[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: This Woman Stands with Judge Roy Moore
Source: Barb Wire
URL Source: https://barbwire.com/2017/11/11/woman-stands-judge-roy-moore/
Published: Nov 12, 2017
Author: Sylvia Thompson
Post Date: 2017-11-12 07:20:51 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 1486
Comments: 18

As has become the pattern with the Left when they are being eviscerated politically, they trot out the vilest of accusations against whomever fits their latest challenge. Judge Roy Moore, who recently won the Alabama state primary against a more establishment Republican candidate, is their new challenge, and like clockwork they have found a “victim” to throw at the judge’s feet.

Judge Moore, like President Trump, is one to be feared. He is a fierce fighter for conservative and Christian causes, and that alone renders him a severe threat to the Republican establishment and the ungodly Left. I sincerely hope he is ready to take on this latest attempt to keep him out of the Senate.

It is now routine for leftist media to dredge up women to use as weapons against politically conservative men. They used the tactic against presidential candidate Herman Cain, and he, by his own admission, was simply unable to finance the necessary legal battle to clear his name. Consequently, he could not continue the race. They did it even more recently to Fox News’ Sean Hannity who, owing to supportive viewers, was able to ward them off.

What galls me is that too many conservative men are quick to cower to political correctness by immediately sympathizing with the female involved, despite sometimes decades of silence. It is interesting that these revelations so often coincide with a man’s seeking a political position.

Even more grating are the faux-conservative Republican politicians, such as John McCain, who without any substantive evidence are already demanding that the Judge step down. Judge Moore should ignore them all.

I frankly am not too concerned about guilt or innocence at this point. What concerns me more is whether or not a person accused of anything is given the chance to have his “day in court,” before he is condemned in the morally corrupt court of leftist public opinion.

Rabid feminists and their sycophants, have so shaped the cultural dialogue that we are now living with a sad state of affairs. Today, if a woman says sexual impropriety (or outright intercourse) happened, the leftist assumption is, it happened. And that conclusion is maliciously dangerous. Accusations may well be valid, but it is just as likely they are not.

I have never considered myself a feminist, because the term “feminism” is in my view, a leftist construct. I am a self-driven, independent woman, and feminism reeks of victimization.

The premise of feminism is that women are victims, particularly of men, and we must be shielded and protected.

Not only do leftist feminists mistrust men, they also mistrust those of us females who have absolutely no problem with men, as men. Yes, we take issue with their behavior, at times, but never with the fact that they are men: who sit with their legs agape (for anatomical reasons), who outstrip us in general physical strength (also an anatomical reality), who are more inclined to do dangerous things, sometimes ridiculously dangerous (they’ve got more testosterone), and who are innately, strongly attracted to females. When these kinds of things become a problem for women, those women are themselves a problem.

This is my non-politically-correct take on some of the madness feminism has wrought.

On rape. The same political correctness that drives much of the discussion regarding men and women in our culture has conjured up a strange definition of rape. Back when I was growing up, it referred to a man (often unknown) forcing himself on an unwilling woman to have sex. Feminists have construed it to be any sex between a man and a woman that the woman might regret having had, after the fact. Newsflash: After the fact is too darn late. It isn’t rape; it’s dissatisfaction with the outcome of what was otherwise, consensual sex.

On marital rape. Given that Almighty God established sex in marriage and set the obligation for a man and a woman to fulfill each other’s needs, “marital rape” is an oxymoron. Marriage is for sex (among other things). Any behavior in a marriage that even approaches the true definition of rape is “assault and battery.” That is how such behavior of a man toward his wife would have been characterized before the feminist Left twisted the conception of what marriage is.

On mutual responsibility. As with so much else in our rotted culture, the Left has succeeded in neutering the term “responsibility.” Women effectively (and often to their detriment) have been fed the lie that their behavior should not have anything to do with how men react to them. Sexually provocative behavior (including apparel) has been throughout the ages designed to entice men. It is the grease that skids the wheels of procreation. That fact will not be changed by any fiction concocted by feminists.

Some men will be mature enough, especially Christian men, not to be overcome by deliberate enticement, but others will be happy to take advantage of it. Thus, we are contending with rampant sexual promiscuousness and all the attendant harm it brings: more aborted children, more fatherless children, more disillusioned women, and on and on. This is the poisonous “legacy” of the modern-day feminist Left.

Our complete rejection of the biblical statement of where men and women stand in Almighty God’s scheme of things has rendered ours one sick, perverted society when it comes to matters of sex.

So, I do blame the victim in instances where they bring on the behavior that harms them. More to the point, they are an affront to me. I have no need to destroy men to validate my own worth or to cover over my responsibilities toward them. My strength is independent of my being female. It comes from my understanding and acceptance of God’s plan for how men and women should relate to each other.

For a thinking, independent woman like me, feminism is unnecessary. It’s time we make that fact known.


Poster Comment:

Alabamans should vote for Judge Moore thereby sending a Conservative to the senate. The evil Democrat-Communists are putting forth yet another lie with true liars as accusers.

This author is a critical thinker with a firm grasp on Gods plan and His natural order for the male / female relationship.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#1. To: IbJensen (#0)

As has become the pattern with the Left

Be careful here. I know you hate the Left, and they are easy to hate. But are you SURE that the LEFT is who is behind these attacks?

Remember again how W's right took out John McCain in the 2000 South Carolina primaries with a phone campaign "informing" the voters that John McCain had an illegitimate black daughter?

Remember that H.W. Bush voted for Hillary Clinton, and that W. Bush did not vote.

And look at the orchestrated chorus of powerful Establishment Republicans: McConnell, McCain and several others all saying the same thing in unison from the same talking point page - that these allegations are so serious that they disqualify Moore from the office they very desperately do not want him to hold.

Truth is, the Democrats have very little chance of winning a Senate seat in Alabama. Truth is, this is a safe Republican seat, and the REPUBLICANS - the powerful ones, the Bush/McConnell/McCain Establishment - THEY are the ones who have the most to lose in this election. If Moore wins, it doesn't change the balance of the Senate between the parties, but it most certainly DOES change the balance of power within the Republican Senate coalition. Moore is a massive, loud, vocal, stubborn, "Tea Party Right" voice - the sort of people who voted for Trump. The sort of people that the BUSHES - who ARE the Republican Establishment - hate so much that the patriarch of the family - former Republican President George H.W. Bush, has publicly signaled that he voted for Hillary Clinton. And W Bush was less loyal a Republican than I am (and I'm not a Republican and pretty much hate their guts). I voted for Trump and the Republican. Bush, the Establishment Republican par excellence, was so butt hurt about not getting his way that he didn't vote at all!

This does not smell or feel to me like a Left wing Democrat operation. These women, these accusations, and the univocal reaction of about 8 Republican Senators all speaking from the same talking points.

It is really quite clear that this smearing of Roy Moore is a REPUBLICAN operation, being conducted by the REPUBLICAN Party, because the REPUBLICAN Establishment does not want to lose control.

It's natural to blame the Democrats and the Left for everything evil, but this time it very probably is not them - this is an onside hit, an attempt by the Republicans to frag one of their own.

The Democrats have not been the ones howling to the moon about this, taking it to the press cycle after cycle. It has been the leaders of the Republican Party, in a constant drumbeat. This is a Republican smear campaign, not a Democrat one.

Once you realize that, you should refocus your ire where it belongs.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-12   8:51:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

It is really quite clear that this smearing of Roy Moore is a REPUBLICAN operation,

I disagree. If it was a Republican operation, the time to do it was the primary. Then you eliminate Moore, put in your guy Strange, and get the added benefit of appearing to go along with Trump's choice.

What do Republicans get for bringing this up during the general election? Even if Moore dropped out his name would remain on the ballot. It's too late to substitute another Republican. And, as a result, the Democrat might win.

If you're suggesting the Republicans would rather elect a Democrat to the Senate than a conservative Republican, say it.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-11-12   11:31:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#4)

If you're suggesting the Republicans would rather elect a Democrat to the Senate than a conservative Republican, say it.

The Republicans would rather elect a Democrat to the Senate than a conservative Republican they don't control.

McConnell has decided that he believes the women accusing Moore.

Really Mitch? Just like that - you believe them?

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-13   14:07:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13 (#7)

The Republicans would rather elect a Democrat to the Senate than a conservative Republican they don't control.

To what end?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-11-13   14:51:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite (#8)

To what end?

To prevent the loss of control of the party itself to Tea Party conservatives. McCain, McConnell, Lady Lindsey, the Bushes - they will temporarily give up Republican seats if it keeps control of the party firmly in their grip.

Remember, George H W Bush voted for Hillary Clinton in the last election, and W didn't vote for President. The very heads of the GOP would not vote for the popular Republican candidate. Why? Trump's political proposals were red meat conservatism. What was their issue, then? The loss of THEIR control over the party.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-13   19:56:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Vicomte13 (#9)

To prevent the loss of control of the party itself to Tea Party conservatives.

By that logic, conservative Republicans should vote for Democrats to prevent the loss of control of the party itself to RINOs. Yes?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-11-14   15:40:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

#12. To: misterwhite (#11)

By that logic, conservative Republicans should vote for Democrats to prevent the loss of control of the party itself to RINOs. Yes?

It's what H.W. Bush did in the last election. He voted for Hillary Clinton, to prevent the party from falling to Trump. And W didn't vote for President.

I'd just be happy if the Republicans would do what they promise to do in the campaign: build the wall, repeal Obamacare, enforce immigration, renegotiate trade deals with China and Mexico - that stuff.

Instead, Trump proposes it all - and to his credit does what he can with Executive Orders - while the Republican snakes pass nothing and do everything they can to stop him.

I have no beef with Trump: he is doing what he promised to do. I like most of it, don't like some of it, but Trump was square with us.

It's where I give credit to the Democrats. I like almost nothing that they do, but when they get elected they do exactly what they campaigned on. They fight for it, and when they use dirty tricks, it's to advance the ball.

IF the Republicans acted that way, I'd be supportive of them, even though I don't agree with several things they stand for.

But Republicans are utter liars. They routinely campaign on things and never actually do it.

Trump's different.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-14 16:55:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: misterwhite (#11)

By that logic, conservative Republicans should vote for Democrats to prevent the loss of control of the party itself to RINOs. Yes?

It's Mitch McConnell's and John McCain's and the Republican Party's logic here, and in Indiana and elsewhere.

Moore won the primary, as did Murdoch in Indiana. This was against the will of the Party leadership.

And so, as in Indiana, Mitch McConnell is suggesting a write-in campaign. In Indiana, that took a Republican seat and gave it to the Democrats. In Alabama, it may do the same.

I have heard over and over and over again, from Republicans such as yourself, that come the general election we MUST support the Republican or else "We are voting for the Democrats".

Well, President H.W. Bush DID vote for the Democrats, outright, in the last election. He voted for Hillary. (I got - and still get - vilified for saying that I might if Trump wasn't the nominee, but I did vote for the Republicans in the end. The LEADERS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY actually VOTED for the Democrats, and ran a write in campaign that took a Republican Senate seat and gave it to the Democrats - and they are talking about doing it again!)

I guess the Republicans think that they are an army, with captive voters, and that the LEADERS can do what the voters are never permitted to do - be treacherous if they don't get their way.

Well, FUCK THAT!

The Republicans have not proven themselves to be particularly good for the country, or competent, or effective at stopping the Democrats. They have proven effective only at advancing their narrow interests. It doesn't make sense to just blindly vote for them.

Republican politicians are in it for PERSONAL FINANCIAL GAIN, and PERSONAL POWER. They truly do not give a shit about rank and file Republican voters, and routinely betray them and mock them.

But THEY - and the duped rubes loyal to the Republicans - demand absolute loyalty, and resort to the most absurd and pathetic namecalling when people think for themselves.

That game is just about run.

If the Republicans don't change, we're going to have Democrat socialism, because the Democrats, for their part, really believe their rhetoric, and really do what they say they will do.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-15 09:00:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com