[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Palin's own 'Climate-gate'
Source: Washington Poat
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy ... /12/14/AR2009121402712_pf.html
Published: Dec 15, 2009
Author: Eugene Robinson
Post Date: 2009-12-19 15:37:36 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 37647
Comments: 224

By Eugene Robinson Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Sarah Palin is such a cold-eyed skeptic about the Copenhagen summit on climate change that it's no surprise she would call on President Obama not to attend. After all, Obama might join other leaders in acknowledging that warming is a "global challenge." He might entertain "opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions." He might even explore ways to "participate in carbon-trading markets."

Oh, wait. Those quotes aren't from some smug Euro-socialist manifesto. They're from an administrative order Palin signed in September 2007, as governor of Alaska, establishing a "sub-Cabinet" of top state officials to develop a strategy for dealing with climate change.

Back then, Palin was the governor of a state where "coastal erosion, thawing permafrost, retreating sea ice, record forest fires, and other changes are affecting, and will continue to affect, the lifestyles and livelihoods of Alaskans," as she wrote. Faced with that reality, she sensibly formed the high-level working group to chart a course of action.

"Climate change is not just an environmental issue," wrote Palin. "It is also a social, cultural, and economic issue important to all Alaskans."

Palin mentioned having created the climate change unit in an op-ed she wrote last week for The Post. What she didn't acknowledge was the contrast between what she says about climate change now and what she said -- and did -- about it as governor of our most at-risk state. When she was in office, Palin treated the issue as serious, complex and worthy of urgent attention. Now that she's the iconic leader of a populist movement that reacts with anger at the slightest whiff of pointy-headed, "one world" intellectualism, she writes as if the idea of seeking ways to mitigate climate change is a crock.

"Alaska's climate is warming," Palin wrote to Alaskans in a July 2008 newsletter. "While there have been warming and cooling trends before, climatologists tell us that the current rate of warming is unprecedented within the time of human civilization. Many experts predict that Alaska, along with our northern latitude neighbors, will warm at a faster pace than any other areas, and the warming will continue for decades."

In her administrative order, Palin instructed the sub-Cabinet group to develop recommendations on "the opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Alaska sources, including the expanded use of alternative fuels, energy conservation, energy efficiency, renewable energy, land use management, and transportation planning." She also instructed the group to look into "carbon-trading markets."

But in her op-ed last week, Palin -- while acknowledging "natural, cyclical environmental trends" and the possibility that human activity might be contributing to warming -- states flatly that "any potential benefits of proposed emissions reduction policies are far outweighed by their economic costs." What she once called "carbon-trading markets" she now denounces as "the Democrats' cap-and-tax proposal."

Palin cites the "Climate-gate" e-mail scandal as reason enough for the president to skip the Copenhagen summit. I've written about those e-mails and why, despite what skeptics say, they do not begin to prove that climate science is fraudulent, politicized or fundamentally flawed. The most compelling evidence for climate change is found in the Arctic, and Palin has seen it firsthand.

In her 2008 newsletter, Palin mentioned one coastal village, Newtok, that would have to be relocated because of flooding due to the effects of warmer temperatures. Since then, relocation plans have been developed for two more towns, Shishmaref and Kivalina. The Army Corps of Engineers has identified more than 160 villages that are threatened, according to a recent newsletter from Palin's successor, Gov. Sean Parnell. At least 31 are judged to be in "imminent" peril.

In case anyone was wondering, Palin's home town of Wasilla sits at an elevation of 333 feet -- high and dry.

The chairman of the Cabinet working group that Palin assembled to develop a climate change strategy, Larry Hartig, is scheduled to deliver a presentation at Copenhagen. Posted in advance on the Internet, the presentation shows that Alaskans aren't just fretting about the abstract possibility of effects from warming. They're dealing with a real, live situation.

I predict we'll see more artful dodges of this kind from Palin. She made any number of pragmatic, reasonable, smart decisions as governor -- and now, it seems, will be obliged to renounce them all. Her tea-party legions have one answer -- a shouted "No!" -- for every question.

Palin knows better, but she has to fiddle her followers' chosen tune -- not while Rome burns, but while Nome melts.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 94.

#5. To: We The People, ALL (#0)

LOL!

While the messiah "king" obammy is busy KILLING America all day EVERY day, this specious bullsh!t is what the jealous paulTARD weeps and his ilk find "important".

Governor Palin SCARES them that much.

Well dry out your tutu weeps, (maybe you should put a new one on, that one smells of pi$$), I hear that TMZ is looking for writers weeps.

Because what is REALLY important is "what is Governor Palin wearing?" /S

Mad Dog  posted on  2009-12-19   16:02:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Mad Dog, Liberator, Iblusomebody (#5)

Well, here's yet another stain on the conservative dress of your neoqueen.

And instead of addressing the facts of the article and the truth about your neoqueen, you Palintards attack the author and attack me for posting the story! (ALINSKY!)

You useful idiots will do anything and say anything to protect the imaginary honor of just another establishment, RINO, neoconservative who has not ONE shred of conservative credentials. Amazing!

For a path to citizenship.

For the bailouts.

Loves and supports McCain 100%.

Swallowed the 'climate change' bullshit hook, line and sinker.

Well, she has shown you who she really is, whether or not you decide to support her (100% LMAO!) is up to you.

For the record, your comments so far also show who you really are, which is why it's impossible to take any of you seriously.

But count on one thing, every time I see any of you call yourselves conservatives, I'll be right there to remind you of just how full of shit you are! ;o)

Merry Christmas!

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   19:26:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: We The People (#15)

Yet you support Paul an open border free tarde libertarian.

WhiteSands  posted on  2009-12-19   19:36:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: WhiteSands (#17)

Yet you support Paul an open border free tarde libertarian.

I don't know why I even bother to respond to your either dishonest or uninformed opinions, or your attempts to deflect and side track the conversation, but here goes anyway:

I do support Paul, but he is not an open border free trade libertarian.

I support his wanting to end welfare, birthright citizenship and jobs for illegals. I support him because he was against the bailouts, the federal reserve, the Iraq war, etc.

I don't agree with Paul on all of his views, but he's the closest thing there is in American government to a real conservative.

But this article isn't about Paul. Would you like to address the substance of this article, or is that taboo for you? This article is about Palin. If you want to discuss Paul you should post a Paul article.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   19:59:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: We The People (#23)

But this article isn't about Paul.

the substance of this article,

An article written by a leftist in the same school as Rachel Maddow and Maureen Dowd and you suck it right on down like a good kool-aid drinker.

What is the substance?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2009-12-19   20:30:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Ibluafartsky (#50)

An article written by a leftist in the same school as Rachel Maddow and Maureen Dowd and you suck it right on down like a good kool-aid drinker.

Nice! Sorry, but your attempts at deflection away from the substance of the article have failed.

Have you forgotten? These comments ARE PALIN'S OWN WORDS, not comments taken out of context and spun by a leftist news source.

What is the substance? It's right here:

"Oh, wait. Those quotes aren't from some smug Euro-socialist manifesto. They're from an administrative order Palin signed in September 2007, as governor of Alaska, establishing a "sub-Cabinet" of top state officials to develop a strategy for dealing with climate change."

The substance is also Palin's stance on a 'path to citizenship', her adoration and 100% support for John McCain, her support of the bailouts, etc.

The substance is...the woman is not a conservative.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-20   11:31:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: We The People (#68)

These comments ARE PALIN'S OWN WORDS,

Wow, over 2 years ago as governor!!!! Desperation on the part of the lefties, and you Palinhaters gladly and lustily drinking the kool-aid!

They're from an administrative order Palin signed in September 2007, as governor of Alaska,

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2009-12-20   15:50:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Ibluafartsky (#69)

Wow, over 2 years ago as governor!!!!

Desperation on the part of the lefties, and you Palinhaters gladly and lustily drinking the kool-aid!

Was it 2 years ago that she said she 'adores John McCain and supports him 100%"?

Desperation, Palinhaters, gladly and lustily, koolaid, etc are all hyperbole. I don't hate Palin. I just don't support those who lean left.

Bottom line, the woman is no conservative. Anyone who says she is, is either being dishonest or ignorant.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-20   16:09:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: We The People (#70)

Was it 2 years ago that she said she 'adores John McCain and supports him 100%"?

I'm willing to bet that what they say she said isn't exactely what she said. The quote is un-original and I have seen it before.

mel  posted on  2009-12-21   10:28:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: mel (#75)

I'm willing to bet that what they say she said isn't exactely what she said. The quote is un-original and I have seen it before.

You'd lose, Mel:

Palin said in the statement to POLITICO: “I am so sorry if people took this silly incident the wrong way. I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago. So much for trying to be incognito."

war  posted on  2009-12-21   12:22:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: war (#76)

I understand that is the statement Politico claims to have quoted her saying.

I also understand that when reporters quote some people, the quote is not always what was said.

mel  posted on  2009-12-21   12:34:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: mel (#78)

Do you have any evidence to the contrary. She's very quick to point out when she's been misquoted...

war  posted on  2009-12-21   13:31:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: war (#81)

Do you have any evidence to the contrary. She's very quick to point out when she's been misquoted...

Unlike some - I don't spend every moment awake following Sarah's every move. I've heard the McCain part of that quote before - when she was his running mate. So no, I don't have any evidence one way or the other. I do know some of the things she has said about McCain and not agreeing with him 100% of the time.

I do have evidence that the media tends to misquote, misinterpret, and take out of context on a regular basis.

Why people want to examine her every word is beyond me. Sometimes we say things just to be polite, even if it's not exactly how we feel. I'm sure you've told your wife she looks great in something you thought she looked ridiculous in.

mel  posted on  2009-12-21   18:50:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: mel (#87)

I've heard the McCain part of that quote before - when she was his running mate.

She said what I provided AFTER the campaign was over.

war  posted on  2009-12-22   8:25:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: war (#89)

She said what I provided AFTER the campaign was over.

Allegedly - according to Politico - You'll have to forgive me if I have trouble believing everything I hear in the media. In fact, remember a couple of people had stated Obama was born in different places - according to the media. IS that true too since the media said so? Didn't think so. Why is it such a big deal anyway?

mel  posted on  2009-12-22   11:22:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: mel (#91)

In fact, remember a couple of people had stated Obama was born in different places - according to the media.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

There's no reason to disbelieve one set of reporting over an issue by one outlet because of the misreporting of another.

Then again, Palinites had the same issue with what The Virgin Sarah said to both Gibson and Couric even in the face of a video record - not that you were one of them.

war  posted on  2009-12-22   11:44:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: war (#92)

There's no reason to disbelieve one set of reporting over an issue by one outlet because of the misreporting of another.

Thank you, Dan Rather.

(do you ever read your own posts?)

Liberator  posted on  2009-12-22   12:04:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 94.

#96. To: Liberator (#94)

What Rather reported was never disputed by boy Blunder.

war  posted on  2009-12-22 13:32:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 94.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com