U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: A Sheriff Just Threatened Charges Over ‘F*ck Trump’ Sticker — and the Internet Is Destroying Him
Source:
The Daily Sheeple
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/a-sh ... ernet-is-destroying-him_112017
Published: Nov 16, 2017
Author: Carey Wedler
Post Date: 2017-11-17 06:40:28 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 12929
Comments: 107
On Wednesday morning, Sheriff Troy E. Nehls of Fort Bend County, Texas, posted a picture of the back of a truck asking members of the community to help him find the ‘offender.’ “I have received numerous calls regarding the offensive display on this truck as it is often seen along FM 359. If you know who owns this truck or it is yours, I would like to discuss it with you,” he said. Nehls apparently already sought to impose punishment, adding, “Our Prosecutor has informed us she would accept Disorderly Conduct charges regarding it, but I feel we could come to an agreement regarding a modification to it.” He also posted a picture in the comments of legal code concerning disorderly conduct, apparently attempting to justify his attempt to suppress free speech by suggesting the truck driver was instigating a breach of the peace. The statute, Sec. 42.01, says “a person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly uses abusive, indecent, profane or vulgar language, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace,” or if it “makes an offensive gesture of display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace.” Attempting to cite this statute suggests Trump supporters could be so triggered by free speech about the president they might incite violence, a particularly hilarious notion considering the right has spent months virtue signaling about the first amendment and scolding leftists for being violent snowflakes. And the Internet responded swiftly as thousands of commenters flowed in offering relentless trolling, thoughtful defenses of free speech, and cutting rebukes of partisan hypocrisy. The trolls were numerous: Other commenters were straightforward and to the point, citing previous court decisions and defenses of free speech: Still others tackled partisan hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance: Some commenters defended the sheriff and received immediate responses: A couple pointed out the fact that people actually called the police because they were so offended: The truck driver also received an offer from a lawyer and former prosecutor for free legal assistance: The ACLU of Texas also chimed in: “Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it. “Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.” Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-43) not displayed.
.
.
.
#44. To: tpaine, rlkk (#36)
Is there some problem with that? There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech." What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him.
And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT. Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"?? Of course the sign saying "Fuck Trump" should be considered as disturbing the peace.. As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed. What more could you want? OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street? Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace. If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
Which only proves that Left is as much in favor of political censorship as the right. Even if it is, it STILL works as agitprop tool of the Left designed to perpetuate a stereotype and bogeyman that simply does NOT exist. "Art" has been a political tool since the 1960s. Of ALL people, you ought to get it as well as what's going on.
What more could you want? Yes, yes, I read it, Paine. But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE: This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team." One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth. Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides. See the imminent future now??
There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech." What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him. How weird, you've read my post, and apparently understood it, but still feel the need to lecture me about leftist propaganda? I'm not your enemy. Trying to get you to realize that some here (notably misterwhite), is a propagandist, isn't getting through.. Am I wasting my time?
Nah. I bet that's Bruce Willis in the 1995 movie Die Hard with a Vengeance.
Firstly, I don't believe you or 95% of the posters here are my enemy. I think that's a weird assertion or presumption to make, but hey, it's a nameless, faceless media where intent and subtleties are often misconstrued and misunderstood. What else is new? Beyond that, I'm not "lecturing," I'm clarifying. I apparently should refrain from giving my overview and opinion on the social dynamics and psyops by the PTB (Which does appear for be a waste of time -- a YUGE one. You're right. My bad.)
But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE: This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team." One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth. Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides. See the imminent future now?? Now you've posted I'm "missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE", --- and implied that what? ---- I'm "taking-one-for-the-team."? What in hell is your problem with me? -- That I can't "See the imminent future now??" I've probably posted just as many articles as you, about how the socialists are trying to ruin our republic. Get off your soapbox when you reply to me...
Thank you...
Now the TV appearances, book, and movie deals start. She's a dead ringer for Honey Boo Boo's mom!
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me. I'd probably laugh. Lack of think skin... is a weakness. I loath weak people. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
You have consistently lied about yourself on this chit-chat channel.
He should be made to put a "Fuck Hillary" sticker on his truck too, see how much grief he gets over that.
Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
The thing that Gatlin is laughing about is that she was arrested on a felony warrant charge. Fort Bend County Sheriff’s Office records show Karen Fonseca was arrested about 2 p.m. Thursday
What this proves is that this really has to be one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her. It also proves that anti-Trumpers have never been known for displaying any degree of intelligence.
Egad! This is one ugly, fat, old tattooed sow. Pull her over and if she draws a gun, shoot her ass! Get the trash off the road. Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Great! Charge her with that. They have no case against her for exercising her First Amendment rights. She should be charged for trying to encourage a sexual assault against the commander and chief.
That MAY be protected speech,but I doubt it. There are still obscenity laws on the books in many places. Regardless of it is is legal,illegal,or borderline,it IS a classless thing to do because that's not saying something in anger once and then leaving it alone,it is virtually shouting it at everyone who sees the truck. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Thanks for defining it clearer than I did. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Is that a political statement,or a call for sexual assault? Can you begin to imagine the screams of outrage if someone had "Fuck Hillary!" in the rear window of their truck? Whymen libbers heads would be exploding. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
You can however shout "Honkey" or "Cracka". Some people are more equal than others. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Fuck off, Ba Ba Baaaaa Bucky the farm animal sucky sucky
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
I highly doubt very much that the use of derogatory language against out President would be protected under the First Amendment as it actually falls under the fighting words doctrine. See here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383 and here constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1/annotation18.htm
I think you're waaay overreacting. Yes, really. I've probably posted just as many articles as you, about how the socialists are trying to ruin our republic. Get off your soapbox when you reply to me... We can either have a decent convo and exchange opinions, or we can't. "Soapbox"?? Gimme a break.
AND the arrest, past police record and exposed sordid abuse of her bull-dyke "wife," and MAYBE the Ellen appearance and hate-fest on the Liberal-Dem Late Nite Talk Show circuit.
Lack of think skin... is a weakness. I loath weak people. Yes, you'd laugh here. In real life I'd bet your pension that it'd be a much different story. IF you or especially your wife/family were targeted with these obscenities -- either via the signage OR from car-window, your reaction would be waaay more different. UNLESS you're telling us that that at a traffic light or elsewhere that were some broad or guy to open a window and shout out, "EFF YOU, B*TCH!," that you're letting THAT go?
Exactly. Imagine the kvetching, b*tching and moaning were THAT the case. OR, 0bama was targeting with the very same "EFF 0BAMA!" vehicle signage. (btw, remember how those several folks who dug out 0bama's student loan data were summarily arrested?? When in positions of power, Dems abuse it, having a hyper-emotional hair-triggers when THEY are "insulted," investigated, busted, and ridiculed otherwise.)
It also proves that anti-Trumpers have never been known for displaying any degree of intelligence. On THIS issue we can agree. (Still staunchly supporting the ACLU, btw? Because THEY are supporting this witch.)
Pull her over and if she draws a gun, shoot her ass! Get the trash off the road. THAT is basically the face (and azz) of the Democrat Party. Ugly IN & OUT.
Great! Charge her with that. They have no case against her for exercising her First Amendment rights. What part of, public "incitement," obscenity/vulgarity/indecency/lewdness" laws don't you get? The First Amendment does NOT protect any of it.
Excellent! Why can't the Bull-Dyke's proud and public display be construed as "Encouragement of sexual assault" as well as a "Hate Crime," Hate Speech," Incitement of "sexual assault," Incitement of Violence, and a few other legit charges?
Regardless of it is is legal,illegal,or borderline,it IS a classless thing to do because that's not saying something in anger once and then leaving it alone,it is virtually shouting it at everyone who sees the truck. Well stated. If all (including kids) are compelled to see it on public roads and stores, the vulgarities/obscenities are indeed forced upon them.
Is that a political statement,or a call for sexual assault? Can you begin to imagine the screams of outrage if someone had "Fuck Hillary!" in the rear window of their truck? Whymen libbers heads would be exploding. Exactly. The double-standard and hypocrisy of the Left as well as Anarchists is again on display and exposed in this case. What I've noticed from the Dem-Antifa-Anarchist Left is that LEADING the hate, hostility, and violence is Hillary's "The Resistance" -- comprised of malcontent Queers, Dykes, and Society's Misfits and Losers. Gotta feeling the test case is only the beginning. They (and the Dems' GOPe-cousins ) are HOPING that this disgusting display becomes epidemic. Call it the "Kaepernick Phenomena." In this seemingly single inconsequential gesture, the Dem-Antifa-Anarchists are in the process of challenging laws and standards of respect and behavior that have stood the constitutional test of time. Their long End Game is clearly Divide & Conquer, and creating legal and social chaos. Antifa and Dems have always pushed the boundaries of "Fighting Words." They need their collective clocks cleaned. Backing them up AS ALWAYS is the ACLU and SPLC.
Don't forget the Constitution and the United States Supreme Court. Funny you should mention Antifa - they are the biggest enemies of free speech in America. You can however shout "Honkey" or "Cracka". Some people are more equal than others. Funny how THAT all works, ain't it? Whitey is now targeted for open Hatred, Censorship," and Employment Restrictions at colleges and universities. With NO pushback. (What's THAT all about??) This legal double standard of speech and deed (including 'Affirmative Action,' select 'Hate Speech/Hate Crime Laws' and unequal protections and license needs once and for all to go to the Supreme Court for remediation (OR be left to the States.)
She's a dead ringer for Honey Boo Boo's mom! I see Rosie O'Donnell playing her in the made for tv role. Wonder how much she can bench press? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Well, the SCOTUS is a joke. Their respective hypocrisy, decisions based on international law, and political caving is making a mockery of justice AND the spirit of the USCON. Funny you should mention Antifa - they are the biggest enemies of free speech in America. Exactly. Oh, the irony.
Let's HOPE he has been lying,and he is really some bored 13 year old kid. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Comments (84 - 107) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIf he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine.
#45. To: Liberator (#38)
Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T??
#46. To: Liberator (#40)
Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#47. To: Deckard (#43)
(Edited)
The image was from a fictional movie!
#48. To: tpaine (#45)
(Edited)
As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed.
#49. To: Liberator (#44)
If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
#50. To: Liberator (#41)
That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset.
#51. To: tpaine (#49)
I'm not your enemy.... Am I wasting my time?
#52. To: Liberator (#48)
Yes, yes, I read it, Paine.
#53. To: Liberator (#51)
You're right. My bad.)
#54. To: Deckard, F Trump arrested, Art of the Deal (#0)
(Edited)
#55. To: Liberator (#8)
What IF, a Vehicle is
#56. To: GrandIsland (#55)
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me
#57. To: Deckard (#0)
#58. To: Deckard (#18)
(Edited)
on an outstanding fraud warrant issued in August by the Rosenberg Police Department. 
The Mushot of Karen Fonseca.
#59. To: Deckard (#46)
#60. To: hondo68 (#54)
#61. To: Gatlin (#59)
What this proves is that this really has to be one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#62. To: Deckard (#61)
#63. To: Deckard (#5)
Protected speech - if you can't help being triggered by a message you disagree with snowflake, then you're the one with the problem.
#64. To: Liberator (#7)
Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected."
#65. To: Deckard (#13)
The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.
#66. To: Liberator (#21)
In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech."
#67. To: buckeroo (#56)
#68. To: Deckard (#0)
#69. To: tpaine (#52)
What in hell is your problem with me? -- That I can't "See the imminent future now??"
#70. To: hondo68 (#54)
Now the TV appearances, book, and movie deals start.
#71. To: GrandIsland (#55)
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me. I'd probably laugh.
#72. To: CZ82 (#57)
He should be made to put a "Fuck Hillary" sticker on his truck too, see how much grief he gets over that.
#73. To: Gatlin, Deckard (#59)
What this proves is that this really has to be one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her.
#74. To: IbJensen (#60)
Egad! This is one ugly, fat, old tattooed sow.
#75. To: Deckard, Gatlin (#61)
["one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her."]
#76. To: A K A Stone, Deckard (#62)
She should be charged for trying to encourage a sexual assault against the commander and chief.
#77. To: sneakypete, Deckard (#63)
That MAY be protected speech,but I doubt it. There are still obscenity laws on the books in many places.
#78. To: sneakypete, CZ82, A K A Stone (#65)
The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.
#79. To: Liberator (#78)
Antifa and Dems have always pushed the boundaries of "Fighting Words." They need their collective clocks cleaned. Backing them up AS ALWAYS is the ACLU and SPLC.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#80. To: sneakypete (#66)
In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech."
#81. To: hondo68 (#54)
Now the TV appearances, book, and movie deals start.
#82. To: Deckard (#79)
Don't forget the Constitution and the United States Supreme Court.
#83. To: buckeroo, Grand Island (#56)
(Edited)
You have consistently lied about yourself on this chit-chat channel.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]