[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Report: Special Counsel Robert Mueller Focusing on Trump Obstruction, Not Collusion

Suozzi (D-NY) Suggests Using the ‘Second Amendment’ on Trump

Did Putin Order the Salisbury Hit?

US Boy Scouts revoke badges from Down's syndrome boy

China To U.S.: ‘Correct The Mistake’ Of Passing Taiwan Travel Act Or Face ‘Military Pressure’

Microsoft tries out new must-use-Edge ploy in Windows 10 preview

Navy Seal Says He Killed Bin Laden — and the Photos of His Dead Body Are Fake

Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian In Arizona: Bigger Government Guaranteed

Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians

Hypocrisy: Why Is It OK When the US Meddles in Elections but Not When Russia Does It?

Women Fined $100,000, Face Potential Jail Time, Just for Braiding Hair

Pelosi Fights Off Democrats Who See Her Leadership as ‘Toxic’ to Party’s Image

Hillary Clinton’s India Trip Cost Taxpayers More than $22k

China's premier hopes trade war can be averted, pledges more open economy

How do civil wars happen?

Sad Truth

Robert Mueller Has Been Botching Investigations Since The Anthrax Attacks

China's space lab to crash soon

This Teen Built A Prosthetic Arm Using Lego

Libertysflames question of the week...Can you think of anything worse then.......

Suozzi Suggests Using the ‘Second Amendment’ on Trump

Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Arizona Pedestrian

JUDAS PRIEST Scores Highest-Charting Album Ever In U.S. With 'Firepower'

Restaurant Patrons Fight Back Against Cop As He Savagely Beats Autistic 12-year-old Girl “UFC-Style”

Deciding To Die (Gun Confiscation)

Muslim pedophile grandfather sold children for sex in his ‘rape house’ where perverts queued down the stairs to abuse little girls

Police officer busted for reverse drunken driving

New Yorker Magazine Under Fire for Body-Shaming Trump

A frustrated Trump lashes out at special counsel Mueller

Cars That Parent Us

Edward Snowden: Facebook Is A Surveillance Company Rebranded As "Social Media"

The conformity of walking out

Hungary PM: Europe Under Migrant Invasion – Those Who Don’t Block it at Their Borders Will be Lost

History of Gun Violence

Going to the Gun Range With Family Got These Students Suspended From School

The End of the world as we know it

Is The U.S. Economy Really Growing? (No)

It Begins: Florida Resident’s Firearms, Ammunition Confiscated Under Gun Control Law

The College of the Holy Cross 'Crusaders' mascot succumbs to 'Islamophobia' concerns

CEO Susan Wojcicki to 'Fight Conspiracies' on YouTube by Adding Wikipedia Boxes to Videos

Sign Referencing Civil War Hero Is Sexual Harassment, Says Massachusetts Lawmaker

It's all Eve's fault

Arizona's Flake, in New Hampshire, mulls 2020 challenge to Trump

Donald Trump signs Taiwan Travel Act despite warning from mainland China

McCabe Fired

Sunrise over the Swamp

Chicago students trash Walmart during walkout over gun violence

Mix up lands senior citizen behind bars for not mowing lawn

Zakharova Tells Who Is Really Behind The Salisbury Anti-Russian Campaign

10 Books That Screwed Up the World: And 5 Others That Didn't Help

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: North Carolina Under the Siege of Tyranny
Source: Barb Wire
URL Source: https://barbwire.com/2017/12/03/north-carolina-siege-tyranny/
Published: Dec 3, 2017
Author: Dr Mark Creech
Post Date: 2017-12-03 17:46:32 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 90
Comments: 3

Charles de Montesquieu, the French lawyer, writer, and political philosopher, whose works had a profound influence on America’s founders, once said, “There is no crueler tyranny than that which is perpetuated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.”

My beloved state, North Carolina, is under siege from tyrants who operate “under the shield of law and in the name of justice.” The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has the state and its future firmly under its iron rule, and yet, there’s been little outrage by the state’s citizenry.

Daniel Horowitz, in Fourth Circuit Takes Control of North Carolina, summarizes the way this unelected body has destroyed the state’s right to self-determination. He writes:

“They have mandated transgenderism, blocked every voter integrity law, required very specific times and amounts of early voting, criminalized voluntary public prayer, and erased every single districting map — from federal and state districts to even county school board maps in the middle of an election season and after candidates already spent enormous sums campaigning. Again, this was all done by federal, not state courts. They are rendering elections moot and are now ensuring that conservatives can never win elections by ruling Democrat racial gerrymander advantages into law and into the Constitution.”

Horwitz’s description of the matter isn’t hyperbole in the slightest.

Stephen McDowell and Mark Beliles rightly argue in Liberating the Nations, the concept of Constitutionalism in America stretches back to the Hebrew Republic which Moses presented to the Israelites via the Book of the Covenant. It contained the Ten Commandments, as well as a companion body of law. Although these laws were inspired by God, they were handed down to the people for their adoption. Exodus chapter 19 reveals this was necessary for the people to enjoy the benefits of these laws.

God is definitely sovereign. If we break his laws, they will break us. Still, God allows us to choose. He will not force himself upon us. Consent is necessary to know the blessings of his way. We can garner from this example provided in Scripture that tyranny is always from the top down and never operates with the consent of the people.

McDowell and Beliles also note that even when Israel changed its form of government to that of a monarchy, the king was still required to abide within and govern by the Covenant or the Book of the Law – law, by the way, which reflected the character of a benevolent and just God. America’s Founders took this concept and wove it into our nation’s framework, clearly stating in the Declaration of Independence that “just powers are derived from the consent of the governed.”

Certainly, the most fundamental principle of a free society, one governed by Constitutionalism, is the right to vote – the right of the people to decide their own destiny. Nevertheless, “under the shield of law and in the name of justice,” the Fourth Circuit has decided it shall decree to North Carolinians in what manner they may cast their votes in the next election.

Once again, let me refer to Horowitz, who gives us the play by play here:

“[A] three-judge panel within the Fourth Circuit and the [U.S.] Supreme Court struck down both the federal and state [legislative district] maps [that state lawmakers drew] in the Tar Heel State.

“It is first important to recognize that North Carolina received pre-clearance from Obama’s Justice Department, and the maps were upheld twice in state court. That should have ended the matter. Federal courts should have no jurisdiction over state legislative maps. Yet the federal courts nullified 28 legislative districts and remanded back to the three-judge panel, which includes two Obama-appointed judges.

“The North Carolina legislature went back and drew a new, clean map that is better than anything Democrats put out when they had control for 100 years. That should have ended the matter. Yet the Obama judges, who have been accorded God-like power over subject matter the Constitution did not entrust to them, want to make sure the maps maximize the Democrat Party advantage. They gave standing to another lawsuit challenging three Senate and nine House districts. Last Thursday, [actually October 26th], in a written order, Judge Catherine Eagles wrote on behalf of the three-judge panel that she feels the new map doesn’t redress the ‘constitutional’ violation and is ‘otherwise legally unacceptable’ – in other words, it doesn’t contain enough Democrat advantages. So, in the ultimate act of legislating from the bench, the judge said that due to ‘the technical nature of determining an appropriate remedy’ and ‘exceptional circumstances,’ the court is appointing a ‘special master’ to oversee the maps.

“Thus, an unelected federal court with no constitutional jurisdiction over maps cleared by the DOJ [Department of Justice] and state courts is now requiring that de facto veto power over the new maps be given to an unelected ‘expert.’”

The unelected ‘expert’ chosen by the Fourth Circuit Court is Stanford University law professor, Nathaniel Persily, from California.

Can you believe this? The situation is so egregious and shocking that it’s difficult for the average citizen in our state to process. It’s so bad that many, without carefully thinking, might simply dismiss it as an unfortunate consequence of Republican gerrymandering.

At the risk of being perceived as partisan, let me say that such a conclusion would be nonsense. North Carolina is in the throes of something unlike anything it’s ever experienced in its history since the American Revolution and “no taxation without representation.”

Back in October, North Carolina House Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett) and Sen. Ralph Hise (R-Mitchell) chairman of their respective chambers’ redistricting committees have said the “order provides absolutely no legal or factual basis for objecting to the new maps, while also potentially delegating the legislature’s constitutional authority to draw districts to a lone professor in California with no accountability to North Carolinians.”

Lewis and Hise also rightly contended that to hand the responsibility of the state’s redistricting maps “to a single person on the other side of the country is an outrageous and extraordinary violation of the principle of federalism and our state’s sovereignty.”

Since making these statements, Lewis and Hise have had the opportunity to review the new maps made by Persily. In a statement released today (December 1) they said that Persily has confirmed their “worst suspicions” and “this entire ‘judicial process’ is little more than a thinly-veiled political operation where unelected judges, legislating from the bench, strip North Carolinians of their constitutional right to self-governance by appointing a left-wing California professor to draw districts handing Democrats control of legislative seats they couldn’t win at the ballot box.”

I must agree with Horowitz’s conclusion on this matter, “While legislative gerrymandering can be insidious, it is not nearly as tyrannical as judicial gerrymandering, which is unconstitutional and against which there is no remedy.”

No remedy? Perhaps. But I’m inclined to believe that if freedom remains precious enough to its beneficiaries they’ll find one.

Charles de Montesquieu also said, “The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy.”

The federal judiciary is off the rails and can only be set right by a citizenry that will no longer consent to its illegitimate yoke.

Poster Comment:

This tyranny of the infested central government courts system has affected most states. It's long past due for a cleansing and gutting!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: IbJensen (#0)

How is it singular insanely commie liberal-Left districts are allowed to "disenfranchise" the consensus of the REST of the State's citizenry??

Liberator  posted on  2017-12-03   23:13:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Liberator (#1)

Time to light those torches!

Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.

IbJensen  posted on  2017-12-04   7:31:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: IbJensen (#2)

" Time to light those torches! "

And tie ropes in the trees, boil the tar, and gather lots of feathers !!!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)

Stoner  posted on  2017-12-04   15:43:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com