[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Actor James Woods bashes Twitter after getting locked out

Handling an AGW (Armed Government Worker)



Kavanaugh will use 1982 calendar to deny sex assault claims

Christine Blasey Ford’s Classmate (Quickly) Changes Her Tune

Criminal Charges for North Carolina Woman Who Sheltered Pets During Hurricane Florence

enate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years

Russian MoD Presents IL-20 Investigation Results - Israel "Crossed The Line Of Civilized Relations"

We need to talk frankly about our rapid population growth in Africa if we want to beat poverty

Beto O’Rourke: “I Did Not Try To Leave The Scene Of The Accident”


BREAKING: Christine Blasey Ford's Female Witness Doesn't Remember Anything

Ron Paul Tells Truth On Syria - Immediately Smeared

Ron Paul Tells Truth On Syria - Immediately Smeared

Ron Paul Tells Truth On Syria - Immediately Smeared

Medea Benjamin Shows America What Real Resistance Looks Like (consistently non-interventionist)

Former Trump Aide Jason Miller Accused of Secretly Administering Abortion Pill

Alex Jones “I’m Ready to Die” - Exclusive Interview After Being Banned

The White House is considering an antitrust investigation into 'online platform bias' at Google and Facebook — read the leaked document here

PayPal Cuts Off Alex Jones’s Infowars

Rosenstein suggested he secretly record Trump and discussed 25th amendment

Chelsea Clinton’s Abortion Claim Sounds Like Something Hitler Might’ve Said

Why Are We in Media Hell?

Trump's "Opposition" Supports All His Evil Agendas While Attacking Fake Nonsense

What Democrats Have Become; Brett Kavanaugh is a casualty of an anything-goes political resistance.

BREAKING: FORMER SCALIA LAW CLERK Drops Pictures and Evidence That Blows Christine Ford’s Case Wide Open

President Trump to North Carolina resident: 'At least you got a nice boat out of the deal'

Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War

Former Admitted Groper Cory Booker Says, ‘It Would Be Irresponsible Not To’ Consider 2020 Presidential Run

Laugh of the Day

Three Cheers for Price Gouging During Hurricane Florence

FEMA: Trump administration will send ‘presidential alerts’ to cellphones across America

Young Christine Blasey Ford remembered as popular figure in Dewey Beach bar scene in 1980's

Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford's team lays out terms it wants for potential Senate interview, sources say

Are Social Media Companies Banning Because Of What Happens In "Real World"? (Face to Face, not online)

COURT DOCUMENTS: Sherrod Brown’s Ex-Wife Accused Him of Assaulting Her

Trump advised Spain to build wall across Sahara to stop migrants

Republicans may 'compel' testimony from Fusion GPS researcher Nellie Ohr, ex-FBI official James Baker

Pope Francis says the devil is causing people to question the Catholic Church

'Family Values' Senator(R) Sentenced to 15 Years for Child Sex Trafficking and Child Porn

Beto O’Rourke to Black American: Illegal Immigrant Labor Needed for Cotton Gin

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Classmate Backs Off Claim She Heard About Alleged Assault

Grassley Ltr to Feinstein Re UNREDACTED Ltr of Christine Blasey Ford (19 Sep 2018)

Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Warner Write Letter to Rosenstein, Wray Demanding They Withstand Pressure to Violate DOJ and FBI Norms

Huh. Democrats really don’t want those Carter Page FISA docs released

BOMBSHELL: Comey’s FBI said to have kept TWO sets of records regarding ‘Spygate’ operation

FBI, Justice Dept plan to redact Russia documents despite Trump order for full declassification: report

Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan Encourages Deep State to Defy President Trump’s Declassification Order

The SOBs got to Norm Macdonald

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: “heroes” Value Their Privacy – But Not Ours
Source: Eric Peters Autos
URL Source: https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2018/02/21/heroes-value-privacy-not/
Published: Feb 21, 2018
Author: Eric
Post Date: 2018-02-23 09:23:02 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 101
Comments: 10

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Here’s a video showing some “heroes” unhappy about a pair of guys taking video of the outside their nest – which is public property and which the citizens therefore have every legal right to take video of.

But the “heroes” do not like this.

They never do.

Notwithstanding that it is legal. Mark that. When a law doesn’t suit them, they obey it grudgingly – or simply ignore it.

They take filming them as an implicit challenge, an affront to their privacy and peace – which of course are sacred. Whereas ours is held in absolute contempt by them, to be violated at will whenever they feel so inclined.

The law reflects this stilted standard, too.

For example, “heroes” may legally ride around in cars (paid for by us, with money taken by force from us; hence not actually their cars) with windows so deeply tinted it is impossible to see the “hero” within – but in most states, it is an offense for ordinary people to have the windows of their cars (which are actually their property, paid for by themselves ) tinted beyond even slightly.

Because it is important for “heroes” to be able to violate our privacy at will.

They insist on the tint restrictions in order to be able to – effectively – search our vehicles with no legal cause whatsoever, merely by looking inside. Which they demand they be able to do at any time  – including when they pull up beside us in traffic.

It is irrelevant that we might not wish them to be able to look inside our vehicles – very much in the same way that most of us would prefer they not examine the contents of our pockets – at least absent the formality of probable cause to suspect a criminal act, which has fallen into desuetude in these times of Keeping Us Safe.

Tinted windows prevent causal thieves from being able to see what we have inside our cars, which is a reasonable and sound idea. Regardless, they are our cars – and window tint or not has nil effect on the “safety” of other drivers, therefore there is no legitimate justification for laws making it an offense to tint them. If this were not so – if tinted windows were a “safety issue” – then tinted opaque “hero” cars are very unsafe indeed.

Of course, it has nothing to do with “safety.”

It is exactly the same as a legal requirement – probably coming soon – that non-“heroes” may not put blinds or shades up in their homes;  “safety” (“officer safety” – not our safety) will be cited as the justification when this law is introduced – as it is cited with regard to laws about window tinting.

It is a question – as per Humpty Dumpty – of which is to be master, that is all.


The same “heroes” who get upset when their space is violated – even though it is not actually their space (a “hero” nest is – as it’s styled – public property, paid for by the taxes extracted from the citizenry, which is why citizens have a legal right to be there and to video record there . . . for the moment) routinely violate our space.

Which is actually our space – because we pay for our homes and land, not the taxpayer.

Regardless, “heroes” trespass upon our property at will. March up to and stand menacingly on our lawns and driveways ad doorsteps – often without warrants – “just asking a few questions,” berating the owners (sic) for not being “cooperative” and “having a bad attitude.”

The thought that perhaps people do not like the presence of armed strangers they did not invite violating the privacy of their property, whom they have no interest in speaking with – and whom they regard in much the same way as a fly landing in one’s soup – never seems to occur to “heroes.”

Perhaps because the “heroes” have become to believe that they are, in fact, heroes – as opposed to what they actually are. Which is armed government workers. The mercenary troops of the government.

Law enforcers.

Over-armed, obsessed with their safety – recklessly indifferent to ours. Clueless about the growing contempt in which they are held by ordinary citizens, who grow tired of being ordered to present ID for no reason other than a “hero’s” need to assert who’s in charge. Of having their travel interrupted for no reason other than that they happen to be driving on a particular road at a particular time and now must prove they are not “drunk” or “on drugs” – despite no evidence or reason to believe that they might be.

Tired of the shaved heads, dark sunglasses, campaign hats and general’s stars.

Of demands for immediate deference and automatic obedience merely because they possess Authority. That is, because they are legally empowered to bully us.

Tired of this manufactured state of never-ending fear – which is being used to justify a regime of terrorism in the name of protecting us from it.


Perhaps laughing at these violent, paranoid geeks is the best medicine for now – as in the video above.

Take away their mirrored sunglasses and body armor and menacing uniforms and what’s left is a species of lesser humanity, the very banality of evil Hannah Arendt wrote about after the fall of the Third Reich. Once-menacing characters such as Ernst Kaltenbrunner and the better known Adolf Eichman and their ilk – who were also law enforcers – didn’t look very menacing once they were out of uniform – and in the dock.

Perhaps one day that history will repeat, as it ought to.

(6 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Eric is complaining about tinted windows and he lives in Virginia.

The Virginia law regarding tinted vehicle windows requires that his SUV front side windows must allow more that 50% of light in. While the rear side windows and back windows on his SUV may be any darkness. They can actually be blacked out.

So, what’s Eric’s problem?

Eric has no problem. He, like the ignorant asshole here on LF, only tries to use any situation to promote their cop-hating agenda.

Let’s hope that perhaps history will some day show that these two severely disgruntled individuals discovered an agenda to devote their unproductive time to something important and socially productive.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-23   11:03:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Gatlin (#1)

The Virginia law regarding tinted vehicle windows requires that his SUV front side windows must allow more that 50% of light in. While the rear side windows and back windows on his SUV may be any darkness. They can actually be blacked out.

I'm not so sure. I find other info online. I found another site with similar info for VA, based on their 1999 law.


DC70%50%50%AS1 OR 5"NET
NE35%20%20%AS1 OR 5"NET
NM20%20%20%AS1 OR 5"NET
OK25%25%25%AS1 OR 5"NET
TX25%25%ANY%AS1 OR 5"NET
WY28%28%28%AS1 OR 5"NET

According to this list, in Virginia you can have 50% tint on front side windows and only 35% on rear side windows or the rear window.

I see that AZ has 33% for front side windows and that you can black out all rear windows. Sensible enough in a sunny state. Saves fuel.

I was surprised to notice that my own state is pretty lax on this law. But we're very boring people here.     : )

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-02-23   11:55:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: Tooconservative (#2) (Edited)

Eric drives a SUV.

Tint darkness for SUV and vans:

  • Windshield: Non-reflective tint is allowed above the manufacturer's AS-1 line.
  • Front Side windows: Must allow more than 50% of light in.
  • Back Side windows: Any darkness can be used.
  • Rear Window: Any darkness can be used.

Virginia Window Tinting Laws

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-23   12:55:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#4. To: Gatlin (#3)

Back Side windows: Any darkness can be used.
Rear Window: Any darkness can be used.

Ah, I missed the "multi-purpose vehicle" exception which would apply to pickups/SUVs/vans built on a truck chassis. VA's DMV forms make it clear now.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-02-23   13:02:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#5. To: Tooconservative (#4)

Edmonton ... :)

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-23   13:03:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#6. To: Gatlin (#5) (Edited)

I bet you never see a story from Edmonton again without knowing it's almost certainly about Canada. LOL

I saw bucky trying to throw it in your face on his recent thread.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-02-23   13:11:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#7. To: Tooconservative (#6)

Oh, I always knew there was an Edmonton, AB in Canada.

I had never heard of Edmonton, CA in Californa.

As far as Bucky goes, I mostly never read anything he posts.

I got tired of dealing with his warped-minded ignorance.

I occasionally happen upon a short post by him and take the opportunity to hit him with a zinger.

I never checked to see if his wife removed the “Mug Shot” picture of him from her FB page.

I broke out in a laugh now thinking about the picture ...

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-23   13:30:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#8. To: Gatlin (#7)

I never checked to see if his wife removed the “Mug Shot” picture of him from her FB page.

You are way too involved with this stuff. LOL

I do recall there was some humorous pic, now that you mention it.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-02-23   13:31:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#9. To: Tooconservative (#8)

You are way too involved with this stuff. LOL

It’s fun....my entertainment between trades.

Good day today....getting ready to do a wrap.

Double good day....I got to chat with you and make money.

Triple good day....you straightened Crestview out.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-23   15:40:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#10. To: Gatlin (#9)

Triple good day....you straightened Crestview out.

They cower before the fury of LF.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-02-23   16:42:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com