Title: Very Jake News: Tapper Melts Down over Criticism of Inaccurate ‘Allahu Akbar’ Comments Source:
Breitbart URL Source:http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa ... icism-inaccurate-allahu-akbar/ Published:Nov 2, 2017 Author:John Nolte Post Date:2017-11-02 14:54:21 by cranky Keywords:None Views:2651 Comments:26
CNNs Jake Tapper, who is already dealing with humiliating ratings and a reputation implosion, decided to put on a public spectacle Wednesday over the criticism of his blatantly inappropriate and misleading comments surrounding the Islamic cry of Allahu Akbar.
In the immediate aftermath of Tuesdays terror attack, the worst in New York City since September 11, 2001, for some bizarre reason, Tapper felt the self-righteous need to say this: The Arabic chant, Allahu Akbar, God is great, sometimes said under the most beautiful of circumstances, and too often we hear it being said in moments like this.
Let us begin with the misleading part.
Allahu Akbar does not mean God is great. It means, Allah is greater.
The left-wing CNN also misinterpreted this in a chyron.
And the difference is all the difference.
As Breitbart News has reported, Allahu Akbar is the aggressive declaration that Allah and Islam are dominant over every other form of government, religion, law or ethic, which is why Islamic jihadists in the midst of killing infidels so often shout it.
In other words, Allahu Akbar is not some benign chant declaring God is great. Rather, it is a belligerent cry of religious and cultural supremacism.
But on top of misleading his viewers, there is the jaw-dropping inappropriateness of Tappers imperious reminder that Allahu Akbar is sometimes said under the most beautiful of circumstances. As Cheryl K. Chumley of the Washington Times accurately points out, so was Heil Hitler said at weddings, funerals, family reunions, and childrens birthday parties. But who thinks offering that kind of context is anything but unseemly?
So not only were Tappers comments tasteless and inaccurate, to deflect from the deserved criticism, he decided to portray himself as the victim of the eeeeevil right-wing media.
Using one of his transparent semantic arguments, Tapper publicly freaked out and launched a hysterical Twitter crusade declaring his critics a liar, including those who quoted him directly, like Sean Hannity, who did nothing more than broadcast video of the segment in question:
Another lie, this time from the Washington Times' @ckchumley, claiming i said something i never said. Just a blatant lie. https://t.co/9hHDkLaWnv
There was a time when one could tell the difference between Fox and the nutjobs at Infowars. Its getting tougher and tougher. Lies are lies https://t.co/stYjntoJUq
And, no surprise, @SebGorka lies as well, claiming i said Allahu Akbar was a "beautiful phrase." Never said it, Sebastian. Blatant lie. https://t.co/Q183XgwXOC
Things only got more entertaining from there as the meltdown spread like an STD through those mindless minions forever begging for crumbs from #JakeSoWoke, and they formed a Borg Army of the Dishonest:
The King of Fake News did not achieve that moniker by accident. As has been detailed here, Tappers outrageously dishonest semantic arguments (e.g. I did not say Allahu Akbar is beautiful; I said it is said during the most beautiful of circumstances) are the failing, left-wing anchors stock-in-trade when it comes to spreading fake news.
Among other things, Tapper has hid behind the slippery shield of semantics to continue to spread the debunked lie that President Trump mocked a reporters disability, to pretend Trump did not disavow David Duke, and to mislead his viewers into believing Trump failed to express condolences after a terrible attack on a mosque in Canada.
But this is not the first time Tapper has publicly lost his poise.
This video from election night 2016, pretty much says it all:
When Turner owned cnn, there was a profit motive, imo.
You clearly don't understand 'murikan communism. It's communism for thee and me,but the leadership class deserve to live like princes because of their brilliance and dedication to de po.
Not to mention their desire for servant class that can't get uppity and quit when you beat one of them.
George Soros is one of the most famous communists in America,and he got his start as a young teen in Nazi-occupied Europe by informing on the whereabouts of his fellow Jews to the Nazi's for the reward money.
Then,mysteriously,after the war ended he somehow acquired access to millions of dollars that he used to buy,repair,maintain,and hire crews to man,surplus WW-2 cargo ships. That's how he got to be a billionaire.
Hillary Clinton is another example. She also loves the "little people" because she needs servants to feel superior to,and to boss around.
Are you kidding? The communist leadership OWNED the countries they ran. They had free access to the public treasury,and they defacto owned the whole damn country. If they wanted to live on the edge of a certain lake,they just had the military and the police evict the people already living there,then used state money to build huge dachas with swimming pools and airstrips.
Meanwhile,the typical resident of Moscow that was a trusted communist or they wouldn't have been allowed to live in Moscow,was sharing a 1 bath,1 kitchen apartment with one or two other families,and the none of the common party member apartments even had air-conditioning or a working elevator. They did have heat,but the building commissar lived on the ground floor,and he had control over the only thermostat. As a result,you could see top floor apartments with the windows open,even in cold weather. Seems like nobody ever told the Soviet architects that heat rises.
Communists are the ultimate fascist capitalists,but it's only capitalism for them. Everyone else lives to serve them.
I remember the first time I went to Russia. It was the year after the Soviet Union dissolved,Yeltsin was President,and the dust had settled. Flying in to the major airport there,the airliner had to circle around and wait to land,,and you could see a long 4 lane paved road that led from Moscow out to the countryside where the Soviet elites had their daschas,and some of them were so big I could even see the swimming pools from thousands of feet in the air.
Once I landed,I discovered the Soviet elites even had special lanes reserved for them on the major Moscow routes out of the city,and had traffic police with wooden red and white batons standing on every corner in case a Soviet limo and escort came into view. Their job was to stop cross traffic so the elites could just breeze right out of the city without having to stop.
Ever heard of a Moscow department store named GUM? It either borders on or is on the same block that borders on Red Square. ONLY Party members were allowed to shop there,and it was the only store in Moscow where you could buy western appliances. The people/drones had to make do with Soviet appliances,which might or might not work.
EVERYTHING was about status and privilege. EVERYTHING.
Red Ted would have been right at home there.
BTW,if you want to find out about his political POV,check out CNN's "Operation Tailwind" news show. It was to be their headline show that boosted their rep,and it was an "expose" of "American Green Berets using nerve gas to poison innocent Laotian women and children in a Laotian village where US POW's were being held. According to CNN,the purpose was to execute the POW's,and the women and children were just "acceptable collateral damage".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Tailwind
CNN ended up killing the show after that one episode,and having to pay out millions in defamation charges to the soldiers on that raid,or their surviving families. They fired Peter Arnett and the woman associate (April Oliver ),and everyone else that worked that show under Teds supervision,and last I heard the best job Arnett has been able to find since then is working for a Arab news organization. I haven't heard of any of the others working anywhere,but I assume someone hired them to work off-camera.