United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Palin Says Marked-Out McCain Visor Wasn't a Political Statement
Source:
Politics Daily
URL Source: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/1 ... r-wasnt-a-political-statement%
Published: Dec 17, 2009
Author: David Sessions
Post Date: 2009-12-17 15:41:49 by sneakypete
Ping List: *Politics and Politicians* Subscribe to *Politics and Politicians*
Keywords: None
Views: 63908
Comments: 413
On Wednesday, paparazzi captured photos of Sarah Palin relaxing on a Hawaii beach with her husband and children, and wearing a McCain campaign visor -- with her former running mate's name scribbled over with a black marker. TMZ called the visor a "searing political statement," but Palin tells Politico that she was just trying to keep a low profile. "I am so sorry if people took this silly incident the wrong way," Palin said in a statement. "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago. So much for trying to be incognito." A Palin friend said that the hotel where the family was staying ..... Continued at link with photo.
Poster Comment: " "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." Ok,there is just no excuse for that. Screw her and the horse she rode in on.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-372) not displayed.
.
.
.
#373. To: diva betsy ross (#327)
OOh..Those guys in the House and Senate have those positions for so many years that eat newcomers up for lunch and spit them. If they don't know any better they pick people like Karl Rove to *ahem* help them out...Like W did. As a hand-picked NWO-Elite puppet, of course Dubya was going to led by the hand by the likes of Rove, Rumsfeld and Cheney to *ahem* "help" steer the NWO-ship. And it's because OF these Elitist NWO-SOBs that we suddenly found ourselves in the "Get-Bin Laden" quagmire and fake war in Iraq. Not happy with that, they helped demolish the conservative wing of the GOP and common sense which aided greatly in ushering one Marxist President. Just a reminder - as a supposed political neophyte (and ex-Texas Guv) Dubya's daddy was CIA director, Reagan's NWO-VP, and President - remember? Sonny-boy, Poppy and the Saudis were business partners. Now how could he have possibly have been that naive and unfamiliar with gubmint? Answer: He wasn't. RECOMMENDED READING: 'House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties' Just go and check out Dana- you might like him. :) I still like Tancredo-Pat Toomey-JC Watts. Diva, I like Toomey but the guy is fighting just for a chance as PA Senator. JC Watts is a RINO and 0bama-voter, and I've yet to closely examine Dana Rohrabacher track record. Palin STILL possesses enough conservative bonafides, and rattles the cages of the political/Elites establishment to warrant serious consideration - regardless of the naysaying speculation here. But that is JMHO.
If it doesn't,she should come right out and say so. As for me,I am done with making excuses for her. She is no longer McLunatics running mate,and she is supposed to be out from under his shadow now and on her own. Politics being what it is, Palin is NOT going to clarify exactly what "100%" meant...maybe because SHE doesn't even know. But I believe it was a statement made in support of the guy who nominated her as VP. Call it a "loyalty" courtesy. To what extent did she mean it? We'll have to wait. But despite that she and McCain have a lot of differences. Whether you want to characterize support of Palin as making "excuses for Palin," get on her case, support her a la carte or whatever is your prerogative, but there is NO way she is a McCain-RINO or the equivalent of 0bama, or just another NWO-Puppet. No way. Once again,HOW is it possible to have a "path to citizenship" WITHOUT amnesty? IT IS ILLEGAL FOR A ILLEGAL ALIEN TO BE GRANTED CITIZENSHIP. A amnesty is REQUIRED before any can become US citizens. And AGAIN, we'll have to wait instead of speculating the worst. "Path to citizenship" does NOT mean "Amnesty." If a Dem or RINO said what she'd said, I'd be more concerned. Palin: "We need to close the borders. They are called illegal aliens for a reason and if they are not going to follow the rules they should not be in our country. It’s pretty simple I ratcheted that one down to the simple answer because its an easier answer than some politicians want it to make it be. You close the borders. You get more aggressive about cracking down on the illegal aliens and we take it serious what our border patrol officers are trying to do." NOT exactly 0bama or Bush, is it? I remember hoping that Boy Jorge was going to be a conservative,too. Actually I knew he was never going to be a "conservative." I supported her in the first place because I had a sense from some of the things that she said that she MIGHT be a genuine conservative at heart. Or maybe I was just so desperate for a conservative to show up that I hoped she was. I still believe in Palin for the same reasons as you. You blew out a tire on the McCain comment. I understand - I didn't like it either - but it still doesn't define her thousand and one politic positions. Check this interview out: The only good news is there is still a year left to go before the 2012 elections start getting into full swing,and I can just hope that Walter Jones or another actual conservative throws his or her hat into the ring....If not,I'm back to voting for local and state candidates in 2012,and casting another write-in ballot for president. Never heard of Jones. As conservative as he may or may not be or anyone else, will he or they have a shot?? I think I'll vote for Cheech Wizard this time. Of Cheech and Chong? How many "Cheech's" are out there?
They understand. It just conflicts with there lust for cheap labor and GOP worship.
You both support the man that voted 9x against putting National Guard on the Border. You dislike the man that did. You are a good open border Libertarians.
----------------------------------------------------------- There's the difference between you and I right there. See, there is black and white and there is also right and wrong. I have a defined set of core values and I don't waiver from them. My core values don't change when the wind blows or my candidate changes from briefs to panties. Save me the sanctimonious "I'm principled, you're not" crap. The "difference" is in accepting reality instead of delusion, the possible instead of IMpossible. We're talking about candidates for the office of Presidency, NOT who we're marrying. Do you really believe there's going to be a candidate that mirrors your "core beliefs" in 2012? If you're going to play this silly game, then Jesus Christ is MY ideal candidate because he mirrors MY "core beliefs." What's that? he isn't available to run? Looks like I've got to go to PLAN "B." Who's your Plan A or B?? I am a conservative and I see things in black and white. You either are or you are not. The issue isn't about what you or I believe; It's about politics, and the nature of politics has always been about shades of gray; Conservatives just hope their candidate represents a shade of gray that is far closer to white then black. And you, my neoconservative/leftist friend, are not. You are pushing for, supporting and defending a candidate who is not conservative, who supports a path to citizenship, McCain, climate change BS and bailouts. Those 'shades of gray' have brought us to where we are right now and we'll continue down this road until pretend conservatives like you find your core values and stick to them. NOW, you've got me LMAO. No really....my Tooth Fairy Conservative Party friend. Your idealism is commendable, but engaging in half-truths, speculations, assumptions don't help convince me that you have ANY grasp of political nuance or reality. You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry. Wait...Is this where the Laugh-Track throttle is shoved to the max?
No. Mostly because he's not running. If he DID decide to run,he would be a serious contender,though. A married Catholic from the south that is a traditional small government conservative that leans very heavily towards being a social conservative also (he seems to be serious about being a Catholic),he was barred from the White House under Boy Jorge,and he is honest and fearless enough he gave a anti-Iraq war speech at Camp Lejune right before a election a couple of cycles ago. A anti-war speech to Marines that got him a standing ovation. As far as I know there is no scandal in his background and he is what women would call a attractive man who has charisma. Yeah,I'd say he would be a contender. If somebody can get him to run. I think I'll vote for Cheech Wizard this time. Of Cheech and Chong? No,although Cheech Marin would be a decided improvement over what we have had to suffer through since Reagan left office. How many "Cheech's" are out there? At least one. Cheech Wizard. The Wizard in Vaugh Bode's cartoons from the 60's that is always surrounded by double-breasted sweeties,and kicks anybody in the nuts that crosses him. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheech_Wizard
No, this is where I repeat myself: You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry. Go ahead and navigate your way through all your 'nuances' and your 'shades of gray' right to a candidate who supports a path to citizenship, McCain and bailouts. You may also enjoy pondering the definition of 'is'. Like I said, your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry, but I'll probably ignore most of them.
LOL! I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
No. Mostly because he's not running. If he DID decide to run,he would be a serious contender,though. A married Catholic from the south that is a traditional small government conservative that leans very heavily towards being a social conservative also (he seems to be serious about being a Catholic),he was barred from the White House under Boy Jorge,and he is honest and fearless enough he gave a anti-Iraq war speech at Camp Lejune right before a election a couple of cycles ago. A anti-war speech to Marines that got him a standing ovation. As far as I know there is no scandal in his background and he is what women would call a attractive man who has charisma. Yeah,I'd say he would be a contender. If somebody can get him to run. Getting barred from the Bush WH puts him in the rarified company of Tom Tancredo. That's a plus. Small gubmint...anti-war...charismatic...sounds principled...But it doesn't help us at a national level unless he busts a move. Cheech Marin would be a decided improvement over what we have had to suffer through since Reagan left office. Wouldn't he? 8^D Cheech Wizard. The Wizard in Vaugh Bode's cartoons from the 60's that is always surrounded by double-breasted sweeties,and kicks anybody in the nuts that crosses him. I read the comic at the link. Yeah, it was pretty funny.
IF you had a clue to begin with I might feel a bit chastised. You're locked and sealed into an intellectual vacuum.
The Paths trailhead is in Mexico. Pauls Amnesty votes (plural) as well as Gutierrez's H.R. 4321 put the trail head here in the US. Paul voted in 1997, 2001( H.R. 1885) and 2002 (H RES 365) to grant, extend or continue Section 245-i amnesties for illegal aliens
----------------------------------------------------------- Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
I like Paul. I also like Walter Jones, which means you'd probably not. Neoconservatives think conservatives are nuts. Jones endorsed Ron Paul in 2008.
So you're NOT feeling a bit chastised? Is that why you're grilling whitey about who MY guy is? Are you looking for revenge libby? LOL!
I like Paul. I do too. But he was faaaar from perfect, has ZERO charisma, has ZERO chance of being President, and refused to run as the Independent he is. Oh, and I defended him when he accepted earmarks after having voted against earmarks.
Jones endorsed Ron Paul in 2008. WHO?? Why should I be surprised still fantasizing about a 'Tooth Fairy' Conservative Party and candidate?
"Amused" is the word. Is that why you're grilling whitey about who MY guy is? You call that simple question "grilling"?? LOL, ok - have it your way. Are you looking for revenge libby? LOL! "Revenge"?? You're not my enemy Weeps. We just disagree on the definition of "reality."
He IS far from perfect, but he's the closest thing to an actual conservative that we have in American government and light-years to the right of Palin. I don't care about charisma. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have charisma. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. I don't fall for the whole cult of personality BS that is shoved down the throats of Americans today. I don't care about his 'chance' of being President. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have a chance of being elected. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. If everyone today did this, we wouldn't be electing leftists no matter what letter comes after their name. I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart. That's part of that whole 'core values' thing I was talking about earlier.
Hyperbole-Ad Nauseam, thy name is We The People. I know personally people who are more "conservative" than Ron Paul, yet the odds of them becoming President is the same as with Ron Paul. I don't care about charisma. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have charisma. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. I don't fall for the whole cult of personality BS that is shoved down the throats of Americans today. Possessing "charisma" is important because it leads. People are NOT inspired by whiny, apologetic, little gnomes - even if they are knowledge, honest and sincere about their ideology. Your Human-Nature IQ is ZERO. "I don't care about his 'chance' of being President. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have a chance of being elected. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. If everyone today did this, we wouldn't be electing leftists no matter what letter comes after their name." Ok, so you've established the fact that you "don't care" if the odds of your candidate (like Paul) are a million-1 AGAINST.... And who cares if in the next election against 0bama, your write-in vote is a vote for stupidity, masochism, and slavery - just as long as YOU retain your "core values," eh? I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart...That's part of that whole 'core values' thing I was talking about earlier. Ummm...I think I get it. It's "because his views mostly resemble" your own. (Acccckkk! Polly wanna cracker??) The issue here is NOT about either "Party" [remember, Ron Paul (R)]; It's about the reality of who can best lead this country and steer it back towards actual conservatism. Right now the best one to fit that bill is Sarah Palin. I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart. Is that really the 4th time you've penned the same exact phrase? Tell me something I already don't know about Party apathy and indifference to the American people... ONE candidate breaks the mold: Sarah Palin. Now step away from the bong.
That's something I'm sure you'll never understand. I thought you wanted to be done with this?
Hey yukon, can you see Russia from your house? LOLAY!
LMAO! Very inspired Lib. Very sincere too. But very dumb. Let me ask you this: What are you going to do if she stumps for McCain in 2010? Will you STILL defend and support her?
Hey yukon, can you see Russia from your house? LOLAY!
I thought I could squeeze out a few more laughs from you about it....along with the obligatory methane. So sue me.
Legitimate question. Bravo... I will cringe and puke and be disappointed...BUT yes, I will still defend and support her for her "core values." We will be the recipient of that same loyalty from her when she defends and supports the American People as President.
I hope you're joking. I can never tell.
Open border/free trader. http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-10-05/ron- paul-free-trade-instead-of-bombs-and-bribes/ Paul had the same view as Bush on embryonic research!
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
You are so full of shit I'm surprised you ever get off the toilet! Do you have a laptop in the bathroom right now? Did you even READ that article? Everything in that article could have been written by George Washington. It's the exact same views.
You are in need of a psychiatrist, lunatic!
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
400.....Did you? Paul had the same view as Bush on embryonic research!
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
You are in need of a psychiatrist, lunatic! Prove me wrong then, if you can. Post some Washington quotes that disagree with Paul's views in that article. If I'm a lunatic then this task should be easily accomplished and you can prove it. If you can't then you're just full of shit and name calling is all you have.
Paul had the same view as Bush on embryonic research! Did Washington also, lunatic?
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
LOL! That's what I thought.
With what?
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
Are you a masochist? I continually expose you as being FOS and you just keep coming back for more. You're not getting some kind of sick, sexual satisfaction out of this are you?
Paul had the same view as Bush on embryonic research! Did Washington also, lunatic? You're such a fookin dunce!
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
Did Washington also, lunatic? So freaking what? WTF does that have to do with the article that you posted and the claims that you made? Washington couldn't have possibly HAD a position on this issue either way! You should give this up cause you really suck at it!
According to your logic it makes Paul and Bush political twins, you fookin idiot!
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
That is the motto of the Lambda Kappa Sigma sorority. Did you belong? Hey idiot, it is the motto of "the Order of the Thistle", and the State of North Carolina, and MANY others ... "North Carolina Great Seal of North Carolina with the state motto esse quam videri. Esse quam videri is the state motto of North Carolina, adopted in 1893. It is unusual that, until the act of 1893, the sovereign state of North Carolina had no motto since its declaration of independence. It was one of the few states that did not have a motto, and the only one of the original thirteen without one. The state motto had also been adopted as a temporary motto by the Virginia class submarine USS North Carolina until being replaced by primus in proelio, which means First in Fight, a play-on-words for First in Flight. [edit] Schools Esse quam videri is (or was) the motto of a number of schools around the world including: Academy at the Lakes, Land O Lakes, Florida Academy of the Holy Names Tampa, Florida Accra Academy High School Accra, Ghana Albert Academy Freetown, Sierra Leone S. Anselm's Preparatory School Bakewell, England Appalachian State University (1899) Boone, North Carolina, USA Ashford School (1899) Ashford, Kent, England Ashville College (1877) Harrogate, England Augusta Preparatory Day School (1972) Augusta, Georgia, USA Beaconsfield Primary School (1883) Tasmania, Australia Ben Franklin Academy (1987) Atlanta, Georgia, USA Bennett, Instituto Metodista, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Berklee College of Music Boston, Massachusetts, USA Boys Latin School of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Brigham Young University Men's Chorus, Provo, Utah, USA Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina, USA Clifton House Preparatory School Harrogate, England The Colleton Primary School, Twyford, Berkshire, UK. Colyton Grammar School (1546) Colyford, England Columbia College Chicago (1890) Chicago, Illinois, USA Connells Point Public School, Sydney, Australia.[1] Cranbrook School Sydney (1918), Sydney, Australia. Darwin High School, Darwin, Australia.[2] Dubbo High School, Australia Ellis Robins High School, Harare, Zimbabwe Esquimalt High School, [Esquimalt], BC, Canada The Episcopal Academy, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA The Forest School Winnersh, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK Garrison Forest School for Girls (1910) Owings Mills, Maryland, USA Groton School (1884), Groton, Massachusetts, USA. The motto changed to "Cui Servire est Regnare" shortly after the school's founding. The Hermitage School (1906), Geelong, Australia which has subsequently become that of The Hermitage House, Geelong Grammar School. Hampden DuBose Academy, Zellwood, Florida, USA Highsted Grammar School, Sittingbourne, Kent, England Hudson Catholic High School, Hudson, Massachusetts The Hemel Hempstead School, (1931), Hemel Hempstead, England.[3] The Ellis School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Instituto Metodista Bennett (1888) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.[4] JMA Armstrong High School, Salisbury, New Brunswick, Canada KIPP Houston High School, Houston, Texas, USA Kingsley School, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, England Kutama College Norton, Zimbabwe Leicester High School(1962)The last graduating class before changing to Leicester Elementary School, Leicester, NC, USA. Magee Secondary School, Vancouver, BC, Canada Miami Coral Park Senior High School, Miami, Florida, USA Moravian Academy Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA current motto is "mind, body, spirit", The Mount School, Mill Hill. London, United Kingdom. North Adelaide Primary School, (1877), Adelaide, Australia Peace College, (1857), Raleigh, North Carolina, USA Queen's College, Queenstown, South Africa Rhodesway School, (1958), Bradford, UK Rockridge Secondary School, West Vancouver, B.C., Canada Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK Salisbury School, Salisbury, Connecticut, USAUK Scott Park Secondary School(1967)Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Southampton Grammar School for Girls [1], Southampton, UK St. Malachy's Memorial High School in Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.[5] Streetsville Secondary School, Streetsville, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Suffield Academy in Suffield, Connecticut, USA. The Taieri High School, Mosgiel, Otago, NZ Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy (1999-Present), Rutherford County, NC.[6] Trevecca Nazarene University, Nashville, TN Truro School [2], (1880-Present), Truro, Cornwall, UK The Boys' Latin School of Maryland (1844), Baltimore, Maryland, USA University of Tampa, Tampa, Florida Villa Devoto School [3] (1908) Buenos Aires, Argentina Wavell State High School Brisbane, Australia St Audries School, West Quantoxhead, Taunton, Somerset, England (since closed and now a hotel) Wyomissing Area School District [4], Wyomissing, PA, USA Yeovil School [5], Yeovil, Somerset, UK [edit] Sororities "Esse Quam Videri" is also the motto of the Delta Phi Epsilon sorority [6], founded in 1917 at New York University Law School. "Esse Quam Videri" is also the motto of the Lambda Kappa Sigma sorority [7], founded in 1913 at Massachusetts College of Pharmacy. "Esse Quam Videri" is also the motto of the House of Susan B. Anthony [8], founded exclusively at The King's College in the Empire State Building. [edit] Fraternities Phi Lambda Sigma, Lebanon Valley College, est. 1867. Alpha Pi Alpha, SUNY Albany, 1952 through 1987 [edit] Sporting Organisations Kingswood Rugby Football Club, Bristol, UK, use a variant of the motto, "Esse Non Videri" as their club motto. [9] [edit] Companies A computer and management training company, http://www.eqv.co.uk/ who are based in Leicestershire, UK. [10] [edit] Families Esse quam videri is the motto used on the coats of arms of the following families: Acraman, Bakewell, Bowen, Breamore, Brownlee, Brownlow, Cambria, Clavering, Coutts, Crawley, Croft, Dickinson, Harmer, Halliday, Hannum, Hood, Isserman, Ivey, Longley, McManners, Manning, Renshaw, Round (Essex County), Shreeve, Sherriff, Sibley, Sturges, Thurston, Turner, Tyler, Walmsley and Woodgate. It was also the motto used within the Brockman coat of arms circa 1700." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esse_quam_videri) But of course you are TRYING to be insulting, aren't you, you little pu$$y?
Esse Quam Videri.
Imagine that. Trying to insult the biggest asshole here, next to yukon that is.
He was trying to insult YOU dickus lickus? Interesting ... /NOT
Esse Quam Videri.
Hmmmm, I still have you figured for a sorority girl.
Comments (413 - 413) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI understand the passion, but- but....
#374. To: sneakypete (#328)
Given her statements as McLunatics running mate,which I was willing to overlook BECAUSE she was his running mate at that time,and given her "I support 100%" statement of yesterday,I have no choice but to believe it means the same thing to her that it means to McLuntic.
#375. To: sneakypete (#316)
This is such a simple concept to understand the typical 8th grader would be insulted if you suggested they couldn't understand it,yet these people insist it doesn't mean what it means.
#376. To: Moderate Mammal, Sneaky Pete (#375)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#377. To: We The People (#372)
Look - between black and white are shades of gray.
#378. To: Liberator (#374)
Never heard of Jones. As conservative as he may or may not be or anyone else, will he or they have a shot??
#379. To: Liberator (#377)
Wait...Is this where the Laugh-Track throttle is shoved to the max?
#380. To: Liberator (#374)
Never heard of Jones.
#381. To: sneakypete (#378)
Never heard of Jones. As conservative as he may or may not be or anyone else, will he or they have a shot??
#382. To: We The People (#379)
Go ahead and navigate your way through all your 'nuances' and your 'shades of gray' right to a candidate who supports a path to citizenship, McCain and bailouts. You may also enjoy pondering the definition of 'is'.
#383. To: Liberator (#382)
(Edited)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#384. To: WhiteSands, We The People (#383)
#385. To: Liberator (#384)
Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
#386. To: Liberator (#382)
IF you had a clue to begin with I might feel a bit chastised.
#387. To: We The People (#385)
Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
#388. To: We The People (#385)
I also like Walter Jones, which means you'd probably not. Neoconservatives think conservatives are nuts.
#389. To: We The People, WhiteSands (#386)
So you're NOT feeling a bit chastised?
#390. To: Liberator (#387)
But he was faaaar from perfect, has ZERO charisma, has ZERO chance of being President, and refused to run as the Independent he is.
#391. To: We The People (#390)
He [Ron Paul] IS far from perfect, but he's the closest thing to an actual conservative that we have in American government and light-years to the right of Palin.
#392. To: Liberator (#391)
just as long as YOU retain your "core values," eh?
#393. To: Liberator (#391)
ONE candidate breaks the mold: Sarah Palin.
#394. To: We The People (#392)
I thought you wanted to be done with this?
#395. To: We The People (#393)
Let me ask you this: What are you going to do if she stumps for McCain in 2010? Will you STILL defend and support her?
#396. To: Liberator (#395)
I will cringe and puke and be disappointed...BUT yes, I will still defend and support her for her "core values."
#397. To: We The People, Liberator (#390)
I support him because his views most closely resemble my own
#398. To: Ibluafartsky (#397)
Open border/free trader. http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-10-05/ron- paul-free-trade-instead-of-bombs-and-bribes/
#399. To: We The People (#398)
Everything in that article could have been written by George Washington.
#400. To: We The People (#398)
Did you even READ that article?
#401. To: Ibluafartsky (#399)
Everything in that article could have been written by George Washington.
#402. To: We The People (#401)
If I'm a lunatic then this task should be easily accomplished and you can prove it.
#403. To: Ibluafartsky (#402)
Paul had the same view as Bush on embryonic research!
#404. To: We The People (#403)
That's what I thought.
#405. To: Ibluafartsky (#404)
#406. To: We The People (#405)
I continually expose you as being FOS
#407. To: Ibluafartsky (#406)
Paul had the same view as Bush on embryonic research!
#408. To: We The People (#407)
So freaking what?
#409. To: Abcdefg (#206)
Esse Quam Videri
#410. To: Mad Dog (#409)
But of course you are TRYING to be insulting, aren't you, you little pu$$y?
#411. To: Bickus Dickus (#410)
#412. To: Mad Dog (#409)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]