[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Estimated 5,000 to 7,000 service members to march in Trump's military parade: Source

Getting conservatives and Libertarians to agree on tariffs

34,704.92 33,685.03 10,300.00

1 House Republican's chilling warning on Trump and Russia

REVISITED: 'I'm a queen and I demand to be treated like a queen!' How Congresswoman involved in race row on plane was chauffeured a block to Congress and was nearly banished from an airline before

The problems with libertarianism. : philosophy

JUDGE JEANINE: Whoopi Goldberg Started Cursing at Me! She Said F-You! F-You! Get the F-ck Out of This Building! (VIDEO)

The Vegas Massacre Exposé: What Really Happened?

Trump under siege from the PNAC crowd for seeking peace with Russia

JOINT NFL-NFLPA STATEMENT - Anthem Policy Standstill Agreement

Reagan on Libertarians & Conservatives VS "Liberal Fascists"

CONTROVERSIAL JEWISH NATION-STATE BILL PASSES INTO LAW

Men Have Forgotten God

Trump: I'll be Vladimir Putin's 'worst enemy' if US-Russia relationship 'doesn't work out'

The great dollar dump: Russia liquidates US Treasury holdings

Humanity Crucified on a Cross of Iron - Eisenhower

President of the United States to Entire World: "THE REAL ENEMY, THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA" (July 19 Tweet)

Planning and Conservation League v. Padilla (Draper) Division SF (18 Jul 2018); CalExit Prop 9 Off Ballot

State of New York v. Mnuchin, SDNY 18-cv-6427 (17 Jul 2018)

The Eruption of the Shills

Legalizing Pot Sales Means...Higher Home Values?

If You Value The Reputation Of Your Restaurant, Maybe You Should Stop Serving Cops

Trump,Putin,and politics

Non-citizens legally register to vote in San Francisco school elections

Why Libertarianism is wrong

Nunes declares war on the media

First Win for Trump-Putin Summit: Agreement to Restrain Iran in Syria

Update: Mueller Suspected of Giving Podesta Brothers Immunity to Indict Manafort and Is HIDING THIS FROM PUBLIC

Crowdstrike Analyst Who Ran Forensics on DNC Server Used to Work For Mueller at FBI

Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror*

Ladies Professional Golf Association using facial recognition technology to surveil fans and spectators

The world’s most nutritious foods

Papa John's founder 'isn't going quietly,' lawyer says — Schnatter just dragged Kanye West into fight with the board

New Kentucky Law Puts Limits on Drone Spying, Will Help Thwart Federal Surveillance Program

What To Learn From The Social Justice Warrior Who Was Eaten By His Own Mob

Is the Media the “Enemy of the People”?

Well, I think I am going to have to schedule a surgery

War...

Las Vegas Police Body Cam: Cop Fires Through Windshield

3 Problems With Libertarianism - After Economics

Brazile, Rice, Obama Gave Russian Hackers Free Rein

The irrational hysteria over Trump and Putin

John Brennan Misses Communist Russia

The Latest: Trump says he misspoke on Russia meddling

Cop Charged After Video Shows Him Execute Unarmed Mother by Shooting Her in the Head

Cop Encounters Tortoise Going Too Slow on Highway, Overcomes His Fear and Doesn't Shoot.

Keeping Cops’ Hands Out of Your Pockets

Trump-Putin Summit Success: Neocons Furious!

Mandalay Bay's owner MGM has sued the Las Vegas mass shooting victims, claiming it's not liable for the massacre

Eric July On Why The Only Rights Are ‘Negative Rights’


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Economy
See other Economy Articles

Title: Success: EPA set to reduce staff 50% in Trump's first term
Source: Washington Examiner
URL Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/s ... mps-first-term/article/2645362
Published: Jan 9, 2018
Author: Paul Bedard
Post Date: 2018-01-10 03:05:17 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 95
Comments: 3

The Environmental Protection Agency, seen by President Trump as a bloated bureaucratic whale, is on schedule to fulfill his promise to reduce its staff nearly in half by the end of his first term mostly through retirements, not cuts, according to officials.

The EPA Tuesday provided to Secrets its first year staff results which show that the agency is below levels not seen since former President Reagan’s administration.

And if just those slated to retire by early 2021 leave, Administrator Scott Pruitt and his team will have reduced a staff of nearly 15,000, to below 8,000, or a reduction of 47 percent.

“We’re proud to report that we’re reducing the size of government, protecting taxpayer dollars and staying true to our core mission of protecting the environment,” Pruitt said in a statement to Secrets.

Several agencies have succeeded in making some cuts, but EPA is taking a lead.

The numbers:

  • As of January 3, 2018, the EPA has 14,162 employees.
  • The last time EPA was at an actual employment level of 14,440 was in fiscal year 1988 when Reagan was president.
  • 23 percent of EPA employees can retire with full benefits and another 4 percent can retire at the end of 2018.
  • Additionally, another 20 percent of EPA employees will be eligible for retirement in the next five years.
  • Taken together, 47 percent of the EPA will be eligible to retire with full benefits in the next 5 years.

Said an EPA official, “We're happy to be at Reagan-level employment numbers and the future retirements shows a preview of how low we could get during this administration. It would be fair to say anywhere from 25 to 47 percent of EPA could retire during this administration.”

Pruitt has used buyouts to spur some of the changes and attractive retirement benefits have also led many to leave the agency. He also instituted a hiring freeze.

Under Pruitt, the agency has gone the “back to basics” of protecting the environment while shucking former President Obama’s political agenda focused heavily on climate change.


Poster Comment:

A follow-up to my recent thread.

LF: Trump Issued 400% Fewer Major Regulations Than Obama Did In His Final Year

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)

The thing about the EPA is that I do support strong environmental regulation. I remember when Lake Erie was practically dead and you couldn't swim in it, and when you couldn't eat the fish out of much of Lake Michigan. Now that has all changed, and it has not changed out of the voluntary goodness of corporate hearts, but because of the Clean Air and Clean Water acts.

I don't want to see any retrograde on those things at all.

But I don't think that Global Warning is real, and the notion of making Carbon Dioxide a pollutant is, to my eyes, nothing more than a naked power grab.

So, I want to see the EPA alive and active, but not pursuing the Global Warming chimera.

Unfortunately, what the two parties give me a choice between is "Environmentalism is wacko" ) (no, it isn't), and "All liberty must be sacrificed to prevent the planet from becoming a boiling hell" (not true).

I think Trump will make the right call, but that's more of a hope than anything else. I do agree with all of his steps so far to open up energy production.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-01-10   6:49:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

We certainly see that Trump and Pruitt are very serious about deregulation, now and well into the future.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-01-10   14:46:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tooconservative (#0) (Edited)

A good start; I hope they get serious about really cutting it, though.
The air is clean enough. The water is clean enough. Time to declare victory, shut it down and go home.
And none of this retirement crap to suck on the taxpayer for the rest of their useless lives. Cut the budget to zero and let them decide what to do with their days.
F'em; useless parasites.

Hank Rearden  posted on  2018-01-10   18:02:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com