros is in eyeball deep in attempting to manipulate international currencies and governments. He admits his goal is to subvert or take over entire governments.

That you would compare ANYONE to George Soros is simply...madness.

And btw -- Paul Ryan is...A GLOBALIST. Not an American nationalist, FYI.

Liberator  posted on  2018-04-09   13:13:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Liberator (#13)

If you think there is any difference in Soros sending $35,000 to Wolfe in Oregon, or the Koch brothers bankrolling ryan....you're simply choosing to be ignorant.

So, you are in favor of corruption and the bribing of the elected leaders of our nation, as long as you agree with the agenda....is this true?

attempting to manipulate international currencies and governments. He admits his goal is to subvert or take over entire governments.

And the goals of those on the right who promote endless war, continuing interference in the affairs of sovereign nations, manipulating worldwide energy resources, and profiteering at any cost, is different how?

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   13:28:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Liberator (#12)

95% of these same billionaire-funded political action committees are a Leftist-Liberal-Dem alliance.

I challenge you to produce evidence to support this claim.

What you fail to grasp is the fact that this corrupt system is wrong.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   13:35:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Liberator (#12)

But what YOU fail to note or concede is that 95% of these same billionaire-funded political action committees are a Leftist-Liberal-Dem alliance.

Here, I'll help you out....

As of April 09, 2018, 1,867 groups organized as super PACs have reported total receipts of $296,026,301 and total independent expenditures of $61,473,012 in the 2018 cycle. See more on Outside Spending.

Of the top 42 Listed (based on at least $100,000 spent) 31 self identify as conservative.

So, because math is hard for you, lets just use round numbers... about 74% are right- wing

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/superpacs.php

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   13:54:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: 3-Dee (#0)

If Soro's did this treat him as an enemy of the state and put him down! This is the CIA's job!

He clearly wants to harm our Nation. That's what he did to England and after causing all the problems there shorted the pound to make a killing.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-09   14:02:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Jameson (#16)

Of the top 42 Listed (based on at least $100,000 spent) 31 self identify as conservative.

I guess that is what you define conservative? W claimed to be conservative and he is a liberal.

BTW I really doubt the stats. Regressives skirt the law at all cost.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-09   14:14:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Justified (#18)

I guess that is what you define conservative?

Not my definition, but point taken.

I was simply refuting another poster's claim that 95% of PACs were "liberal"

BTW I really doubt the stats.

It is my understanding that the site "opensecrets" is reasonably fair.

Jameson  posted on  2018-04-09   14:35:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Jameson (#19)

Count me doubtful. Not saying they are wrong but it always seems like after you take something at face value it always is shown later on that my first thought was correct.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-09   14:41:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com