[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Estimated 5,000 to 7,000 service members to march in Trump's military parade: Source

Getting conservatives and Libertarians to agree on tariffs

34,704.92 33,685.03 10,300.00

1 House Republican's chilling warning on Trump and Russia

REVISITED: 'I'm a queen and I demand to be treated like a queen!' How Congresswoman involved in race row on plane was chauffeured a block to Congress and was nearly banished from an airline before

The problems with libertarianism. : philosophy

JUDGE JEANINE: Whoopi Goldberg Started Cursing at Me! She Said F-You! F-You! Get the F-ck Out of This Building! (VIDEO)

The Vegas Massacre Exposé: What Really Happened?

Trump under siege from the PNAC crowd for seeking peace with Russia

JOINT NFL-NFLPA STATEMENT - Anthem Policy Standstill Agreement

Reagan on Libertarians & Conservatives VS "Liberal Fascists"


Men Have Forgotten God

Trump: I'll be Vladimir Putin's 'worst enemy' if US-Russia relationship 'doesn't work out'

The great dollar dump: Russia liquidates US Treasury holdings

Humanity Crucified on a Cross of Iron - Eisenhower

President of the United States to Entire World: "THE REAL ENEMY, THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA" (July 19 Tweet)

Planning and Conservation League v. Padilla (Draper) Division SF (18 Jul 2018); CalExit Prop 9 Off Ballot

State of New York v. Mnuchin, SDNY 18-cv-6427 (17 Jul 2018)

The Eruption of the Shills

Legalizing Pot Sales Means...Higher Home Values?

If You Value The Reputation Of Your Restaurant, Maybe You Should Stop Serving Cops

Trump,Putin,and politics

Non-citizens legally register to vote in San Francisco school elections

Why Libertarianism is wrong

Nunes declares war on the media

First Win for Trump-Putin Summit: Agreement to Restrain Iran in Syria

Update: Mueller Suspected of Giving Podesta Brothers Immunity to Indict Manafort and Is HIDING THIS FROM PUBLIC

Crowdstrike Analyst Who Ran Forensics on DNC Server Used to Work For Mueller at FBI

Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror*

Ladies Professional Golf Association using facial recognition technology to surveil fans and spectators

The world’s most nutritious foods

Papa John's founder 'isn't going quietly,' lawyer says — Schnatter just dragged Kanye West into fight with the board

New Kentucky Law Puts Limits on Drone Spying, Will Help Thwart Federal Surveillance Program

What To Learn From The Social Justice Warrior Who Was Eaten By His Own Mob

Is the Media the “Enemy of the People”?

Well, I think I am going to have to schedule a surgery


Las Vegas Police Body Cam: Cop Fires Through Windshield

3 Problems With Libertarianism - After Economics

Brazile, Rice, Obama Gave Russian Hackers Free Rein

The irrational hysteria over Trump and Putin

John Brennan Misses Communist Russia

The Latest: Trump says he misspoke on Russia meddling

Cop Charged After Video Shows Him Execute Unarmed Mother by Shooting Her in the Head

Cop Encounters Tortoise Going Too Slow on Highway, Overcomes His Fear and Doesn't Shoot.

Keeping Cops’ Hands Out of Your Pockets

Trump-Putin Summit Success: Neocons Furious!

Mandalay Bay's owner MGM has sued the Las Vegas mass shooting victims, claiming it's not liable for the massacre

Eric July On Why The Only Rights Are ‘Negative Rights’

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

New World Order
See other New World Order Articles

Title: WH about-face: Trump now opposes 702 renewal?
Source: HotAir
URL Source: https://hotair.com/archives/2018/01 ... dicts-wh-gop-section-702-vote/
Published: Jan 11, 2018
Author: Ed Morrissey
Post Date: 2018-01-11 12:16:51 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 94
Comments: 2

Was Donald Trump for the PATRIOT Act before he was against it? Later today, the House will vote on reauthorizing the controversial Section 702 of the law, which has come under fire for its potentially overbroad reach. Opponents of the current law have offered a “USA Rights” amendment to the bill aiming to curtail government surveillance authority and jurisdiction, which has picked up bipartisan support. Republican leadership opposes the USA Rights amendment, and at least as of yesterday, so did the Trump administration, which issued a statement urging the House to reject it and preserve 702 as is:
here’s the very strong @PressSec statement last night opposing the amendment being offered to 702 reauth today. Admin has been hand/glove with GOP leaders on this effort to this point pic.twitter.com/4jbYmQlKEA

— Phil Mattingly (@Phil_Mattingly) January 11, 2018

And that held up for … oh, twelve hours or so. This morning, Trump blamed Section 702 for the “discredited and phony” Steele dossier produced by Fusion GPS and other abuses with this message on his favorite platform:
“House votes on controversial FISA ACT today.” This is the act that may have been used, with the help of the discredited and phony Dossier, to so badly surveil and abuse the Trump Campaign by the previous administration and others?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 11, 2018

That may complicate matters for the Section 702 renewal, which has already been delayed once. Privacy advocates have made a strong push to roll back 702, efforts led by both conservatives and liberals in both chambers of Congress:
The pro-privacy protection group includes Republicans such as Freedom Caucus leader Mark Meadows, Tea Party member Justin Amash and Rep. Ted Poe, along with Democratic Reps. Zoe Lofgren and Jerrold Nadler. It also includes Republican Sens. Rand Paul and Steve Daines.

On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee decided to allow debate on an amendment backed by a contingent of 40 lawmakers led by Amash and Lofgren. The amendment would require the FBI to obtain a warrant before it begins searching the NSA’s surveillance database for information on American citizens.

The group is pushing back against legislation passed by the House Intelligence Committee that would require a warrant only if the information the FBI obtains is to be used in a criminal proceeding — a bar that Amash, Lofgren and Nadler say is so low that it is meaningless.

Lofgren also is sounding the alarm on the scope of collection. Unlike the 2015 clash among lawmakers on provisions of the Patriot Act that revolved around intelligence agencies being able to collect metadata on Americans’ phone calls — data that showed who called whom, when and for how long, but not the content — the current debate involves content of calls and emails.

Without some changes to 702, Rand Paul has threatened to filibuster the 702 renewal in the Senate:
“My worry is that they also collect information on millions of Americans, and I don’t want that database to be searched without a warrant,” the Kentucky Republican said.

He added, “I will filibuster and do whatever to stop that.”

Paul said he would vote to reauthorize Section 702, however, if there are protections in place for Americans’ private information, and added that he supports the USA Rights Act, another amendment to the program proposed by Rep. Justin Amash, R-Michigan.

Bear in mind that 702 reauthorization is a high priority not just for the intel community, but also for Trump’s own Department of Justice and its domestic counter-terrorism efforts. Until this morning, they probably figured that they could focus their resources on Capitol Hill to push it through. Now they may need to reconvince the commander in chief all over again. Otherwise, Trump’s broadside this morning will give political cover to the USA Rights amendment’s advocates, and might even spell trouble for Section 702 entirely.

And so far, we don’t even know why Trump appears to have reversed himself, or at least the White House position which presumably got it from Trump. Is internal communication that bad, or is Trump that mercurial?

Update: Fifty minutes later, the climb-down:
With that being said, I have personally directed the fix to the unmasking process since taking office and today’s vote is about foreign surveillance of foreign bad guys on foreign land. We need it! Get smart!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 11, 2018

“Get smart”? It was looking more like KAOS this morning on Twitter.

Trump appears to be arguing now that he’s already fixed the law, but that’s not possible. He might direct his administration to adhere to better discipline on unmasking, but unmasking is only a small part of the objections that prompted the USA Rights Amendment, and it doesn’t permanently solve even the unmasking issue. He’s given Paul and other privacy advocates plenty of steam for their amendment vote today, and now Mike Lee has pledged his support to Rand Paul to get it:
I stand with @SenRandPaul. Americans deserve 4th Amendment protections. https://t.co/3qLdrr4Ykx

— Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) January 11, 2018

Update: “Disarray” …. or KAOS? Thanks to Trump’s tweets, the reauthorization might get pulled altogether:
I’m hearing that Trump’s FISA tweets have thrown both party’s whip counts into total disarray, making it very hard to predict what happens with the vote.

— Byron Tau (@ByronTau) January 11, 2018

Hearing a lot of opposition to #FISA702 on house floor. Bill might get pulled. @WashTimes #fisa

— Alex Swoyer, esq. (@ASwoyer) January 11, 2018

That would be a huge mistake, says James Comey:
Thoughtful leaders on both sides of the aisle know FISA section 702 is a vital and carefully overseen tool to protect this country. This isn’t about politics. Congress must reauthorize it.

— James Comey (@Comey) January 11, 2018

That’s probably not an endorsement the White House will cite today, though.

Update: Pelosi says Ryan should check in with the president before putting 702 reauthorization up for a vote:
JUST IN: House Minority Leader Pelosi has asked Speaker Ryan to cancel today's FISA vote in light of President Trump's tweet, a senior Democratic aide tells @NBCNews.

— NBC News (@NBCNews) January 11, 2018

Poster Comment:

McConnell and Ryan must be tearing their hair out. Too funny.

In the interim, Ryan managed to pull the House together enough to pass the bill. On to the Senate!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tooconservative, Amash, Civil Rights Champion Trump, Paul, vs the DC swamp, *Bill of Rights-Constitution* (#0) (Edited)

Rand Paul & Justin Amash stand with President Trump against Pelosi, Ryan, and the Constitution hating D&R swamp dwellers.

hondo68  posted on  2018-01-11   12:51:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: hondo68 (#1)

It's out of the House now so Amash and Massie and Jim Jordan and the Freedom Caucus are no longer as important.

We move now to the Senate. Mike Lee was tweeting his support for Rand and his efforts to block this.

If Lee stands with Paul, McConnell can't pass it in the Senate without a number of Dem votes. That's a lot of bribes for McConnell to be forced to offer to Red-state Dems and others. And once it is known that the Turtle is tossing bribes around the Senate, all the hogs will be lining up at the trough.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-01-11   12:54:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com