[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Las Vegas shooting: An in-depth analysis *The following post will be continually updated in real-time as we get intel. LAS VEGAS (INTELLIHUB) The proof is in the pudding or so they say. The following timeline documents real and actual events which occurred on the night of Oct. 1, 2017, and the early morning of Oct. 2, and how they all unfolded contradicting the official narrative that only one shooter, a 64-year-old man by the name of Stephen Paddock, shot and killed 58 people during the Route 91 Harvest Music Festival. ***** (Key elements only) [Begining of Transcript #1]The view from alleged shooter Stephen Paddocks room showing his vantage point over the Route 91 Harvest Music Festival. (Screenshot via Google Maps) [End of Transcript #1] [Begining of Transcript #2] [Transcript #3 starts here] RELATED: Condensed audio of the first hour or so after the shooting started: MUST WATCH: More key audio with eyewitness video and commentary Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
Thanks for listing a coherent timeline so that at least some of the math can be added up... This timeline is alarming disturbing and indicting on so many levels. There were obviously several reported eyewitness reports, commentary, and video of multiple shooters. (You wonder why there's ZERO Hotel footage. OH WAIT. We might actually SEE the truth instead of a narrative/fairy tale.) This shooting was clearly a planned op. Only an absolute zombie or stooge wouldn't question the "Official" version thus far. Diversions or simultaneous ops were occurring/created elsewhere that tied up resources. Of note right off the bat: At 09:59 pm security guard Jesus Campos was "reportedly struck in leg by a bullet"...by one of 200-rounds volley of bullets fired through the door of room 135 of guest/patsy...er...supposed sniper Paddock. Of further note: It took forever for LE to storm the place. Speculative suspects: 1) Antifa elements In any case, there is an obvious reluctance to reveal the truth of the matter -- for obvious reasons. We can expect all evidence to be scrubbed, the Hotel demolished, and Paddock's carcass immediately incinerated. THE Narrative: "If just ONE person can do this, what could 63 million angry, bigoted, gay-bashing, racist KKK Trump voters do? I mean, what about the children??"
If you kept up on the reporting, we've known for several days that there was already a team (usually meaning 4-6 cops) already in the shooter's hotel in another wing on another floor dealing with some situation there in another suite well before the shooter had fired his first shot. Was that some partiers out of control or was there an ongoing threat of violence? No one has ever accounted for the other reported police team already in the hotel when the shooting started. The big question is what was so damned important that they didn't immediately dispatch that team to deal with the shooter in the first minutes of the massacre? Many lives might have been saved. See, actual interesting details that don't require added kookery by known frauds on Youboob. Sometimes a story really is just a story.
Was that some partiers out of control or was there an ongoing threat of violence? No one has ever accounted for the other reported police team already in the hotel when the shooting started. To be honest, I haven't kept score on the reporting -- official OR unofficial. All you can really do at this point is let ambitious OTHERS cobble the tapestry of events. Then discern what's plausible, possible, probable, definite. We may "have known for several days" that the search for the perp(s) was ongoing in the middle of the sh*t-storm. That there were at least TWO separate strike teams seems to indicate more than one shooter, doesn't it? Perhaps LE/Strike Team 2 that was supposedly *already* in the Hotel wasn't accounted for initially because: 1) They were tipped off and that info wasn't supposed to be disseminated to the public. With respect to the theory that some revelers might have been out of control, any thing is possible. EVEN A DIVERSION. I saw reports of two different broken windows. Flash of gunfire light from more than two different positions. It is said eyewitnesses mentioned a strobe light (which was designed obviously to camouflage the firing positions.) The last two observations can't be attributed to delusion or wishful thinking. A second broken window may just be evidence of returned LE fire. (See? Admit that being a CTer is better and less boring than ticking off all the boxes that are merely the path to least resistance and heartbreak.) I believe many of those who automatically discount CTs do so as a psychological defense mechanism that preserves the notion and belief from childhood that whomever represents our current American leadership is merely just an extension of the very same principle and honor of our Founders. To believe that they may NOT be -- worst than that -- may be subversive, would be heartbreaking, turning their entire world upside down. Again -- just a "theory."
There are no replies to Comment # 8. End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|