A top immigration hard-liner said Monday he thinks Donald Trumps positions on immigration are like Jell-O and accused the president of backing limited amnesty for immigrants in the country illegally.
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), who advised Trump on immigration issues during the 2016 campaign, said he has grown frustrated by Trumps failed promises to build a wall on the southern border with Mexico and end protections for young immigrants enrolled in the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
We finally elected a president who called for the end of amnesty and he was going to end DACA at noon on Jan. 20, 2017, and we all expected that would happen without fanfare. Instead, we learned that permits were being issued. Then, he served [DACA] up as a bargaining chip to build the wall, King told The Hill in an interview in the Capitol.
When he sent out his tweet Sept. 5 that he was going to end DACA, that tweet was pretty clear: Get your act together, make your arrangements. Its over, King went on. Then the next day, it seemed that things changed a little bit and he opened the door to negotiation with Democratic leaders Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.).
Now hes for some sort of a DACA fix. And he has transformed himself as someone whos going to restore the rule of law to the guy whos essentially leading with a limited amnesty and trying to get enforcement on the other side of that. I said, why would you negotiate against yourself?" King said.
He had a mandate to end DACA; he had a mandate to build the wall, a mandate to end sanctuary cities, a mandate to pass Kates Law, King continued. In fact, I actually wrote much of his first statement on immigration when he announced his candidacy.
So youre saying the president has been waffling on the issue of immigration? a reporter asked King.
He knows that, replied King, who spoke to Trump two weeks ago. Ive been talking to him about that. ... He says, Ive got to get this passed 500 people, meaning 535 lawmakers, so hes saying hes adjusting to the political reality. I say stand on principle.
Its stunning to me that you can stand on principle, and when pragmatism kicks in, it trumps principle, King said. Where I live, in my ideological world, its the exact opposite.
King and other immigration hawks are wary of a deal struck between Schumer and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to reopen the federal government after a three-day shutdown.
McConnell has pledged to bring a bipartisan immigration bill to the floor by Feb. 8 that would shield from deportation hundreds of thousands of DACA recipients.
A bipartisan plan pitched by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) would provide a path to citizenship for the young immigrants. But King is vehemently opposed to offering legal status to DACA recipients.
Kings criticism of Trumps handling of the immigration issue echoed that of Schumer, who lambasted the president over the weekend as an unreliable negotiating partner who keeps changing his position.
Negotiating with this White House is like negotiating with Jell-O, Schumer said amid talks to fund the government.
Let's block Muslims the real killers, and not little kids from Mexico.
Let's block them all. I don't like Muslims and I have no use for reconquista talk from Mexicans. The white man built triving cities where there was nothing but plains, forests, deserts and swamps. The mexicans didn't have a damned thing to do with it. They didn't do anything with their own country. They didn't contribute to ours. Now they want to reconquer and take back what they never had. They're mad at us if we don't give it to them. It's economic disparity.
You also have to be kidding. We need Mexicans to do jobs that Americans dont want to do, like pick the fruits and vegatables you put on your dinner table. Otherwise you would be starving right now.
You also have to be kidding. We need Mexicans to do jobs that Americans dont want to do, like pick the fruits and vegatables you put on your dinner table. Otherwise you would be starving right now.
Not really. Pull Food Stamps and Welfare from the healthy,and just watch how quickly people start jumping at the chance to work in the fields.
Having said that,I know it's not likely to happen,and I have no problem with allowing pickers into the country to do seasonal work,and then return home.
AND......while they are here working,they should have all the health and welfare workplace standards as any American worker. No huts with no running water,toilets,or electricity. Access to medical care paid for by their employers while here,etc,etc,etc. Stuff like this will get us a better quality worker coming in,and might even increase the number of Americans willing to work in the fields.