[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Unlike Nixon, Trump Will Not Go Quietly

Big Brother installing surveillance cameras in places of worship

NFL fan turnout so bad that Fox Sports is soliciting actors to play fans, fill seats at Sunday’s pre-game show

Las Vegas Massacre Coverup: Two Hours Of Surveillance Footage From The Bellagio Hotel Was Erased And Possibly Swapped Out

‘Snowflake Students’ Force University to Apologize for Saying Snow is ‘White’

Mainstream Media Now Urging Parents to Give 3-Year-Old Kids Dangerous Drugs for Depression

Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein Says Doesn’t Support Getting Warrants!

The Whole POINT of the Internet of Things Is So Big Brother Can Spy On You

40 Years on the Road: A Report

Putin: Trump-Russia 'collusion' talk undermining US system

Malzberg | Minister Quanell X reactions after going through a police "Shoot, Don't Shoot" exercise

Florida mom guilty of killing son known as 'Baby Lollipops'

Paul Ryan Sees His Wild Washington Journey Coming to An End

What Happens When Cops Don't Shoot

Medical marijuana has no health risks: WHO

The Deep State’s Christmas Present to America: Surveillance That Never Ends

Former Pentagon staffer: absence of engines, tail, wings show no 757 crashed at the Pentagon on 9/11

There Is Nothing More Despicable Than a Democrat

Contrived ridicule of conspiracy theories really means ‘Stop questioning, stop thinking’

Power, obedience and the illusion of freedom

Your Future via Terror

Deputies Involved In 62,000 Criminal Cases Shown To Be Liars, Frauds, Domestic Abusers, And Sexual Predators

The video 'Black Lives Matter' does not want you to see

How Government Agents Troll Online to Divide and Confuse

Employers would pocket $6.1 billion of workers’ tips under Trump administration’s proposed “tip stealing” rule

Troops, Toys & Threats: Trump Signs $700 Billion Military Funding Bill

Don't Shoot the F*cking Dog!

JUST IN: GOP Takes Charge, Democrats Seethe As “Provable Evidence” Sent To DOJ

Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks reveals he has prostate cancer

As Trump-Russia goes cold, Clinton-Comey turns up smoking gun

Coverup? Alabama Supreme Court Blocks Lower Court Order To Preserve Senate Election Voting Records

4 Officers Walk Off Security When They See Players’ Black Lives Matter Jerseys

Surgeon who exposed Clinton Foundation corruption in Haiti found dead in apartment with stab wound to the chest

Every Time You Wish Someone ‘Happy Hanukkah’ You Acknowledge The Historic Jewish Claim On Jerusalem

Evidence of Voter Fraud in Alabama As Mobile County Results Come In Late

Man convicted of killing fiancee's son, 8, over messy room

Trump 'unfit to clean toilets in Obama's presidential library'

Roy Moore Spokesman Briefly Dies on Live TV After Learning Politicians Don’t Have to Take the Oath on a Bible

Man Charged with Abuse in Death of 3-Year-Old Who Wouldn't Put on Her Pajamas: Officials

Daniel Shaver's shooting by police officer was an avoidable execution

Moral Values and Customs vs. Laws

'Idiot' most common word used by voters to describe Trump

'Suck it, Bannon'

Video Surfaces Showing Killer Cop Beating Up Teens Months Before He Murdered Daniel Shaver

This 11-year-old stepped outside — and found herself on the other side of a cop’s gun, mom says

HIT & RUN BLOG Georgia Lawmaker Introduces Bill To Require Conviction for Asset Forfeiture

Contradicting Prohibitionists, Survey Says Adolescent Pot Use Is Falling in Colorado

Rebellious Jurors Make the World a Better Place

Mitch McConnell Is The Reason Doug Jones Is A Senator

Roy Moore loses to Democrat Doug Jones in humiliating result for Trump


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: A Sheriff Just Threatened Charges Over ‘F*ck Trump’ Sticker — and the Internet Is Destroying Him
Source: The Daily Sheeple
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/a-sh ... ernet-is-destroying-him_112017
Published: Nov 16, 2017
Author: Carey Wedler
Post Date: 2017-11-17 06:40:28 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 391
Comments: 107

On Wednesday morning, Sheriff Troy E. Nehls of Fort Bend County, Texas, posted a picture of the back of a truck asking members of the community to help him find the ‘offender.’

fuck trump

“I have received numerous calls regarding the offensive display on this truck as it is often seen along FM 359. If you know who owns this truck or it is yours, I would like to discuss it with you,” he said.

Nehls apparently already sought to impose punishment, adding, “Our Prosecutor has informed us she would accept Disorderly Conduct charges regarding it, but I feel we could come to an agreement regarding a modification to it.”

He also posted a picture in the comments of legal code concerning disorderly conduct, apparently attempting to justify his attempt to suppress free speech by suggesting the truck driver was instigating a breach of the peace.

The statute, Sec. 42.01, says “a person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly uses abusive, indecent, profane or vulgar language, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace,” or if it “makes an offensive gesture of display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace.

fuck trump

Attempting to cite this statute suggests Trump supporters could be so triggered by free speech about the president they might incite violence, a particularly hilarious notion considering the right has spent months virtue signaling about the first amendment and scolding leftists for being violent snowflakes.

And the Internet responded swiftly as thousands of commenters flowed in offering relentless trolling, thoughtful defenses of free speech, and cutting rebukes of partisan hypocrisy. The trolls were numerous:

fuck trump

fuck trump

fuck trump

fuck trump

fuck trump

Other commenters were straightforward and to the point, citing previous court decisions and defenses of free speech:

fuck trump

Still others tackled partisan hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance:

fuck trump

Some commenters defended the sheriff and received immediate responses:

fuck trump

A couple pointed out the fact that people actually called the police because they were so offended:

fuck trump

The truck driver also received an offer from a lawyer and former prosecutor for free legal assistance:

fuck trump

The ACLU of Texas also chimed in:

Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it.

“Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.”

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple(16 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

I read this on a less yella article... a load of horseshit IF he's found and cited for the language. If he's stopped because his tint is too dark and rear window obstructed... that's all good... but why make a big deal out of those violations???? Because the DA of that county isn't smart enough to see the bigger picture of the 1st amendment restriction in his quest.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-11-17   6:56:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

If I saw that I wouldn't call the police. I'd take a baseball bat to his truck and let him call the police.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-11-17   10:43:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#2)

I'd take a baseball bat to his truck and let him call the police.

So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like?

You have much in common with Antifa.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   11:02:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Deckard (#3)

So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like?

I am the violence he's inciting.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-11-17   11:06:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite (#4)

I am the violence he's inciting.

Protected speech - if you can't help being triggered by a message you disagree with snowflake, then you're the one with the problem.

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

Seems like your view of the First Amendment is that it should only apply to those who share your viewpoint.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   11:50:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

"F*CK TRUMP"

And F*CK Trump if you voted for him"

F*CK Trump if you voted for him" is "FREE SPEECH"?? As well as others??

THAT'S what you consider, "FREE SPEECH"??

What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"??

Is THAT also the type of "Free Speech" you'd "defend to the death for the right for others to say it"??

Man, this is one of yours or anyone else's worst defenses of "Freedom" ever.

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   12:35:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Deckard, Gatlin, Mr. ACLU (#0)

the Internet Is Destroying Him

Like hell.

THAT is the interpretation and Fake News of the Leftist Antifa trolls.

The ACLU of Texas also chimed in:

“Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it.

“Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.”

Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected."

But then again, it IS the Leftist-Commie America-hating ACLU, isn't it? Yu and Gatlin finally find common ground. Oh, the irony.

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   12:40:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: GrandIsland (#1)

Geez, you're actually agreeing with Deckard on this?

What IF, a Vehicle is rolling around town with, "F*CK SGT GRAND ISLAND AND HIS MOTHER and Everyone who honors them"??

Tell me the truth -- THAT person is gonna get a beat down, aren't they, sooner or later, aren't they? (And deservedly so.)

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   12:44:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite (#2)

If I saw that I wouldn't call the police. I'd take a baseball bat to his truck and let him call the police.

With ya.

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   12:45:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: misterwhite, Deckard (#4)

Deckard: "So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like?"

You have much in common with Antifa

Misterwhite: "I am the violence he's inciting.."

Misterwhite is right again. By your rationale and logic, MW's baseball bat across the back windshield is merely also "free speech."

Incitement is a criminal offense and a verbal assault in this case. As well as defending the honor of one's wife, mother, daughter, family, friends.

Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.

The perp not only chose to publicly verbally assault the President, but those who "voted FOR him."

Deckard, to what end does this kind of incendiary Antifa baiting and BS end?

Nasty, vulgar insults designed to bait and incite can only lead to one conclusion. And THIS is just part of the Left's/Antifa's open season on Trump and those who voted for him.

With respect to this case, there are only TWO sides to take. You've chosen poorly.

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   12:55:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Liberator (#7) (Edited)

Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected."

The Supreme Court has ruled that it is protected speech.

No
automatic alt text available.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:00:29 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Liberator (#10) (Edited)

Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.

Sorry that words and ideas that you disagree with trigger you to violence snowflake - how is your response any different than that of Antifa?

Would you be as upset if it had said "F**k Obama"?

I've seen such sentiments here and I don't recall you ever calling for censorship.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:04:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Liberator (#7)

But then again, it IS the Leftist-Commie America-hating ACLU,

The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:04:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Liberator (#6)

What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"??

Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:06:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Liberator (#10)

Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.

With respect to this case, there are only TWO sides to take. You've chosen poorly.

'Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.

Not that misterwhite has the real balls to take a bat to anything. -- He's an agitprop ringer, a phony.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-17   13:27:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Deckard (#11)

"F*CK THE DRAFT" is far different than, "F*CK TRUMP," F*CK YOUR MOTHER," or "F*CK TRUMP VOTERS."

If you can't see the obvious, I can't help you, the ACLU, or Gilligan.

This is just "Common Sense 101."

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:29:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Deckard (#12)

Sorry that words and ideas that you disagree with trigger you to violence snowflake - how is your response any different than that of Antifa?

You're projecting...

That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!", I'm sure you'll "Fight for his right to shout it," right?

Cut the crap.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:32:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Liberator (#16)

"F*CK THE DRAFT" is far different than, "F*CK TRUMP," F*CK YOUR MOTHER," or "F*CK TRUMP VOTERS."

The only one that could even remotely be considered "fighting words" is "F**k your mother"

The others have been ruled as protected speech by the Supreme Court. Same thing with flag burning.

If you can't see the obvious, I can't help you, the ACLU, or Gilligan.

The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this.

How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa?

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:34:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Deckard (#12)

Would you be as upset if it had said "F**k Obama"?

No I would not be as upset. BUT I would recognize it as wrong to do it IN PUBLIC while also recognizing the potential baiting/incitement factor.

I've seen such sentiments here and I don't recall you ever calling for censorship.

Hey brutha -- THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions.

Now tell me -- whatcha gonna do about that car that circles your home with a megaphone, "F*CK Deckard and His Mom!!! They are douches!!"

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:35:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Liberator (#17)

That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!",

Once again you fail to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words".

You come to my house talking that trash and I'll deal with you harshly.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:36:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Deckard (#13)

The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.

CONTEXT.

Public Vulgarities, Obscenities, Incitement, and Pornographic speech and acts are NOT "protected speech."

In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech." NOW WHAT??

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:38:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Deckard (#14)

Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.

You can't have it both ways or all ways.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:38:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Liberator (#19)

THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions.

Who cares what the ACLU thinks?

I don't know how many times I have to tell you this before it sinks in to your thick skull - the Supreme Court has ruled that political statements such as "F**k Trump" are PROTECTED speech.

Now you can bitch and moan and disagree all you want, but the fact remains.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:39:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: tpaine (#15)

'Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.

Ok...

So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:40:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Liberator (#22)

Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.

You can't have it both ways or all ways.

I thought you were smarter than this.

In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech."

Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:41:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Deckard (#18)

The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this.

How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa?

No, the funny thing is that YOU cited the ACLU....while Gatlin worships them.

More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics. They bait, and now you support baiting.

Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.

Whatcha gonna do?

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:43:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Liberator (#26) (Edited)

More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics.

Seems to me you're the one triggered by words and ideas you don't agree with and will resort to violence to shut someone up who is exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech.

Saying "F**k Trump" is not the same thing as saying "Kill Trump".

Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.

Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.

Once again you fail to grasp even the simplest of concepts.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:49:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Deckard (#25) (Edited)

Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

Bullsh*t.

People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes" are enforced BY LAW.

Moreover, the Supreme Court is a corrupt puppet show where killing babies is legal as is men "marrying" men.

In ALL these cases -- as well as the "Free Speech" end of they insane spectrum, you are dead wrong IN PRACTICE, legally as well as wrong morally and common sense-wise, 110%.

It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:50:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Deckard (#27)

Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.

Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.

Thanks for proving my point, Rambo.

*snicker*

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:51:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Liberator (#28)

People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes"

Their business their rules.

It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public.

Please don't resort to lying - as I have made it clear, those would be considered "fighting words", not political speech.

It's a shame that you don't get that.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:53:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Deckard (#30)

We're done.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   13:54:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Liberator (#29)

Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.

Thanks for proving my point, Rambo.

Good grief man, you can't possibly be this dense, can you?

You really are unable to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words"?

Look - I like you Lib, but you really need to understand the difference between the two.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   13:55:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Liberator (#24)

So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

Your career as a rap artist is off to a good start.

hondo68  posted on  2017-11-17   13:55:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: hondo68 (#33)

Thanks.

My next concept for the second verse of my lyrics is, "B*TCH."

Wanna co-write it?

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   14:01:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Liberator (#31)

We're done.

Alternate
text
if image doesn't load

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-11-17   14:02:35 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Liberator (#24) (Edited)

Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.

Ok... So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street?

Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace.

If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine.

Is there some problem with that?

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-17   14:09:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Liberator, Deckard (#10)

MW's baseball bat across the back windshield is merely also "free speech."

Exactly. But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences. Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing.

HE has rights. You don't.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-11-17   14:25:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: tpaine (#36) (Edited)

OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street?

Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace.

Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T??

And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT.

Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"??

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   14:28:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Liberator (#24)

So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-11-17   14:33:20 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: misterwhite, Deckard, tpaine (#37)

But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences.

Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing.

Hear ya.

For over 5,000 years, insulting and dishonoring one's mother or wife would be cause for b*tch-slapping and knuckle-sandwiching at the least, challenge to a dual/fight, OR worse. In the "old neighborhood" -- not long ago, EVERYONE would have understood the common sense unspoken rules and laws of society.

What is being defended in this case of Donald Trump as well as his voters told to "Eff" themselves, is well over the line of decency and crystal clear incitement to violence. It reeks of Antifa/Alinsky tactics. In a nutshell, we are witnessing a hostile and clear case of Social Anarchy. But only because Trump is President. The MSM has been encoraging the overt public hostility.

Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested.

This irrational support of free speech under ALL circumstances is a very new concept. However, it is VERY selective, based on political correctness and those who control the culture's power structure.

There seems to be one set of rules for Democrats, Progressives, and Homos/Queers, and one for Republicans, Conservatives, and Christians.

The inconsistencies and bias from Democrats, the Judiciary, AND even the Supreme Court in their enforcement of Constitutional Law is conspicuously one-sided. It seems Social Justice crusaders get mulligans, whereas Conservatives are disproportionately penalized.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-17   14:47:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 107) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com