[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Vapers seek relief ... by turning to cigarettes

Same Gov’t Who’s Now Banning Flavored E-Cigs, Approved Candy-Flavored Amphetamines for Kids

Remember the Vallejo Cop Who Tackled a Veteran for Filming Him?

Blood, Delusions, and Corruption in the American West

Will Justin Amash Run for President as a Libertarian in 2020?

Ken Burns Delves into the Hardscrabble History of Country Music

"Remain in Mexico" immigration hearings begin in tents at border

Black Race Huslter Deray Accuses White Race Grifter Shaun King of Fleecing Donors, Demand He Stop His "Fundraising" Scams

Are Comedians Finally Fighting Back Against the Far Left’s Cultural Clampdown?

Pete Buttigieg’s Association With the Abortionist Who Stockpiled Baby Corpses in His Home Is Hardly Surprising

Elizabeth Warren’s Social Security Proposal Doesn’t Go Far Enough: It’s Time For A Basic (Retirement) Income

The CIA’s Influence Over the Media: Use of the Conspiracy Theorist Slur

Pete Buttigieg Chides Gun Owners Who Have ‘Sense of Manhood’ Wrapped Up in Guns

Is Vaping Marijuana Safe? Deaths and Lung Disease Linked to E-Cigs Call That Into Question

DOJ Inspector General Has Completed FISA Abuse Probe

Ohio gamer sentenced to 15 months prison in 'swatting' case

Court: FBI Must Destroy Memos Calling Antiwar.com a Threat

Trump administration enters new phase for border wall, sets ambitious timetable after securing land

Eddie Money, ‘Two Tickets to Paradise’ singer, dead at 70

Eighth Illegal Alien Charged with Rape in Same Maryland Sanctuary County

Free (with ads) Movie "The Wrecking Crew"

Judicial Watch Sued To Get Footage of The ‘Plane’ Hitting The Pentagon On 9/11 (Video)

Webb Wilder & The Beatnecks - Baby Please Don't Go

95 Percent of Americans Believe the Media is Full of Shit

Orange County deputy accidentally shoots himself while training

9/11 Solidified the Destruction of Our Freedom

The Orange Car Guy

AGW is “Paid to Find Out Who’s in Town”

Witness: Girls as young as 11 visited Jeffrey EpsteinÂ’s island in 2018

Christine Blasey Ford's Father Privately Supported Brett Kavanaught's Confirmation

'Way Too Far To The Left': Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Skewers Democrats On Immigration

Biden Tried to Buy Putin’s Support for Iraq War With Promise of Oil Money

Clown World: Canadian Cancer Society Claims Men Without Cervixes Can Get Cervical Cancer

Revealed: You Know How Rush Limbaugh Talks About "Seminar Callers"? Turns Out They're Real -- Employed by a Joint Clinton-DNC Effort

Don’t look now, but there’s more border wall news

Psychedelic Science Just Got a Big Boost

The Bill of Rights Turns 230, and What Do We Have to Show for It? Nothing Good

Trump Replaces Bolton with Fringe Neocon

When Booze Was Banned but Pot Was Not

The 911 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie

More Americans Questioning Official 9/11 Story As New Evidence Contradicts Official Narrative

Gun Registration is Gun Confiscation – Updated 2019 Edition

10 Reasons Why You Should Be Questioning the ‘Official’ Story on 9/11

Supreme Court Slaps Down Rogue Ninth Circuit Judge and Gives President Trump a Huge Win On Asylum

Hijackers Surprised To Find Selves In Hell

Trump-shaped 9th Circuit hands White House major win on asylum policy

Something Strange Is Going On With All Those Retiring Texans

BRACE YOURSELVES: EATING WITH FORKS IS EUROCENTRIC RACISM

SHOW OF FAITH Ashura festival sees children left covered in blood as devout Muslims use knives to slice their heads open

Least Masculine Society In Human History Decides Masculinity Is A Growing Threat


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Why Did it Have to be ... Guns?
Source: lneilsmith.org
URL Source: http://www.lneilsmith.org/whyguns.html
Published: Feb 19, 2018
Author: L. Neil Smith
Post Date: 2018-02-19 22:27:06 by Hondo68
Ping List: *Bang List*     Subscribe to *Bang List*
Keywords: walk into hardware store, any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything
Views: 235
Comments: 9

Over the past 30 years, I've been paid to write almost two million words, every one of which, sooner or later, came back to the issue of guns and gun-ownership. Naturally, I've thought about the issue a lot, and it has always determined the way I vote.

People accuse me of being a single-issue writer, a single- issue thinker, and a single- issue voter, but it isn't true. What I've chosen, in a world where there's never enough time and energy, is to focus on the one political issue which most clearly and unmistakably demonstrates what any politician -- or political philosophy -- is made of, right down to the creamy liquid center.

Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put.

If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you.

If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims.

What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him?

If he doesn't want you to have the means of defending your life, do you want him in a position to control it?

If he makes excuses about obeying a law he's sworn to uphold and defend -- the highest law of the land, the Bill of Rights -- do you want to entrust him with anything?

If he ignores you, sneers at you, complains about you, or defames you, if he calls you names only he thinks are evil -- like "Constitutionalist" -- when you insist that he account for himself, hasn't he betrayed his oath, isn't he unfit to hold office, and doesn't he really belong in jail?

Sure, these are all leading questions. They're the questions that led me to the issue of guns and gun ownership as the clearest and most unmistakable demonstration of what any given politician -- or political philosophy -- is really made of.

He may lecture you about the dangerous weirdos out there who shouldn't have a gun -- but what does that have to do with you? Why in the name of John Moses Browning should you be made to suffer for the misdeeds of others? Didn't you lay aside the infantile notion of group punishment when you left public school -- or the military? Isn't it an essentially European notion, anyway -- Prussian, maybe -- and certainly not what America was supposed to be all about?

And if there are dangerous weirdos out there, does it make sense to deprive you of the means of protecting yourself from them? Forget about those other people, those dangerous weirdos, this is about you, and it has been, all along.

Try it yourself: if a politician won't trust you, why should you trust him? If he's a man -- and you're not -- what does his lack of trust tell you about his real attitude toward women? If "he" happens to be a woman, what makes her so perverse that she's eager to render her fellow women helpless on the mean and seedy streets her policies helped create? Should you believe her when she says she wants to help you by imposing some infantile group health care program on you at the point of the kind of gun she doesn't want you to have?

On the other hand -- or the other party -- should you believe anything politicians say who claim they stand for freedom, but drag their feet and make excuses about repealing limits on your right to own and carry weapons? What does this tell you about their real motives for ignoring voters and ramming through one infantile group trade agreement after another with other countries?

Makes voting simpler, doesn't it? You don't have to study every issue -- health care, international trade -- all you have to do is use this X-ray machine, this Vulcan mind-meld, to get beyond their empty words and find out how politicians really feel. About you. And that, of course, is why they hate it.

And that's why I'm accused of being a single-issue writer, thinker, and voter.

But it isn't true, is it?Subscribe to *Bang List*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: hondo68 (#0)

All valid points.

AND.....,in MY lifetime it was perfectly acceptable to most of that. The exception being buy a machine gun without getting a special government permit. Even that was legal prior to the Kangeroo Court ruling in 1934,where the court didn't notify the defense of the new court date,and just issued a ruling because opposing counsel didn't show up to defend their stance.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-02-20   4:25:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0) (Edited)

This was a poorly written article in which the author emphatically stated in the first sentence:
“Over the past 30 years, I've been paid to write almost two million words, every one of which, sooner or later, came back to the issue of guns and gun- ownership. Naturally, I've thought about the issue a lot, and it has always determined the way I vote.” [Underline Added].

The author states in closing that: “People accuse me of being a single-issue writer, a single-issue thinker, and a single-issue voter.” Then he asks “is it” true that he is “accused of being a single-issue writer, thinker, and voter?”

After carefully reading the article and thoroughly considering his question, I must answer: Yes, it is true and he openly admitted it is true.

As to the other question the author asks:

“Should you believe anything politicians say?’
I answer, Hell NO.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-20   5:38:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: hondo68 (#0) (Edited)

why...?

Because being a Pavlovian drooler who reflexively worships the created things associated with the 2nd amendment requires less effort than responsibly articulating a worldview that's rooted in logic and reason...

Why does 2nd protect 1st?

VxH  posted on  2018-02-20   7:02:13 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Gatlin, Y'ALL (#2)

This was a poorly written article ----- gatlin

L. Neil Smith is a well known published author of over two million words, which people pay him to write..

He does not write 'poorly'. --- Gatlin is a poor reader, incapable of understanding the finer points of Smith's rhetoric.

tpaine  posted on  2018-02-20   8:15:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Gatlin (#2)

"This was a poorly written article ..."

I agree. You'd think that after two million words he'd be a little more coherent. I also agree he's a fanatical, single-issue writer.

All that aside, his arguments suck. Nobody believes "anyone should be allowed to buy any weapon". Why is it so oppressive if we insist they be a citizen? Or a non- felon? Or sane? Or old enough for the responsibility?

We reasonably regulate the first amendment. I don't see why we can't do the same with the second.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-02-20   9:19:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite, -- a slave to the gun grabbing lobby (#5)

Nobody believes "anyone should be allowed to buy any weapon". Why is it so oppressive if we insist they be a citizen? Or a non- felon? Or sane? Or old enough for the responsibility?

We reasonably regulate the first amendment. I don't see why we can't do the same with the second. ---- misterwhite

Hoisted on his own petard,--- misterwhite once again shows his true stripe...

tpaine  posted on  2018-02-20   9:36:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#5)

We reasonably regulate the first amendment. I don't see why we can't do the same with the second.

Excellent point ...

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-20   9:40:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Gatlin, misterwhite, with some reasonable infringements... (#7)

misterwhite (#5) --- We reasonably regulate the first amendment. I don't see why we can't do the same with the second.

Excellent point ... Gatlin

Everyone will now hold our breaths while these two fools make up some reasonable infringements...

tpaine  posted on  2018-02-20   9:56:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: tpaine, misterwhite (#8)

Everyone will now hold our breaths ...

Hey, asshole, only YOU need to do that....then turn fucking blue and die, to make the world a better place.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-02-21   13:45:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com