A good friend of mine wrote me recently. He complained about smug leftist neighbors who are “making decisions to ‘feel good’ with virtually no regard for true factual input or testing.”
I get this a lot.
If you want to understand Donald Trump, you need understand why this complaint is myopic. Once you do understand, you’ll never see politics the same way again. You’ll also begin to grasp that leftism does work, and that you’ve just failed to understand how.
Which is why you lose so often.
Want a clue?
“Feel good” about what?
Not about being right, which is best described as “useful, to a point.” Aristotle noticed over 2,000 years ago that many people aren’t persuadable by logical arguments. So what’s the “feeling good” all about?
The right’s favorite mistake
Try this on for size:
People often take public positions in an attempt to increase their social status.
If you’ve been in a corporate setting, or settings with certain friends, I don’t need to offer further examples of this idea. You’ve seen it happen, and you also know that you need to be “reading the room” at all times before you speak and act. Failure costs status. People notice this dynamic, and act accordingly.
I didn’t say it was an ideal state of affairs. But a truly rational person must notice reality. My friend and his wife are picking up on a “we’re higher status than you” signal, and it’s part of the reason they’re so upset.
Macro examples also abound:
Do you really think it’s a coincidence that leftism and its “Diversity Pokemon Points” amount to a full caste system?
Do you have any doubt about The left’s hatred for those who will not stay in their assigned status?
Have you noticed their quickness to turn on their own allies? Fail to follow the latest fad, and your status is demoted.
Maybe that’s because American public education is now a 20-year Milgram Experiment. Where the meta-message inside political correctness is to override your own judgement, in favor of deliberately-shifting judgements from people with higher status.
These aren’t accidents. They’re clues.
Leftism isn’t a policy machine or an economic machine. Its economic results would tell you that much in a hurry. But the machine keeps running. Which means it must work for something. The correct question is: in what way does it work?
Analysis: Leftism is a status machine. A very, very successful status machine. Conservatives have lost status battle after status battle, often because they fought it as a policy battle. It rarely is.
That’s conservatism’s most consistent and most damaging mistake.
From theory to practice: Trumping the media
President Trump’s systematic thrashing of the leftist media is the example that illustrates the theory.
Conservatives complained about the media for a long time. Aristotle’s dialectic approach, against people uninterested in truth. Net effect? Very low. Sad!
So let’s apply what we’ve learned.
Why do the media have power? Because they have social status with ordinary people. Are we still hearing about Watergate — decades later? The Pentagon Papers? How many movies seem to exist just to show journalists as heroes? Or let’s take a different tack: What’s the attraction of such a low-paying profession? Status given by the profession, and status from rubbing shoulders with high-status people. Status by acting as a vector for status signals, which is what every women’s magazine is. Ditto publications like WIRED, which is just Cosmo for geeks.
The media offers people clues about what things are high status within the areas they cover. People notice, and act accordingly. Yet most conservatives still don’t understand Trump’s response:
If I lower the media’s status, I will wreck their power.
So The Donald says that the media has “some of the most dishonest people” he has ever seen. Not an arm’s length complaint. A direct and personal status attack, rooted in truth.
Trump also acts in ways that cause journalists to fulfill his pre-suasion labeling. He makes “outrageous” statements, which many people outside the Beltway Bubble agree with. Those statements receive over-the-top media attacks, which make his enemies look ridiculous. Then events swiftly show that Trump had a point. Trump rubs it in, using the media’s own “Fake News” term against them and pouncing on every sloppy and dishonest mistake. As a final topper, Trump makes the dishonest media a focus during every massive rally. Which strengthens his out-grouping effect among participants and viewers.
He uses ridicule and lèse majesté, not bended knee and appeals — note that subordinating word — to logical argument.
The result?
American belief in the credibility of their news media is now at about 32 percent. That’s the lowest ever polled, and an 8 percent drop from the lowest point of the 2008-2015 period. The media has lost audience, and a lot of power. When Vogue tried to damage Melania by ripping her wardrobe, activists promptly made memes from a photo of the weird-looking critic. The attack instantly lost its power.
Facebook has tried to fight these trend lines by flagging items as “fake news.” Recently, the social media giant decided to stop. Too many people sought out flagged articles. Or, put another way: In many circles, the mainstream media’s status has become negative.
What an amazing amount of damage to a hostile institution.
Rational people notice and acknowledge real-world results. Even the left has noticed.
So, why hadn’t anyone ever done this before? In fairness, Newt Gingrich had some success in the 2012 primaries, and Ted Cruz has also tried. But they lacked the full array of tools. Worse, they didn’t understand how to make the media their enemy.
Once you understand conservatives’ biggest and most consistent mistake, it all becomes clear.
Now, how about a 12-step program to finally stop making the same mistake?
Poster Comment:
I hate this argument. But I think the writer has a point.
Maybe Trump really is beating the Left at their own virtue-signalling libmedia game.
I hate this argument. But I think the writer has a point.
Maybe Trump really is beating the Left at their own virtue-signalling libmedia game.
The argument, the analysis, the conclusion is irrefutable...
(Excellent post, btw)
Why hate this argument? It's dead-on. The writer not only has a point, his point is a dagger twisted into the heart of the entire agenda and function of a weaponized Soviet Mainstream Media. It's brilliant.
Indeed -- Trump IS beating (or bashing BASHING) the Left at their own virtue-signalling libmedia childrens' game. (Acosta wanted to be the face of the libmedia? Well now Trump is making him/them his b*tch.) If they haven't won by now, they ain't winning. They have been hemorrhaging cred while losing every battle.
As President, Trump has the Last Word. He will and cannot be ignored. With each and ever tweet, he is stripping away layer after layer of lib-media's continued pretense of impartiality, their blatant lies masquerading as truth, and their faux ethics, morality, and patriotism.
WHAT WE'VE LEARNED: This Left/Right dichotomy has never been about ideology, the war IS certainly and simply first and foremost about Status and Virtue-Signaling. And who who gets to call the shots from "The King of the Hill"...
The Left has owned it -- despite being fascists, baby-killers, and pathological liars. THE key as Trump knows is NOT the message, but the Messengers: THE MSM.
Drive a stake through their heart; discredit and ridicule THEM (as they have done to Conservatives for a half-century), and WE start gaining yuge ground AND WINNING. Conservative at social media outlets are now on the warpath, overrunning lib positions (which is exactly why we are seeing widespread censorship by Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.)
Because at heart, Republicans are like the Tories and Whigs who believed in Enlightenment ideals of a marketplace of ideas, a notion of promoting the commonwealth and the commons, etc. These are the ideals of classic liberalism with a small-L.
But maybe things are at the point that you need someone to get down in the mud with them. I still think Trump overplays it a bit.
