Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles
Title: President Donald Trump: His Life May Very Well Be in Danger
Source:
Barb Wire
URL Source: http://barbwire.com/2017/10/25/president-trump-life-danger/
Published: Oct 26, 2017
Author: Cliff Kincaid
Post Date: 2017-10-26 08:23:06 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 2723
Comments: 24
In the Mel Gibson film “Edge of Darkness,” a mysterious consultant to a group of conspirators says, in regard to covering their tracks for a series of murders, “…make it so convoluted that anyone can have a theory, but no one’s got the facts.” Many theories have been offered about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, but the truth is not hard to find. The communists killed Kennedy. And they have the ideological motivation to kill President Trump. During a year in which Russian interference in the American political process is considered a hot topic, one might think that the communist role in the assassination of an American president would be examined in detail, and that the progeny of the groups which motivated Lee Harvey Oswald to kill JFK would be scrutinized and even banned as criminal organizations. But that’s hard to do when we have the example of John Brennan, who would serve as President Obama’s CIA director, admitting that he voted for the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) ticket when he was in college in 1976. That was 13 years after Oswald shot Kennedy and was arrested in Dallas, saying, “Yes, I want attorney Abt.” John Abt was the longtime chief counsel for the CPUSA. The Russian Role President Trump has indicated that he will facilitate the release of new documents in the JFK assassination case. That’s a good thing. But he was the candidate who falsely linked the father of Senator Ted Cruz to Lee Harvey Oswald and JFK’s murder. Trump’s associate, marijuana aficionado Roger Stone, is the author of a book that makes the equally outlandish claim that LBJ had JFK murdered. Trump should review the hard evidence that the Russian regime and Vladimir Putin’s comrades were ultimately responsible for murdering President Kennedy. It may lead to an understanding of how the “old” Soviet terrorism networks of the 1980s have remained in effect and have played a role in the growth of radical Islamic terrorism threatening the United States and Europe. He may also come to an understanding that the communists who murdered Kennedy are alive and well on the streets of America and could soon turn their attention to him. On Tuesday, a fanatic by the name of Ryan Clayton of a group called “Americans Take Action” entered the Capitol and got close enough to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and President Trump to throw Russian flags at them as they arrived for a Republican Senate Policy Luncheon. How did he get so close to the president? Will there even be an inquiry? This was a serious and ominous breakdown in security for President Trump. Some law enforcement officials were seen in the video of the incident simply walking on by as the anti-Trump zealot threw his Russian flags and shouted “treason.” Consider the fact that communists who are still inspired by the Soviet Union are holding a November 5 event titled, “The Russian Revolution: 100 years and still shaking the world,” in Washington, D.C. and featuring Brian Becker, a member of the “central committee” of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL). Becker is also a host on a radio station in Washington, D.C. controlled by the Russian government through a propaganda front called Sputnik International. When I paid $100.00 to attend and cover the ANSWER Coalition’s “People’s Congress of Resistance” in September at Howard University, it was “BBecker” from a group called “Justice First” who informed me that they were refunding my money and I couldn’t attend. I was told they didn’t want me to “disrupt the meeting,” a spurious charge designed to conceal what was really going on. Brian Becker, co-director of ANSWER Coalition and co-founder of the PSL, was one of the speakers at the event. Official literature disclosed that other speakers included representatives of anti-police and pro-North Korea organizations and an official of the embassy of Venezuela. During his U.N. address, Trump had said, “The problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented, but that socialism has been faithfully implemented. From the Soviet Union to Cuba to Venezuela, wherever true socialism or communism has been adopted, it has delivered anguish and devastation and failure. Those who preach the tenets of these discredited ideologies only contribute to the continued suffering of the people who live under these cruel systems.” Such comments have made Trump into a target for the communists, just like JFK was. The number of communist groups active in the U.S. has multiplied, with the Revolutionary Communist Party, a Maoist group, threatening revolution on November 4. Its founder, Bob Avakian, was an associate of communist Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, who helped launch Obama’s political career. While these are said to be on the fringe, please note that James Hodgkinson, who opened fire on a group of Republican members of Congress in June, was a “Bolshevik Bernie” Sanders supporter who declared he wanted to “terminate” Trump and the Republicans. Incredibly, West Point has just graduated a cadet who declares “communism will win” and has proclaimed himself a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. Judging by what we see on the streets on America, in the violence of Antifa and the “Refuse Fascism” crowd, there are many more like James Hodgkinson or even Lee Harvey Oswald out there, some of them products of the “Marxist Madrassas” known as colleges and universities. In the case of the West Point grad, they already have military training and skills, including rifle marksmanship. How many more like him are there in the military academies? Blood on Their Hands Communist organizations still operate in the United States because of clever lawyers who insist their criminal activities are somehow protected under the law and the Constitution. In this context, one of the most interesting connections Oswald had to communism was his request after being arrested for CPUSA attorney John Abt. The communist lawyer admits in his book, Advocate and Activist, that Oswald had written to the CPUSA for information and how to join, and that CPUSA official Arnold Johnson had “sent a reply of no consequence, enclosing some promotional brochures.” After the JFK assassination, Abt said he urged Johnson and another party official, Gus Hall, to “inform the FBI about the letter from Oswald,” because the CPUSA was an “innocent” party in the affair. He said, “We never again heard from the FBI on the matter.” Of course, Oswald never needed a lawyer. Jack Ruby, who killed Oswald, is believed by Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest ranking intelligence official ever to defect from the Soviet bloc, to have been a Cuban agent whose assignment was to keep Oswald from talking. Pacepa, the former Romanian intelligence chief, wrote a booklet on the Kennedy assassination documenting that Oswald was recruited by the KGB when he was a U.S. Marine stationed in Japan and that, after defecting to the Soviet Union, he came back to America three years later for the express purpose of killing Kennedy. Even though the Soviets, for their own reasons, subsequently tried “to turn Oswald off,” Oswald went ahead with the plan and was already “programmed to kill” by the communists. Kenneth J. Dillon, a former Foreign Service officer and intelligence analyst, writes that “Given Oswald’s aggressive mentality [he had tried to kill right-wing General Edwin A. Walker] and track record (well known to the KGB), it would have required very little for the KGB to insert into his mind the suggestion that he should assassinate Kennedy. Indeed, virulent communist hate propaganda during Oswald’s years in the Soviet Union might have instilled in his impressionable brain the need to take action, as the occasion presented itself, against those like the American president who thwarted the progress of communism.” Poster Comment: The Communist Party (A Division of the Democrat Party) is no doubt conducting secret meetings to kill our president! Who among us believes anything in the media and who trusts the Republicrat Party? Most Republicrats are engaged in incestuous relations with those traitors on the other side of the aisle! Amaericans can't count on the Secret Service, FBI, or CIA to have a handle assassination plotting. They're the very ones who will facilitate the attempt!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: IbJensen (#0)
Communists? Really? More Americans have been killed domestically and abroad by right wing fascists than by Communists. If you said the Cubans, that's probably true. The Kennedy brothers made multiple attempts on Castro's life. So he paid them back. Something similar happened after World War II between Stalin and Tito. When Russian/Yugoslav relations broke down and Tito took Yugoslavia down a different path, Stalin decided to have him assassinated. Tito became fed up with that in a hurry, and sent a letter to Stalin: "Stop sending people to kill me. We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle (...) If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send one to Moscow, and I won't have to send a second." The REASON that Gerald Ford, who was on the Warren Commission, signed the executive order prohibiting the US from assassinating foreign rulers is because he knew, from his experience on the Warren Commission, that it is impossible in a free society to truly protect the President, particularly against well-armed, well-equipped, trained professional state actors. So he took the US out of that game. The Kennedys tried to take out Castro, Castro succeeded in taking them out. There is a lesson in this. Ford learned it. Is Trump trying to off foreign leaders? No. Do the Communists even exist anymore, outside of Red China and North Korea? The "US Communist Party" consisted of two groups of people: "leadership", who were entirely US government agents, and naive young, ignorant, rank-and-file college-age kids who joined it and voted for it as a protest...and thereby touched the honey pot that had been set up for them in the first place, getting themselves on watch lists and monitored. Now, thing is, it's a free country and we're all surrounded by crazy people with crazy ideas all the time. Our intelligence agents are citizens just like the rest of us, and they have as much experience distinguishing the crazy from the frightening as any of us, and better information. They can generally tell when a "Communist" is a deluded college kid who isn't going to do any harm, an old embittered union leader, and somebody who actually goes and makes ties with enemy governments. And they don't waste the resources of the US government on a vendetta against 23 year olds for being idiots. Some guy voted for Gus Hall 50 years ago? SO WHAT? It was not illegal to vote for Communists. It doesn't even mean that the guy was a bad person. The President of France, Georges Clemenceau, had the same issue with his young, idealistic son. Clemenceau, the head of the French "Republican" Party, was fiercely criticized for failure to "do something" about his son joining the French Communist Party. He wrote in reply: "My son is 22 years old. If he had not become a Communist at 22, I would have disowned him. If he is still a Communist at 30, I will do it then." A French politician named Anselm Batbie, famously said in the 1870s: "Celui qui n’est pas républicain à vingt ans fait douter de la générosité de son âme; mais celui qui, après trente ans, persévère, fait douter de la rectitude de son esprit." Which is to say "He who isn't a republican at 20 raises doubts about the generosity of his heart, but he who persists in being one after 30 raises doubts about the rightness of his mind." Churchill famously paraphrased this remark. Young men are hotheaded and stupid, and they do things that they would never do when they are older and wiser. They see the world and change their minds. Obama had somebody working for him who, at college age, voted for a (fake) cartoon Communist who had no chance of victory? So what. The Communists aren't coming, and they are not the threat. Hard oligarchy is almost here, and it is trying to cement itself into a hereditary caste: that IS a threat. Islam is rising demographically, and that IS a threat.
Really? Little Vlad Putin was 10yo. Did he organize the conspiracy himself? Kind of a silly article.
Are you sure you really want to defend that statement? It's ridiculous.
You're right. It is silly. It's not the Russians who have formed a cabal to destroy President Trump. Rather it's his own party in collusion with the Democrat-Communist Party.
Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Not likely. It was a coup/regime change done by the CIA and Lyndon Johnson. Jackie firmly believed LBJ was complicit in the plot. So did Howard Hunt: Before his death in January 2007, CIA master spy and convicted Watergate conspirator Howard Hunt confessed to being peripherally involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, and named several other participants. In notes and conversations with his son Saint John, and in an audiotape he created in 2004 to be played after his death, Hunt described being invited into the "big event" at a Miami safehouse in 1963. Others named in the plot: I am interested to see if Trump releases the full JFK archive. If he does, then I think the Deep State keeps going. If he doesn't, I'll wonder if he made a deal with them to make the Mueller investigation go away in a month or so. I'd like to see Trump do the JFK dump then move on to clean house at the intel agencies and the Pentagon. And get an independent prosecutor after Hitlery and Billy Bob and all their co-conspirators to finally make them pay for long criminal history.
Didn't Bobby think so too? I've wondered if LBJ killed a second Kennedy to cover up for killing the first one.
Right! There's no cause to worry. Many of the Democrats and a few of their lackey Republicrats belong to the CPUSA.
Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Right! All these agencies are corrupted beyond repair! Mueller, Comey and Clinton belong in prison! Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Thanks, Deckhard. I believe what you have stated to be true.
Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
All of the American deaths in World War II were at the hands of Fascists, not Communists. So yes, I ABSOLUTELY stand by my statement. Vietnam and the Korean War were small beer compared to World War II, and in World War II we were fighting the ultra-nationalist Fascistic Right, not the Communist Left. Besides Korea and Vietnam, which were civil wars that we waded into, we haven't had mass death in war against the Communists. We had a Cold War with Russia, not had a hot one. America lost nearly a half-million lives fighting the Fascist Right in World War II. And in World War I, we were fighting hard right German nationalism, not the Communist left. They were fighting each other in Russia, not us. So yes, we have lost huge numbers of lives fighting the nationalist Right - starting with the Redcoats, then the Redcoats again, then the Mexicans, then the Confederacy, the Spanish, the Germans and the Axis. Most of the deaths Americans have experienced on the battlefield have been against right wing nationalists. We fought Communist nationalists in Korea and Vietnam. Against the Communists proper elsewhere, Russia first, we ALLIED with them to beat the more murderous (to US) Fascist nationalist right. We engaged in Cold Wars with the USSR and Mao, and now Communist China is our largest trading partner. So yes, I not only stand by what I said, but I think it's ridiculous to be so obsessed with Communism as to think that it is the worst thing we ever faced. It isn't even close. THAT is merely the insanity of the crony capitalist right infecting the brains of people who ought to know better. "We are your overlords" right wing nationalism has always been the most dangerous force in the world, because it is easily internalized and believes, and becomes the motivator for the worst atrocities of all. The English really believed they had some sort of RIGHT to go rule Ireland, for example. The Germans really believed that their dreams of German-ness gave them the RIGHT to a piece of France and all of Russia. The Union believed that it had the RIGHT to destroy the South to prevent any territory from getting away from its rulership, and the Southerners believed they had the RIGHT to enslave the blacks in THEIR country without interference if they wanted to. The Americans believed that they had the manifest RIGHT to overwhelm the Indians and take everything from them. Communism had nothing to do with any of that, and THAT instinct and motivation has been what has slaughtered American soliders through the centuries. The belief that the workers should use the state to control the means of production is very small beer in America compared to that.
Bollocks. The only thing we actually signify when we say fascism is Nazi Germany. We never think of Japan or Italy or Spain when we use the word fascist. They were Axis allies but they were not all fascists, no more than Russia was a capitalist country merely because it was an Allied power. Japan was an emperor with warlords and rising industrialism in an undeveloped area of the world. Their notions of racial superiority were centuries old, not some newfound philosophy by Mussolini and Hitler. Italy was a chronically weak central government that fell into the hands of an egotistic dictator, Mussolini. This notion that the Axis powers were all fascists is a modern misunderstanding of the nature of fascism and the history of these countries. Italy had already eclipsed by the time America fully entered the war. We did fight German fascists in Italy and across western Europe. Then we took on the warlords of Japan. To say we were fighting fascism throughout is an error. We did, however, fight three different allied powers that were the Axis, signatories to the Tripartite Pact. And the Mongol Hordes? The Muslim conquest? More rightwingers obsessed with Milton Friedman and manifest destiny? Your argument is strained but it's clear we won't agree. You have a cartoonish view of history when you mount your little hobbyhorse to tilt at that rightwing windmill.
Idiotic.. The Americans Constitution ensured that we had the manifest RIGHT to demand that the Indians obey our rule of law. -- We placed those who refused, --- on tribal reservations, Under tribal law. There are far more native Americans living off reservations than on. Many/most now call themselves Hispanic.
We had no such right - we simply took the land by conquest and then said we were in charge. By doing so, we established the rules of the game. The winner imposes the law on the loser. You've doubled down on that. Pray to God you never lose to me, because I promise you that I will rule you according to the very rule that you set: which is that once I proclaim a law, I have the right to do whatever I want to you if you break it. Vae victis!
Who's "we", Paleface?
Have it your way. We were fighting right wing nationalism throughout the world. First British imperial arrogance, then Indian tribal nations, then the Mexican nation in a land grab for our own, then Confederate sense of culture self, then Spanish imperialism, then Filipino Muslim nationalism, then German nationalism, twice! And Japanese and Italian nationalism. In Vietnam in particular, we fought Vietnamese nationalism, which was less Communist than nativist. The Vietnamese USED the Chinese, but then fought their own war with them to keep them out. The Vietnamese USED the Soviets, but when the dust settled, Vietnam is primarily Vietnam, and it's willing to trade with us. In Korea we fought warlordism armed by Communism, and then we did fight Chinese Communism directly - fought it to a draw. In Iraq we fought hard-line Iraqi dictatorialism, and beat it handily, then we fought Islam and ultimately found a truce in which we let our primary regional enemy de facto gain political leadership in the country. In Afghanistan we fought. We fought lots of things there. Still are fighting them. Not getting anywhere. Never will. Have it your way. Most of our wars were not against "Fascism". They were against other people's patriotism. We won most of those wars. What is not in that mix is very much Communism. We did not lose most of the American lives we have lost in war fighting Communism. We didn't lose all that many fighting Communism. We might have CALLED it a fight against Communism, but the only two places we could plausibly do that would be Vietnam and North Korea, and in Vietnam we were really fighting Vietnamese nationalism. We just chose to CALL it Communism. In North Korea, we really fought ChiCom Communism. To a draw. Our losses in Korea hardly constituted most of our losses, or millions of American dead.
We had deeds and titles to those lands. The Indians didn't.
It's long been evident that you do not agree with our Constitution or our ability to write and enforce one, --- as long as it does not infringe on the rights of the individual. Poor you. Individual native Americans have always been able to reject tribalism, and live as free men, under our constitution. --- A lot did, and I have known many in Minnesota and the Dakotas.
My main point was that when we say fascism, we really mean Nazis. At least, 95% of us do.
Look, just because some watery Klingon tart tossed a bat'leth at you from a cloaked bird of prey hidden in a pond is no excuse for manufacturing a system of feudalism under the abstract legal fiction of land "ownership". bIQDaq vIHtaHbogh ghotI'mey DaleghlaH'a'?
Perhaps Eddie Izzard can clarify it for you.
See the authority, Eddie Izzard, above.
I could take Eddie Izzard a lot better if I do not have to look at him.
Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt "If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
Well, he's a silly man and pretends to be nothing else. It is a comedy routine and very British. I would guess he was quite surprised when he became popular in the States.
#2. To: IbJensen (#0)
Trump should review the hard evidence that the Russian regime and Vladimir Putin’s comrades were ultimately responsible for murdering President Kennedy....
#3. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
Communists? Really? More Americans have been killed domestically and abroad by right wing fascists than by Communists.
#4. To: Tooconservative (#2)
#5. To: IbJensen (#0)
(Edited)
The communists killed Kennedy.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#6. To: IbJensen (#4)
#7. To: Deckard (#5)
Jackie firmly believed LBJ was complicit in the plot.
#8. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
#9. To: Tooconservative (#6)
I'd like to see Trump do the JFK dump then move on to clean house at the intel agencies and the Pentagon. A
#10. To: Deckard (#5)
#11. To: Tooconservative (#3)
(Edited)
Are you sure you really want to defend that statement? It's ridiculous.
#12. To: Vicomte13 (#11)
All of the American deaths in World War II were at the hands of Fascists, not Communists. So yes, I ABSOLUTELY stand by my statement. Vietnam and the Korean War were small beer compared to World War II, and in World War II we were fighting the ultra-nationalist Fascistic Right, not the Communist Left.
"We are your overlords" right wing nationalism has always been the most dangerous force in the world, because it is easily internalized and believes, and becomes the motivator for the worst atrocities of all. The English really believed they had some sort of RIGHT to go rule Ireland, for example. The Germans really believed that their dreams of German-ness gave them the RIGHT to a piece of France and all of Russia. The Union believed that it had the RIGHT to destroy the South to prevent any territory from getting away from its rulership, and the Southerners believed they had the RIGHT to enslave the blacks in THEIR country without interference if they wanted to.
#13. To: Vicomte13 (#11)
(Edited)
Americans believed that they had the manifest RIGHT to overwhelm the Indians and take everything from them.
#14. To: tpaine (#13)
The Americans Constitution ensured that we had the manifest RIGHT to demand that the Indians obey our rule of law.
#15. To: Tooconservative (#12)
We never think of Japan or Italy or Spain when we use the word fascist.
#16. To: Tooconservative (#12)
(Edited)
#17. To: Vicomte13 (#14)
We had no such right - we simply took the land by conquest and then said we were in charge.
#18. To: Vicomte13 (#14)
Pray to God you never lose to me, because I promise you that I will rule you according to the very rule that you set: which is that once I proclaim a law, I have the right to do whatever I want to you if you break it.
#19. To: Vicomte13 (#16)
#20. To: Tooconservative (#17)
(Edited)
We had deeds and titles to those lands.
#21. To: Vicomte13 (#17)
We had deeds and titles to those lands. The Indians didn't.
#22. To: VxH (#20)
Look, just because some watery Klingon tart tossed a bat'leth at you from a cloaked bird of prey hidden in a pond is no excuse for...
#23. To: Tooconservative (#21)
#24. To: Stoner (#23)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]