[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

911 Audio and video
See other 911 Audio and video Articles

Title: WTC7 — This is an Orange
Source: FromThe Trenches/YouTube
URL Source: http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wtc7-this-is-an-orange/216377
Published: Jan 17, 2018
Author: Anthony Lawson
Post Date: 2018-01-17 05:44:06 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2155
Comments: 18


Published on Dec 9, 2007

A comparison between what we are told and what we can see, with our own eyes. World Trade Center 7 collapsed after having been damaged by fire and falling debris, but the collapse looks very much like a controlled demolition.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

#2. To: Deckard (#0)

"but the collapse looks very much like a controlled demolition."

That's true. It also "looks like" an alien spaceship could have fired disrupter beams at the base of the building. That's what it looks like.

However, with ZERO proof that this or anything else occurred, I'm going with the original 911 finding.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-01-17   10:10:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#2)

However, with ZERO proof that this or anything else occurred, I'm going with the original 911 finding.

The film is evidence. What other explanation exists?

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-01-17   10:12:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)

The film is evidence. What other explanation exists?

The film is evidence only of the building collapsing. We all agree the building collapsed.

If your explanation for that collapse is that it was a result of a controlled demolition, fine. But I'm going to need proof.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-01-17   10:48:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite (#4)

The proof is no building collapses like that without controlled taking out of support columns.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-01-17   10:51:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#5)

The proof is no building collapses like that without controlled taking out of support columns.

So you're saying that's the only way a building collapses "like that" -- a controlled demolition?

Obviously not, since it did collapse "like that" without a controlled demolition. Unless you have proof there was one.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-01-17   12:53:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: misterwhite (#7)

The proof is in the manner it fell.

If you had proof otherwise you would post it. You don't so you just tell me to prove it. When the video already proved it.

Tell us how you think it collapsed.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-01-17   12:56:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: A K A Stone (#8)

Tell us how you think it collapsed.

I'm not a structural engineer. I have no idea. But the explanation given sounded plausible and I've seen no proof to the contrary.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-01-17   13:02:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#10) (Edited)

You just saw the video and said it looks like controlled demolition.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-01-17   13:07:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#11)

"You just saw the video and said it looks like controlled demolition."

Sure. And those lights in the sky look like flying saucers. But with no proof, speculation is pointless.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-01-17   13:36:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: misterwhite (#12) (Edited)

It's it speculation when you see controlled demolition and recognize it.

Lights in the sky could be a lot of things you're mixing apples and watermelons.

You look at something and you need the government to tell you what it was. Even though you know you saw controlled demolition.

It's ok you were never the brightest one here. Your opinion or mine will change nothing.

Remember to be a good American you must always worship the government line and dismiss your lying eyes.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-01-17   13:51:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: A K A Stone (#13)

Even though you know you saw controlled demolition.

Could it be a controlled demolition? Is that what you're asking? Sure, it could be.

Or it could be a combination of factors including physical damage, fire and the building's unusual construction that set off a chain- reaction collapse.

I'm going with the second explanation until you or someone else presents with me with some evidence to the contrary.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-01-17   17:35:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: misterwhite (#16)

What unusual design are you talking about?

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-01-17   17:37:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: A K A Stone, misterwhite (#17)

What unusual design are you talking about?

It had that ConEd electrical substation that took up the first 3 ground floors as I recall.

Wiki:

The building was constructed above a Con Edison substation that had been on the site since 1967. The substation had a caisson foundation designed to carry the weight of a future building of 25 stories containing 600,000 sq ft (56,000 m2). The final design for 7 World Trade Center was for a much larger building than originally planned when the substation was built. The structural design of 7 World Trade Center therefore included a system of gravity column transfer trusses and girders, located between floors 5 and 7, to transfer loads to the smaller foundation. Existing caissons installed in 1967 were used, along with new ones, to accommodate the building. The 5th floor functioned as a structural diaphragm, providing lateral stability and distribution of loads between the new and old caissons. Above the 7th floor, the building's structure was a typical tube-frame design, with columns in the core and on the perimeter, and lateral loads resisted by perimeter moment frames.

The building collapsed after burning all afternoon. All the fire suppression systems had failed due to lack of water. WTC 7 was a 47-story building built on the 20yo foundation which was only designed to support a building of 25 stories.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-01-17   21:13:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 18.

        There are no replies to Comment # 18.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com