[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Senate Votes to Open Debate on Landmark Voter ID Bill"

"The American Islamist Threat Never Left Us"

"Trump to Attend White House Correspondents' Dinner"

"Islamic Republic of Iran Not Dead Yet, Reportedly Using Electronic Warfare in Crucial Strait of Hormuz"

"Can Britain Be Restored?"

"Trump's Big, Beautiful Cartel Crackdown: 92 Cartel Members Extradited Before Jalisco Raid"

"Why the Left is Triggered by Western Culture"

"The Uncomfortable Truth About Trans Violence and Political Radicalization"

"AOC’s Risible Performance"

"Why the Outrage Over the Cuts at the Washington Post Is So Annoying"

"New Poll Crushes Dem, Media Narrative: Americans Demand Mass Deportations, Back ICE Overwhelmingly"

"Democratic Overreach on Immigration Beckons"

How to negotiate to buy a car

Trump warns of a 'massive Armada' headed towards Iran

End Times Prophecy: Trump Says Board of Peace Will Override Every Government & Law – 10 Kings Rising

Maine's legendary 'Lobster Lady' dies after working until she was 103 and waking up at 3am every day

Hannity Says Immigration Raids at Home Depot Are Not ‘A Good Idea’

TREASON: Their PRIVATE CHAT just got LEAKED.

"Homan Plans to Defy Spanberger After ‘Bond Villain’ Blocks ICE Cooperation in VA: ‘Not Going to Stop’"

"DemocRATZ Radical Left-Wing Vision for Virginia"

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 4, 2018
Author: Lydia O’Connor
Post Date: 2018-04-04 11:28:15 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 1435
Comments: 12

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use

Opening fire should be enforced as the last resort, the bill’s supporters say.

By Lydia O’Connor

On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its- kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.

The proposed legislation would change the guidance in California’s use of force laws so that police may open fire ”‘only when necessary’ rather than ‘when reasonable,’” Sacramento-based Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (D), said at a press conference Tuesday.

He co-authored the bill with fellow Democrat Assemblywoman Shirley Weber with support from the American Civil Liberties Union and fellow members of the California Legislative Black Caucus. They were joined at Tuesday’s press conference with Sacramento leaders from the NAACP and the Black Lives Matter movement, along with the grandfather of 22-year-old Stephon Clark, last month’s shooting victim.

“We should no longer be the target practice of a ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ police force,” Assemblyman Christopher Holden (D) said, before listing the names of several other unarmed black victims of police shootings.

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW DOWNLOAD The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men. Supporters of the bill hope raising the standard for when lethal force is permitted will encourage officers to make de-escalation their first line of defense.

The current standard comes from an “over-100-year-old law that too often justifies deadly force incidents,” McCarty said.

In the weeks since Clark’s death, McCarty’s district has been stormed by protestors furious about the emerging details surrounding the shooting. Upward of 300 demonstrators gathered in Sacramento last Friday after an autopsy revealed the young father was shot at least seven times in the back in his own backyard.

“It’s clear that the current law protects the police, not the people,” ACLU legislative advocate Lizzie Buchen said at Tuesday’s announcement as activists recounted similar shooting incidents involving police.

Weber is confident the state can pave the way on this issue.

“If California can’t do it,” she asked, “who can?”


Poster Comment:

Good plan, the first rational law by the progressives in a long time, ---- about gun use.. Far to many cops are cowboys, eager to use their weapons.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#2. To: tpaine (#0)

The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men.

This may be a slanted claim.

The reality is that urban areas have disproportionately higher black populations. Does anyone contest that? Whatever the reason I believe it's true.

And it's also true that urban areas have the highest crime, so I would expect urban areas therefore to have the highest rates of police shootings.

So to measure things fairly, you need to look at the black/white police shooting victim rates in comparison with the black/white population rates where the shootings occur.

There may well still be racial profiling, but it's certainly not fair to compare national racial stats with national police shootings and conclude there is profiling, if most shootings are in urban areas where blacks make up a higher percentage of the population.

When people are packed into cities, crime will go up no matter what race they are.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-04-04   11:49:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Pinguinite (#2)

This may be a slanted claim.

Yep, I agree it is.. But race aside, cops are a bit too eager to blast away for my comfort.

tpaine  posted on  2018-04-04   13:53:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tpaine, Pinguinite (#4)

cops are a bit too eager to blast away for my comfort.

I disagree. I think they are terrified which cause them to act fast or die(or greatly harmed).

How did we in the old days have so little problem with so few officers? To me it keeps coming back to we ask them to do too many things which require more officers which means we will get unqualified officer in the field because we need numbers on the street.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-04   14:05:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Justified, tpaine (#6)

How did we in the old days have so little problem with so few officers? To me it keeps coming back to we ask them to do too many things

In the old days, local cops had their "beat" which was their section of the city or town they patrolled. They knew the people who lived there and what they were like, and those people knew the cops. The cops also knew when someone didn't belong.

With that knowledge and understanding of the community, cops knew who was a threat and who wasn't.

With more time comes more bureaucracy and laws and cops now have to enforce more edicts, like shutting down lemonade stands by 3rd graders and yard sales lacking a permit, and confiscating money from people for not wearing a seatbelt or speeding somewhat, so they deal with less real crime and no longer represent protection, but rather become the symbol of big brother government who more often than not, mean bad news for anyone they have dealings with. And that bad chemistry means cops will have less inhibition about reaching for a gun.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-04-04   14:50:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

        There are no replies to Comment # 8.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com