[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Senate Issues Failing Dairy Industry $1 Billion Handout (Gov Cheeze Welfare)

Innocent 84yo Grandmother Assaulted by Police as They Did a Welfare Check on Her Neighbor

Preachers Jailed for Talking About Christianity Without Getting Police Permission First

American flag was ripped from a flagpole, desecrated, slashed and replaced with ISIS flag at UTAH high school

What the SpaceX Success Means for the Moon, Mars, and More

Tucker Carlson: Indicted Russians Were Facebook Trolls

Student who survived Parkland school shooting: ‘We were told the police would do a fake code red, with fake guns’

The Trump Presidency: A Repeat Of G.W. Bush?

House Freedom Caucus Is On the Warpath Again

Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows

25 Disturbing Facts About Refugee Resettlements from Somalia

13 Russian nationals indicted for interfering in US elections

Mueller Accuses 13 Russians of Aiding Trump

Tearful Jimmy Kimmel Pops off on Trump: ‘You’re Obviously Mentally Ill’

Trump Talked About 'Big Black Dick' and Offended Playboy Model

Immigrant rights activists block Homeland Security van from accessing Metropolitan Detention Center

Nazi Germany’s (and America’s) Drug War

In 3 Years, Cops Have Killed 450% More Citizens Than 4 Decades of Mass Shootings COMBINED

With McCain’s retreat, some turn to Romney to carry his torch

Family Members Say Florida School Shooter Was On Antidepressants for Emotional Issues

Students Report Multiple Shooters & Mass Shooting Drill at Florida High School

Grassley Says He Wants to Discuss Gun Legislation After Massacre

A Million Dollars a Minute

Hmm: FBI warned about Parkland school shooter...but couldn’t ID him?

Shooting at N.S.A. Headquarters Leaves Several Injured

Thoughts & Prayers... and NRA Funding...

Christian parents lose custody of daughter after refusing to support her ‘transition’ to male

Dim-witted Cops Look Like Clowns Bragging About Dozens of Raids for Entirely LEGAL Hemp CBD

Dead Male Prostitute, Piles of Meth Found in Clinton Mega-Donor’s Home—NO ARRESTS

One Pentagon Agency Lost Track of $800 Million—But Now We're Spending Even More on Defense

Drama on the House floor from the Freedom Caucus

Meet the most powerful man in the House

Trilateral conspirators out in the open—and Donald Trump

House Conservatives [Freedom Caucus] Revolt Over Immigration

Freedom Caucus Fires Fresh Warning Shots to Ryan on Immigration ‘Consequences’

Rand Paul tried to do his job, and got the wrath of the Senate in exchange

NSA shooting: Several injured as vehicle crashes at gate

Should this be a required first day video for any new student in economics?

Delaware students can now choose their own race. This should end well

17 killed in shooting at high school in Parkland, Florida, authorities say

Politico/Morning Consult: Republicans take first lead on generic ballot

Evolution or Creation Science?

Sony Apologizes for Weaponizing a Food Allergy in "Peter Rabbit", Because We Live in Stupid Times

Fake news sharing in US is a rightwing thing

Trump’s New Budget Plan Is a Fiscal Disaster

China Set To Launch Yuan-Prices Oil Futures Next Month

Cops Called on Parents Whose Autistic 5-Year-Old Son's Hair Was Too Messy

The Military Industrial Complex Strikes Again: War Spending Will Bankrupt America

Water, Water Everywhere, But Not a Drop on Earth

Duke prof suggests libertarians are 'on the autism spectrum'


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Wiki and DACA
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/02/wiki_and_daca.html
Published: Feb 6, 2018
Author: Bert Peterson
Post Date: 2018-02-11 09:19:14 by 3-Dee
Keywords: None
Views: 21
Comments: 1

Wiki and DACA

By Bert Peterson

In its article about itself, Wikipedia writes:

Wikipedia must not take sides. All opinions and viewpoints, if attributable to external sources, must enjoy an appropriate share of coverage within an article. This is known as neutral point of view (NPOV).

Exactly how does this policy work out in practice?

Take one of the currently most controversial subjects of the day, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Under this policy, in the name of “prosecutorial discretion,” more than a million illegal immigrants -- ones who, prior to the magic year of 2007, were under 16 when they illegally entered the U.S. -- were given “temporary” legal status. (Lasting, in theory, apparently, only until such time as immigration authorities had finished their business with higher priority illegal immigrants (such as those minors who illegally entered the U.S. after the magic year of 2007.)

In its entry on DACA, Wikipedia devotes one section to its impact, which it divides into five categories: Crime, Economy, Education, Health, Migration Flows. Two of these of these -- Education and Health -- deal with whether DACA has had a positive effect on the DACA residents themselves, as if that were DACA’s purpose. Perhaps it was, but if so, then that purpose was something other than the “prosecutorial discretion” that was supposedly the basis for such policy.

On Crime, Wikipedia relies on FactCheck.org, which states:

"…there is no evidence that DACA holders are more likely to commit crimes than U.S. citizens.”

Interesting point. But why would anyone search for evidence about such a particular subset of illegal immigrants in any case? And, in fact, based on the citation provided by Wikipedia, no one has. That citation refers to sanctuary cities, with no mention of DACA.

Regarding Migration Flows, Wikipedia cites a study that found that DACA did not lead to greater illegal immigration. On the face of it, this seems hardly surprising, since it was enacted retroactively; specifically, it was enacted in 2012 to cover nonadults who, as previously noted, illegally entered the U.S. in 2007 or earlier. Anyone entering after that year, five years prior to the policy itself, would not be eligible.

On the other hand, for young, poor Mexicans and Central Americans, such a legality might be lost. Or they could conclude that if DACA was enacted retroactively once, it could be enacted retroactively again. And, in fact, there was in a surge of nonadult illegal immigrants from Central America in 2014, two years after DACA. (For some reason, Mexico relaxed its own usually strict controls over its southern border, apparently to facilitate this migration.)

The Obama administration claimed that this surge was caused by crime and lack of economic opportunity (as if these were novel conditions in Central America,) and made no mention of DACA. Wikipedia repeats this explanation without comment.

Finally, we get to the economy, where Wikipedia finds not simply a benefit to the DACA residents themselves, or the absence of a negative impact on America at large, but finds rather a positive impact on it.

According to the entry, “some” or “most” economists see the economic consequences of DACA as positive. Several economists and public policy researchers, for example from from the Center for American Progress, were cited and discussed. Of those finding a negative impact, however -- such as the Center for Immigration Studies, or the Heritage Foundation -- none, zero, were either cited or discussed.

There are at least two categories missing: the fact that illegal immigration serves to turn American states from red to blue; from Republican to Democratic, and the impact DACA has on our jurisprudence.

The political flipping of American states is a consequence of more than the DACA program itself, but the DACA program contributes to it. In the words of former Obama Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri:

"The fight to protect Dreamers [DACA residents] is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party's future electoral success… If Democrats don't try to do everything in their power to defend [DACA residents,] that will jeopardize Democrats' electoral chances in 2018 and beyond."

Since DACA residents, in theory, cannot vote, it’s not clear (except in California) why they would have an impact on the 2018 elections. But, as former top-level advisor for the Obama administration and also for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, presumably Palmieri knows what she is talking about.

DACA also impacts our jurisprudence -- how we enact our laws in the first place. Do we do it through the legislative process, or by presidential executive order? In 2011, DACA failed the legislative approach. So in 2012, Obama resorted to executive order.

Wikipedia, with some basis, describes the legal opinion on the constitutionality of the creation of DACA as “divided.”

It is “divided,” on whether “prosecutorial discretion” authorizes not simply the nonenforcement of the law, but also the provision of benefits to such persons that would actually deter them from voluntarily complying with the law and returning to their native nations.

What if (as the Wiki editors appear to support) DACA were upheld? What would be the jurisprudential impact? It would be that “prosecutorial discretion” can justify everything done under the aegis of DACA. In other words, separation of powers would be crippled, if not fatally so, in favor of the executive. Of course, the executive would remain democratically elected. But then, so was Hitler, Juan Peron, and Hugo Chavez. If Wikipedia is going to “neutrally” venture into addressing the “impacts” of DACA, this is not one to be omitted, but to be put at the top of the list.

So does this article adhere to Wiki’s policy of NPOV? It is apparent that it does not.

But what about Wiki’s reader editing policy? Not for this entry -- due to “vandalism,” it has been designated as “semi-protected.” In that event, changes can be made only by a registered editor.

A seemingly more plausible policy would be a BPOV -- a “balanced point of view,” but the problem is, someone has to decide what that balance should be. Wikipedia should acknowledge that troublesome fact of life. And so, as an encyclopedia -- that is, an objective publisher of facts, not opinion -- it should not be addressing controversial issues, or the controversial aspects of them, at all; it should be leaving that for publications and authors that make no claims to neutrality.

Bert Peterson operates a website at 4thofjuly.info. He is author of Does Our Banner Yet Wave? which proposes a more painstaking approach to political debate.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: 3-Dee (#0)

"…there is no evidence that DACA holders are more likely to commit crimes than U.S. citizens.”

If they're committing crimes against other illegals, who's going to report the crime? Crime in the illegal community could be 10X higher and we'd never know.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-02-11   9:41:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com