[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 4, 2018
Author: Lydia O’Connor
Post Date: 2018-04-04 11:28:15 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 698
Comments: 12

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use

Opening fire should be enforced as the last resort, the bill’s supporters say.

By Lydia O’Connor

On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its- kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.

The proposed legislation would change the guidance in California’s use of force laws so that police may open fire ”‘only when necessary’ rather than ‘when reasonable,’” Sacramento-based Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (D), said at a press conference Tuesday.

He co-authored the bill with fellow Democrat Assemblywoman Shirley Weber with support from the American Civil Liberties Union and fellow members of the California Legislative Black Caucus. They were joined at Tuesday’s press conference with Sacramento leaders from the NAACP and the Black Lives Matter movement, along with the grandfather of 22-year-old Stephon Clark, last month’s shooting victim.

“We should no longer be the target practice of a ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ police force,” Assemblyman Christopher Holden (D) said, before listing the names of several other unarmed black victims of police shootings.

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW DOWNLOAD The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men. Supporters of the bill hope raising the standard for when lethal force is permitted will encourage officers to make de-escalation their first line of defense.

The current standard comes from an “over-100-year-old law that too often justifies deadly force incidents,” McCarty said.

In the weeks since Clark’s death, McCarty’s district has been stormed by protestors furious about the emerging details surrounding the shooting. Upward of 300 demonstrators gathered in Sacramento last Friday after an autopsy revealed the young father was shot at least seven times in the back in his own backyard.

“It’s clear that the current law protects the police, not the people,” ACLU legislative advocate Lizzie Buchen said at Tuesday’s announcement as activists recounted similar shooting incidents involving police.

Weber is confident the state can pave the way on this issue.

“If California can’t do it,” she asked, “who can?”


Poster Comment:

Good plan, the first rational law by the progressives in a long time, ---- about gun use.. Far to many cops are cowboys, eager to use their weapons.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tpaine (#0)

It will last until they lose a bunch of officers.

Hesitation and seconded guessing will lead to officers dying.

How about just making less laws so officers can deal with real crime?

Justified  posted on  2018-04-04   11:47:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tpaine (#0)

The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men.

This may be a slanted claim.

The reality is that urban areas have disproportionately higher black populations. Does anyone contest that? Whatever the reason I believe it's true.

And it's also true that urban areas have the highest crime, so I would expect urban areas therefore to have the highest rates of police shootings.

So to measure things fairly, you need to look at the black/white police shooting victim rates in comparison with the black/white population rates where the shootings occur.

There may well still be racial profiling, but it's certainly not fair to compare national racial stats with national police shootings and conclude there is profiling, if most shootings are in urban areas where blacks make up a higher percentage of the population.

When people are packed into cities, crime will go up no matter what race they are.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-04-04   11:49:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Justified (#1)

Good plan, the first rational law by the progressives in a long time, ---- about gun use.. Far to many cops are cowboys, overly eager to use their weapons.

Hesitation and seconded guessing will lead to officers dying.

I see a lot of cowboy shootings, very few where officers die from hesitating.

I've got no problem with them drawing their guns, but being so quick on the trigger needs some change..

tpaine  posted on  2018-04-04   13:46:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Pinguinite (#2)

This may be a slanted claim.

Yep, I agree it is.. But race aside, cops are a bit too eager to blast away for my comfort.

tpaine  posted on  2018-04-04   13:53:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: tpaine (#3)

I think the problem is officers are ask to do too much and the tactics that save their life will cause officer to act fast. Done over and over these actions are going to cause premature discharge.

Really its comes down to officers are ask to do too much and the statics are in the favor someone getting killed. If you demand officer to slow down the statics will push back to were officers are killed more. In the end its the fact that we should not ask officer to do so much bring down the odds of something bad happen.

Its about the destruction of society by the progressives to make it impossible for officer to do their job with out great harm.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-04   14:00:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tpaine, Pinguinite (#4)

cops are a bit too eager to blast away for my comfort.

I disagree. I think they are terrified which cause them to act fast or die(or greatly harmed).

How did we in the old days have so little problem with so few officers? To me it keeps coming back to we ask them to do too many things which require more officers which means we will get unqualified officer in the field because we need numbers on the street.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-04   14:05:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Justified, tpaine (#6)

I think they are terrified which cause them to act fast or die(or greatly harmed).

No, cops are clearly not "terrified". If they truly were that, they would simply not be able to ever function as cops day in and day out. No one would be able to put up with going to do a job that terrifies them day in and day out.

But they are constantly armed, and deeply trained and reminded very frequently about how failing to instantly shoot at the first sign that a target may be a threat makes them, for lack of a better word "trigger happy" though I would not say "happy" enters into the equation. Certainly some cops are, as I'm confident the infamous "simon-says" cop was.

And certainly some cops have survived hostile encounters because of that training. But what I would like to see is a statistical count of the number of cops that killed people who were not threats at all vs the number of cops that were killed in hostile encounters.

I suspect that ratio is very lopsided against innocent civs, but I'd like to see the stats.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-04-04   14:40:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Justified, tpaine (#6)

How did we in the old days have so little problem with so few officers? To me it keeps coming back to we ask them to do too many things

In the old days, local cops had their "beat" which was their section of the city or town they patrolled. They knew the people who lived there and what they were like, and those people knew the cops. The cops also knew when someone didn't belong.

With that knowledge and understanding of the community, cops knew who was a threat and who wasn't.

With more time comes more bureaucracy and laws and cops now have to enforce more edicts, like shutting down lemonade stands by 3rd graders and yard sales lacking a permit, and confiscating money from people for not wearing a seatbelt or speeding somewhat, so they deal with less real crime and no longer represent protection, but rather become the symbol of big brother government who more often than not, mean bad news for anyone they have dealings with. And that bad chemistry means cops will have less inhibition about reaching for a gun.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-04-04   14:50:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Pinguinite (#2)

When people are packed into cities, crime will go up no matter what race they are.

East St Louis IL => pop - 26,672; murder rate 100.9/100K

Gary IN => pop - 74,186,; murder rate - 60.1/100K

San Jose CA => pop - 1,025,373; murder rate - 4.5/100K

San Diego CA => pop - 1,381,069; murder rate - 3.5/100K

_________________________________

Source: city-data.com

kenh  posted on  2018-04-04   15:50:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Pinguinite (#7)

No, cops are clearly not "terrified".

You do not have to be terrified all the time. Just in a really bad situations. Like wars officers are bored 90% of the time and that 10% is where all the training comes to bear. That 10% can be shear terror. Remember police are called to a place where someone is having their worst day ever and some of these people are pure shit for human beings(human animals).

Truth is how often does an officer shoot an unarmed person anyway?

Of those that are shoot how many where attacking the officer?

To me people are always saying its the officers fault when in my mind I see most of these problems coming from nanny state where officers are always having to deal with stupid stuff not really part of dealing with real criminals. Because we require so much of them that there isn't enough good officers and government is forced to hire anyone with a pulse. These tend to be the officers that causing all the problems. So is it the officer problem or a over burdensome government who can't find enough qualified officers the problem? I say its the governments fault.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-04   16:45:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Pinguinite (#7)

I would like to see is a statistical count of the number of cops that killed people who were not threats at all vs the number of cops that were killed in hostile encounters.

I suspect that ratio is very lopsided against innocent civs, but I'd like to see the stats.

Me too...

tpaine  posted on  2018-04-04   16:55:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: tpaine (#0)

Give them pop guns to use against the multitudinous gaggle of imbecilic monkeys.

How scary it is for a policeman to stop a car on the highway at night. He doesn't know what's hunched over that steering wheel, or if he'll get home tonight.

Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.

IbJensen  posted on  2018-04-07   10:25:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com