Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: What’s Missing – and Why!
Source:
Eric Peters Autos
URL Source: https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2018/04/01/whats-missing-and-why/
Published: Apr 1, 2018
Author: Eric
Post Date: 2018-04-03 09:33:51 by Deckard
Ping List: *Cars and Automotive* Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*
Keywords: None
Views: 1934
Comments: 19
New cars have many features old cars never had – LCD touchscreens and WiFi, for instance. But new cars are missing some things, too. Maybe you remember – and wonder why? Bumpers that could take a bump – Until about the early-mid 1990s, most cars still had external bumpers designed to be . . . bumped. They were made of steel and so didn’t easily tear, like today’s plastic bumper covers do – leading to very expensive repairs, usually involving the replacement of the torn bumper cover and then repainting it. So, why? Environmental regs made chrome-plating steel bumpers expensive – so they were replaced with cheap plastic bumper covers painted body color. Underneath these plastic fascias – as they’re called – are structures designed to crumple up like tin foil, which is another reason why new cars incurs so much damage in even minor accidents. In the Bumper Days, there was often no immediately noticeable damage after bumping into another car – and if there was, it was often possible to just pull the bumper back into place. You can’t do that with a torn plastic fascia. Visibility – It’s getting hard to see where you’re going, especially to the sides and behind you. It’s become so bad that most new cars have sensors that beep when you’re about to bump into something – operating on the same principle as the blind man’s cane – and cameras with TV monitors to let you see what you otherwise couldn’t. It used to be that only huge RVs had back-up cameras – because only huge RVs needed them. So, why? Saaaaaaaaaaaaafety regulations have turned passenger cabins into tank command centers, with about the same view of the outside world. The pillars which support the roof are easily three times as thick as they used to be – in order to support the weight of the car if it rolls onto its roof, per the federal requirement. Of course, the poor visibility makes it more likely that the car will end up rolling onto its roof – but at least you’ll be saaaaaaaaaafe if it happens. Most new cars also have bloated/jacked-up kaboooses – sheetmetal and plastic Kim Kardashians – and that plus often tiny and sharply slanted rear glass makes it very hard to see what’s going on behind you – and whether, in particular, there’s a child playing in the road behind you. Hence the back-up cameras and remote TV displays – which older cars never had but which all new cars have to have, per federal fatwa. The floorboard headlight dimmer switch – My ’76 Trans Am, like most American cars of its time, has a floor-mounted dimmer switch. If you want to cancel the high beams, you use your left foot – enabling you to keep both hands on the wheel. In modern cars, it’s usually necessary to take at least one hand off the wheel in order to dim the headlights via pulling back on a steering column-mounted stalk. This stalk also often houses the controls for the turn signals, windshield wipers and (in some cars) other things, too. So it’s fairly easy to turn on (and off) other things when all you wanted to do was turn off the high beams. So, why? Packaging. The car companies make money by figuring out how to sell you a car for more that cost them less to build. A single multi-function steering column-mounted stalk apparently costs less in the grand scheme of things than a separate, floor-mounted dimmer switch. Another (and less snarky) reason has to do with keeping the high beam control clean and dry. On the floorboard, it’s more vulnerable to getting wet – and to dirt getting into the works. And then, not working. Wing vents for the door side glass – Most cars didn’t use to have air conditioning – which for a long time was a high-end (and highly expensive) option. So it was necessary to make sure the air flowed some other way. One way was by installing moveable wing vents in the door glass that could be opened – and canted – to direct air into the car. When the car was moving, this was a very effective way to “air condition” the car for free, particularly when the wing vents were paired up with under-dash vents that could be opened and closed by pulling on cable-actuated levers. Those have gone away, too. So, why? Air conditioning – which is standard equipment in every new car – eliminated the need for “free” air conditioning but there were also the issues of the physical security of the car (it’s easier to break into a car with wing vent windows) and the phsyical integrity of the interior (wing vent windows tend to leak both air and water over time, as the rubber seals age and shrink). An irony of the times is that many new cars have fixed vent windows that seem to be begging to be opened – if only they had hinges to allow them to do so. 
Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
When the central socialist government got into the designing of our automobiles we allowed these liberal pansies who rule and ruin our lives and our country to get away with it. All the so-called government edicted 'safety' features was so much airbag nonsense! Then we have Al Gore to thank for shoving legislation through to limit the size of the toilet water used to flush the damned toilets. You have to flush it twice. Sometimes before I flush I think I see Al's face. Next some dimwitted congressrat submits a bill that was subsequently passed outlawing Thomas Edison's excellent incandescent light bulb. The new light bulbs were to use less electricity, emit the same amount of light and last for a decade. Not so. The American light bulb factories were forced to close and the Chinese make these bulbs that don't last very long and put out poor quality of light! Practically all, save two or three, Congressrats piss on the Constitution on a regular basis.
Then we have Al Gore to thank for shoving legislation through to limit the size of the toilet water used to flush the damned toilets. You have to flush it twice. Sometimes before I flush I think I see Al's face. NOT true! That was true maybe the first year they were mandated,but now there is no comparison between how effective a modern low-water flush toilet is to one of the older toilets. I have one of each in my home,and a modern low-water flush toilet out in my shop,and the new ones are amazing. I'm surprised anybody is still able to sell plungers to people who only have new toilets. If you can manage to get one of them to overflow from a bowel movement,it's because you used a whole roll of toilet paper,and maybe your wallet fell in when you dropped your pants. They work at least 10 times better on 1/3rd of the water,
What about the Chinese light bulbs?
What about them?
Yeah! What about the central socialist government edicting that we can only buy Chinese lightbulbs??????
#15. To: IbJensen (#14)
When did this happen?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#5. To: IbJensen (#3)
#6. To: sneakypete (#5)
#12. To: IbJensen (#6)
What about the Chinese light bulbs?
#14. To: sneakypete (#12)
What about them?
Replies to Comment # 14. Yeah! What about the central socialist government edicting that we can only buy Chinese lightbulbs??????
End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]