[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Opinions/Editorials Title: Medical Marijuana Isn’t a Miracle Drug Medical Marijuana Isnt a Miracle Drug For some, cannabis can cause the very symptoms its trying to prevent Bias is, essentially, a human thing. We look at evidence from our own point of view. We choose results that suit our personal perspective, because we all want our opinions to be right. We cant help it. So when I say that cannabis is great, and that I am fully behind legalization of it as a public good, you might wonder why Im writing an article about how its not a very useful medicine. Id love cannabis to cure everything from headaches to seizures, but the evidence is not on my side. As much as I wish it were. Medicinal cannabis is currently big in the news, with media sources the world over proclaiming it the most amazing remedy around. Cannabis plays into all of our common misconceptions about what makes something healthy; its natural, has been used for hundreds of years, and you can literally grow your own. How many drugs can make that claim? And, more importantly, weve all heard stories of the miracles that medical cannabis can cause. Young children with epilepsy, destined for death or a life of disability, take a single dose of cannabis and are completely cured of their malady. People with cancer are suddenly almost entirely well after just a few drops of oil. It sounds like a miracle. The only problem? There arent any miracle cures. So, whats the evidence for cannabis as a medicine? The first important thing to note is that when we say medical cannabis, we are rarely talking about smoking a joint, or getting high. Theres strong, international evidence that smoking cannabis is bad for you, in much the same way that smoking virtually anything is harmful. When we talk about medical cannabis, we are usually referring to people who take some kind of cannabis oil, or another purified form of the cannabis plant. Moreover, they are usually taking specific medicinal strains of the plant, that have been cultivated to be more beneficial to people with certain illnesses. This brings us to the second important point: cannabis is a complex mix of chemicals, and we often have very limited understanding of what they do. We know that tetrahydocannabinol (THC) is the primary psychoactive component of cannabis, and that cannabidiol (CBD), another significant compound, has a number of effects on the body and brain, but we dont know how or why these work. In the words of Dr. Rose Chesworth, a neuroscientist working in gene-drug interactions of schizophrenia: We dont really understand how these compounds interact with the brain. We know that they have neuroprotective and anti- inflammatory effects, but they also can cause negative symptoms. Separating the good effects from the bad ones is the challenge. So we know that cannabis is a complex mix of chemicals that can have a huge number of effects. What are some uses? Well, everyones heard the stories of cannabis curing childhood epilepsy. Kids who are having hundreds of seizures a week, miraculously reduced to barely anything. Proponents of these treatments claim that they are effective largely due to the high amounts of CBD in the strains of cannabis that they are using. But theres a problem. A recent trial of CBD found that the effects of using it to treat epilepsy were, at best, not much better than traditional anti-epileptic medication. A l arge review of the literature on using cannabis to treat epilepsy found the research inconclusive, revealing zero evidence to recommend it as a treatment. When we design scientific tests to see if cannabis works to treat epilepsy, it doesnt seem to have much of an effect. But it definitely does cause harm. Cannabis is a risk factor for number of mental health issues, most notably schizophrenia and paranoia. While there is some evidence that this may be due to THC, it appears to happen even in low-THC strains that are commonly used for treating illness. Moreover, in some people it can cause the very symptoms that its trying to prevent. It can increase the severity of seizures, and causes nausea and loss of appetite in some groups of people who take it when they are on chemotherapy. The problem, according to Dr. Chesworth, is genetics; There are complex gene interactions that we dont fully understand, which means that its hard to differentiate benefits from side-effects. Basically, we dont know who will get better on medical cannabis, and who will get worse. What does this mean for you, the person interested in taking medical cannabis? First, that its risky. The rates of serious, potentially life-changing side-effects when taking medical cannabis was as high as 2 percent in some studies. Thats a very high risk for a drug that youll potentially be taking for years. Secondly, that the evidence isnt good. I chose epilepsy because it is the most commonly known use for cannabis, but this cycle repeats itself when you look at most other problems. Cannabis may be effective for treating chronic pain, but it can also cause heightened perceptions of pain. It might be helpful for people experiencing symptoms of multiple sclerosis, but it definitely causes some nasty side-effects there as well. Which makes medical cannabis exactly like every other drug in the world. Seriously, the point is not that medical cannabis is a terrible scourge. Its not going to kill you in a spiteful fit of wrath. But, just like every drug, there are potential benefits and potential costs. There are very serious side-effects but there is also the potential for significant benefit. Cannabis is good for some things, bad for others. And while legalizing it as a harm-reduction method to reduce the number of people that we put in jail for non- violent crimes makes a great deal of sense, its not going to cure every problem that youll ever have. Its not a panacea, just another drug. Gideon is a health nerd and epidemiologist (public health person) working in chronic disease. He writes about how simple health science really is, how we get it so wrong and why being terrified of that New Scary Study is usually a bad idea. If you want to get in contact, he is shamefully addicted to Twitter and would love to hear from you! Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#1. To: Gatlin (#0)
A poorly researched opinion. A recent trial of CBD found that the effects of using it to treat epilepsy were, at best, not much better than traditional anti-epileptic medication. A l arge review of the literature on using cannabis to treat epilepsy found the research inconclusive, revealing zero evidence to recommend it as a treatment. When we design scientific tests to see if cannabis works to treat epilepsy, it doesnt seem to have much of an effect. Not True... Marijuana Treatment Reduces Severe Epileptic Seizures (Scientific American) A rigorous study validates a cannabis-derived treatment for a rare, drug-resistant childhood epilepsy Published in The New England Journal of Medicine, the findings stem from a double-blind, placebo-controlled studythe most scientifically rigorous type of investigation possible. This study clearly establishes cannabidiol as an effective anti-seizure drug for this disorder and this age group," says principal investigator Orrin Devinsky, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at New York University Langone Medical Center. It certainly deserves to be studied in other types of epilepsy.
Your source isn't credible. They teach evolution as fact. Are you an evolutionist too?
Really? The New England Journal of Medicine teaches evolution? Gee - are all the doctors there evolutionists? And anyways, what freaking difference does it make - the findings stem from a double-blind, placebo-controlled studythe most scientifically rigorous type of investigation possible. This study clearly establishes cannabidiol as an effective anti-seizure drug for this disorder and this age group," says principal investigator Orrin Devinsky, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at New York University Langone Medical Center. It certainly deserves to be studied in other types of epilepsy. Your credibility here is nonexistent. Are you an evolutionist too? No.
Scientific American does. That is at least one of your sources.
The New England Journal of Medicine did the study - Scientific American only published the findings.
Ok now answer the question.
There are no replies to Comment # 14. End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|