911
See other 911 Articles
Title: Tokyo-bound flight diverted back to LAX after 'unauthorized person' discovered on plane (Boarding Pass Scanners Fake)
Source:
KABC Los Angeles
URL Source: http://abc7.com/travel/tokyo-bound- ... zed-person-discovered/2828071/
Published: Dec 27, 2017
Author: KABC
Post Date: 2017-12-27 17:02:02 by Hondo68
Keywords: boarding pass scanner, makes beedoop noises, entirely different airline
Views: 1071
Comments: 2
LOS ANGELES (KABC) -- A flight bound for Tokyo's Narita Airport Tuesday made a U-turn back to Los Angeles International Airport after an "unauthorized person" was discovered aboard in an apparent mix-up. a flying first for me: 4 hours into an 11 hour flight and we are turning around because we have a passenger who isn’t supposed to be on this plane. Why...why do we all gotta go back, I do not know— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) December 27, 2017 So many questions and I have no answers. Either do they. This person must be mortified though— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) December 27, 2017 They keep saying the person had a United ticket. We are on ANA. So basically the boarding pass scanner is just a beedoop machine that makes beedoop noises that register to nowhere— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) December 27, 2017 Police were interviewing all the people seated around the mystery person once we got off the plane. Why would they do this! I MUST KNOW MORE— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) December 27, 2017 My first tweet can’t be more epic than this: just survived an 8-hour LAX-LAX flight with @chrissyteigen and @johnlegend on #ANA #NH175 pic.twitter.com/yY0vIqfcja— Raffy (@Raffywu) December 27, 2017
According to LAX Airport Police, officers had a unit and supervisors on scene when the plane, flight ANA 175, arrived back in Los Angeles.
Police said the return of the Tokyo-bound flight was due to a "mix up and was straightened up."
The airline, All Nippon Airways, issued an apology early Wednesday for the inconvenience. They said they were investigating how the passenger boarded the wrong flight.
The statement read: During the flight, the cabin crew became aware that one of the passengers boarded the incorrect flight and notified the pilot. As part of the airline's security procedure, the pilot in command decided to return to the originating airport, where the passenger was disembarked. ANA is researching the situation currently to determine how the passenger boarded the flight. ANA would like to express its apologies to the passengers for the inconvenience. We take great pride providing exemplary customer service, and on this flight we failed to do so.
The flight was re-boarded overnight and was on its way to Tokyo Wednesday morning.
Model Chrissy Teigen, who was aboard the flight with her husband John Legend, tweeted that she had been on the plane for four hours when it turned around midair.
"A flying first for me: 4 hours into an 11 hour flight and we are turning around because we have a passenger who isn't supposed to be on this plane. Why...why do we all gotta go back, I do not know," Teigen said in a tweet.
Teigen went on to tweet that she was unsure of exactly what had taken place on the flight that caused the plane to turn around. "This person must be mortified though," Teigen tweeted.
According to Teigen, passengers were told that the person in question had a ticket on an entirely different airline.
Teigen said passengers were held on the plane for at least 20 minutes after it landed for police to conduct interviews with passengers.
Meanwhile, another passenger snapped a photo with Teigen and Legend, who seemed to be taking it all in stride.
The plane took off from LAX at 11:36 a.m. Tuesday and landed back at LAX at 7:33 p.m. The flight's total duration was recorded at seven hours and 56 minutes. (1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
It would have been much more reasonable for the plane to just continue to Japan. That way only the single errant passenger is inconvenienced (especially since s/he already missed their intended flight) instead of everyone else. The flight was nearly half way there anyway. There should have been no security concern as the passenger presumably went through regular security.
#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)
I agree they should have continued their flight plan and then dumped the errant passenger into the sea. No one would ever know what happened then.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 1.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]