U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: A Sheriff Just Threatened Charges Over ‘F*ck Trump’ Sticker — and the Internet Is Destroying Him
Source:
The Daily Sheeple
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/a-sh ... ernet-is-destroying-him_112017
Published: Nov 16, 2017
Author: Carey Wedler
Post Date: 2017-11-17 06:40:28 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 17702
Comments: 107
On Wednesday morning, Sheriff Troy E. Nehls of Fort Bend County, Texas, posted a picture of the back of a truck asking members of the community to help him find the ‘offender.’ “I have received numerous calls regarding the offensive display on this truck as it is often seen along FM 359. If you know who owns this truck or it is yours, I would like to discuss it with you,” he said. Nehls apparently already sought to impose punishment, adding, “Our Prosecutor has informed us she would accept Disorderly Conduct charges regarding it, but I feel we could come to an agreement regarding a modification to it.” He also posted a picture in the comments of legal code concerning disorderly conduct, apparently attempting to justify his attempt to suppress free speech by suggesting the truck driver was instigating a breach of the peace. The statute, Sec. 42.01, says “a person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly uses abusive, indecent, profane or vulgar language, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace,” or if it “makes an offensive gesture of display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace.” Attempting to cite this statute suggests Trump supporters could be so triggered by free speech about the president they might incite violence, a particularly hilarious notion considering the right has spent months virtue signaling about the first amendment and scolding leftists for being violent snowflakes. And the Internet responded swiftly as thousands of commenters flowed in offering relentless trolling, thoughtful defenses of free speech, and cutting rebukes of partisan hypocrisy. The trolls were numerous: Other commenters were straightforward and to the point, citing previous court decisions and defenses of free speech: Still others tackled partisan hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance: Some commenters defended the sheriff and received immediate responses: A couple pointed out the fact that people actually called the police because they were so offended: The truck driver also received an offer from a lawyer and former prosecutor for free legal assistance: The ACLU of Texas also chimed in: “Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it. “Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.” Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.
#6. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
And F*CK Trump if you voted for him" F*CK Trump if you voted for him" is "FREE SPEECH"?? As well as others?? THAT'S what you consider, "FREE SPEECH"?? What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"?? Is THAT also the type of "Free Speech" you'd "defend to the death for the right for others to say it"?? Man, this is one of yours or anyone else's worst defenses of "Freedom" ever.
Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.
You can't have it both ways or all ways.
You can't have it both ways or all ways. I thought you were smarter than this. In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech." Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment
Bullsh*t. People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes" are enforced BY LAW. Moreover, the Supreme Court is a corrupt puppet show where killing babies is legal as is men "marrying" men. In ALL these cases -- as well as the "Free Speech" end of they insane spectrum, you are dead wrong IN PRACTICE, legally as well as wrong morally and common sense-wise, 110%. It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public.
Their business their rules. It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public. Please don't resort to lying - as I have made it clear, those would be considered "fighting words", not political speech. It's a shame that you don't get that.
We're done.
#35. To: Liberator (#31)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"F*CK TRUMP"
#14. To: Liberator (#6)
What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"??
#22. To: Deckard (#14)
Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.
#25. To: Liberator (#22)
Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.
#28. To: Deckard (#25)
(Edited)
Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment
#30. To: Liberator (#28)
People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes"
#31. To: Deckard (#30)
Replies to Comment # 31. We're done.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]