[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: Rider Passed Protecting Military Firearms, Ammunition, and Components
Source: NRA/ILA
URL Source: http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=5258
Published: Dec 19, 2009
Author: unknown
Post Date: 2009-12-19 10:35:03 by sneakypete
Keywords: Surplus guns, Surplus ammo
Views: 46409
Comments: 106

With the holiday season upon us, and the end of the year fast approaching, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 3326—the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2010. With the passage of this bill, NRA-ILA wraps up its appropriations work for the year.

Our efforts on the huge spending bill were rewarded with the restoration of a longstanding rider to protect M-1 carbines, M-1 Garands, M-14s, .22 caliber rifles, and others from being destroyed.

This language also includes a prohibition on the destruction of small arms ammunition and components, and a response to the short-lived concern over destruction of spent brass casings earlier this year.

Section 8019 of the bill reads: "None of the funds available to the Department of Defense may be used to demilitarize or dispose of M-1 Carbines, M-1 Garand rifles, M-14 rifles, .22 caliber rifles, .30 caliber rifles, or M-1911 pistols, or to demilitarize or destroy small arms ammunition or ammunition components that are not otherwise prohibited from commercial sale under Federal law, unless the small arms ammunition or ammunition components are certified by the Secretary of the Army or designee as unserviceable or unsafe for further use."

NRA-ILA would like to thank U.S. Representative John Murtha (D-PA) for his help in getting the rider restored and expanded.

To read the full bill, please click here.

Continued at link


Poster Comment:

Having been fooled too many times in the past I don't entirely trust the sincerity of the NRA,but I decided to post this anyway.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: sneakypete (#0)

Think I'll go to the range again this weekend.

Last week I met the firearms instructor for my city's police dept. there. He was there with his grandson. He had some very nice gear and invited me to fire all I wanted. I declined at first but he said, "Never turn down the chance to fire another man's ammo". LOL!

He pulled out some AK's, some AR's, an SKS, an M1, and several side arms.

I had this with me http://www.kel-tec-cnc.com/su16d.htm and he wanted to fire it. After he fired it he said he HAD to have one.

A very nice guy. Very pro 2nd amendment.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   10:58:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: sneakypete (#0)

NRA....yeah well...better than the antis thats for sure...

I guess its kinda like fishing...

You got your elitist "fly" fisherman...crank bait and lure guys...and your weekend cane pole and worm folks...not to mention the Russian..Norweigan..and Japanese trawlers..

IMO the NRA directorship has always pretty much been the "fly fisherman" who say they represent the interests of all who fish...

You'd think they would,sooner or later, learn where their bread is buttered and who butters it...

Now if we could elect a POTUS that would allow us to purchase "overuns" from supplies with govt contracts like we used to be able to do until Slick Willy Clinton cut us off..

Or roll back the laws to prior the Kennedy assassination...there was a crisis they took full advantage of at least in the area of increasingly restrictive gun laws..

Joe Snuffy  posted on  2009-12-19   10:59:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: We The People (#1)

an M1

A M-1 as in "Garand"?

Be still my beating heart! Those things were mass-issue target rifles. I love em,love em,love em! I'd take one in a heartbeat over ANY issue battle rifle of today.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   11:19:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: We The People (#1)

I had this with me http://www.kel-tec-cnc.com/su16d.htm and he wanted to fire it. After he fired it he said he HAD to have one.

BTW,I know nothing about ,and had never even heard of that weapon before your post,but if it's as well made and reliable as the Kel-Tec handguns,it's a good rifle for what it was designed for.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   11:22:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: sneakypete (#3)

an M1

A M-1 as in "Garand"?

I don't know. I don't know a lot about them.

I know he did call it something other than an M1 but I don't remember what.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   11:22:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: sneakypete (#4)

I just googled M1 Garand and came up with this photo:

http://www.capitanhipower.com/Photos/M1Rifle.jpg

It did look a lot like this but I still don't know. I don't remember.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   11:25:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Joe Snuffy (#2)

Or roll back the laws to prior the Kennedy assassination.

Which IS what should be done because it is what the Constitution intended.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 is completely and totally un-Constitutional,and should be repealed along with every law that snuck under the covers with it.

We went from the 1600's to 1968 with no gun laws,and for over 350 years this was no problem. Even convicted felons could get out of jail and legally buy a gun because they had served their time and now they were free and the Bill of Rights applied to them just like it did everybody else.

Suddenly it was a "national emergency" in the early 1960's,and now there are whole bureaucracies built up around it.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   11:26:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: We The People (#6)

It did look a lot like this but I still don't know. I don't remember.

It get's confusing because the M-1 Carbine is also sometimes referred to as a M-1,and so is the semi-auto civilian version of the M-14,but it has the modified "A" behind it instead of Carbine or Garand.

In other words,the civilian version of the M-14 is called a M1A,and that is probably what the guy had. They are good rifles and are accurate,but they aren't in the same league as the M-1 Garand.

In fact,I would rather have a metric FN-FAL than a M1A. The FAL isn't as accurate do to a truly shitty trigger and poor sights,but it is much sturdier and more reliable than the M1A.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   11:31:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: sneakypete (#4)

BTW,I know nothing about ,and had never even heard of that weapon before your post,but if it's as well made and reliable as the Kel-Tec handguns,it's a good rifle for what it was designed for.

I bought a Kel Tec P11 years ago and it impressed me, so I bought more from Kel Tec.

The P11 of course isn't accurate at all past a certain range, but it's been as reliable as any I've ever owned. Never jammed or misfired.

I love the su16. Overall very impressed with Kel Tec.

I'm thinking about one of these for the wife:

www.freedom1791.com/

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   11:32:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: We The People (#9)

I'm thinking about one of these for the wife:

www.freedom1791.com/

Unless she is an experienced shooter that is used to carrying everyday,don't.

Get her a snub-nosed 22LR revolver and take the rear sight off and file down all the rough or sharp edges on the front sight,making it round and smooth so it won't snag on anything.

One I recommend is the Taurus Ultra-Lite 9 shot 22 LR snub nose revolver. Specifically,this one. I would also round off the sharp edges on the hammer if it were me.

www.taurus-handguns.com/i...940029UL_M94__22LR_2.aspx

Load that sucker up with 9 CCI "Stinger" hollowpoints and it becomes a effective self-defense weapon. If you shoot somebody in the eye socket,it makes no difference if you were shooting a 22 than if you were shooting a 44 magnum. All you can kill them is dead.

AND....since it is also true that a miss with a 22 is just as effective as a miss with a 44 Magnum,this makes the 22 more attractive because she is less likely to miss. She is less likely to miss because she can afford to buy 22 caliber ammo a thousand rounds at a time to practice with,and this means she will be more familiar and comfortable with the gun and she will know where it shoots when she pulls the trigger.

PLUS...it is very light which means she is more likely to carry it with her when she leaves the house,AND it doesn't have a safety she has to remember to disengage under pressure before she can fire it. Revolvers are the original "point and click" devices. You just point them and keep pulling the trigger until it starts clicking.

Not to mention that you can shoot a revolver right from your coat pocket without ever taking it out,and you can't so this with a autoloader because it will jam. Not that I recommend doing this because your coat might catch fire,but there is an advantage to having a gun already in your hand if you think you might be in danger,but not confident enough about it that you are willing to pull it out and point it at somebody.

If you are bound and determined to get her something bigger than a 22,but this one for her. It's a 38 Special,but 38 Specials don't really have enough recoil or muzzle blast to bother her. Their only disadvantage over the 22 is the ammo is much more expensive.

Don't even THINK about buying a snub-nosed magnum revolver. The recoil and the muzzle blast are horrific,and you end up only getting 38 Special velocities anywhay.

Don't let the goofy look of the hammer shround throw you. If they had this version in 22 LR,that's the one I would recommend you buy. The shroud keeps the hammer from snagging on your pants or coat pocket when you go to pull the gun out.

www.taurus-handguns.com/i...51CIA_38SPL_2_SS_AS_.aspx

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   11:57:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: sneakypete (#10)

Thanks for the advice Pete.

You really think the .22 is heavy enough?

She's not that experienced, and I like the thought of the smaller caliber. She has expressed an interest in revolvers too, her sister has a 38 S&W.

The long and hard trigger pull on the P11 is just to much for her.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   12:06:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: sneakypete (#10)

Don't let the goofy look of the hammer shround throw you. If they had this version in 22 LR,that's the one I would recommend you buy. The shroud keeps the hammer from snagging on your pants or coat pocket when you go to pull the gun out.

www.taurus-handguns.com/i...51CIA_38SPL_2_SS_AS_.aspx

Wow! That is truly goofy looking. LOL!

I kind of like it though. I've always been attracted to ugly guns and ugly cars for some strange reason I've yet to figure out.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   12:08:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: We The People (#11)

As long as the perp isn't wearing lots of layers of heavy winter clothing

A hit with a 22LR is better than a miss with a 44 mag

Whatever you do get her...

Get her lots and lots and lots of RANGE TIME with the weapon of choice

Professional Instruction to go with it

Followed by more RANGE TIME

As they say..."You Will Not Rise To The Occasion...But Will Instead Default To Your Level Of Training"

Joe Snuffy  posted on  2009-12-19   12:19:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: We The People (#12)

Smith and Wesson M351 Lt Wt. 22 Mag

Smith and Wesson 317 22 LR Airweight

Joe Snuffy  posted on  2009-12-19   12:24:13 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: sneakypete (#3)

A M-1 as in "Garand"?

Be still my beating heart! Those things were mass-issue target rifles. I love em,love em,love em! I'd take one in a heartbeat over ANY issue battle rifle of today.

Over a M-1A? Over a PTR-91? Over a Vector Arm RPK-74?

I'm of the opinion that all those rifles above are far superior to the Garand.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   12:55:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Joe Snuffy (#13)

Thanks Joe.

I appreciate the advice.

We The People  posted on  2009-12-19   14:08:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Nebuchadnezzar, sneakypete (#15)

I'm of the opinion that all those rifles above are far superior to the Garand.

LOL! In what way are those "far superior" to the Garand? Other than magazine capacity, I see nothing "far superior" as far as ballistics, accuracy, stopping power, reliability, etc. are concerned.

eskimo  posted on  2009-12-19   14:26:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#15)

A M-1 as in "Garand"?

Be still my beating heart! Those things were mass-issue target rifles. I love em,love em,love em! I'd take one in a heartbeat over ANY issue battle rifle of today.

Over a M-1A? Over a PTR-91? Over a Vector Arm RPK-74?

I'm of the opinion that all those rifles above are far superior to the Garand.

Give me a FAL!

FAL

FAL

FAL

Other than that, I still want a Garand, because General Patton decreed it to be the finest battle implement ever made.

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-12-19   15:41:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: eskimo (#17)

LOL! In what way are those "far superior" to the Garand? Other than magazine capacity, I see nothing "far superior" as far as ballistics, accuracy, stopping power, reliability, etc. are concerned.

M1 Garand = termite gun.

Shit, a Russian SKS is a better rifle and will take all sorts of ammo, unlike the finique Garand.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   16:20:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: echo5sierra (#18)

Give me a FAL!

FAL

FAL

FAL

A FAL is a far, far superior weapon to the Garand "termite" rifle.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   16:22:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: We The People (#11)

You really think the .22 is heavy enough?

It's not anybody's first choice for a military assault,but if you put the bullet where it needs to go it will do the job. There is a reason the military has been issuing 22 caliber pistols with silencers since prior to WW-2.

And,as I wrote earlier,a miss with a 44 is no deadlier than a miss with a 22.

I usually carry my own 22 Taurus snub whenever I go to town. I sometimes carry a 9mm Kel-Tec or my 44 Special snubnose,but I usually carry the 22. Mostly because I always already have it with me,but I am also confident that if I need it it will do the job. I normally carry it around my yard and in my shop because I live in a rural area,and poisonous snakes aren't that unusual (I even got bit by one last summer),and I have even had to shoot rabid coons twice.

The 22 is always the one with me because it fits easily into my pocket,and it's so light you forget it's there. If I thought I seriously needed a gun on any given day,I'd be carrying my 12 gauge Ithaca pump,not a handgun.

As always,the best gun to use is the one you have with you. Due to the low recoil,the relative lack of muzzle blast,and the cheap ammunition for target practice,a 22 is the gun she is most likely to be willing to take with her every day,and it is the one she is most likely to have shot enough to be able to hit something with it.

The long and hard trigger pull on the P11 is just to much for her.

The 22 revolver is both single and doubt action. If you have the time you can cock the hammer for a easier trigger pull,or you can just pull the trigger for a double-action shot. The double action trigger pull is longer and heavier than the single action pull,but it's still a lot lighter than the trigger pull on the Kel-Tec.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:33:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Joe Snuffy, We The People (#13)

As long as the perp isn't wearing lots of layers of heavy winter clothing

I don't let that worry me. I'd just put one in his eye and not worry about him anymore. With the low recoil of a 22,that's pretty easy to do,and followup shots come quicker than with a gun that does a lot of recoiling. A 22 anywhere in the head will pierce a human skull. No real need to put one through a eye socket. I'm just not the sporting gentleman I used to be.

Whatever you do get her...

Get her lots and lots and lots of RANGE TIME with the weapon of choice

Which is where the 22 really shines. Ammo cheap enough you can fire 500 rounds for what a box of 50 45 ACP would cost you,and recoil so mild she will be willing to shoot those 500 rounds.

Professional Instruction to go with it

Here is some REALLY good marital advise. DO NOT TEACH HER YOURSELF. Hire somebody else to do it. Seriously.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:39:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Joe Snuffy, (#14)

Smith and Wesson M351 Lt Wt. 22 Mag

The 22 mag is the next thing to useless. The ammunition is insanely expensive and you can't even buy it everywhere. On top of that,it just isn't that much more powerful for short range self-defense out of a handgun barrel.

A 38 Special with swaged 146 grain hollowpoints loaded backwards over some fairly stiff loads of Unique would be a MUCH better choice. I used to load some up for friends that lived in apartments,and they would expand to 72 caliber and not penetrate 4 inches of soft pine.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:43:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#15)

Over a M-1A? Over a PTR-91? Over a Vector Arm RPK-74?

ABSOLUTELY! By the time you get up close enough to hit me with those play toys,I will have been shooting pieces off of you for the last 400 yards. BIG pieces that a 30/06 will take off.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:45:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: eskimo (#17)

LOL! In what way are those "far superior" to the Garand? Other than magazine capacity, I see nothing "far superior" as far as ballistics, accuracy, stopping power, reliability, etc. are concerned.

Even the target grade M1-A's rarely match the accuracy of a ISSUE M1 Garand. Rack grade Garands would shoot 1 inch groups at 100 yards with issue ammo.

It's a good thing he didn't offer me a BAR as a option,though. That's another one with the"reach out and touch somebody" feature,but it also has box magazines and a slow-fire option to the selector switch.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:48:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: echo5sierra (#18)

Give me a FAL!

A metric FAL is my number 2 pick.

Unless of course I get a M1918A2 BAR as a pick. Then the FAL falls to number 3.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:51:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Nebuchadnezzar, , *Humor* (#19)

M1 Garand = termite gun.

Shit, a Russian SKS is a better rifle and will take all sorts of ammo, unlike the finique Garand.

ROFLMAO! Ok,that one earns you a humor ping.

When you write stuff like that,you deserve to have people laugh at you.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:54:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#20)

A FAL is a far, far superior weapon to the Garand "termite" rifle.

LOL! For your sake,I hope you never get into a shooting contest at any range beyond 200 yards with a man carrying a Garand,or even closer if you both have good cover.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-19   18:56:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: sneakypete (#24)

ABSOLUTELY! By the time you get up close enough to hit me with those play toys,I will have been shooting pieces off of you for the last 400 yards. BIG pieces that a 30/06 will take off.

What a crock sneaky. That termite gun is 50+ years, at best.

Archaic is the best term for that club.

8 rounds. What's up with that?

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   18:57:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#29)

8 rounds. What's up with that?

It only takes ONE well-placed round, numbnuts.

What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2009-12-19   19:04:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: sneakypete (#27)

ROFLMAO! Ok,that one earns you a humor ping.

When you write stuff like that,you deserve to have people laugh at you.

Well I'm still laughing over your laughable comments on the termite gun, aka Garand.

Looks like we both are having a good laugh today.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   19:05:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Ibluafartsky (#30)

8 rounds. What's up with that? It only takes ONE well-placed round, numbnuts.

Right, sure, whatever.

I see you've either been hitting the sauce too much today or have been playing too much Call of Duty.

Iblowboys, why don't you leave this conversation to men?

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   19:06:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: sneakypete (#28)

LOL! For your sake,I hope you never get into a shooting contest at any range beyond 200 yards with a man carrying a Garand,or even closer if you both have good cover.

Unless the termites haven't eaten that Garand for dinner you mean!

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   19:07:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#32)

Iblowboys

Hell, we all suspected you're a pedophile, numbnuts.

What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2009-12-19   19:15:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Ibluafartsky (#34)

Sorry, you're the one with the name "Iblowboys".

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   19:32:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#35)

Iblowboys

It's all yours, pedophile. What a fookin moron you are.

What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2009-12-19   19:42:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Ibluafartsky (#36)

Iblowboys It's all yours, pedophile. What a fookin moron you are.

Wow, you're clueless. All of us here find you disgusting.

You're the one boasting about blowing things pal.

You own it. It's yours.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2009-12-19   19:54:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#19)

M1 Garand = termite gun.

You should have just said that did not know anything about the Garand.

eskimo  posted on  2009-12-20   2:54:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: sneakypete (#25)

It's a good thing he didn't offer me a BAR as a option,though.

LOL! Yes, I agree the M1918 is some serious hardware.

eskimo  posted on  2009-12-20   3:08:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#37)

You're the one boasting about blowing things pal.

I'm not your pal, pedophile.

What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2009-12-20   3:11:42 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 106) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com