Video and Audio
See other Video and Audio Articles
Title: Mapping the massacre
Source:
Powerline
URL Source: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv ... 17/10/mapping-the-massacre.php
Published: Oct 24, 2017
Author: Scott Johnson
Post Date: 2017-10-24 11:25:53 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 2177
Comments: 18
A New York Times team including Malachy Browne, Drew Jordan, Nicole Fineman and Chris Cirillo has produced a video that maps a timeline of the Las Vegas massacre: “The shots began at 10:05. Twelve bursts of gunfire later, police broke down Stephen Paddock’s door at the Mandalay Bay. Using forensic analysis, The Times mapped 30 videos that show a vivid picture of what happened that night.” The Times has posted the video here and also made the video embeddable. I have posted it below. The Times does not specifically address the controversy surrounding the alterations in the timeline regarding Jesus Campos. Rather, the video maps his activity in the corridor during the massacre. We remain far from a definitive account of the massacre. It remains a riddle wrapped inside an enigma. Poster Comment: FWIW.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)
Their analysis makes sense - but that won't matter. "The NYT is just part of the coverup" in 3...2...
Meh. It's certainly incomplete. They indicate they were counting the shots and the volleys. Why no timeline for how many shots fired in each volley and a total? Info that we still don't have. I still think he shot at the aviation fuel tanks first but there is not mention of that. I thought the illustration and timeline of the hallways was helpful. And we found out where Paddock put his hallway cam (supposedly). But we don't know if he was carrying a laptop from the one room to another or if he had a tablet to monitor the camera with. This could have been done a lot better and they obviously had more info. Certainly the Times should be able to afford some A/V shooting experts. So I'd really just give it a 'C'. If even that. Things are pretty sad if this is the best that the supposed top investigative newspaper can produce after weeks. I was hopeful it would be better, lured in by their mention of basing it on 30 eyewitness videos.
This is kinda suspicious: https://youtu.be/nvkKJdjY3Pk?t=13s Supposedly it's "the sound of gunfire in different videos" that "we lined up". The top track looks the same as the bottom one - with the exception of what looks like somebody doing a half arsed attempt to make it look different with something like the photoshop smudging tool. Half arsed and half fast - typical example of MSM "journalism" these days.
Mmmm...maybe. One audio track shows a lot of background noise. So the cleaner one might be the lady taxi driver with her quiet background and clearer shots fired, the other one might be from the concert with music in the background or people screaming. I'm not saying it is but that is a possible reasonable explanation for the discrepancy that you noted.
So, once again - as in the video claiming "forensic PROOF" - they do a half arsed job by presenting the PROCESS - but not showing the detailed application of the methodology on actual audio. OCCUM'S Razor: They're just lazy dipshytes whose half arsed "journalism" this is a typical example of. They couldn't be bothered to take the time to do it right with REAL examples. And why should they? The sheeple will eat up whatever they toss over the fence as "news" anyhow. /Rant off
There are no replies to Comment # 11. End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: VxH (#1)
(Edited)
Their analysis makes sense - but that won't matter.
#4. To: Tooconservative (#2)
The timing of the peaks would line up on video recorded at two distinct sources - but I would expect the amplitude (height) of each peak to be different. There would also be different ambient noise from the crowd, traffic, whatever - recorded and observable in the graph; but we don't see it here.
Either both tracks were recorded by devices very close to each other (maybe two cameras down on the field) or this is just an example of NyT's journalistic laziness.
Observe that they didn't give specific details for which video-audio was being "lined up" in the example frame above.
#6. To: VxH (#4)
The top track looks the same as the bottom one - with the exception of what looks like somebody doing a half arsed attempt to make it look different with something like the photoshop smudging tool.
#11. To: Tooconservative (#6)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 11.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]