[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Allahu Akbar-itis: America's Deadly and Debilitating Disease
Source: The Hill
URL Source: https://townhall.com/columnists/mic ... -debilitating-disease-n2403155
Published: Nov 6, 2017
Author: Michelle Malkin
Post Date: 2017-11-06 14:34:32 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 413
Comments: 21

"Shout 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers."

Who knew hijacker Mohammed Atta's parting words, discovered in his journal after the 9/11 attacks, would become a national punchline? The louder and more frequently jihadists around the globe shriek their signature battle cry, the more fervently multicultural apologists deny its meaning. They've transformed the Islamic supremacists' obvious and explicit call for violence into a bland utterance of peace as indiscernible and nonsensical as "Aloha Snackbar."

With blood still fresh on the pavement in Manhattan after Tuesday's outbreak of Allahu Akbar-itis that took at least eight innocent lives, Palestinian-American propagandist and Hamas cheerleader Linda Sarsour tweeted:

"Every believing Muslim says Allahu Akbar every day during prayers. We cannot criminalize 'God is great.'"

Rice University sociologist Dr. Craig Considine mourned: "It begins. CNN reports murderer said "Allahu Akbar." Queue the Islamophobia."

And confused former director of national intelligence James Clapper mused: 'It's hard to comprehend...what moves a human being to do that to another human being."

Instead of striking fear, "Allahu Akbar!" has unleashed collective foolishness.

"Allahu Akbar!" screamed Amor Ftouhi just five months ago at Bishop Airport in Flint, Michigan, before stabbing a police officer in the neck. CARTOONS | Tom Stiglich View Cartoon

"Allahu Akbar!" Ftouhi chanted repeatedly in multiple court hearings throughout the summer.

"Motive still unknown," the experts declared.

"Allahu Akbar!" fulminated militant Muslim black separatist Kori Ali Muhammad in April after shooting and killing three white people in downtown Fresno, California.

"It's too early to say" whether the motive was "terrorism," law enforcement officials opined. The Associated Press whitewashed Muhammad's declaration, helpfully obscuring his exact exclamation to the Islam-free translation, "God is Great."

"Allahu Akbar!" spewed Dahir Adan at St. Cloud's Crossroads Center mall in Minnesota, before plunging kitchen knives into 10 shoppers. Last month, on the anniversary of the bloodbath, the head-scratchers at the Minneapolis Star-Tribune announced:

"One year later, motive of St. Cloud mall attacker remains unclear."

From the Muslim monsters who decapitated American hostage Nick Berg, to the Fort Dix, New Jersey, attack plotters, to convicted al-Qaida scientist Aafia Siddiqui, to Fort Hood assassin Nidal Malik Hasan, to Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad, to the machete-wielding murderers who beheaded a London soldier on a busy street, to the truck and stabbing jihadists in Dijon and Nantes, to the Charlie Hebdo-targeting jihadists in Paris, to the ISIS gunmen at Bataclan, to double-stabber Wasil Rafat Farooqui in Roanoke, Virginia, the message of "Allahu Akbar" is unmistakable:

Kill all infidels.

But to those who pretend that "Islamophobia" and the imagined "backlash" against Muslims are greater threats than the hijackers and head-choppers, "Allahu Akbar" is Arabic for "The death and destruction committed in the name of Islam have nothing to do with Islam."

As Islam scholar and author Dr. Robert Spencer told me: "Every time there's a jihad terror attack and every time there's an uncovered plot for jihad terror attack, the news media is filled with stories about anti-Muslim backlash. (The) local mosque asks for police protection. The imam says we're afraid of right-wing yahoos who are going to come and victimize innocent people."

And every suspicious sneeze and sideways glance at oversensitive Muslims is definitively interpreted by the grievance-mongers of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and their ilk as a "hate crime."

When homicidal warriors for Allah are maiming and murdering non-Muslims according to the plain directives of the Quran --and spelling out their celebration of Islam-inspired violence word (ALLAHU) for word (AKBAR) -- it is crazy and delusional to say their actions cannot be understood.

Stop the whitewash. Stop the insanity. Jihad denial is suicidal.

"IslamoFAUXbia: The Hoax Crime Epidemic," a new episode of Michelle Malkin Investigates, debuts this week on CRTV.com. Her email address is writemalkin@gmail.com. To find out more about Michelle Malkin and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.


Poster Comment:

Geraldo on FoxNews started that same crap "well, you can't tarnish ALL muslims..."

Well I'm sick of this and YES I AM GOING TO TARNISH ALL MUSLIMS from now on. Sure, only 3% commit the terrorism but the other 97% are culpable because they 1) never report these terrorists before they commit their terrorist acts, and 2) remain silent after the terrorist attack.

Until the 97% start reporting the terrorist in their midst, and the imams preaching terror to the authorities, I will tarnish all of them. Tarnish all Muslims no matter what they do. Islam is, at its heart, a murder/slavery cult (simply read its sacred writings to confirm this) and anyone who self-identifies as a follower of that religion deserves condemnation. The only good Muslim is an ex-Muslim. The radical terrorist Muslim slices off your head neatly at the neck while the 'moderate' muslim holds down your legs so you don't twist around and spoil a perfect cut!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: IbJensen (#0)

Islam has been a murderous, evil religious ideology since it poured out of the desert with the Arabs and destroyed the Eastern half of Christendom starting in the mid-600s.

The Catholics have been fighting this demon for 1350 years, and will probably have to continue fighting it until the end of the world.

The evil at the heart of Islam is obvious from the moment one perceives what it is, exactly, their belief system is.

It is not "Islamophobia" to observe the truth about something. First of all, there is no phobia. There is no reason to FEAR Islam. Whenever Catholicism has opposed it on the battlefield in an organized and systematic method, whether at Tours with Charles Martel, in Spain during the Reconquista, at Vienna, when the Poles and Hungarians rode to the rescue, at Lepanto where the Turks were smashed, or anywhere else where Catholics have stood up in arms and gone after the enemy, the enemy loses. They are violent barbarians - too weak, stupid, backwards and cowardly to actually win in the field: we should recall that the First Crusade was a SUCCESS.

But what happens after defeating the Muslims on the field is that the Christians turn back to our ENDLESS bickering among ourselves, and the Muslims regroup. That form of barbarism never civilizes, and unless an expedient such as the Spanish Inquisition is used, Islam will use its propensity to lie to hide itself.

Yes, that's right, the Spanish Inquisition was the EFFECTIVE, and SUCCESSFUL way that crypto-Muslims, playing their game of "taqiyya" were defeated. They thought that the Christians were stupid enough to just accept that their proclaiming they were Christian now would cause the Christians to simply believe it.

But the Muslims say that their God authorizes them to lie to all unbelievers. Catholics are not stupid. They know their enemy. And the Spanish Inquisition was the answer to it. Muslims who were still Muslims PRETENDING TO BE Christians so they could plan a return of Muslim rule were rooted out and destroyed.

Only today, with Christianity having largely disappeared from a secularizing Europe obsessed with birth control and pansexualism, have the Muslims come surging back in through the gates. Right now, the Muslims are winning it because nobody is effectively fighting them on an ideological basis.

It would be great if we could have peace with Islam. It would have been great for the Chinese if they could have had peace with the Mongols too. But that was impossible. Eat or be eaten.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-06   15:13:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: IbJensen (#0)

how to identify yourself as an idiot, shout "allah akbar"

paraclete  posted on  2017-11-06   19:13:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

The presence of violent Muslims is no more an indictment of their religion than the existence of violent Catholics. There are violent people in every demographic.

If we wish to fight terrorism, we must resist the temptation to become terrorists ourselves. One way to resist is to avoid violence. Another way is to carry a true understanding of the wonder of creation. When we understand creation, and the role of God at the center of all, we find it is impossible to do harm to anyone. We know that our mission is to care for and love one another. And we do not judge people by the lot.

The media must not be allowed to speak for Pope Francis. The media would have you believe many things that are untrue about Pope Francis and the words he speaks. The Holy Father has issued no condemnation of Islam. Nor has he said the two faiths are on the same level. The ability to coexist does not mean that Islam is equal to Catholicism. As Catholics, we believe the only full and true revelation of the God is present in the infallible teaching of the Church. But despite this difference, we must not judge or terrorize our Muslim neighbors, or scapegoat them for what a misguided minority do. Instead, if we appreciate the primacy of the Catholic Church, then we will strive to coexist and appreciate one another, and we will do no harm no matter the depth of the divisions between us.

www.catholic.org/news/hf/faith/story.php?id=70197

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-06   19:49:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

Muslims have attended Catholic services and are even participating in the Extraordinary Jubilee. How can Islam be to blame?

www.catholic.org/news/hf/faith/story.php?id=70197

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-06   19:50:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13, redleghunter, (#1)

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-06   19:53:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

The Catholics have been fighting this demon for 1350 years, and will probably have to continue fighting it until the end of the world.

The evil at the heart of Islam is obvious from the moment one perceives what it is, exactly, their belief system is.

Your god disagrees.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-06   19:58:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#3)

Since we cannot go and kill them all, we do have to strive to live in peace with them, that's right.

But they're not going to live in peace with us, so we have to fight wherever and whenever we have to fight them, because they WILL attack us, because they are barbarians.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-06   20:15:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: A K A Stone (#5)

Francis has an optimistic view of things Islamic, and he wants peace.

I want peace too, but I am much more pessimistic about the prospects of that with Islam, given what Islam is and its very long history of being just exactly that.

So, while it may not be exactly right to say that Islam is a terrorist faith, it is certainly an aggressively proselytizing faith, and always has been (and likely always will be), and there are millions of Muslims at war with us all over the world.

So, while Pope Francis precious use of words is technically correct, it is of little practical difference: large numbers of aggressive Muslims are trying to kill us, and we have to resist them or be killed by them. That's the bottom line. He may not accept that. He probably has a different opinion.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-06   20:19:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#6)

Both of those men in that picture are praying to my God. You do too. None of us agrees on what that God wants, apparently.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-06   20:20:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Vicomte13 (#8)

Francis has an optimistic view of things Islamic, and he wants peace.

quit spinning your holy father disagrees with you. You said he is infallible. You said he can over rule Christ.

You are a dumb ass who spins obvious truth. You're not being honest with yourself.

Fuck this pope liar who isn't the least bit holy.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-07   6:44:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Vicomte13 (#9)

Muslims don't pray to the god of the Bible. Im not sure if you do either since you don't believe the Bible.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-07   6:45:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Vicomte13 (#8)

So, while Pope Francis precious use of words is technically correct, it is of little practical difference: large numbers of aggressive Muslims are trying to kill us, and we have to resist them or be killed by them. That's the bottom line. He may not accept that. He probably has a different opinion.

More bullshit spin.

You got it right earlier unlike the fake christian pope.

Now you are back pedaling for some illogical reason.

All muslims are evil. 100 percent of them. A muslim. is anyone who really believes the koran. It says to murder Christians and Jews.

The pope is a useless piece of shit. He is probably the false prophet who will give credibility to the antichrist beast.

You are deceived and that is sad. Because I can tell that you want to believe and be right and do the right thing. You are blind vic. Rethink your faith in catholic doctrine that contradicts scripture.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-07   6:57:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

Excellent points ALL!

Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.

IbJensen  posted on  2017-11-07   7:24:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#10) (Edited)

You said he is infallible. You said he can over rule Christ.

Perhaps you believe you are telling the truth, but your capacity for distinguishing one thing from another is weak. Therefore you stumble into errors such as the above.

The pope is indeed said by the Church to be infallible - because he is directly inspired by God - when he speaks ex cathedra on a matter of faith and morals.

It is not for you (or me) to determine what is ex cathedra, and what is a matter of faith and morals. That is a matter for the Church to determine.

I have not said that he can rule over Christ, what I have said is that when he speaks infallibly, he speaks AS Christ, and AS the Father, and AS the Holy Spirit - when the Holy Spirit speaks through his mouth under the circumstances that he speaks infallibly. Pope Francis has never spoken infallibly. Very few statements by Popes are. The last infallible statement by a Pope was made in 1950. Before that, in 1854. Before that 1794, then 1653, and then all the way back to 1336.

There simply have not been that many instances of papal infallibility being brought into play.

So when you state things such as "You said he is infallible", you state a truth, but then you follow up with various insults and non-sequiturs. The Pope IS infallible, under certain specific conditions - conditions which are not engaged in our current discussion of Islam.

According to you, I am a dumb ass who spins obvious truth, who is not honest with myself. I reject these characterizations, because they are vitriolic assertions without any basis in fact or truth.

Truth is, you simply don't understand what I am talking about, and you don't make an effort to understand. You are ignorant and proud of it. Your ignorance is not invincible, because it is within your ability to control. You simply choose to not exercise any sort of discipline over your mind or your mouth.

It's why you say such foolish and vicious things.

Two forms of Christianity are on display, yours and mine. You have not made yours look very good.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-07   10:40:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Vicomte13 (#14) (Edited)

The Pope IS infallible, under certain specific conditions - conditions which are not engaged in our current discussion of Islam.

Oh really. How interesting. So exactly when is he infallible?

This is why people think Catholics are cult members.

When did you learn that the pope is infallible and what is it based on? Like where in scripture can I learn about this? Which of the disciples or where did Jesus talk about this pope that would come? Doesn't god in scripture make his point over and over again? So there should be plenty of scripture to back up this Catholic fairy tale. Unless the Catholics just made it up to grant themselves some mystical false power here on earth.

I don't think you have adequate answers to this valid question.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-07   18:43:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: A K A Stone (#15)

I don't think you have adequate answers to this valid question.

I don't think your mind is open to any answer at all, and all experience has taught me that attempting to go down that road with you will be a waste of time, and an invitation for you to heap on more abuse.

Pass.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-07   21:53:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Vicomte13 (#16)

My mind is not open to deception. Meaning adding to scripture or taking away. Besides I'm not the only one who sees your posts.

Go ahead and answer the question if you can.

Just because you know your religion added things and claimed they were from God.

So again go ahead and answer.

Thanks in advance.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-07   22:03:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Vicomte13 (#16)

The forum is for debating and ideas. If you can't defend your ideas what is your purpose here.

Words of disagreement are hardly abuse. Especially directed at a guy who said it would be a good idea to murder everyone who has my point of view.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-07   22:08:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: A K A Stone (#18)

The forum is for debating and ideas. If you can't defend your ideas what is your purpose here

This is the exact question I've asked others here at various times, about different issues. When they can't answer, they either hide behind the bozo function, or try stonewalling.

But hey, -- that's what cowards do... And trolls...

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-07   23:09:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: A K A Stone (#15)

So exactly when is he infallible?

The Pope is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra (not simply when he speaks, but when he speaks to the whole church, specifically as the head of the church) on a matter of faith and morals (not economics, law, politics, etc.).

The last time a pope spoke infallibly was 1950.

The reason the Pope in infallible under those circumstances, only, is that he is speaking for the Church, in which the Holy Spirit dwells, to protect it from error.

What you think the Bible is - the fount of truth established by God - Catholics know that the Church is - the fount of truth established by God.

As far as "cult" goes, the problem with calling Catholicism a "cult" is that the Catholic Church is both the largest human institution in the world - there are more Catholics than red Chinese - the oldest continuous human institution - in unbroken and unchanged succession and structure back to St. Peter and Jesus - and there are more than twice as many Catholics in the world than all of the other types of Christian COMBINED.

So, Catholicism IS the dominant, predominant form of Christianity, and always has been since Jesus founded it. It is this big and successful because God dwells in it, and it is the original universalist, globalist institution: God calling all.

Your little Protestant splinter group is a sliver of Christianity. Catholicism is the main body. To call the main body a cult is silly. By definition the majority, the main body, is "the way it is", and cults are those things that split off from the main body, the way it is.

Catholicism IS Mark 1 Mod 0 Christianity, as practiced all over the world. You're in a tiny cult, with all of the bad manners, idolatry and evil that cult members routinely display.

And the funny thing is, educated Catholics - such as me - actually seem to know what's IN your idol (the Bible) better than you do. Your theology is based on taking about five lines of Scripture that you particularly like, cobbling them together, and then repeating over and over, louder and louder, "La la la, I can't HEAR you" as though your little self-chosen handful of phrases really is "what God intended".

The REASON your little cult remains a little cult, leaving you howling angrily at God and man, is because there's no logic in it, and it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

WHY is the Bible the ultimate authority? IT never says it is anywhere in it. YOU say it...because you say it. IT doesn't say it anywhere, but YOU say that it says it, and then you jam your fingers in your ears and blind your eyes to anybody and anything that says different.

So there's actually no talking to you. It's like talking to a Muslim. You and the Taliban share the same thing: there is no rational basis for your authority - your book doesn't tell you that it has the authority you say it has and you say that it says it has. But you simply don't care. You've made up your mind, don't bother you with the facts.

So you sit in your little group of like-minded thinkers, a little splinter lunatic fringe on the edge of Christianity and the edge of society, and you throw shit at everybody else like a bad tempered chimpanzee in the zoo.

Then you say that nobody can give adequate answers to you. Even after you've been answered 100 times, you say the same thing over and over again.

You're ignorant by willful choice, just exactly like the Muslims. You're sure you're right because you declare yourself right, and you say your book says so - even though those of us who have READ it see that it doesn't.

And you fling poop at everybody who walks by your cage, then get butthurt when nobody tries to communicate with you in earnest.

I've told you the reason why the Pope is infallible. And I've told you not only why you will reject that, but also that you won't even see or understand that I have answered your question and told you why.

Now you will bleat and bray in anger and distress yet again. This isn't our first rodeo. It won't be our last. I answer, but you not only don't listen, you don't even realize that I HAVE answered you. You never do.

THAT is why the communications are so pointless. It's like talking to a mule.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-08   9:56:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: A K A Stone (#17)

My mind is not open to deception. Meaning adding to scripture or taking away.

So, you have declared yourself God then.

God never declared the Scriptures the ultimate source of truth - not ever. You claim he did. Cite the Scripture where he does.

You will cite a man, Paul, saying that Scripture is good for instruction. That's true, but it does not declare Scripture as God.

You can cite Jesus saying "Go consult the Scriptures, for in them YOU THINK you have eternal life..." That's Jesus telling you what you think, not that you're right. He says that the Scriptures speak of him.

And he says, in Scripture, to listen to HIM, to follow HIM. And then HE goes out, chooses men, and makes a Church - and he doesn't leave a single written word, but sends the Holy Spirit into the Church.

The Scriptures tell you to listen to Jesus, and he points you at the Church, not the book.

But YOU say the Book is above all, placing yourself above the Father, who did not say "this is my book, follow it", but "This is my son, follow HIM".

And you put yourself above Jesus, who said "Follow ME" (not "follow this book!").

And you put yourself above the Holy Spirit, whom Jesus said he would send into his church - so that the gates of hell would not prevail against it.

The Church never said that the book was the highest thing.

The Father never said it. The Son never said it. The Spirit never said it. The Church never said it.

But YOU say it, and you say that your mind is not open to shed your self- worship, your self deception.

You have declared a book to be above God himself. You are an idolator, and the Bible is your lifeless idol. That is what idolatry looks like, sounds like and feels like. Now you understand why Muslims and Canaanites so fiercely defended their idols, just as you do. The Devil fills you with pride and makes you fierce in fighting off God in service of your idol.

To the rest of us mere Christians, this makes you an extraordinarily unpleasant person to deal with. You're certain of everything, immune to reason, loud, abusive, and impervious to logic. Your idol answers all, and only you and your fellow idolators understand the truth.

It's a hermetically sealed little cult you're in, and it's small, and it never gets anywhere.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-11-08   10:17:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com