LF: Muslims to soon beat out Jews in U.S. population

Heavily armed police guard as revelers march during the Greenwich Village Halloween Parade, Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2017, in New York. New York City's always-surreal Halloween parade marched on Tuesday evening under the shadow of real fear, hours after a truck attack killed several people on a busy city bike path in what authorities called an act of terror.

There are about 3.35 million Muslims in the United States right now, according to recent Pew Research Center’s Factank figures.

But by 2050, that particular population is projected to grow — from about 1 percent of the U.S. population to about 2.1 percent. If it does, that means America will be home to more Muslims than Jews.

Just something to think about, post New York City terror attack — a terror attack that we now know was committed by a radicalized Muslim who professed allegiance to ISIS.

President Donald Trump, in a tweet, wrote: “We must not allow ISIS to return, or enter, our country after defeating them in the Middle East and elsewhere. Enough!”

And of course, all sane Americans are with him on that point.

But truth is: How do we reel back the radicalization of those Muslims in America now — of those who are yet to come?

From Pew: Of the 3.35 million Muslims in America right now, 2.05 million are adults — and “a majority of them, 58 percent, are migrants.”

In other words, they weren’t born here. They were let in the gate.

It’s only common sense to do as Trump also tweeted, and bolster border security.

“I have just ordered Homeland Security to step up our already Extreme Vetting Program,” he tweeted. “Being politically correct is fine, but not for this!”

Exactly.

Terror attacks committed in the name of Allah aren’t welcome in America. That’s the obvious.

But let’s remember, too, our nation was founded on Judeo-Christian principles — not Islamic ones. Do we really want that to change?

“Our demographic projections,” Pew wrote, “estimate that Muslims will make up 2.1 percent of the U.S. population by the year 2050, surpassing people who identify as Jewish on the basis of religion as the second-largest faith group in the country (not including people who say they have no religion). A 2013 Pew Research Center report estimated that the Muslim share of immigrants granted permanent residency status (green cards) increased from about 5 percent in 1992 to roughly 10 percent in 2012, representing about 100,000 immigrants in that year.”

And once here, these Muslim families usually get busy — well, getting busy.

“Muslims have more children than members of other religious groups,” Pew reported.

Muslim women, for example, have an average 2.9 children, compared to 2.2 children from women of all other faith groups. On top of that, Muslim women have children at younger ages than women of other religions, fueling Muslim population growth even further.

Between migration and birth rates, Muslims are seeing a significant jump in cultural influence in America. Don’t forget the conversions — and don’t forget the fact that the cultural influence often leads to political influences, as well.

Political correctness dictates that talking about Muslim population surges in the context of Islamic terror attacks is out of order — is discriminatory, stereotypical, an offense to the peaceful Muslims of the world.

But this latest terror strike in New York City should be a foot-down moment for America. How many more terror attacks should innocents suffer until the left, the amnesty-loving and Islamic apologetic left, gets it through its head — Islam and terror are tied at the hip.

Trump’s temporary bans on migrants and refugees entering America from known terror hotspots in the world is common sense safety. Sending in intelligence agents to monitor mosques around the country is similarly security oriented — similarly, sensible. The time has come to cast political correctness to the wind and launch a full-frontal assault on the leftists of the country who would argue that monitoring mosques and keeping out radicals are outrageous acts of discrimination.

The time has come to recognize that yes, indeed, America is at war with an enemy that doesn’t play by rules of combat, that uses deception and deceit and infiltration by population as regular tools of take-over. Trump’s the right no-nonsense commander-in-chief to lead this fight. Now it’s up to the rest of us to support what must be done, to rage against the politically correct machine and make the leftists who want to drag America toward destruction to go silent.

Our screwed up foreign policy leads to lots of "political refugee" visa's from the muslim countries we destroy to "spread democracy", and loot and plunder. Once these former US gov employees and "allies" in the middle east, Africa, etc. get turned loose in the USA, they're on their own.

President Trump is expanding the war on everyone & everything, he can beat the projections!

It's gonna be YUUUGE! Enjoy your new mooselimb neighbors, and Thank The Neocon Whores.

No surprise there. They breed like rabbits because the government pays all their expenses,and the DNC is working night and day to bring them in by the boatload and hand them welfare checks to buy their loyalty on election day.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

No,they are not. They are given "Free" apartments to live in with "free" utilities,free food,free medical care,and a free check each month to be paid for all the trouble they had to go though to sign up for the free stuff,and for registering to vote Dim.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

You think that is far into the future? Basically,it is long enough for the Muslim welfare babies of today to reach adulthood and have pumped out several new Dim voters and welfare recipients who now have their own little AFDC herds.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

There is only one solution to an overpopulation of extremist terrorists, and it ain't pretty.

The truth is we should just deport ALL of them that refuse to denounce Islam,and destroy the Mosques. It is not a freedom of speech issue because Islam is the enemy of freedom,and the Mosques are their outposts.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

I remember things that happened 30-40 years ago that seem as current as anything that happened last week.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Actually, The truth is we should just deport ALL of them that refuse to denounce the radical teachings of Islam,and close the Mosques that refuse to do so. -- It is a freedom of speech and religion issue according to our constitution, so even though Islam is the enemy of freedom,and the Mosques are their outposts, we must tread carefully.

I disagree. Islam declared war on us and Islam is incompatible with freedom. They are a more dangerous enemy than the Nazi's or Imperial Japan ever were.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

It'll be interesting to see if any of the PC crowd around here have any counters.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

The question is, do they have the right to preach anticonstitutionalism in a church?

A policy of zero tolerance. If a muslim becomes radicalised and commits a terror attack, arrest everyone associated with his mosque, bulldoze the mosque and deport all who are not citizens. All hate preachers should be deported and if citizens should loose their citizenship.

Ok, I know this violates some constitutional provisions, but the founders did not envisage the world we live in

The rest of us also have the right to either not listen to them,or to laugh at and ridicule them. Not that *I* would ever laugh at or ridicule a dumbass,you understand?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

No,it doesn't. The Bill of Rights doesn't justify or excuse treason. Nor does it forbid national self-defense. The whole "you can't shout "FIRE!" in a crowded theater thing.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

The Islamists are free to preach sedition/treason, --- and then the government has the power to destroy their mosques and deport them for doing so?

Good plan, --- providing we can trust the govt to use that power against only those radicals ..... Can we?

Close,but no cigar. They have a right to talk all the trash they want to talk,as long as they don't threaten to harm individuals or the country.

Which,when you think of it is the ideal setup because they pretty much "out" themselves as traitors and/or enemy agents,so the Feebs know where to start looking and who to start following in the hope it will lead them to the deep cover agents.

And we all know the one thing these loons can't quit doing is running their mouths.

Good plan, --- providing we can trust the govt to use that power against only those radicals ..... Can we?

Not until the public bring out their pitchforks and march on DC with rope and hang half of the US Senate at random,and a high percentage of the congress critters in order to send a message to the ones that survive that "there is a new sheriff in town,and he doesn't bring bags of unmarked cash,he brings the hangman."

I am completely uninformed about the FACTS on this issue. All I know/THINK I know is what I read from various sources,and then connecting the dots in my head with what I know about politics and politicians,as well as world History.

It is MY firm belief that most of the trouble in today's world comes directly from Saudi Arabia. Ain't saying what I would do my first day as the new Ultimate Ruler of America,but let's just say that Saudi Arabia would be in a HEAP of trouble before sunset. It has been MY experience in life that when you cut the head off of a snake,the snake ceases to be dangerous to you. Yeah,I don't see it happening either,and it's a damn shame it won't.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

I has been my experience that the snake is dangerous until sunset, so cutting off the head doesn't assure you you won't be bitten. One sure way of getting that pit of vipers, which is the Islamic religion, riled up against you will be to attack their holy land which is Saudi Arabia

We're in a religious war with radical Muslims, and cutting off the Saudi head is not a wise move, imho.

I like Pete's idea that it should be constitutional to prosecute radical Islamists for sedition/treason..

They ALREADY want to murder every non-believer and enforce a Muslim police state over the whole world,so why should I give a rabid rats ass if they were to get upset over destroying Saudi Arabia?

Are you trying to claim we must be careful to not upset the people that DECLARED WAR ON US?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Yeah,and killing Hitler at the start of WW-2 would have been a bad idea too,huh?

You people need to understand that Islam is at war with the entire western world,and want nothing less than total domination over us,and having up end up as their slaves. The more tribal heads and Immans we kill,the better off the world will be.

You either fight a war to win it,or you surrender and start blowing the enemy leadership. You can't have it both ways.

The world today would be a much different place if we had gone ahead and defeated the communists in North Korea as well as Red China if they did't back off. It gave America's enemies hope and made them bold because they suddenly KNEW they could go to war with us without negative consequences coming to them if they lost.Hell,we would even help them rebuild and feed their people.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

I have NO problem with killing Islamic leaders or individuals who want war with us. I was advocating such assassinations back at FR, as one of the best ways to win this war..

-- But I don't think it would be wise to instigate a world war (probably ending as nuclear) against hundreds of millions of moderate Muslims who treat their religion as most people do, as a social duty, a way to go along to get along.

The problem as I see it is a matter of select, PC law, gubermental & judiciary enforcement that aggressively prosecutes certain demos (Ex: Pro-Lifers, Pro-Family) while enabling others (Ex: Antifa, BLM.)

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

It was ISLAM that declared war on US,and as a result started attacking us. Including right here inside our own country.

MY suggestion would be to quietly tell the second teir Muslim princes that they have a choice,they can either revolt and hang the Kings and Clerics that promote the war,or they can die with the bastards when we take them out.

This is a war that has been going on for several hundred years. We fight it over and over and kill off enough of them they become submissive until they bread another couple of generations of jihadists and start up the fight again.

Of course there would be a winner,and it would be us as well as the rest of the world. Provided of course that we do it now. If we wait another 20 years they will have bought their own nukes and delivery systems,and will no doubt use them to take over the world.

People keep forgetting that they are NOT rational people. They are religious nutcases who have no interest in living in peace,and will keep fighting until we either kill all of them off,or they kill all of us off. Time to put an end to this crap once and for all.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Nor did the millions of ordinary muslims declare war, -- and we agree on warning their leaders that they cannot win.

Far too many of them are indeed irrational. But that leaves hundreds of millions who aren't, --- yet.

It's gonna be tough to kill all the radical nutcases without going nuclear, and maybe that's impossible. -- We have to find some way to do it though, imo.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

No that's not how I read it, a group of saudi terrorists declared war on you because you had troops in their land. Terrorists aided and abetted by the high eschalons of Saudi Arabia. These same Saudi wanted you to fight their proxy war against Saddam for them and wanted you to fight Iran for them and you fell for it. You were protecting your oil supply or so you thought. But your foreign policy is a fickle thing, it changes every time your king changes

Your claim that we have king is weird. --- Where are you from, and what's your agenda? And cleansing from inside? Where?

No It is not weird, you have an elected king or Emperor, only the title is different. My agenda is to comment on events and to bring a perspective from outside the USA. Don't you get news first hand? The Saudi Dauphin has arrested many for corruption, who knows where it will lead, interestingly one of them is an enemy of Dump. So just maybe Dump is not so much in the pocket of the Russians as the pocket of the Saudi, just like the Bush clan

Hey, you won't answer some basic questions, feel free to continue on being a weirdo.

Kings have unlimited power. If we had a king then when Obama would have taken our guns. Only little pussies let the government take their guns. Kind ok like the Aussie pussies who let their king who they must worship take their guns. What a docile people.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.