This same video was already posted here at LF. These scumbags slapped a new video title on it and uploaded it again. They're clickbaiting off mass murder. I guess they're not alone.
Huh? Anyway, there probably was just one shooter. The two hotel employees were there in the hallway and would have seen someone else escape. And no evidence exists to indicate there were shooters at any other location.
Normally, you would assume they would be doing full crime scene workups of bullet impacts and trajectories, to trace the source of the bullets, to count the total rounds to match to the casings found in the room, match as many bullets as possible to the guns that fired them.
But this investigation seems so amateurish, I'm not confident that we can assume they are doing any of those things.
The two hotel employees were there in the hallway and would have seen someone else escape.
And no evidence exists to indicate there were shooters at any other location.
Gee, Chief Inspector TC -- you must be privy to some extra-special Double-Secret OFFICIAL access to the Vegas Investigation.
Thanks for assuring us that this is much ado about nuthin'; Let's assume as you have that there was "PROBABLY just one shooter"; And assume there were "two hotel employees there in the hall"...AND we'll assume THEY "would have seen someone else escape"; Oh...and by ALL means, let's do more "assuming" and especially conclude that "no evidence exists to indicate there were shooters at any other location."
Yes, by all means let's wrap up this unnecessarily hysterical case. I dunno why anyone could leap to any conclusion other than embracing your notion that this particular case has been sussed and sorted out, so let's just move on. Nothing too see here.
OH WAIT. Does that mean the following should be dismissed or ignored?:
1) ALL eyewitness accounts of at least TWO sniper locations 2) A Sheriff who immediately concluded himself that there were two shooters 3) The sudden death of one key witness 4) The confiscation of cells phone and erasure of all content 5) The odd frantic pre-concert warnings from two people, "You're all gonna die!!", 6) The lack of evidence Paddock ever even checked into the Mandalay Bay, 7) The immediate fingering OF Stephen Paddock as THE Perp (much the same way every single 911 perp was fingered) 8) The immediate release of a cherry-picked profile as a wealthy gambler who often frequented casinos, but not much more 9)PADDOCK'S staged "suicide" and instantaneous graphic photos of a bloody Paddock 10) Photos ID'ing Paddock at Progressives protests 11) The ID'ing of Paddock's supposed Filipino girlfriend, who we're told was allowed to travel back to Asia immediately after the slaughter AND BACK to the USA -- WITHOUT INTERROGATION OR INCIDENT 12) Supposed "Security Guard" Campanos' fortuitous escape and interruption of Paddock in the act (while evading 200 rounds of ammo BEFORE the slaughter...12b) AND Campanos' SUDDEN DISAPPEARANCE) 13) An ever changing, adjusted "official" Timeline A Sheriff whose body language signals obvious duress 14) Alleged witness-tampering and intimidation, and scrubbing of crime scenes and evidence 15) Immediate public release "leak": Paddock = GUN-FREAK!!
Yes, the above indicates a degree of paranoia that is patently absurd and unfounded. Especially given the Feeb's recent history of "adjusting" facts and accounts -- notably involving one Hag, one ex-Prez, two AGs, and Alphabet Agy Director. For starters.
Why, of course. It should just be accepted that the Feebs and LVPD have had this simple incident under control all along. Their inconsistent, murky narrative is plausible, probable, and likely. Without question. OR IS IT?
CT illusions: Rife sloppiness, incompetence, confusion, stonewalling of "Official Investigation," and Swiss Cheese holes from A-Z.
And here we've been assured that the Alphabet Overlords know-all, and are archiving every single keystroke in order to "keep us safe"; Whether one's father was a 'Most Wanted', is ISIS-connected, or attended Antifa protest. OR, whether one's father is working at Walmart as a Greeter. MEH.
Looking forward to your further energized Gate-Keeper diversions, irrelevant "LOOKIE HERE!!" posts about Alex Jones, and off-handed ridicule, discrediting and dismissing of truth, actual evidence, math, and theories.
It is still true that no evidence exists of any other shooters in the Paddock suite or at any other location in the area.
To be clear, you're citing "Official" evidence, right? And discarding ALL eyewitness accounts and interviews, ballistic investigations, videotapes evidence?
To be clear, you're citing "Official" evidence, right? And discarding ALL eyewitness accounts and interviews, ballistic investigations, videotapes evidence?
But aren't all those sources actually that same horrible "Official" evidence?
I know you like to take the news releases and press conferences and select some facts to believe, others to discard, then freely inject any crackpot crap you want.
But to be consistent, why do you accept as factual even the idea that a massacre occurred at all? Isn't that just more "Official" news?
Similarly, why believe any of these photos or videos? What if they're all just "crisis actors"? You have no way to know.
You just watch these news reports, then free-associate some crackpot theory, then announce it as some Eternal Truth. Then settle back to throw rocks at people who want to hear what the "Official" investigation reveals (as opposed to listening to a bunch of CT nutjobs like you who get their info from a bunch of clickbait massacre profiteers on YouBoob).
