United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Palin Says Marked-Out McCain Visor Wasn't a Political Statement
Source:
Politics Daily
URL Source: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/1 ... r-wasnt-a-political-statement%
Published: Dec 17, 2009
Author: David Sessions
Post Date: 2009-12-17 15:41:49 by sneakypete
Ping List: *Politics and Politicians* Subscribe to *Politics and Politicians*
Keywords: None
Views: 72465
Comments: 413
On Wednesday, paparazzi captured photos of Sarah Palin relaxing on a Hawaii beach with her husband and children, and wearing a McCain campaign visor -- with her former running mate's name scribbled over with a black marker. TMZ called the visor a "searing political statement," but Palin tells Politico that she was just trying to keep a low profile. "I am so sorry if people took this silly incident the wrong way," Palin said in a statement. "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago. So much for trying to be incognito." A Palin friend said that the hotel where the family was staying ..... Continued at link with photo.
Poster Comment: " "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." Ok,there is just no excuse for that. Screw her and the horse she rode in on.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 392.
#6. To: sneakypete (#0)
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." That's pretty funny. She thought so much of McCain she grabbed the nearest Magic Marker and badly blacked-out McCain's name. Just as funny are some of the people who think phrases like "I adore ____", or "I support _____ 100 percent" aren't politic-speak for "Bwaahaa!"
Is it that painful for you to face the truth about this woman?
LOL! Weeps you are such a LOSER, just like your hero RonniePaulie. You certainly can NEVER face the truth about him can you LOSER? Is it that painful for you to face the truth about this man? It just eats you paultards up that Governor Palin, with almost zero effort, totally eclispes your failure of a hero on ALL levels ? Doesn't it LOSER? LMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not nearly as much as it eats at you Palintard, rino, GOP faithful fools.
LOL! PaulTARDS = LOSERS!
Yeah, but Palin who 'adores McCain', is FOR a path to citizenship and was FOR the bailouts, and her tards are winners, right? Paul, a strict constitutionalist who wants to enforce the laws and cut all welfare to illegals and voted against the bailouts is a loser. But Palin who wants to make the illegals citizens, LOVES McCain and was FOR the bailouts, now THERE'S a winner for you! LMAO! You have no idea how stupid you appear do you? Post some more photos. That will convince those with IQ's less than 75.
LOL! What's the matter weeps? Cant you handle the TRUTH about RonniePaulie? and about you mouth breathing paulTARDS? YOU certainly have no room to speak about anyone else "appearing STOOPID", you PDS insane jealous paulTARD LOSER. My dogs have a higher IQ than you do LOSER.
What truth is that MD? Spell it out for me, IF you can. Exactly what can't I handle? And why are you ignoring the facts about Palin? The truth comes out about Palin and all you talk about is Paul? In case you haven't noticed, the word PALIN is in the headline, not Paul. Does the phrase 'a river in Egypt' ring a bell? Weirdo.
The truth comes out about Palin So what's "the truth" in your opinion, you fookin Palinhater?
Are you for real? You can't be that dense. It's not my truth. It's your neoqueen Palin's OWN WORDS! It's HER truth! "I am so sorry if people took this silly incident the wrong way," Palin said in a statement. "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago.
Yes, you fookin idiot! She could have said, "John McCain and Ron Paul are Republicans, just as I am. BFD!" You fookin Palihaters are phonies who make a mountain out of a molehill when she speaks, but are silent as Obama and the rats are doing their open and earnest best to break the back of middle Americans. Now go piss on your messiah's leg and tell him it's raining.
Yes, you fookin idiot! She could have said, "John McCain and Ron Paul are Republicans, just as I am. BFD!" You fookin Palihaters are phonies who make a mountain out of a molehill when she speaks, but are silent as Obama and the rats are doing their open and earnest best to break the back of middle Americans. Now go piss on your messiah's leg and tell him it's raining. You sure are an emotional creature aren't you? Please, try to stay on subject. I don't care about your 'feelings' or your opinions. Please try to stick to the facts and substance of the article. The subject is Palin, and (in her own words) her support for a path to citizenship for illegal aliens, her support for the bailouts, and how she 'adores' John McCain and supports him 100%. If you have any statement concerning those facts, I'll be happy to read them.
Have you any idea...ANY idea what that "path" is? Wha....You mean it could be a maze, a "path" or orbit around the solar system, or just...political parsing and bullsh*t? Huh?? You mean Palin supported McCain's positions when she was running for VP and didn't contradict him even IF they disagreed on policy? Wow. Startling "news." Newsflash: On the campaign trail, that would be considered sabotage. DUH. But....they were "her own words" you say? Yeah, as she understood it explained at the time. She wasn't and still isn't a member of either House...you know that, right? Oh, and the WORST "offense" - "supporting" John McCain. GAME OVER. She's a Traitor, Liar, and underground CFR-RINO in-waiting. Yeee-aaah. Weepy, who are YOU supporting as a candidate for President these days? Say it a little louder - I didn't quite get the name...
When a candidate comes along who I can support and throws his/her hat in for the 2012 election, I'll let you know. You can bet on one thing for sure though, if I support that candidate, he'll be a constitutional conservative. He might not be perfect and he might not win, but he'll be a constitutional conservative. But listen, if you seriously want to talk about this, in terms other than at an 8th grade level, I'm all ears. If you want to act like a pissy little child about it, and call me weepy, you can go fuck yourself. If I want to deal with pissy little children I'll go talk politics with my sisters kids. Either way is fine.
IOW, nobody then? I'd looove to believe in the Tooth Fairy too. Look - between black and white are shades of gray. The best that can be expected is a light shade of gray. The Lone Ranger and his/her snow white hat ain't riding in tomorrow and in the meantime the 2012 Time Bomb is ticking. No one has ever claimed Sarah Palin is perfect; She may not even run. But she's as straight a shooter as is available out there - and then some. If you think ANY DC-Outside is going to emerge within the next 24 months to punch out Hussein's lights, you'd better start digging DEEP. In terms other than at an 8th grade level, I'm all ears. If you want to act like a pissy little child about it, and call me weepy, you can go fuck yourself. Stop whining. You've earned the grief with your petty-ante nitpicking, elitist pomposity, and juvenile glee at helping Dims (and Elites, ahem) derail their worst nightmare - "President Sarah Palin." "We the People". My azz. You don't give a rats ass about "The People." You're the frickin' guy who rejects the date with the model because "her legs are too long."
There's the difference between you and I right there. See, there is black and white and there is also right and wrong. I have a defined set of core values and I don't waiver from them. My core values don't change when the wind blows or my candidate changes from briefs to panties. I am a conservative and I see things in black and white. You either are or you are not. And you, my neoconservative/leftist friend, are not. You are pushing for, supporting and defending a candidate who is not conservative, who supports a path to citizenship, McCain, climate change BS and bailouts. Those 'shades of gray' have brought us to where we are right now and we'll continue down this road until pretend conservatives like you find your core values and stick to them. You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry.
There's the difference between you and I right there. See, there is black and white and there is also right and wrong. I have a defined set of core values and I don't waiver from them. My core values don't change when the wind blows or my candidate changes from briefs to panties. Save me the sanctimonious "I'm principled, you're not" crap. The "difference" is in accepting reality instead of delusion, the possible instead of IMpossible. We're talking about candidates for the office of Presidency, NOT who we're marrying. Do you really believe there's going to be a candidate that mirrors your "core beliefs" in 2012? If you're going to play this silly game, then Jesus Christ is MY ideal candidate because he mirrors MY "core beliefs." What's that? he isn't available to run? Looks like I've got to go to PLAN "B." Who's your Plan A or B?? I am a conservative and I see things in black and white. You either are or you are not. The issue isn't about what you or I believe; It's about politics, and the nature of politics has always been about shades of gray; Conservatives just hope their candidate represents a shade of gray that is far closer to white then black. And you, my neoconservative/leftist friend, are not. You are pushing for, supporting and defending a candidate who is not conservative, who supports a path to citizenship, McCain, climate change BS and bailouts. Those 'shades of gray' have brought us to where we are right now and we'll continue down this road until pretend conservatives like you find your core values and stick to them. NOW, you've got me LMAO. No really....my Tooth Fairy Conservative Party friend. Your idealism is commendable, but engaging in half-truths, speculations, assumptions don't help convince me that you have ANY grasp of political nuance or reality. You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry. Wait...Is this where the Laugh-Track throttle is shoved to the max?
No, this is where I repeat myself: You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry. Go ahead and navigate your way through all your 'nuances' and your 'shades of gray' right to a candidate who supports a path to citizenship, McCain and bailouts. You may also enjoy pondering the definition of 'is'. Like I said, your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry, but I'll probably ignore most of them.
IF you had a clue to begin with I might feel a bit chastised. You're locked and sealed into an intellectual vacuum.
The Paths trailhead is in Mexico. Pauls Amnesty votes (plural) as well as Gutierrez's H.R. 4321 put the trail head here in the US. Paul voted in 1997, 2001( H.R. 1885) and 2002 (H RES 365) to grant, extend or continue Section 245-i amnesties for illegal aliens
Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
I like Paul. I also like Walter Jones, which means you'd probably not. Neoconservatives think conservatives are nuts. Jones endorsed Ron Paul in 2008.
I like Paul. I do too. But he was faaaar from perfect, has ZERO charisma, has ZERO chance of being President, and refused to run as the Independent he is. Oh, and I defended him when he accepted earmarks after having voted against earmarks.
He IS far from perfect, but he's the closest thing to an actual conservative that we have in American government and light-years to the right of Palin. I don't care about charisma. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have charisma. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. I don't fall for the whole cult of personality BS that is shoved down the throats of Americans today. I don't care about his 'chance' of being President. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have a chance of being elected. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. If everyone today did this, we wouldn't be electing leftists no matter what letter comes after their name. I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart. That's part of that whole 'core values' thing I was talking about earlier.
Hyperbole-Ad Nauseam, thy name is We The People. I know personally people who are more "conservative" than Ron Paul, yet the odds of them becoming President is the same as with Ron Paul. I don't care about charisma. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have charisma. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. I don't fall for the whole cult of personality BS that is shoved down the throats of Americans today. Possessing "charisma" is important because it leads. People are NOT inspired by whiny, apologetic, little gnomes - even if they are knowledge, honest and sincere about their ideology. Your Human-Nature IQ is ZERO. "I don't care about his 'chance' of being President. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have a chance of being elected. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. If everyone today did this, we wouldn't be electing leftists no matter what letter comes after their name." Ok, so you've established the fact that you "don't care" if the odds of your candidate (like Paul) are a million-1 AGAINST.... And who cares if in the next election against 0bama, your write-in vote is a vote for stupidity, masochism, and slavery - just as long as YOU retain your "core values," eh? I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart...That's part of that whole 'core values' thing I was talking about earlier. Ummm...I think I get it. It's "because his views mostly resemble" your own. (Acccckkk! Polly wanna cracker??) The issue here is NOT about either "Party" [remember, Ron Paul (R)]; It's about the reality of who can best lead this country and steer it back towards actual conservatism. Right now the best one to fit that bill is Sarah Palin. I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart. Is that really the 4th time you've penned the same exact phrase? Tell me something I already don't know about Party apathy and indifference to the American people... ONE candidate breaks the mold: Sarah Palin. Now step away from the bong.
That's something I'm sure you'll never understand. I thought you wanted to be done with this?
#394. To: We The People (#392)
I thought I could squeeze out a few more laughs from you about it....along with the obligatory methane. So sue me.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#29. To: Liberator (#6)
Just as funny are some of the people who think phrases like "I adore ____", or "I support _____ 100 percent" aren't politic-speak for "Bwaahaa!"
#46. To: We The People, Liberator (#29)
Is it that painful for you to face the truth about this woman?
#102. To: Mad Dog (#46)
It just eats you paultards up that Governor Palin, stupid, blah blah more stupidity, blah blah wah wah, wah wah wah, wah, wah wah...
#135. To: We The People (#102)
= 
#136. To: Mad Dog (#135)
PaulTARDS = LOSERS!
#137. To: We The People (#136)
=
#139. To: Mad Dog (#137)
Cant you handle the TRUTH about RonniePaulie?
#140. To: We The People (#139)
Title: Palin Says Marked-Out McCain Visor Wasn't a Political Statement
#142. To: Ibluafartsky (#140)
So what's "the truth" in your opinion, you fookin Palinhater?
#169. To: We The People (#142)
Are you for real?
#199. To: Ibluafartsky (#169)
Are you for real?
#212. To: We The People (#199)
The subject is Palin, and (in her own words) her support for a path to citizenship for illegal aliens, her support for the bailouts, and how she 'adores' John McCain and supports him 100%.
#246. To: Liberator (#212)
Weepy, who are YOU supporting as a candidate for President these days?
#281. To: We The People (#246)
When a candidate comes along who I can support and throws his/her hat in for the 2012 election, I'll let you know. You can bet on one thing for sure though, if I support that candidate, he'll be a constitutional conservative. He might not be perfect and he might not win, but he'll be a constitutional conservative.
#372. To: Liberator (#281)
Look - between black and white are shades of gray.
#377. To: We The People (#372)
Look - between black and white are shades of gray.
#379. To: Liberator (#377)
Wait...Is this where the Laugh-Track throttle is shoved to the max?
#382. To: We The People (#379)
Go ahead and navigate your way through all your 'nuances' and your 'shades of gray' right to a candidate who supports a path to citizenship, McCain and bailouts. You may also enjoy pondering the definition of 'is'.
#383. To: Liberator (#382)
(Edited)
#384. To: WhiteSands, We The People (#383)
#385. To: Liberator (#384)
Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
#387. To: We The People (#385)
Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
#390. To: Liberator (#387)
But he was faaaar from perfect, has ZERO charisma, has ZERO chance of being President, and refused to run as the Independent he is.
#391. To: We The People (#390)
He [Ron Paul] IS far from perfect, but he's the closest thing to an actual conservative that we have in American government and light-years to the right of Palin.
#392. To: Liberator (#391)
just as long as YOU retain your "core values," eh?
Replies to Comment # 392. I thought you wanted to be done with this?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 392.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]