[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

'I always do my best to treat people respectfully, including those I disagree with': Sarah Sanders slams owner of restaurant who kicked out her and seven members of her family because she 'works for the president'

Three FBI Cadets

Retrospective: UNBELIEVABLE OBAMA GAFFES, Mistakes, Lies, and Confusion (as worshipful MSM still drooled over their idiotic "genius" & "cool" Prez anyway)

Trump Valiantly Tried to Save America

John McAfee says he has been poisoned, and tells culprits: 'You will soon understand the true meaning of wrath'

The Prisoner (All 17 Episodes)

Huge Win for Everyone With a Cellphone (and for the Fourth Amendment) at the Supreme Court

The Best Places To Live In All 50 U.S. States

Mad Dog Mattis, the destroyer of Raqqa, frets about losing moral authority

What Kind of Country Are We?

Will Our Lack of Humanity Be the END of Humanity?

Hypocrisy

Evangelical Nevada Voters Back Trump-Praising Brothel Owner; 'I Want to Hurl,' CWA President Penny Nance Says

Time Magazine Corrects Cover Story on Crying Migrant Girl, Admits Family Was Never Separated

A mystery: Italy seizing migrant rescue ships, but who owns them? [Soros]

Tom Arnold says he's teaming up with Michael Cohen and 'taking Trump down'

Hoops legend Kevin McHale slammed for apparently attending Trump rally: ‘He should never work in the NBA again’

David Hogg Reappears to Take Another Stab at Destroying Laura Ingraham’s Career

Justice Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch levy internet taxes

Bombs Away! US Airstrikes Every 12 Minutes?

VULGAR OPEN-BORDERS MEDIA-HOLLYWOOD LIBERALS-DEMOCRATS DECLARE TOTAL WAR ON AMERICA & TRUMP (**MSM DIVERSIONS CREATED TO STOP SCRUTINY OF 0BAMA COUP INVOLVEMENT**)

Anti-Trump media moves goal posts after executive order in 'shameful' display of bias

Bypassing Facebook on the dark web

Bannon, Salvini, And A Powerful Catholic Cardinal Are Gunning For Pope Francis

DOJ requests military lawyers to help prosecute immigration crimes: report

Canada legalizes marijuana, sales to start on October 17

Will the Real Donald Trump Please Stand Up?

WHY CAN’T WE SUE THE TSA FOR ASSAULT?

WATCH VIDEO: Muslim calls flight attendant a ‘fucking slut*’ and a ‘bitch for serving him what he thinks is pork – “She should have respected my religion”

James Comey And Peter Strzok Walk Into A Courtroom And Meet The America They Sold Out

Barack Obama: Liar And Nation Wrecker

Islamic Takeover Of America!

What Trump Gets Right About Europe

America the beautiful

"I'm 81 and I'm Tired"

Rachel Maddow Breaks Down in Tears Delivering News of Migrant Babies Being Detained

Disability Applications Plunge as the Economy Strengthens

Nazi Media or MSM as we know them

'Disastrous' copyright bill vote approved

Google Is Training Machines to Predict When a Patient Will Die

Tariffs Will Wipe Out the Benefits of Tax Reform

Study Confirms Most Psychopaths Live in Washington D.C.

Can Police Arrest Person Carrying Gun Without First Checking If He's Licensed? |

Why America’s Trade War With China Will Be Absolutely Crippling For The U.S. Economy

Mainstream Media Confirms "Conspiracy Theory" That Walmart Stores Are Being Turned into Prison Camps

AMA Says Take Your Meds While Doctors Take Your Guns

Wealthy Asians Are Getting Richer Faster Than Anyone Else

Government Eyes Are Watching You: We Are All Prisoners of the Surveillance State

Taxation=Theft

Why Can't We Sue the TSA For Assault?


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder
Source: Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/bi ... der-caused-by-antidepressants/
Published: Mar 12, 2018
Author: Rachel Blevins
Post Date: 2018-03-13 07:33:05 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 87
Comments: 6

Every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of people who automatically question whether the suspect had mental health issues or was taking prescription medications such as antidepressants.

While history has shown that the most notorious mass shooters in this century were taking antidepressants or Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) before they carried out the deadly rampages, there are a number of killings that have been linked directly to the dangerous drugs. In fact, the pharmaceutical companies behind the most popular SSRI’s have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in damages:

Eli Lilly Paid Secret Settlements to Survivors After Man on Prozac Went on Shooting Rampage in 1989

Joseph T. Wesbecker, 47, carried out a mass shooting in which he shot 20 workers at Standard Gravure Corp. in Kentucky, in September 1989. Eight of the victims were fatally wounded, and Wesbecker ended the rampage by shooting and killing himself.

Just one month earlier, Wesbecker had started taking the antidepressant Prozac, which included side effects such as “obsession with suicide and dangerously violent behavior,” according to an article in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

When the survivors of the shooting filed a lawsuit against Eli Lilly arguing that it had known about the propensity of Prozac to cause violent outbursts and suicidal tendencies, the company convinced the victims to agree to secret settlements outside of court.

GlaxoSmithKline Paid $6.4 Million to the Family of a Man Who Murdered Three Family Members Hours After Taking Paxil in 1998

Donald Schell, 60, was prescribed the antidepressant Paxil to treat depression in Wyoming in February 1998. Within hours of taking the first dosage, he burst into a fit of rage and fatally shot his wife, Rita; their daughter, Deborah Tobin; and their 9-month-old granddaughter, Alyssa.

Schell then shot and killed himself. His remaining family members filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company behind Paxil, and they were awarded $6.4 million based on “the company’s failure to sufficiently warn doctors and patients that the effects of the drug could include agitation and violence.”

GlaxoSmithKline Also Paid $3 Million to the Widow of a Man Who Committed Suicide After Taking Paxil in 2010

Stewart Dolin, 57, was working as a corporate attorney in Illinois when he was prescribed the generic version of the antidepressant Paxil for depression and anxiety. While taking the drug, he committed suicide by jumping in front of a Chicago Transit Authority train.

His widow, Wendy Dolin, filed a lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline, arguing that the company failed to warn her husband’s doctor that the drug he was being prescribed would increase his risk of suicidal behavior, which led to his death.

“This for me has not just been about the money. This has always been about awareness to a health issue, and the public has to be aware of this,” Wendy Dolin told the Chicago Tribune after she was awarded $3 million in compensation.

While the cases mentioned above are notable because they received significant media attention, there is still an overwhelming number of lawsuits that stemmed from cases in which pharmaceutical companies paid millions of dollars for failing to warn doctors that the antidepressants they were prescribing could drive patients to kill themselves and others.

According to reports, the first lawsuit involving a Paxil suicide case went to trial in 2001, and since then, GlaxoSmithKline has paid more than $390 million in settlements or verdicts for Paxil-related cases. If that is the price they are willing to pay, then the profit they are making off of the controversial drug must be incredible.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

Schell then shot and killed himself. His remaining family members filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company behind Paxil, and they were awarded $6.4 million based on “the company’s failure to sufficiently warn doctors and patients that the effects of the drug could include agitation and violence.”

He didn't kill himself because of the drug. The family was awarded $6.4 million because the company failed to warn doctors and patients that the effects of the drug could include agitation and violence.

What a bunch of bullshit.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-03-13   10:05:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: misterwhite (#1)

He didn't kill himself because of the drug. The family was awarded $6.4 million because the company failed to warn doctors and patients that the effects of the drug could include agitation and violence.

What a bunch of bullshit.

Let me get this straight. Because they didn't warn about the violent behavior the drug caused, they had to pay out. But you contend that the drug actually does not cause this violent behavior.

Do I have that right?

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-03-13   13:40:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Pinguinite (#2)

Let me get this straight. Because they didn't warn about the violent behavior the drug caused, they had to pay out.

Correct.

"But you contend that the drug actually does not cause this violent behavior."

I have no idea if it does or it doesn't, and I never contended anything.

The drug company said that agitation and violence could be possible side effects of the drug in a small percentage of patients, and that patients should discontinue the drug if they experienced these symptoms. Have you read about other instances of suicide or violence or mass murders because of this drug? I haven't. How many thousands of lives has this drug saved?

misterwhite  posted on  2018-03-13   14:01:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3)

I have no idea if it does or it doesn't, and I never contended anything.

And I quote:

He didn't kill himself because of the drug.

You care to recant that statement.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-03-13   14:06:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Pinguinite (#4)

He didn't kill himself because of the drug.
You care to recant that statement.

Two different arguments.

I said I never contended that the drug does or does not cause this violent behavior in the patients who took it. The drug company said it might.

Now, as for him specifically, I said he didn't kill himself because of the drug. Because no one is claiming it did. Certainly not his family.

Are you saying it did?

misterwhite  posted on  2018-03-13   16:19:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Pinguinite (#4)

He didn't kill himself because of the drug. --- misterwhite

You care to recant that statement. ---- Pinguinite

misterwhite ---- I said he didn't kill himself because of the drug. Because no one is claiming it did.

No one is claiming "it", --- the drug killed him.

misterwhite contended, "because of the drug", "he killed himself"

Meaning, ---- "because of (taking) the drug", "he killed himself"

Words have meaning, misterwhite contends he is a master of twisting them.

tpaine  posted on  2018-03-13   17:18:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com