politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: Rand Paul revels in role of Senate troublemaker
Source:
The Hill
URL Source: http://ttp://thehill.com/homenews/s ... in-role-of-senate-troublemaker
Published: Feb 10, 2018
Author: ALEXANDER BOLTON
Post Date: 2018-02-11 05:09:05 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 9620
Comments: 50
Rand Paul seems to revel in frustrating fellow members of the Senate — and that makes his blatant disregard for the chamber’s chummy protocols even more infuriating to them. Paul, the junior senator from Kentucky, appeared to thumb his nose at fellow Republicans Thursday night when he posed for a picture with conservative Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) just off the Senate floor. They posed with their arms folded, grinning for the camera in the midst of a government shutdown fight that Paul himself had triggered. The snapshot was especially galling to Republicans because the trio posed in front of the Senate portrait of Henry Clay, the 19th century Kentucky senator known as the "Great Compromiser.” Clay is the historical hero of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who negotiated the budget deal that Paul was trashing. “[Paul is] the perennial annoying gadfly with no positivity associating with it. What he did didn’t change the outcome. He’s all about grandstanding,” said a Senate Republican aide. “Taking selfies with Justin Amash and Thomas Massie — he just is the perennial annoyance,” the aide added. “He’s here to go on television and that’s what he kept doing. It’s about self promotion.” Al Cross, a journalism professor at the University of Kentucky and a longtime commentator on Kentucky politics, said Paul’s actions likely don’t sit well with the GOP leader, even if he doesn’t say anything about it publicly. “There’s no doubt that it gets his nose out of joint, but he’s dealt with Rand Paul for a long time and he’s pretty accustomed to it,” Cross said of McConnell. But Paul doesn’t care if he’s making his colleagues uncomfortable. He says he wouldn’t have delayed the budget deal if GOP leaders had merely allowed him a vote on restoring the spending caps that the deal was setting aside. Leaders said if they allowed Paul a vote other senators would then demand votes on their own amendments, delaying the bill even longer. Still, many Republicans didn't want to vote against reimposing spending caps that they had declared a major victory only a few short years ago, when they fought with the Obama administration over spending cuts. “You could feel the frustration and embarrassment growing in Congress as we exposed the hypocrisy of Republicans who are joining in an unholy alliance and spending free-for-all with Democrats,” Paul tweeted Thursday night. Members of the Senate are accustomed to the opposing party forcing them to take tough votes, rather than a member of their own conference. Senate Republican Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) fumed that Paul’s tactics were “grossly irresponsible” and “bad behavior” that he didn’t want to reward by making any concessions. Senate Republican Conference Chairman John Thune (S.D.) called it a “colossal waste of everyone’s time.” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) called the whole episode another example of the Senate’s “dysfunction,” labeling it “ridiculous.” Rand Paul seems to revel in frustrating fellow members of the Senate — and that makes his blatant disregard for the chamber’s chummy protocols even more infuriating to them. Paul, the junior senator from Kentucky, appeared to thumb his nose at fellow Republicans Thursday night when he posed for a picture with conservative Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) just off the Senate floor. They posed with their arms folded, grinning for the camera in the midst of a government shutdown fight that Paul himself had triggered. The snapshot was especially galling to Republicans because the trio posed in front of the Senate portrait of Henry Clay, the 19th century Kentucky senator known as the "Great Compromiser.” Clay is the historical hero of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who negotiated the budget deal that Paul was trashing. “[Paul is] the perennial annoying gadfly with no positivity associating with it. What he did didn’t change the outcome. He’s all about grandstanding,” said a Senate Republican aide. “Taking selfies with Justin Amash and Thomas Massie — he just is the perennial annoyance,” the aide added. “He’s here to go on television and that’s what he kept doing. It’s about self promotion.” Al Cross, a journalism professor at the University of Kentucky and a longtime commentator on Kentucky politics, said Paul’s actions likely don’t sit well with the GOP leader, even if he doesn’t say anything about it publicly. “There’s no doubt that it gets his nose out of joint, but he’s dealt with Rand Paul for a long time and he’s pretty accustomed to it,” Cross said of McConnell. But Paul doesn’t care if he’s making his colleagues uncomfortable. He says he wouldn’t have delayed the budget deal if GOP leaders had merely allowed him a vote on restoring the spending caps that the deal was setting aside. Leaders said if they allowed Paul a vote other senators would then demand votes on their own amendments, delaying the bill even longer. Still, many Republicans didn't want to vote against reimposing spending caps that they had declared a major victory only a few short years ago, when they fought with the Obama administration over spending cuts. “You could feel the frustration and embarrassment growing in Congress as we exposed the hypocrisy of Republicans who are joining in an unholy alliance and spending free-for-all with Democrats,” Paul tweeted Thursday night. Members of the Senate are accustomed to the opposing party forcing them to take tough votes, rather than a member of their own conference. Senate Republican Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) fumed that Paul’s tactics were “grossly irresponsible” and “bad behavior” that he didn’t want to reward by making any concessions. Senate Republican Conference Chairman John Thune (S.D.) called it a “colossal waste of everyone’s time.” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) called the whole episode another example of the Senate’s “dysfunction,” labeling it “ridiculous.” But Paul gets energy from riling up his colleagues on points of principle and refused to back down, even though it was clear that the budget deal had the votes to pass. “They’re mad that they have to do their jobs,” said Brian Darling, a GOP strategist and former Paul aide. Darling said his former boss doesn’t care about upsetting his fellow senators. “He cares more about doing the right thing, not going along to get along. Members were really angry with him but he has the right to do what he did. “Congress waits until the last minute to do their appropriations bill and then challenges a single member to object. They’re doing this on purpose to bully members to get bad bills passed,” he said. Paul doubled down Friday with an op-ed that called his colleagues “hypocrites.” “We now control the House, Senate and White House, and we should stand for less government and less spending,” he wrote in Time. “Instead, we see a massive increase that would make President Obama cringe.” Paul said he expected “a lot of tired staffers” would try to feed media stories “about how I wouldn’t play nice with them and let them get their massive spending bill in secret.” He said didn’t regret how things played out. “People tuned in to TV, followed on social media, and had the debate trending number one all night,” he noted. Thursday was only the latest example of Paul sticking his finger in the eye of Republicans leadership. He was a thorn in the side of leaders during last year’s health-care debate, when he declared on television the GOP plan to repeal and replace the 2010 Affordable Care Act was “ObamaCare-lite” and a “bailout" for insurance companies. At one point, he accused Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) of selling “a bill of goods” to President Trump in the health-care debate. Paul was later one of a handful of Senate Republicans to vote against the ObamaCare repeal and replace plan that passed the House, and that McConnell had spent weeks negotiating with his conference. In December, Paul panned the short-term spending proposal that GOP leaders advanced to keep the government open as “reckless deficit spending.” For Paul, playing the role of maverick is good politics. A Mason-Dixon poll of registered voters in Kentucky in December showed that he has a substantial better job rating than McConnell, the ultimate Republican team player. The survey showed Paul with a 44 percent job approval rating, while only 30 percent approved of McConnell’s performance. Paul’s one-man revolt on the budget deal was also a hit with conservatives. “A senator has an ability to be a voice and not just a vote,” said Daniel Horowitz, senior editor of Conservative Review. “He’s able to give to the forgotten man … the average American taxpayer.” “When the political class of both parties get together and decide they’re going to get a specific outcome there’s no way to thwart that outcome in the short run. But the only thing worse than screwing taxpayers is screwing them and having no one find out about it,” he added. Senators thought Thursday would be a routine day after McConnell and Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) announced they had reached a two-year budget deal that gained swift support from Ryan in the House. They needed consent from everyone in the chamber to speed up the procedural clock and vote in the morning and afternoon in time to catch flights back home for an early weekend. But Paul surprised them all by digging in his heels and delaying a vote until 1:30 a.m. after McConnell refused to give in to his demand for a separate vote on budget caps. The frustration with Paul spread to the other side of the Capitol, where members of the House had to stay on call until 5 a.m. Friday morning to receive the bill and pass it, something they expected to happen hours earlier. One frustrated Republican lawmaker, Rep. Charlie Dent (Pa.), quipped he could sympathize with Rene Boucher, Paul’s neighbor in Bowling Green, Ky., who allegedly tackled the senator over a landscaping dispute. “When Rand Paul pulls a stunt like this, it’s easy to understand why it’s difficult to be Rand Paul’s next-door neighbor,” Dent told Politico. Paul’s office didn’t find that remark at all humorous. The assault gave Paul broken ribs. “That comment is disgusting and Charlie Dent should apologize. Senator Rand Paul will always stand up for what is right, regardless of which party is in control,” said Paul’s spokesman Sergio Gor. “He successfully brought much-needed attention to the hypocrisy in the halls of Congress when it comes to out-of-control spending,” he added.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
#3. To: Gatlin (#0)
If that is the case, then we need a few hundred more just like him. “You could feel the frustration and embarrassment growing in Congress as we exposed the hypocrisy of Republicans who are joining in an unholy alliance and spending free-for-all with Democrats,” Paul tweeted Thursday night. Keep up the good work Rand.
Then they all could join Rand Paul, Justin Amash and Thomas Massie to open a chain of Kabuki theaters across the country where male actors play both male and female roles.
Rand Paul is right. The Republicans are being hypocrites in scolding Obama then doing the same thing. Rand Paul is hands down the best Senator we have. We need more Rand Paul's and less John piece of shit McCain's.
I on the other hand say we need more Senators like Rafael Edward Cruz and less Senators like the piece of shit John McCain. Ted Cruz is an unyielding debater and the far right’s most formidable advocate. Ted Cruz says, “In both law and politics, I think the essential battle is the meta-battle of framing the narrative.” From his reading of Sun Tzu he has learned that a battle is won by “choosing the terrain on which it will be fought.” I feel that Ted Cruz is absolutely right. The battle is not won by leaving the spending bill debate on the Senate and running out multiple times during that debate to get in front of the news cameras, like Rand Paul did Friday night. The battle is not won by talking on the Senate floor with not other effective reason but to show the world through the TV cameras how long you can go without pissing in your pants, like Rand Paul did Friday night. Rand Paul was offered additional time after to continue his publicity seek charade, but prime time for TV audience was over....so only the did he let the vote happen.
More senators like Ted Cruz also. For sure. Except his globalist positions.
As opposed to Rand Paul’s isolationist positions like bringing all of the troops home from Afghanistan today....I will still go with Ted Cruz.
What is the goal in Afghanistan? How much did it cost so far? Is it really worth it? My answers. Who knows, way to much, no.
The Afghanistan War has cost $1.07 trillion.
There are no replies to Comment # 25. End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestRand Paul...Senate troublemaker
#4. To: Deckard (#3)
... we need a few hundred more just like [Rand Paul].
#9. To: Gatlin (#4)
(Edited)
#17. To: A K A Stone (#9)
Rand Paul is right. The Republicans are being hypocrites in scolding Obama then doing the same thing.
Yes, he is right about that. I said so in a post. Rand Paul is hands down the best Senator we have.
That’s your opinion and you are entitled to it. We need more Rand Paul's and less John piece of shit McCain's.
If that’s the only choice, then I agree.
#18. To: Gatlin (#17)
#19. To: A K A Stone (#18)
More senators like Ted Cruz also. For sure. Except his globalist positions.
#20. To: Gatlin (#19)
#25. To: A K A Stone (#20)
What is the goal in Afghanistan?
My Answers:
How much did it cost so far?
Is it really worth it?
My answers. Who knows, way to much, no. What is the goal in Afghanistan?
We will achieve success after there is a stable enough Afghanistan that is able to manage its own internal and external security to the point that stops interference and the take over from outside powers like especially Iran. When the country is able to resist the establishment of terror bases that were there before. That I say is our goal in Afghanistan and one we must achieve. Nothing more and nothing less. How much did it cost so far?
Is it really worth it?
My answer is, I don’t YET know and I have no way of knowing until the goal is achieved or we capitulate.
Replies to Comment # 25.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]