United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Cops Illegally Break Into Property and Gun Down Family Dog for ‘Trotting’ in Their Direction
Source:
From The Trenches
URL Source: http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... -dog-trotting-direction/214206
Published: Dec 18, 2017
Author: Anti-Media
Post Date: 2017-12-19 07:11:00 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2596
Comments: 40
Durango, CO — A family in Durango, Colorado, is hoping for justice after police fatally shot their family dog, Dozer, at their home in October. Neil Anderson and Kerry Doyle, along with Doyle’s children, are seeking compensatory and punitive damages against three state troopers — Gablin Watkins, Randy Talbot, and Josiah Fuller, as well as the Colorado State Patrol. A lawsuit filed last Monday in the U.S. District Court in Denver alleges that state troopers unlawfully entered the property of Neil Anderson and Kerry Doyle and negligently discharged a weapon just 50 feet from and in the direction of the family, killing Dozer. The suit cites Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights violations. On October 11, 2017, state troopers Watkins, Talbot, and Fuller investigated a car crash involving Doyle’s son, Porter Williams. After running the registration, the vehicle came up as belonging to Williams’ father, who lives on the same road as Doyle and Anderson. When the officers were unable to enter the locked gate at Williams’ father’s home, one of the troopers recalled seeing a piece of paper inside Porter Williams’ vehicle at the tow yard with what he thought had the gate’s entry code written on it. Kristina Bergsten, Anderson and Doyle’s attorney, alleges that at no time did the troopers “place an administrative or police hold on the Jeep at the tow yard in order to make contact with the driver of the involved Jeep,” Porter Williams. Rather, the troopers left for the tow yard and returned to the house the next day. Porter’s father met with the troopers on his property down the road and, before taking them to the correct property, twice told the troopers to call before going back to Anderson and Doyle’s residence so they could put Dozer away. Trooper Watkins forbade Williams’ father from calling because he did not want Williams to “run” or “hide” even though Anderson, Doyle, and Bergsten claim that “there was no basis for such a claim.” The three state troopers and Williams’ father walked down the driveway towards Anderson and Doyle’s house, where the children were skating outside. Moving past a lower locked gate at the beginning of the property marked “No Trespassing,” as well as a second locked gate near the home marked “Beware of Dog,” the troopers walked towards the house. It is not clear in the lawsuit whether the troopers used the gate code found in Porter Williams’ vehicle, or if Williams’ father led them past the gate. Dozer, their six-year-old Staffordshire bull terrier laying watching the children skate, got up from under the tree next to the family’s skate ramp and moved toward the troopers, who were approaching the house. Bergsten told Anti-Media in a phone call that the trooper’s report indicated Dozer “trotted towards” the troopers. Noticing that Watkins was reaching for his gun, Anderson yelled out to the officers “No, that’s my- Hey, hey, hey! No, no, no! No, don’t!” Fuller also drew his firearm, moving laterally from behind Watkins to get a shot. Talbot initially reached for his gun but decided to pull his taser, repeatedly shouting “Taser!” at the others. Even as the three state troopers ran around the driveway, juking and spinning from the dog, Anderson and Doyle allege that “at no time did Dozer act in an aggressive manner.” State trooper Watkins shot three times towards Dozer, hitting Dozer twice and sending one bullet towards the ground in the direction of the children at the skate ramp. After he was shot, Dozer let out a cry, turned around, and ran to hide under the wooden ramp where Doyle’s kids stood in horror. Bleeding from his mouth due to the two gunshot wounds, Dozer laid down as Doyle attempted to apply pressure and save the dog. Initially, Dozer survived, but Anderson and Doyle had to have him euthanized three weeks later. The court date and amount of damages the family is seeking are to be determined. According to Colorado State Patrol Captain Adrian Driscoll, Watkins remains on active duty. Police have otherwise declined to comment on the case until it is resolved. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#2. To: Deckard, misterwhite, GrandIsland (#0)
(Edited)
Uh-huh....sure. Since there is no video posted of the “family dog trotting in the direction of the cop” before the cop shot it, I will therefore post the video of another “family dog trotting out a door in the direction of a cop” before the cop shot it. Uh-huh The story Anti-Media told and you posted here had no video. I cannot help but wonder if Anti-Media would have written the same judgmental story with great condemnation about the cop shooting the dog in the video I posted....had no video been available to dispute their version. If Anti-Media had also written a story on that incident in the video I posted and no video was available....I can just imagine the headline would read something like this: Cop shoots dog after lovely family dog, friendly wagging his tail, warmly greeted the mean old cop illegally knocking on the door. In doing a story about the incident in the video and with no video available, then Anti-Media would make the good name of cops take another negative hit while Anti-Media and the few shitheads who promulgate their yellow journalism crap would take measures to try and insure that cops would make a few new enemies. I am hear to tell you that you should not trust the yellow journalism garbage these anti-cop-hating sites put out. Their sole agenda in life is to get as many people hating cops as possible and promote anarchy. Somehow they manage to find a some dolts who gladly assist them in the effort toward their goal. More than not trusting their crap, you should not spread it. If it is shit that you so desperately want to spread...the go find yourself a big barnyard and have at it. There ...
I found the video in Post #2 on YouTube. I just discovered a story describing the incident. This story was printed and the dog owner’s remarks in the story were made before the dog owner saw the video. This story was taken from the Idaho Press Tribune. NAMPA — Police Department officials released video footage of the officer who shot a dog Monday evening. Officers were called to the home to check on the welfare of two children, Deputy Chief Craig Kingsbury said at a press conference Wednesday. Upon knocking on the slightly-ajar door, two dogs attacked one of the officers. The videos shows the officer firing his weapon three times at close range, severely injuring the dog, Junior. Officers transported the animal to a veterinary hospital, but the dog died en route. Larry Carver, brother-in-law of the dog’s owner Anthony O’Hare, said the first gunshot hit Junior in the leg, dropping him to the ground. Two more shots were fired, one in the dog’s stomach, which killed him. The Idaho Press-Tribune requested comment from O’Hare, but did not receive a reply Wednesday evening. “I can tell you he’s not heartless,” Kingsbury said of the officer who shot the dog. “This bothered him, and it bothered several other members of this agency. A lot of us are dog lovers.” The second dog fled when the shots were fired, Sgt. Tim Randall said. Officers don’t know if it has since returned to the home. A dog was barking inside the residence Wednesday evening when the Press-Tribune spoke with Carver. The welfare check was otherwise routine, Kingsbury said, and the caller’s concerns, when investigated, were unfounded. Carver, who ran outside just after shots were fired, believes the situation could have been handled differently. He questioned why the police didn’t use the “mace” they had on them on the dog instead. “I just didn’t understand that and they were here to do a welfare check, and they’re firing guns,” Carver said. Pepper spray from the belt of the officer who shot the dog was punctured by apparent bite marks. Randall said that while it’s acceptable to have dogs for protection, it’s important to understand the liability that goes along with it. “They need to be careful to make sure that the dog doesn’t come into contact with the wrong person,” Randall said. “Whether that’s keeping the door locked, or a good fenced yard, a secure yard that’s well-signed.” The two videos were taken by the officers’ CopVu cameras, small devices that clip to their uniforms shirts and are activated with a simple slide motion. All Nampa patrol officers wear the cameras and activate them any time they interact with members of the public.
Irrelevant spam. Hypocrite.
You may call it irrelevant if you want to. Mox Nix to me. The video and the picture below clearly shows what can happen to a cop if the cop doesn’t shoot a dog trotting towards him. These two dogs came trotting out of a door towards the cop and attacked the cop. When a dog comes trotting at a cop, I have absolutely no problem with the cop shooting the dog.
So, in your opinion, cops have the right to shoot any dog no matter how docile or friendly or no matter no small they are. And a cop doesn’t either and that is what matters.... And there's the problem in a nutshell. According to you, it's open season for any cop to shoot a dog for any reason at all. I hereby officially declare this CASE IS CLOSED forever on LF....judgment so rendered. Not by a long shot - who the hell do you think you are? Your utter hubris and self-aggrandizement only displays your rampant insecurity. You've embarrassed yourself on this thread by posting completely irrelevant videos of events that had nothing to do with the article - the same thing that you accuse others of doing. That's called hypocrisy.
#14. To: Deckard (#12)
So, in your opinion, cops have the right to shoot any dog no matter how docile or friendly or no matter no small they are. No, that is not my opinion.
And there's the problem in a nutshell. According to you, it's open season for any cop to shoot a dog for any reason at all. That is not according to me.
I am GATLIN. I repeat: THIS CASE IS DEFINITELY CLOSED. Goodbye ...
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest ... Gun Down Family Dog for ‘Trotting’ in Their Direction
#6. To: All (#2)
Notice the distinct difference in the way that J Funk, reporter for the Idaho Press Tribune, structured the descriptive narrative for his story published in a small hometown newspaper….Then compare that to the one the cop-hating agenda driven staff member for Anti-Media descriptively structured for his article in a Web publication? Do you notice the different style and methodology? I do….I definitely do. J Funk did what a reporter was supposed to do to meet proper and ethical journalistic standards….that being to stick to giving the: Who, Where, What, When, Why and How. The staff writer for Anti-Media structured and composed his article in such a manner so as to try and convince readers that here are some more cops that are assholes just like all the rest of cops. Looks as though he succeeded in doing that….in a couple cases here. On the other hand, that was a damned fine job by J Funk. Doncha think? Sure….you must, after making the comparisons.
This screen capture from a second officer’s CopVu cam shows two dogs jumping up on a Nampa Police officer moments before he shot one of the dogs in self defense.
#9. To: Gatlin (#6)
I found the video in Post #2 on YouTube. I just discovered a story describing the incident.
#10. To: Deckard (#9)
(Edited)
And a cop doesn’t either and that is what matters....not what you think matters.
It’s too bad if you have a problem, because it’s your fucking problem....learn to live with it.
Since there is nothing you can do about it....except of course continue to whine.
Shooting the dog in the article you posted was highly justified.
I hereby officially declare this CASE IS CLOSED forever on LF....judgment so rendered.
You must now stand in front of your computer as I leave the thread ...
#12. To: Gatlin (#10)
(Edited)
When a dog comes trotting at a cop, I have absolutely no problem with the cop shooting the dog.
Replies to Comment # 12. When a dog comes trotting at a cop, I have absolutely no problem with the cop shooting the dog.
#15. To: Deckard (#12)
And a cop doesn’t either and that is what matters....
#16. To: Deckard (#12)
(Edited)
... who the hell do you think you are?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]