United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Bruce Springstein Thinks God Is Wrong and Faggots Should Be Allowed To Marry
Source:
Washington Examiner
URL Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/e ... ll-in-new-jersey-78875832.html
Published: Dec 16, 2009
Author: AP
Post Date: 2009-12-16 19:09:34 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 1368
Comments: 47
TRENTON, N.J. — "The Boss" is backing gay marriage in the Garden State. Bruce Springsteen posted a statement on his Web site urging support of the gay marriage bill that's up for a vote in New Jersey's Senate on Thursday. Springsteen wrote that he's long believed in and has "always spoken out for the rights of same-sex couples." The native son says he agrees with Gov. Jon Corzine that marriage equality is a civil rights issue. Gov.-elect Chris Christie is a big Springsteen fan. The Republican has said he would veto the bill. A state Senate committee approved the bill by one vote on Monday. Democrats concede the measure may fall short of the 21 votes needed to pass the Senate. __ On The Net: http://www.brucespringsteen.net/news/index.html
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Actually, GOD just said to kill the faggots ... doesn't have anything to say about them getting married or not.
Who at Walmart made him the boss?
----------------------------------------------------------- Bruce could suck the chrome off a tailpipe.
Another Marxist ahole who takes the nickname of Stalin "The Boss" When he isn't sucking up to Castro,Obama or crying out for the rights of faggots.. What a W I M P weak ignorant malingering p*ssy
You are now confirmed and set to full posting privelages. Welcome.
What "rights" are Queers deprived of? Oh that's right - one of the couple demand the State recognize a man's "right" to wear a weddin' dress and white pumps at an Altar. Boo-f'n-Hoo! Then why doesn't he write a song about it? OR he can change "Little Girl I Wanna Marry You" to "Little Boy..." He can have even Big Man blow his sax up 'The Boss's' azz for added emphasis and keepin' it real. P.S. - I approve of the title "adjustment."
They're doing a good enough job themselves by "impregnating" rectal canals and dining on turds. doesn't have anything to say about them getting married or not. So according to you, maybe Barney Frank IS right?
I support gay marriage and voted for it here in AZ
This has nothing at all to do with "freedom". This is about making most Americans PAY for behavior that we consider repulsive at best. Homosexuals already have exactly the same rights as all of us do. They want special rights. They want state approval of their perversion and they want MONEY. If marriage isn't limited to "monogamous" heterosexuals for the sake of possible children, it can, and it WILL be applied to any and all possible "relationships". Are you as ardent a supporter of child molesters "rights" and "freedoms"?, how about group "marriages"? or "marriages" to animals?, or necrophiliacs? etc.etc. If you are OK with that, are you OK with paying tax money to them? and granting them protection under the law so that you as a landlord would be required to rent to them, or you as an employer having to pay them benefits after having to hire them? How about them being protected and so making religious organization have to hire and pay them "married" benefits? This has sh!t all to do with "freedom". If the issue is love, why do they need the state's approval other than to get MONEY and state protection/rights to exercise their perversions right in other peoples faces? What about the rights and freedoms of the vast majority of people? You think that it's acceptable to make a church hire a child molester who has "marries" a child? because that's exactly where this cr@p is headed. Homosexuals can form corporations just as we all can and they can convey wealth to each other that way. This has sh!t all to do with "freedom", this is about MONEY and POWER, and forcing the vast majority of Americans to not only accept behavior that we find unacceptable, but making us PAY them for that exact same behavior.
Esse Quam Videri.
No one said anything about that. You're making up stories again.
I understand what you're saying, except for the MONEY and PAYING parts. How do faggots make us PAY MONEY to them ?
Take it easy on Luberator. If he doesn't have a certain number of internet friends he gets manic and starts kissing ass at a sickening rate until his count goes up.
You mean just like THIS one of YOURS?: "Actually, GOD just said to kill the faggots" Your opinions regarding queer marriage and special homosexual "rights" mirror Barney Frank's. Admitting it doesn't necessarily make you a bad person; Just wrong. Clarification in case anyone's interested: Whenever the Bible mentions marriage, it is between a male and a female. The first mention of marriage, (Genesis 2:24), describes it as a man leaving his parents and being united to his wife. In passages that contain instructions regarding marriage, such as 1 Corinthians 7:2-16 and Ephesians 5:23-33, the Bible clearly identifies marriage as being between a man and a woman. Biblically speaking, "marriage" is the lifetime union of a man and a woman, primarily for the purpose of building a family and providing a stable environment for that family; NOT contortionist semantics based on the lie of "rights," so-called "enlightenment," or "freedom." The Bible alone, however, doesn't even have to be used to demonstrate this understanding of marriage. The biblical viewpoint of marriage has been the universal understanding and tradition of marriage in EVERY human civilization in world history.
Wow, can you also use the bible to justify your racism towards blacks? I mean you seem to be an expert at bible stuff as well as everything else, lol.
You know I love ya palo, but you're wrong. I don't know many libertarians who'd condone bestiality - which "doesn't harm another" - but how does one discount the "harm" to the human spirit thus the human soul in that case? NATURE itself demolishes "Homosexuality." By its very nature it's genes can NOT be passed on (of course now with artificial insemination it can.) Pure libertarianism is anarchy. NO RULES. NO LAW. Do you really favor that? Btw - You have "libertarian leanings" - we all do.
Hey big fella - aren't there some testicles for you to chase around the Internets? That's what you advertise as your tagline, right?
If marriage isn't limited to "monogamous" heterosexuals for the sake of possible children, it can, and it WILL be applied to any and all possible "relationships". Are you as ardent a supporter of child molesters "rights" and "freedoms"?, how about group "marriages"? or "marriages" to animals?, or necrophiliacs? etc.etc. If you are OK with that, are you OK with paying tax money to them? Highlights to an excellent dissertation, MD. Moreover, "Special Rights" denied to ANYONE about ANY "relationship" will also be considered "discriminatory."
I'm not the first to notice how quickly your 'mind' latches onto homosexually oriented topics. It seems to be what you think about most.
There's nothing stopping them from getting "married". The Government does not have to recognize such marriages. Their relationship does not fit the definition of the term marriage, so it is not really a marriage. Get the government out of marriage all together and put it back in the church where it belongs. You don't need a piece of paper from the government that says your married anyway.
Isn't your brother the wealthy one in the family?
says the guy posting on a homosexually oriented topic....
I didn't state any opinions regarding queer marriage and/or special homosexual "rights" ... ... your kooky brain just concocted psychotic delusions and made up stories again.
... your kooky brain just concocted psychotic delusions and made up stories again. Unlike for some here (including you apparently), connecting two dots isn't all that difficult. How about your contention, "Actually, GOD just said to kill the faggots"? Is that a mirage?? Were you possessed when you typed that out on your keyboard? Tell me I'm wrong about my dot-connecting. You support "Gay Marriage." If not, I'll apologize if you say I'm wrong.
You seem to create wide but shallow conclusions. If anything, I was more making commentary on (or poking fun of) that.
They would get "married" benefits from gooberments and the private sector. This is across the spectrum of all benefits. ALL benefit costs would go up, everywhere, (since there would be more "married" households). ie. In gooberment, one of the first places to be hit would be all of "academia", where there would be an increase in the numbers of people getting said benefits from school districts and colleges etc. Guess who pays for ALL of it? Yep EVERYONE.
Esse Quam Videri.
It would HAVE to be under the LAW, and it most certainly would be. There would be no practical limitations to the definition of "relationships".
Esse Quam Videri.
Exactly mel! This has sh!t all to do with "marriage" or "freedom".
Esse Quam Videri.
God (and therefore Jesus Christ if you are a Christian) pretty much stated his mind on that subject at Sodom & Gomorrah. Actions speaking louder than words..and all that.
The main problem with sodomites getting married (from a secular point of view) is dragging their diseases with them into the insurance realm of "family" members..that and NO society can survive for very long when perversion is main streamed... God does not allow As we are seeing currently in the demise of America..socially..economically.. morals..out right theft by our government of the people's national treasury.. taxes...corruption at every level... When good becomes evil and evil good...it's over.
All true Joe, althou I wish it were not so. I really do wish that people could just be with the one they loved. There goes my idealism. ;) Our system is to let the States decide on social matters like this, and that is where it should go~ to the states. If the states want to offer tax incentives for homosexuals to get married, then so be it. They already have all the rights everyone else has to get married. No special amendments to the Constitution- because that is who is behind this... people who want to subvert the US constitution. Gay marriage is one way- feminism is another way. So, this issue is like all other PC nonsense.. it is just to divert us from seeing the power grabs.
Even on a none theological basis that is bad, since the increased costs will be carried by the vast majority of Americans. I do agree with you on a theological basis, but in todays world, and in a secular country, I believe that the non theological arguments against so called "gay" "marriage" are compelling enough to defeat this absurdity. Not that I think that the perverts will ever stop trying to force it onto the American culture. I for one am certainly not about to just cede success to them, ever, there are many Americans who are just shouted down by the perverts and their brain dead supporters. They will be heard sooner or later. America isn't "dead" yet, by a long shot.
Esse Quam Videri.
Yes, exactly
I thought it was a clever touch considering Springsteen REALLY thinks he's 'The Boss.' If anything, I was more making commentary on (or poking fun of) that. As for "kill the faggots", the reference was to the Leviticus "abomination" stuff. The chapter of Leviticus is no doubt un-PC, setting up some rather harsh penalties for definitive "abominations". The opinion of God hasn't changed though.... In the last part of Revelations God discusses further "Abominations" for which the penalty is far worse; Denial into His Kingdom. IF I've been wrong about my characterization of your opinion mirroring Franks', then just say so and an apology will be forthcoming.
In the entire history of mankind, a marriage had always be an arangement between a MAN and a WOMAN to love eachother and show their love by raising children together. The purpose for marriage is exactly that. You get married, have kids, raise a family, grow old together, take the grandkids on the weekends, etc. Man was not created to serve such purposes for another man. Women were created to serve such purposes for man. It's like a puzzle, you can't put two of the same pieces together, they simply do not fit and were not made to fit. If you don't like your pieces, there are doctors who can alter them for you. You are right. It is not about marriage, it is about money from the Government, which is why I say to get the Government out of marriage. It's none of their business.
Exactly!
What makes you think you are so important that I would care about an apology from you ? You are nothing more than an internet nobody to me, as I imagine I am to you.
There goes my idealism. ;) Our system is to let the States decide on social matters like this, and that is where it should go~ to the states. If the states want to offer tax incentives for homosexuals to get married, then so be it. They already have all the rights everyone else has to get married. No special amendments to the Constitution- because that is who is behind this... people who want to subvert the US constitution. Gay marriage is one way- feminism is another way. There's nothing wrong with your idealism. People can be with the ones they love. There's no laws against being gay except for God's laws. Other than the states part, your post is dead on. I wouldn't even put this matter in the states hands. I don't think any Government should play any part in marrigage. As far as the tax issue is concerned, people who live together should be allowed to file jointly if they share expenses, whether they are married, partners, a parent with an adult child, or simply friends. If we got the Gov't out of our marriages and allowed people residing in the same home to files taxes together, there would be NO gay (perverting) marriage issue.
The problems are age and number. Would a state be able to lower the age of consent or increase the number of legal "loves"?
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
That is a very valid point- and as I said, I know my wish it is idealistic. No- we should no lower the age of consent, IMO.
Yup, anyone who wants to marry another human being should be left the fuck alone to marry whom they dhose. Busy buddy fucking relationship Nazis who fret about human bonding between two concenting adults engaged in any depth of association with anther need to stick it up their swazi shaped ass and worry more about getting a life then oppressing others.
Comments (41 - 47) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#3. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#4. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#5. To: Huckleberry Phin (#0)
#6. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Springsteen wrote that he's long believed in and has "always spoken out for the rights of same-sex couples."
#7. To: f_christain (#1)
Actually, GOD just said to kill the faggots ...
#8. To: All (#7)
I thought all libertarians are for it
the Libertarian Party credo is Let anyone do what they want as long as they do not harm another
This is my belief too
I love freedom and want it for myself and my brother
Love, Palo
#9. To: Palo Verde (#8)
#10. To: Liberator (#7)
So according to you, maybe Barney Frank IS right?
#11. To: Mad Dog (#9)
#12. To: f_christain (#10)
Chasing Nuts Around the Interweb for Years
#13. To: f_christain, Palo Verde, Mad Dog (#10)
You're making up stories again.
#14. To: Liberator (#13)
Chasing Nuts Around the Interweb for Years
#15. To: Palo Verde (#8)
I thought all libertarians are for it the Libertarian Party credo is Let anyone do what they want as long as they do not harm another This is my belief too
#16. To: Biffy Boy (#14)
#17. To: Mad Dog, all (#9)
(Edited)
Homosexuals already have exactly the same rights as all of us do. They want special rights. They want state approval of their perversion and they want MONEY.
#18. To: Liberator (#16)
Chasing Nuts Around the Interweb for Years
#19. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Click if you want the truth. Click here for an important video message
#20. To: Palo Verde (#8)
I love freedom and want it for myself and my brother
#21. To: Biff Tannen (#18)
I'm not the first to notice how quickly your 'mind' latches onto homosexually oriented topics. It seems to be what you think about most
Click if you want the truth. Click here for an important video message
#22. To: Liberator (#13)
Your opinions regarding queer marriage and special homosexual "rights" ...
#23. To: f_christain (#22)
(Edited)
I didn't state any opinions regarding queer marriage and/or special homosexual "rights" ...
#24. To: Liberator, a k a stone (#23)
You have also noted above the poster (AKA Stone) changed the article title to spin religion into the article.
As for "kill the faggots", the reference was to the Leviticus "abomination" stuff. Anything else you conclude about me saying I am for gay rights/ gay marriage/ Barney Frank are merely insane psychotic ramblings on your part.
#25. To: f_christain (#11)
I understand what you're saying, except for the MONEY and PAYING parts. How do faggots make us PAY MONEY to them ?
#26. To: Liberator (#17)
"Special Rights" denied to ANYONE about ANY "relationship" will also be considered "discriminatory."
#27. To: mel, A K A Stone (#19)
There's nothing stopping them from getting "married". The Government does not have to recognize such marriages. Their relationship does not fit the definition of the term marriage, so it is not really a marriage. Get the government out of marriage all together and put it back in the church where it belongs. You don't need a piece of paper from the government that says your married anyway.
#28. To: f_christain (#1)
#29. To: Mad Dog (#27)
#30. To: Joe Snuffy (#29)
#31. To: Joe Snuffy (#29)
#32. To: Joe Snuffy (#28)
God (and therefore Jesus Christ if you are a Christian) pretty much stated his mind on that subject at Sodom & Gomorrah.
#33. To: f_christain, A K A Stone (#24)
You have also noted above the poster (AKA Stone) changed the article title to spin religion into the article.
#34. To: Mad Dog (#27)
Click if you want the truth. Click here for an important video message
#35. To: Joe Snuffy (#28)
God (and therefore Jesus Christ if you are a Christian) pretty much stated his mind on that subject at Sodom & Gomorrah.
Click if you want the truth. Click here for an important video message
#36. To: Liberator (#33)
... then just say so and an apology will be forthcoming,
#37. To: diva betsy ross (#30)
All true Joe, althou I wish it were not so. I really do wish that people could just be with the one they loved.
Click if you want the truth. Click here for an important video message
#38. To: diva betsy ross, Joe Snuffy (#30)
I really do wish that people could just be with the one they loved.
#39. To: Ibluafartsky (#38)
#40. To: A K A Stone (#0)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]