Title: George W. Bush Institute Summit, NYC: President Bush Remarks On The Crisis With North Korea (globalist neocon discontent, Nativism, White Supremacy) 10/19/17) Source:
C-SPAN URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2YlVZxu_L0 Published:Oct 20, 2017 Author:Jorge W. Boosh Post Date:2017-10-20 00:34:27 by Hondo68 Keywords:None Views:680 Comments:10
Published on Oct 19, 2017
Former President George W. Bush delivers remarks "The Spirit of Liberty: At Home, In The World" at the Bush Institute Summit in New York City.
We’ve seen nationalism distorted into nativism – forgotten the dynamism that immigration has always brought to America. We see a fading confidence in the value of free markets and international trade – forgetting that conflict, instability, and poverty follow in the wake of protectionism.
I thought conflict, instability, and poverty resulted from eight years of Bush/Cheney and the Neo-cons. I must have missed the economic victory party thrown in October 2008.
I do remember the declaration of mission accomplished for ridding the world of non-existent weapons of mass destruction.
Our identity as a nation – unlike many other nations – is not determined by geography or ethnicity, by soil or blood. Being an American involves the embrace of high ideals and civic responsibility. We become the heirs of Thomas Jefferson by accepting the ideal of human dignity found in the Declaration of Independence. We become the heirs of James Madison by understanding the genius and values of the U.S. Constitution.
Not this crap again.
Jefferson was a slave owner, tended to by his slave Jupiter while he spruced up the words of George Mason for a political call to arms. Madison was a slave owner. Washington was a slave owner until the day he died.
And the Constitution recognized and protected slavery.
Seventh and Last Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Alton, Illinois
October 15, 1858
We profess to have no taste for running and catching niggers—at least I profess no taste for that job at all. Why then do I yield support to a fugitive slave law? Because I do not understand that the Constitution, which guarantees that right, can be supported without it.
